Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Infection and Immunity
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Microbial Immunity and Vaccines

Intranasal Vaccinations with the trans-Sialidase Antigen plus CpG Adjuvant Induce Mucosal Immunity Protective against Conjunctival Trypanosoma cruzi Challenges

O. K. Giddings, C. S. Eickhoff, N. L. Sullivan, D. F. Hoft
O. K. Giddings
1Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology
2Department of Internal Medicine, Saint Louis University Medical Center, St. Louis, Missouri
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C. S. Eickhoff
2Department of Internal Medicine, Saint Louis University Medical Center, St. Louis, Missouri
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
N. L. Sullivan
1Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology
2Department of Internal Medicine, Saint Louis University Medical Center, St. Louis, Missouri
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D. F. Hoft
1Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology
2Department of Internal Medicine, Saint Louis University Medical Center, St. Louis, Missouri
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: hoftdf@slu.edu
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.00278-09
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Trypanosoma cruzi is an intracellular protozoan parasite capable of infecting through mucosal surfaces. Our laboratory has previously elucidated the anatomical routes of infection after both conjunctival and gastric challenge in mice. We have shown that chronically infected mice develop strong immune responses capable of protecting against subsequent rechallenge with virulent parasites through gastric, conjunctival, and systemic routes of infection. We have also shown that intranasal immunizations with the unique T. cruzi trans-sialidase (TS) antigen protect against gastric and systemic T. cruzi challenge. In the current work we have investigated the ability of purified TS adjuvanted with CpG-containing oligonucleotides to induce immunity against conjunctival T. cruzi challenge. We confirm that intranasal vaccinations with TS plus CpG induce TS-specific T-cell and secretory IgA responses. TS-specific secretory IgA was detectable in the tears of vaccinated mice, the initial body fluid that contacts the parasite during infectious conjunctival exposures. We further show that intranasal vaccinations with TS plus CpG protect against conjunctival T. cruzi challenge, limiting local parasite replication at the site of mucosal invasion and systemic parasite dissemination. We also provide the first direct evidence that mucosal antibodies induced by intranasal TS vaccination can inhibit parasite invasion.

Trypanosoma cruzi is an intracellular parasite and the causative agent of Chagas' disease. An estimated 16 to 18 million people in Latin America are infected, and up to 40% of those will develop the manifestations of chronic Chagas' disease, including cardiac arrhythmias, cardiomyopathy, megaespophagus, and/or megacolon. To date there is no highly efficacious treatment for chronic infection, nor is a vaccine to prevent infection currently available. The parasite is not capable of infecting the mammalian host through intact skin but can infect through breaks in the skin or mucosal surfaces, such as the gastric mucosa after oral challenge or nasal-associated mucosa after conjunctival contamination (8, 12). The conjunctival route of T. cruzi infection is a common mode of parasite transmission. In fact, unilateral palpebral edema known as Romaña's sign, which occurs after conjunctival parasite contamination, has been recognized as a marker for acute Chagas' disease since the 1930s (15).

We are currently investigating whether a vaccination protocol using the T. cruzi trans-sialidase (TS) antigen can induce mucosal immunity protective against conjunctival parasite challenge in susceptible BALB/c mice. The TS gene is a member of the largest gene family of T. cruzi and an important virulence factor for parasite infection. T. cruzi is not capable of synthesizing its own sialic acid; however, this molecule is required for host cell invasion by the parasite (5). TS both cleaves sialic acid residues from the surface of host cells and transfers them to the parasite surface. TS is an immunodominant protein inducing strong antibody and cell-mediated responses during human infection (13). The catalytic domain contains an H-2kd-restricted CD8+ T-cell epitope (IYNVGQVSI) and at least one unidentified CD4+ T-cell epitope (6). DNA vaccines encoding the catalytic domain of TS have been shown to induce immunity protective against systemic T. cruzi challenge (3, 4, 6, 16). It has also been shown that both CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell epitopes are required for this TS-specific protective immunity (6). We have recently shown that intranasal vaccination with TS protein adjuvanted with CpG can induce immune responses protective against systemic and oral T. cruzi challenge (11).

