Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Infection and Immunity
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Molecular Pathogenesis

VimA-Dependent Modulation of Acetyl Coenzyme A Levels and Lipid A Biosynthesis Can Alter Virulence in Porphyromonas gingivalis

A. Wilson Aruni, J. Lee, D. Osbourne, Y. Dou, F. Roy, A. Muthiah, D. S. Boskovic, H. M. Fletcher
A. J. Bäumler, Editor
A. Wilson Aruni
aDivision of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, School of Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Lee
cInstitute of Oral Biology, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D. Osbourne
aDivision of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, School of Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Y. Dou
aDivision of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, School of Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
F. Roy
aDivision of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, School of Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. Muthiah
aDivision of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, School of Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D. S. Boskovic
bDivision of Biochemistry, School of Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H. M. Fletcher
aDivision of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, School of Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. J. Bäumler
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.06062-11
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

The Porphyromonas gingivalis VimA protein has multifunctional properties that can modulate several of its major virulence factors. To further characterize VimA, P. gingivalis FLL406 carrying an additional vimA gene and a vimA-defective mutant in a different P. gingivalis genetic background were evaluated. The vimA-defective mutant (FLL451) in the P. gingivalis ATCC 33277 genetic background showed a phenotype similar to that of the vimA-defective mutant (FLL92) in the P. gingivalis W83 genetic background. In contrast to the wild type, gingipain activity was increased in P. gingivalis FLL406, a vimA chimeric strain. P. gingivalis FLL451 had a five times higher biofilm-forming capacity than the parent strain. HeLa cells incubated with P. gingivalis FLL92 showed a decrease in invasion, in contrast to P. gingivalis FLL451 and FLL406, which showed increases of 30 and 40%, respectively. VimA mediated coenzyme A (CoA) transfer to isoleucine and reduced branched-chain amino acid metabolism. The lipid A content and associated proteins were altered in the vimA-defective mutants. The VimA chimera interacted with several proteins which were found to have an LXXTG motif, similar to the sorting motif of Gram-positive organisms. All the proteins had an N-terminal signal sequence with a putative sorting signal of L(P/T/S)X(T/N/D)G and two unique signatures of EXGXTX and HISXXGXG, in addition to a polar tail. Taken together, these observations further confirm the multifunctional role of VimA in modulating virulence possibly through its involvement in acetyl-CoA transfer and lipid A synthesis and possibly by protein sorting.

INTRODUCTION

Porphyromonas gingivalis, a Gram-negative anaerobic bacterium, is one of the main etiological agents of adult periodontitis. While several virulence factors, including fimbriae (28), hemagglutinin (17), capsule (4), and lipopolysaccharide (68), have been implicated in the pathogenicity of P. gingivalis, the strong proteolytic abilities of this organism are considered to be important for its survival and thus play a significant role in virulence (12, 63). The major proteases, called gingipains, consist of arginine-specific (Arg-gingipain [Rgp]) and lysine-specific (Lys-gingipain [Kgp]) proteases that are both extracellular and cell membrane associated (32). The activation of these gingipains is associated with several genes, including vimA, vimE, and vimF, that modulate the posttranslational glycosylation of those proteins (44, 62–64). These genes are part of the 6.15-kb bcp-recA-vimA-vimE-vimF-aroG locus which has previously been shown to be important to the pathogenic potential of P. gingivalis (1, 26, 44, 62–64).

We have demonstrated that the bcp and recA genes play the expected role in oxidative stress resistance and DNA repair, respectively (26). The association of these genes with the vim genes on the same transcriptional unit could be considered an important strategy for P. gingivalis to coordinate its oxidative stress and proteolytic activities. A response to oxidative stress will involve binding of oxygen and its toxic derivatives to iron accumulated on the surface of the cell (1). The bound heme can be involved in the catalytic destruction of the toxic oxygen derivative species (55). Because the specific functional roles of the vim genes are not yet fully defined, we cannot rule out the possibility that their modulation of other proteins could have similar mechanistic properties. Protein-protein interaction studies using the purified recombinant VimA (rVimA) showed that this protein can interact with the gingipains, HtrA, RegT, sialidase, and other proteins in P. gingivalis (2, 47, 61, 64). Also, in addition to its role in glycosylation, the VimA protein can affect capsular synthesis, fimbrial phenotypic expression, and anchorage of several cell surface proteins (44). Collectively, these observations may implicate a multifunctional role for the VimA protein. In this study, we further confirmed the functional role for VimA in a different genetic background of P. gingivalis and used an in silico approach to further explore the functional domains of VimA. Here we report that VimA plays a role in acetyl coenzyme A (acetyl-CoA) transfer and modulates lipid A and its associated proteins. Further, VimA may also be involved in protein sorting and transport.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bioinformatic analysis.The DNA and amino acid sequences were aligned using Bioedit software (http://www.mbio.ncsu.edu/bioedit/bioedit.html). The phylogenetic relationships of these sequences between the oral pathogens were analyzed using the MEGA program, version 4.0 (57). The phylogenetic distance was calculated using the Kimura 2-parameter model (29). For clustering, the neighbor-joining method used bootstrap values based on 1,000 replicates (49). The amino acid sequences were analyzed using the ClustalW program, version 2.0 (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/). The secondary structure prediction and modeling of the protein were performed using the Modeler software package (13). The models were validated using the WHATIF program (65). The signal peptide and potential cleavage sites were predicted using both the neural network and hidden Markov models (25). Metabolic pathway analysis was carried out using the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) (www.genome.jp/kegg/) (27), based on the information from the online databases Biosilico (24), BRENDA (7), and ExPASy Enzyme (3).

