Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Infection and Immunity
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Molecular Pathogenesis

UpaH Is a Newly Identified Autotransporter Protein That Contributes to Biofilm Formation and Bladder Colonization by Uropathogenic Escherichia coli CFT073

Luke P. Allsopp, Makrina Totsika, Jai J. Tree, Glen C. Ulett, Amanda N. Mabbett, Timothy J. Wells, Bostjan Kobe, Scott A. Beatson, Mark A. Schembri
Luke P. Allsopp
School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane QLD 4072, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Makrina Totsika
School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane QLD 4072, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jai J. Tree
School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane QLD 4072, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Glen C. Ulett
School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane QLD 4072, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amanda N. Mabbett
School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane QLD 4072, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Timothy J. Wells
School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane QLD 4072, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bostjan Kobe
School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane QLD 4072, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Scott A. Beatson
School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane QLD 4072, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark A. Schembri
School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane QLD 4072, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: m.schembri@uq.edu.au
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.01010-09
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIG. 1.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 1.

    (A) Physical map indicating the genomic location of upaH in E. coli CFT073, UTI89, and MG1655. (B) Schematic illustration of the domain organization of UpaH from E. coli CFT073. Indicated are the signal peptide, the repeat region within the passenger domain, and the transmembrane β-domain. Numbers indicate amino acid positions of region boundaries. (C) Predicted structure of the β-domain of UpaH. Shown is a ribbon diagram of the structure of the β-domain (residues 2528 to 2845) obtained by homology modeling based on the crystal structure of the NalP β-domain (43), colored blue (N terminus) through green and yellow to red (C terminus). (D) Amino acid sequence of the repeats present in UpaH. Amino acids in red indicate ≤98% conservation; amino acids in blue indicate ≤55% conservation.

  • FIG. 2.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 2.

    (A) Western blot analysis of UpaH performed using whole-cell lysates prepared from E. coli MS427(pBAD) and MS427(pUpaH) grown in the presence of 0.1% arabinose. (B) Phase-contrast and immunofluorescence microscopy employing UpaH-specific antiserum against cells of E. coli strains MS427(pUpaH) (i) or MS427(pBAD) (ii) grown in the presence of arabinose. Overnight cultures were fixed and incubated with anti-UpaH serum followed by incubation with goat anti-rabbit IgG coupled to Alexa Fluor 488. (C) Immunogold electron microscopy of E. coli MS427(pUpaH) (i) and MS427(pBAD) (ii) grown in the presence of arabinose and labeled with anti-UpaH serum followed by protein A-gold (10 nm) conjugate. Gold particles were observed on the surface of E. coli MS427(pUpaH) but not MS427(pBAD).

  • FIG. 3.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 3.

    UpaH mediates biofilm formation. (A) Biofilm formation in polystyrene microtiter plates by E. coli MS427(pBAD) and MS427(pUpaH) following static growth in the absence (−) or presence (+) of 0.1% arabinose. Biofilm growth was quantified by solubilization of crystal violet-stained cells with ethanol-acetone and determination of the absorbance at 595 nm. Results represent averages of a minimum of 8 replicates ± SEM. Significant biofilm growth was observed for E. coli MS427(pUpaH) following induction of UpaH expression with arabinose (*, P < 0.001 as determined by analysis of variance [NOVA]). (B) Dynamic-flow-chamber assay examining biofilm formation of E. coli OS56(pBAD) and OS56(pUpaH) grown in the presence of 0.1% arabinose. Biofilm development was monitored by confocal scanning laser microscopy after 24 h. The images are representative horizontal sections collected within each biofilm and vertical sections (to the right of and below each larger panel, representing the yz plane and the xz plane, respectively) at the positions indicated by the white lines. E. coli MS427(pUpaH) produced a significant biofilm in this assay.

  • FIG. 4.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 4.

    (A) Western blot analysis of UpaH performed using whole-cell lysates prepared from E. coli CFT073, CFT073upaH, CFT073upaH(pBAD), and CFT073upaH(pUpaH). A band corresponding to UpaH was detected in E. coli CFT073 and CFT073upaH(pUpaH) but not in E. coli CFT073upaH and CFT073upaH(pBAD). (B) Western blot analysis of UpaH performed using whole-cell lysates prepared from E. coli M161, M161upaH, M357, and M357upaH. A band corresponding to UpaH was detected in E. coli M161 and M357 but not in E. coli M161upaH or M357upaH. (C) Phase-contrast (i) or immunofluorescence (ii) microscopy employing UpaH-specific antiserum against cells of E. coli CFT073, CFT073upaH, CFT073upaH(pUpaH), or CFT073PcLupaH. Overnight cultures were fixed and incubated with anti-UpaH serum, followed by incubation with goat anti-rabbit IgG coupled to Alexa Fluor 488. A positive reaction indicating surface localization of UpaH was detected only for CFT073upaH(pUpaH) and CFT073PcLupaH.

  • FIG. 5.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 5.