In the current work we demonstrate that intranasal vaccination with the catalytic domain of TS combined with an oligonucleotide containing Toll-like receptor 9 (TLR-9)-triggering CpG motifs induces strong type 1 cellular immune responses as well as production of mucosal secretory IgA (sIgA) present in fecal extracts (FE) and in tears. We also demonstrate that these immune responses are protective against both systemic and conjunctival T. cruzi challenge and that opsonization with vaccine-induced TS-specific mucosal antibodies can inhibit parasite infection after conjunctival challenge. This is the first direct evidence that a vaccine-induced mucosal antibody response can inhibit T. cruzi infection after conjunctival challenge. These data provide further evidence that the development of vaccines protective against T. cruzi infection is a reasonable research goal and that these efforts should be directed toward generating type 1 immune responses and production of secretory IgA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Parasites, mice, and challenge protocol.The Tulahuèn strain of T. cruzi was maintained by passage through BALB/c mice (Harlan, Indianapolis, IN) and the reduviid vector Dipetalogaster maximus. To generate culture-derived metacyclic trypomastigotes (CMT), T. cruzi epimastigotes were cultured in modified Grace's medium (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) for 7 to 14 days. Parasite concentrations were determined by hemacytometer count, and percentages of CMT were determined by DiffQuik staining (Dade International Inc., Miami, FL). Blood form trypomastigotes (BFT) were maintained by passage through BALB/c mice. Immunized BALB/c mice were challenged with these CMT preparations by atraumatic deposition of 2 to 5 μl containing 3 × 105 to 1 × 106 parasites on the ocular surfaces of both eyes of anesthetized mice. All animal studies were conducted with the approval of the Saint Louis University Animal Care Committee in AALAC-accredited facilities.

Immunization protocol.Six- to 8-week-old BALB/c mice were immunized intranasally twice, 1 week apart, with either 50 μg recombinant trans-sialidase (TS) protein or 50 μg phage 10 protein as a negative control (NC) and 10 μg CpG 1826 as previously described (10). All preparations of recombinant TS and phage 10 protein contained less than 15 endotoxin units/mg of protein. One month after the second immunization, mice were either challenged subcutaneously with 5,000 BFT and monitored for survival or challenged with 3 × 105 CMT by contaminative placement on the conjunctiva for protection and immune studies.

Real-time PCR detection of T. cruzi in conjunctiva-associated tissues.Parotid and submandibular lymph nodes, nasal cavities with associated nasolacrimal ducts, and spleens were harvested from immunized mice challenged conjunctivally with CMT. DNA samples were purified using a DNeasy kit (Qiagen, San Diego, CA), and total DNA concentrations were adjusted to 20 to 40 ng/ml. Primers (5′AACCACCACGACAACCACAA3′ and 5′TGCAGGACATCTGCACAAAGTA3′) were used to specifically amplify a 65-bp fragment of cruzipain, with a protocol similar to one we have previously described (10). However, instead of using Sybr green detection as in our previous method, amplicon generation was detected using a 6-carboxyfluorescein (FAM)/N,N,N′,N′-tetramethyl-6-carboxyrhodamine (TAM) probe (5′TGCCCCAGGACCGTCCCCA 3′) (Synthegen, Houston, TX), TaqMan PCR master mix (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA), 900 nM each primer, and 100 to 200 ng of sample DNA. A standard curve was generated using positive control DNA harvested from a known concentration of T. cruzi epimastigotes grown in pure culture. These reactions were run in an ABI Prism 7700 sequence detector (Applied Biosystems) using the following conditions: 95°C for 10 min followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 s and 60°C for 1 min. Analysis was performed using Sequence Detection Systems version 1.9a software (Applied Biosystems). Results are reported as T. cruzi molecular equivalents (ME).

Assays to assess T-cell proliferation.Spleen and lymph node cells were harvested from memory-immune and naïve mice 3 days after parasite challenge. Total cells were plated at a concentration of 2 × 106 cells/ml in 96-well round-bottomed microtiter plates. Cells were incubated with medium alone or 2 μg/ml recombinant trans-sialidase protein. Plates were incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 72 h. Supernatants were then harvested and cells pulsed with 0.5 μCi/well [3H]thymidine (Amersham Biosciences Corp, Piscataway, NJ). Plates were incubated for 6 hours more, and cells were harvested with a Tomtec Mach-IIIM cell harvester (Tomtec, Hamden, CT) onto glass filter mats. Radioactivity on the filters was counted using a Wallac Trilux 1450 Microbeta liquid scintillation counter (Perkin-Elmer, Boston, MA). Results are reported as disintegrations per minute (dpm).

Enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) assay to assess IFN-γ production.Millititer HA 96-well microtiter plates with nitrocellulose bases (Millipore, Bedford, MA) were coated with a monoclonal antibody specific for murine gamma interferon (IFN-γ) (R46A2; American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA). Plates were blocked with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) to prevent nonspecific binding. To assess antigen-specific IFN-γ secretion by both CD4+ and CD8+ TS-specific T cells, total lymph node or spleen cells were cultured with A20J cells permanently transfected with a plasmid expressing T. cruzi trans-sialidase (TS). Wells containing nontransfected A20J cells were used as negative controls. To evaluate relative levels of CD8+ T-cell responses, a previously described H-2kd-restricted epitope (IYNVGQVSI) derived from the TS antigen was used to stimulate lymphocyte cultures (6). A total of 2 × 105 mononuclear cells were plated per well and pulsed with 2 μM TS peptide. The numbers of IFN-γ-producing cells were detected by the addition of biotinylated anti-IFN-γ (Pharmingen, San Diego, CA), followed by addition of streptavidin conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (HRP) (Jackson Immunoresearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA) and 3-amino-9-ethylcarbazole substrate precipitation. Results are reported as the number of spot-forming cells (SFC) per million cells.

Harvest of mucosal secretions to assess antigen-specific secretory IgA responses. T. cruzi-specific secretory IgA levels were measured in tears and fecal extracts obtained from memory-immune and naïve BALB/c mice. Mice were anesthetized with a standard dose of 60 mg/kg ketamine and 5 mg/kg xylazine. The conjunctival and ocular surfaces of five mice from each group were washed with 5 μl PBS containing 10% fetal calf serum (FCS). These washes were pooled and the final volume adjusted to 50 μl. Fecal pellets were collected from five memory-immune and five naïve mice and pooled for each group. The pellets were dissolved in PBS containing 10% FBS by vortexing for 15 min at room temperature. Extracts were clarified by centrifugation. TS-specific sIgA responses were also measured in tears and fecal extracts from six mice intranasally vaccinated with TS CpG and six mice intranasally vaccinated with NC CpG. Samples were prepared as described above; however, in this case the samples were not pooled. The supernatants and tear preparations were serially diluted and added to Immulon II HB enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) plates coated with either 20 μg/ml T. cruzi lysate or 5 μg/ml recombinant TS protein to measure sIgA levels in memory-immune and TS CpG vaccinated mice, respectively. Plates were incubated overnight at 4°C and washed with PBS-0.05% Tween 20. Biotinylated goat anti-mouse IgA (Southern Biotechnology Associates, Burlingame, AL) was added to detect bound IgA antibodies. Plates were incubated for 2 h at room temperature, washed, and developed with streptavidin conjugated to horseradish peroxidase, followed by the addition of 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) substrate (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). Plates were analyzed at 450 nm referenced to 540 nm.

Assessment of protection provided by opsonization of CMT with fecal extracts (FE) from memory-immune and TS CpG-vaccinated mice.For opsonization studies, parasites (107 CMT/ml) were mixed 1:1 with sterile filtered (0.2 μm) FE from TS CpG-vaccinated mice and incubated at room temperature for 30 min. For in vivo studies, mice were inoculated with 5 μl of each opsonized parasite suspension (containing 2 × 105 CMT) per eye as described above. Mice were sacrificed after 10 days and DNA isolated from the draining lymph nodes. Parasite replication was measured by real-time PCR as described above.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Intranasal TS CpG vaccination induces antigen-specific type 1 immune responses.To characterize the immune responses induced by intranasal vaccination, we measured antigen-specific proliferative responses and IFN-γ production. Briefly, two doses of recombinant TS or negative control phage 10 (NC) protein (50 μg) adjuvanted with CpG 1826 (10 μg) were administered intranasally to BALB/c mice 1 week apart, as previously described (10). One month after the final vaccination, mice were challenged via contamination of the ocular surface with 3 × 105 CMT as described previously (8). Three days after challenge, mice were sacrificed, spleens harvested, and single-cell suspensions prepared. Spleen cells plated at 2 × 105 cells per well in 96-well microtiter plates were cultured with either medium alone or 2 μg/ml of recombinant TS protein. Proliferation was measured by [3H]thymidine incorporation as previously described (10). Significantly higher levels of TS-specific proliferation were seen in wells containing spleen cells from TS CpG-vaccinated mice than in wells containing spleen cells from NC CpG-vaccinated controls (Fig. 1a) (n = 3/group; P < 0.01 by Mann-Whitney U test), with means of 212,340 versus 33,437 dpm, respectively.

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

Intranasal vaccination with TS CpG induces proliferative immune responses and IFN-γ production. (a) Spleen cells (SC) from mice vaccinated with TS CpG showed significantly greater proliferation in response to recombinant TS protein than those from NC CpG-vaccinated controls (n = 3/group; P < 0.01 by Mann-Whitney U test). (b) SC from TS CpG-vaccinated mice had significantly higher numbers of IFN-γ-producing cells in response to both TS protein (black bars) and an H2-kd-restricted CD8+ T-cell epitope of TS (hatched lines) than those from NC CpG vaccinated controls (n = 3/group; P < 0.01 by Mann-Whitney U test). In both panels, error bars represent the standard errors of the means. These results are representative of five experiments.

To assay for antigen-specific T-cell IFN-γ responses, spleen cells were cocultured with A20J cells stably transfected with a plasmid encoding the signal peptide and catalytic domain of TS or with control A20J cells. The numbers of TS-specific IFN-γ-secreting cells were determined by ELISPOT assay as described previously (10). Significantly higher numbers of IFN-γ producing cells were seen in lymphocyte preparations harvested from TS CpG-vaccinated mice than in controls, with means of 75 and 2.5 spot-forming cells (SFC) per million spleen cells, respectively (Fig. 1b) (n = 3/group; P < 0.01 by Mann-Whitney U test). To assess antigen-specific CD8+ T-cell responses, we used a synthetic peptide encoding the H-2kd-restricted CD8+ T-cell epitope of TS (IYNVGQVSI) (6). Significantly higher numbers of IYNVGQVSI-specific CD8+ T-cell responses were seen in the TS CpG-vaccinated mice than in negative controls, with means of 23.5 and 0.5 SFC/million spleen cells, respectively (n = 3/group; P < 0.01 by Mann-Whitney U test).

These results indicate that a TS protein, CpG-adjuvanted vaccine administered intranasally can generate type 1 immune responses, characterized by antigen-specific IFN-γ secretion. It was important to demonstrate that a vaccine administered through a mucosal site could induce a significant systemic immune response. It has been repeatedly demonstrated in T. cruzi infection models as well as other intracellular parasite infections that systemic type 1 responses, characterized by CD8+ T-cell responses and IFN-γ production, are crucial for controlling parasitemia (1, 9, 10).

Intranasal vaccination with TS CpG stimulates sIgA production.We have previously shown that conjunctival infection induces protective mucosal antibody responses (8). However, chronic infection is not a viable vaccination strategy. Therefore, we investigated whether our TS CpG vaccination protocol also could induce protective mucosal antibody responses. Fecal extracts (fecal pellets dissolved in PBS containing 10% FBS and clarified by centrifugation) and tears were prepared from either TS CpG-vaccinated mice or mice vaccinated with a negative control protein plus CpG and studied for levels of TS-specific sIgA by ELISA. Briefly, Immulon II HB ELISA plates were coated with 5 μg/ml recombinant TS protein. Tears and fecal extracts (FE) were serially diluted and added to the coated plates. End point titers of sIgA were determined by addition of a biotinylated anti-IgA antibody followed by streptavidin-HRP (Jackson Immunoresearch) and visualized with TMB substrate (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). Significantly higher titers of antigen-specific sIgA were seen in both the FE and tears of the TS CpG-vaccinated mice (Fig. 2a and b). Differences between the TS-vaccinated and negative control groups were statistically significant to end point dilutions of 1:64 and 1:320 in FE and tears, respectively (n = 6/group; P < 0.05 by Student's t test).