    (A) Biofilm formation in polystyrene microtiter plates by three sets of isogenic strains with respect to upaH: E. coli CFT073 and CFT073upaH; E. coli M161 and M161upaH; and E. coli M357 and M357upaH. Results represent averages of OD595 readings of at least 4 independent experiments ± SEM. There was no difference in the growth of wild-type and upaH mutant strains. (B) Dynamic-flow-chamber assay examining biofilm formation of E. coli CFT073 (i), E. coli CFT073upaH (ii), and E. coli CFT073PcLupaH (iii). Biofilm development was monitored by confocal scanning laser microscopy after 40 h. The images are representative horizontal sections collected within each biofilm and vertical sections (to the right of and below each larger panel, representing the yz plane and the xz plane, respectively) at the positions indicated by the white lines. (C) Three-dimensional image demonstrating the structure of the biofilm formed by E. coli CFT073 (i), E. coli CFT073upaH (ii), and E. coli CFT073PcLupaH (iii).

  • FIG. 6.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 6.

    (A) RT-PCR analysis of upaH transcription by CFT073 during colonization of the mouse urinary tract. Urine from six mice infected with CFT073 was collected and pooled at 18 h postinoculation and added directly into a 2× volume of RNAprotect (Qiagen). CFT073 cells were concentrated by centrifugation, and total RNA was extracted. Lane 1, upaH-specific PCR product (328 bp) obtained from genomic DNA (positive control); lane 2, 1-Kb Plus DNA ladder (Invitrogen); lane 3, PCR employing RNA prior to cDNA synthesis as a template (negative control); lane 4, upaH-specific PCR product (328 bp) obtained using the cDNA as the template. (B) Competitive mixed-infection experiment. C57BL/6 mice (n = 24) were challenged with a 1:1 mixture of E. coli CFT073cam and CFT073upaH. Total CFU were enumerated on selective medium to differentiate between CFT073cam (chloramphenicol resistant) and CFT073upaH (kanamycin resistant). Each symbol represents the total number of CFU for an individual mouse per 0.1 g of bladder tissue or the total number of CFU per ml urine. Lines connect values for the same mouse. Horizontal bars represent the median values. No significant colonization of the kidneys was observed.

Tables

  • Figures
  • TABLE 1.

    Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study

    Strain or plasmidRelevant characteristic(s)Reference
    E. coli strains
        BL21F−ompT hsdS(rB− mB−) dcm galStratagene
        CFT073Wild-type UPEC isolate 38
        CFT073camCFT073lacZ::cam-gfp; CamrThis study
        CFT073upaHCFT073upaH::kan; KanrThis study
        CFT073PcLupaHCFT073PcLupaH; constitutively expressed UpaHThis study
        M161Wild-type UPEC isolateThis study
        M161upaHM161upaH::kanThis study
        M357Wild-type UPEC isolateThis study
        M357upaHM357upaH::kanThis study
        MS427MG1655flu 46
        OS56MG1655flu; GFP+; Ampr 53
    Plasmids
        pUpaHTruncated747-bp portion of upaH gene from CFT073 was amplified with primers UpaHTF and UpaHTR, digested with NcoI-HindIII, and ligated into NcoI-HindIII-digested pBAD/Myc-HisB; AmprThis study
        pUpaH upaH gene from CFT073 was amplified with primers 520 and 521, digested with XhoI-HindIII, and ligated into XhoI-HindIII-digested pBAD/Myc-HisA-kan; Ampr KanrThis study
        pSG10Chloramphenicol resistance gene from pKD3 inserted into HindIII site of gfp expression plasmid pKEN2This study
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
UpaH Is a Newly Identified Autotransporter Protein That Contributes to Biofilm Formation and Bladder Colonization by Uropathogenic Escherichia coli CFT073
Luke P. Allsopp, Makrina Totsika, Jai J. Tree, Glen C. Ulett, Amanda N. Mabbett, Timothy J. Wells, Bostjan Kobe, Scott A. Beatson, Mark A. Schembri
Infection and Immunity Mar 2010, 78 (4) 1659-1669; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.01010-09

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Infection and Immunity article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
UpaH Is a Newly Identified Autotransporter Protein That Contributes to Biofilm Formation and Bladder Colonization by Uropathogenic Escherichia coli CFT073
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Infection and Immunity
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Infection and Immunity.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
UpaH Is a Newly Identified Autotransporter Protein That Contributes to Biofilm Formation and Bladder Colonization by Uropathogenic Escherichia coli CFT073
Luke P. Allsopp, Makrina Totsika, Jai J. Tree, Glen C. Ulett, Amanda N. Mabbett, Timothy J. Wells, Bostjan Kobe, Scott A. Beatson, Mark A. Schembri
Infection and Immunity Mar 2010, 78 (4) 1659-1669; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.01010-09
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

biofilms
Escherichia coli Proteins
Urinary Bladder
uropathogenic Escherichia coli
virulence factors

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About IAI
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #IAIjournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0019-9567; Online ISSN: 1098-5522