FIG. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 2.

Intranasal TS CpG vaccination induces secretory IgA production. Fecal extracts (FE) and tears (a and b, respectively) were harvested from TS CpG- and NC CpG-vaccinated mice. End point titers were determined by TS-specific ELISA. Differences between TS CpG- and control-vaccinated mice were statistically significant to end point dilutions of 1:64 and 1:320 in FE and tears, respectively (n = 5/group; P < 0.04 and 0.02, respectively, by Student's t tests). These results are representative of three experiments. Error bars indicate standard deviations.

Inductions of both mucosal antibody responses and type 1 immunity are important goals for any vaccine strategy targeting intracellular pathogens that are capable of invading through a mucosal route. It is reasonable to assume that because humoral immunity characterized by generation of pathogen-specific antibodies is characteristic of type 2 immune responses and the cytokines involved in the generation of type 1 versus type 2 responses antagonize the generation of the other immune response, an immunization strategy resulting in a type 1 systemic response could inhibit the production of mucosal IgA. This has previously been shown not to be the case, and our current data clearly show that mucosal antibody responses develop in the context of a mucosally administered vaccine which stimulates a systemic type 1 response (9, 10, 12).

Mice immunized intranasally with trans-sialidase and CpG are protected against T. cruzi systemic challenge.Six- to 8-week-old BALB/c mice were immunized twice intranasally with TS or control protein and CpG 1826 as described above. One month after the second immunization, six mice from each group were injected subcutaneously with 5,000 BFT, a lethal dose for naïve BALB/c mice. Five out of six of the TS CpG-vaccinated mice survived the challenge, while none of the NC CpG-vaccinated mice survived (Fig. 3). These results are significantly different by the Fisher exact two-tailed test (P < 0.02). All deaths occurred between 15 and 21 days after challenge. Five of the six TS CpG-vaccinated mice survived for at least 2 months postinfection. These results demonstrate that a significant protective systemic immune response was generated by intranasal TS CpG vaccination.

FIG. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 3.

Intranasal TS CpG vaccination protects mice against a systemic T. cruzi challenge. BALB/c mice were vaccinated with either TS CpG or NC CpG and later challenged subcutaneously with 5,000 BFT. Five of the six TS CpG-vaccinated mice survived to an end point of 50 days, while none of the NC CpG-vaccinated mice survived (n = 6/group; P < 0.02 by Fisher's exact two-tailed test). These results are representative of five experiments.

We have shown that a purified protein vaccine adjuvanted with CpG and given intranasally is capable of inducing immunity protective against systemic T. cruzi challenge. T. cruzi can infect its mammalian host either through mucosal surfaces or through breaks in the skin. After initial invasion, the parasite replicates in local tissues, and it then disseminates hematogenously to distant sites (8, 12). The parasite is capable of infecting any nucleated cell. It is therefore critical that any vaccine directed toward controlling parasitemia protect against systemic parasite challenge. While our current vaccine strategy does not provide sterilizing immunity (parasites have been recovered from TS-immunized mice surviving challenge by transferring blood samples into SCID mice [unpublished observations]), we are currently working on using alternate vectors and vaccine strategies to achieve this goal.

Intranasal vaccination with TS CpG provides protection against a conjunctival T. cruzi challenge.Six- to 8-week-old BALB/c mice were vaccinated intranasally and challenged conjunctivally 4 weeks later with 2 × 105 CMT. Twelve days after challenge, mice from each group (TS CpG and NC CpG) were sacrificed and nasal cavities (including nasolacrimal ducts), draining lymph nodes (parotid and submandibular), and spleens harvested. DNA was purified using a DNeasy kit, and T. cruzi-specific real-time PCR was used as described previously (8) to determine the amounts of parasite replication in each tissue. Significantly less recoverable parasite DNA was found in the draining lymph nodes harvested from the TS CpG-vaccinated group than in those from the negative control group, with mean values of 462 and 195 T. cruzi ME/μg DNA, respectively (Fig. 4a) (n = 6 and 9/group, respectively; P < 0.05 by Mann-Whitney U test). Statistically significant differences in amounts of recoverable parasite DNA were also seen in the spleens of TS CpG-vaccinated mice compared with NC CpG-vaccinated controls (data not shown). These data demonstrate that mucosal immunity can be generated by intranasal vaccination with TS protein adjuvanted with CpG.

FIG. 4.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 4.

Intranasal TS CpG vaccination induces immune responses and sIgA protective against conjunctival T. cruzi challenge. (a) Intranasally TS CpG- and NC CpG-vaccinated mice were challenged conjunctivally 1 month after their second vaccination and sacrificed 10 days later, and draining lymph nodes were harvested. The numbers of parasite molecular equivalents (ME) were determined by real-time PCR. Significantly lower levels of recoverable parasite DNA were found in the lymph nodes of TS CpG-vaccinated mice than in those of negative controls (n = 6 and 9/group, respectively; P < 0.04 by Mann-Whitney U test). These results are representative of three experiments. (b) Parasites were opsonized with filtered FE from TS CpG-vaccinated or control mice for 30 min. Naïve BALB/c mice were challenged conjunctivally with opsonized parasite suspensions. At 10 days after challenge, DNA was isolated from the draining lymph nodes and parasite levels assayed by real-time PCR. Challenges with parasites opsonized with FE from TS CpG-vaccinated mice resulted in significantly lower levels of infection than challenges with parasites opsonized with FE from control mice (P < 0.03 by Mann-Whitney U test). These results are from a single experiment with n = 6 per group. Error bars indicate standard deviations.

In addition to generating systemic immunity, we devised our vaccine strategy to specifically target mucosal immunity as well. By generating immune responses at the immediate site of infection, we hoped to decrease the number of parasites capable of infecting and replicating in local tissues and thereby decrease the overall parasite burden. It is not known what factors influence the development of Chagasic pathology in humans, as only 30 to 40% of those infected with T. cruzi will go on to manifest symptoms of Chagas' disease. One reasonable possibility is that the lower the parasite burden, the less likely the individual is to develop Chagasic pathology. This possibility is supported by recent studies showing that treating patients chronically infected with T. cruzi with antiparasitic agents can delay and in some cases reverse pathological electrocardiogram (EKG) changes seen in cardiomyopathy due to Chagas' disease (2, 7, 17, 18). It is possible that a vaccine to prevent the development of Chagas' disease does not need to provide sterilizing immunity. Decreasing the parasite burden may be sufficient to prevent the clinical manifestations of chronic T. cruzi infection. Further studies are required to determine whether or not this is the case.

TS-specific sIgA protects against conjunctival challenge.We also investigated whether the sIgA induced by TS CpG vaccination could inhibit T. cruzi infection. FE from TS CpG-vaccinated or control mice were mixed with CMT at a 1:1 ratio and incubated for 30 min at room temperature, and 6- to 8-week-old BALB/c mice were then challenged conjunctivally with approximately 3 × 105 CMT from each preparation. At 10 days after challenge, mice were sacrificed and draining lymph nodes harvested. DNA was purified and the amount of recoverable parasite DNA determined by real-time PCR. Figure 4b. shows that significantly lower levels of parasite replication were detected in the draining lymph nodes of mice challenged with parasites opsonized with FE from TS CpG-vaccinated mice (n = 4/group; P < 0.03 by Mann-Whitney U test). The mean amount of recoverable T. cruzi DNA from mice challenged with TS CpG FE-opsonized parasites was 158 T. cruzi ME/μg DNA, compared with a mean of 723 T. cruzi ME/μg DNA recoverable from mice challenged with naïve FE-opsonized CMT, an approximately 5-fold decrease.

T. cruzi does not normally infect through the large intestine, where sIgA titers present in FE occur. Therefore, one could question the relevance of using sIgA obtained from FE in our opsonization studies (used instead of tears because of the increased total volumes obtained). After oral and conjunctival challenge, T. cruzi infects through gastric and nasal-associated mucosal tissues, respectively. The concentrations of secretory antibodies in gastric secretions are unknown and difficult to measure. However, we show in Fig. 2 that the concentrations of TS-specific sIgA are 5-fold higher in tears (which contact parasites inoculated conjunctivally) than in FE in TS-vaccinated mice. Therefore, the use of FE for our opsonization studies is likely to underestimate the relevance of sIgA for protection induced by TS vaccination.

These results indicate that a strong mucosal antibody response is generated by mucosal TS CpG vaccination, which is capable of inhibiting infection at the site of parasite entry. Although we have not purified the TS-specific sIgA and shown that sIgA and not contaminating IgG is responsible for these protective effects, we have quantified both total IgA and total IgG in fecal extracts and found that there was at least 5-fold more IgA than IgG and that specific depletion of IgA and not IgG has reduced the protective opsonizing effects of the immune fecal extracts (data not shown).

Our lab has previously shown that mucosal antibodies are associated with type 1 immune responses that are protective against subsequent mucosal T. cruzi challenges (8, 9, 10, 12). Studies from other groups have shown that opsonization with monoclonal antibodies can decrease the infectivity of parasites (14). Presented here are the first data, however, to show that mucosal antibodies induced in vivo by vaccination can decrease the infectivity of T. cruzi. Induction of mucosal immune responses is an important aspect of mucosal vaccine strategies, and IgA production has been used as a correlate of protective immunity. This is the first evidence in the T. cruzi model to directly indicate the importance of mucosal IgA.

We have shown that vaccination with TS protein adjuvanted with CpG provides protection against both systemic and conjunctival T. cruzi challenges. This protection is mediated by type 1 immune responses as demonstrated by an increased number of TS-specific IFN-γ-producing CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. We have also shown that TS CpG vaccination induces mucosal IgA production. This parasite-specific IgA prevents infection with opsonized parasites.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by research grant R01-AI-040196 from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 10 March 2009.
    • Returned for modification 24 June 2009.
    • Accepted 20 November 2009.
  • Copyright © 2010 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Abbas, A. K., K. M. Murphy, and A. Sher. 1996. Functional diversity of helper T lymphocytes. Nature383:787-793.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    Apt, W., X. Aguilera, A. Arribada, C. Perez, C. Miranda, G. Sanchez, I. Zulantay, P. Cortes, J. Rodriguez, and D. Juri. 1998. Treatment of chronic Chagas' disease with itraconazole and allopurinol. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg.59:133-138.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  3. 3.↵
    Costa, F., G. Franchin, V. L. Pereira-Chioccola, M. Ribeirao, S. Schenkman, and M. M. Rodrigues. 1998. Immunization with a plasmid DNA containing the gene of trans-sialidase reduces Trypanosoma cruzi infection in mice. Vaccine16:768-774.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    Costa, F., V. L. Pereira-Chioccola, M. Ribeirao, S. Schenkman, and M. M. Rodrigues. 1999. Trans-sialidase delivered as a naked DNA vaccine elicits an immunological response similar to a Trypanosoma cruzi infection. Brazilian J. Med. Biol. Res.32:235-239.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    Cross, G. A. M., and G. B. Takle. 1993. The surface trans-sialidase family of Trypanosoma cruzi. Annu. Rev. Microbiol.47:385-411.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    Fujimura, A. E., S. S. Kinoshita, V. L. Pereira-Chioccola, and M. M. Rodrigues. 2001. DNA sequences encoding CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell epitopes are important for efficient protective immunity induced by DNA vaccination with a Trypanosoma cruzi gene. Infect. Immun.69:5477-5486.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    Garcia, S., C. O. Ramos, J. F. Senra, F. Vilas-Boas, M. M. Rodrigues, A. C. Campos-de-Carvalho, R. Ribeiro-Dos-Santos, and M. B. Soares. 2005. Treatment with benznidazole during the chronic phase of experimental Chagas' disease decreases cardiac alterations. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.49:1521-1528.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    Giddings, O. K., C. S. Eickhoff, T. J. Smith, L. A. Bryant, and D. F. Hoft. 2006. Anatomical route of invasion and protective mucosal immunity in Trypanosoma cruzi conjunctival infection. Infect. Immun.74:5549-5560.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    Hoft, D. F., and C. S. Eickhoff. 2002. Type 1 immunity provides optimal protection against both mucosal and systemic Trypanosoma cruzi challenges. Infect. Immun.70:6715-6725.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    Hoft, D. F., and C. S. Eickhoff. 2005. Type 1 immunity provides both optimal mucosal and systemic protection against a mucosally invasive, intracellular pathogen. Infect. Immun.73:4934-4940.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    Hoft, D. F., C. S. Eickhoff, O. K. Giddings, J. R. Vasconcelos, and M. M. Rodrigues. 2007. Trans-sialidase recombinant protein mixed with CpG motif-containing oligodeoxynucleotide induces protective mucosal and systemic Trypanosoma cruzi immunity involving CD8+ CTL and B cell-mediated cross-priming. J. Immunol.179:6889-6900.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    Hoft, D. F., P. L. Farrar, K. Kratz-Owens, and D. Shaffer. 1996. Gastric invasion by Trypanosoma cruzi and induction of protective mucosal immune responses. Infect. Immun.64:3800-3810.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    Leguizamon, M. S., O. E. Campetella, G. Russomando, M. Almiron, I. Guillen, S. M. Ganzalez-Cappa, and A. C. C. Frasch. 1994. Antibodies inhibiting Trypanosoma cruzi trans-sialidase activity in sera from human infections. J. Infect. Dis.170:1570-1574.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    Neira, I., F. A. Silva, M. Cortez, and N. Yoshida. 2003. Involvement of Trypanosoma cruzi metacyclic trypomastigote surface molecule gp82 in adhesion to gastric mucin and invasion of epithelial cells. Infect. Immun.71:557-561.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    Prata, A. 1999. Evolution of the clinical and epidemiological knowledge about Chagas disease 90 years after its discovery. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz94(Suppl 1):81-88.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    Vasconcelos, J. R., M. I. Hiyane, C. R. Marinho, C. Claser, A. M. Machado, R. T. Gazzinelli, O. Bruna-Romero, J. M. Alvarez, S. B. Boscardin, and M. M. Rodrigues. 2004. Protective immunity against Trypanosoma cruzi infection in a highly susceptible mouse strain after vaccination with genes encoding the amastigote surface protein-2 and trans-sialidase. Hum. Gene Ther.15:878-886.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. 17.↵
    Viotti, R., C. Vigliano, H. Armenti, and E. Segura. 1994. Treatment of chronic Chagas' disease with benznidazole: clinical and serologic evolution of patients with long-term follow-up. Am. Heart J.127:151-162.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. 18.↵
    Viotti, R., C. Vigliano, B. Lococo, G. Bertocchi, M. Petti, M. G. Alvarez, M. Postan, and A. Armenti. 2006. Long-term cardiac outcomes of treating chronic Chagas disease with benznidazole versus no treatment: a nonrandomized trial. Ann. Intern. Med.144:724-734.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Intranasal Vaccinations with the trans-Sialidase Antigen plus CpG Adjuvant Induce Mucosal Immunity Protective against Conjunctival Trypanosoma cruzi Challenges
O. K. Giddings, C. S. Eickhoff, N. L. Sullivan, D. F. Hoft
Infection and Immunity Feb 2010, 78 (3) 1333-1338; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.00278-09

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Infection and Immunity article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Intranasal Vaccinations with the trans-Sialidase Antigen plus CpG Adjuvant Induce Mucosal Immunity Protective against Conjunctival Trypanosoma cruzi Challenges
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Infection and Immunity
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Infection and Immunity.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Intranasal Vaccinations with the trans-Sialidase Antigen plus CpG Adjuvant Induce Mucosal Immunity Protective against Conjunctival Trypanosoma cruzi Challenges
O. K. Giddings, C. S. Eickhoff, N. L. Sullivan, D. F. Hoft
Infection and Immunity Feb 2010, 78 (3) 1333-1338; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.00278-09
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Adjuvants, Immunologic
Chagas disease
Glycoproteins
Immunity, Mucosal
neuraminidase
Oligodeoxyribonucleotides
Protozoan Vaccines
Trypanosoma cruzi

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About IAI
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #IAIjournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0019-9567; Online ISSN: 1098-5522