Bacterial strains and growth conditions.Strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 1. P. gingivalis strains were grown in brain heart infusion (BHI) broth (Difco) supplemented with hemin (5 μg/ml), vitamin K (0.5 μg/ml), and cysteine (0.1%). Experiments with hydrogen peroxide were performed in BHI without cysteine. All cultures, unless otherwise stated, were incubated at 37°C. P. gingivalis strains were maintained in an anaerobic chamber (Coy Manufacturing) in 10% H2, 10% CO2, 80% N2. Growth rates for P. gingivalis strains were determined spectrophotometrically (optical density at 600 nm [OD600]). Antibiotics were used at the following concentrations: clindamycin, 0.5 μg/ml; erythromycin, 10 μg/ml.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

Strains and plasmids used in this study

DNA isolation and analysis.P. gingivalis chromosomal DNA was prepared as previously described (37). For plasmid DNA analysis, DNA extraction was performed by the alkaline lysis procedure as previously reported (14). For large-scale preparation, plasmids were purified using a Qiagen plasmid maxikit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA).

Construction of vimA chimera.Long PCR-based fusion of DNA fragments was done using overlapping extension PCR as previously described (23). The primers used in the development of the vimA chimera are listed in Table S1 in the supplemental material. Briefly, 1 kb of the flanking fragments upstream and downstream of the target vimA gene was PCR amplified from the chromosomal DNA of P. gingivalis W83. The ermF cassette was amplified from the pVA2198 plasmid (Table 1) using custom-made oligonucleotide primers containing overlapping nucleotides for the upstream and downstream fragments. The upstream fragment was fused with a His tag at the 3′ end, and the downstream fragment was fused with PG1866. The upstream fragment of vimA was fused with PG1864, and its downstream fragment was fused with the His tag (see Fig. S1C in the supplemental material). The fusion PCR program consisted of 1 cycle of 5 min at 94°C, followed by 30 cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 30 s at 55°C, and 4 min at 68°C, with a final extension of 5 min at 68°C. This PCR-fused fragment was used to transform P. gingivalis W83 by electroporation as previously described (1). The cells were plated on BHI agar containing 10 μg/ml of erythromycin and incubated at 37°C for 7 days. The correct gene replacement in the erythromycin-resistant mutants was confirmed by colony PCR and DNA sequencing.

Construction of vimA-defective mutant in ATCC 33277 strain.Construction of a P. gingivalis ATCC 33277 isogenic mutant defective in the vimA gene was carried out by long PCR-based fusion of several fragments using overlapping extension PCR as previously described (23). The primers used in the development of deletion mutants are listed in Table S1 in the supplemental material. The PCR-fused fragment was used to transform the P. gingivalis ATCC 33277 strain by electroporation as previously described (1). The cells were plated on BHI agar containing 10 μg/ml of erythromycin and incubated at 37°C for 7 days. The correct gene replacement in the erythromycin-resistant mutants was confirmed by colony PCR and DNA sequencing.

Complementation of vimA-defective isogenic mutants.DNA fragments containing an upstream regulatory region and open reading frame (ORF) for vimA were amplified from P. gingivalis ATCC 33277 chromosomal DNA using the appropriate primer set (Table S1 in the supplemental material). A BamHI restriction site was designed at the 5′ end of both primers to facilitate the subcloning of the PCR fragment into the BamHI-digested pTCOW plasmid (15). The purified recombined plasmid, designated pFLL451a, was used to electrotransform P. gingivalis FLL451 (vimA::ermF). The transformants were selected on BHI agar plates in the presence of erythromycin and tetracycline.

RT-PCR analysis.Total RNA was extracted from P. gingivalis strains grown to early stationary phase (OD600s, 1.2 to 1.3) using a RiboPure kit (Ambion, Austin, TX). The primers used for the reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) analysis are listed in Table S1 in the supplemental material. The reaction mixture (50 μl) contained 1 μg of template RNA in the Superscript One-Step RT-PCR mix (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). RT-PCR cycling conditions were 1 cycle of 5 min at 94°C, followed by 30 cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 30 s at 54°C, and 1 min at 68°C, with a final extension of 5 min at 68°C.

Evaluation of protease activity.Non-gingipain protease estimation was carried out using a protease assay kit (Molecular Probes) as previously described (2). The presence of Arg-X- and Lys-X-specific gingipain activities was determined as reported elsewhere (34).

Sialidase assay.Sialidase estimation in the P. gingivalis mutants was carried out using an Amplex Red neuraminidase (sialidase) assay kit (Molecular Probes). The assay utilizes Amplex Red to detect H2O2 generated by galactose oxidase oxidation of desialylated galactose, the end result of neuraminidase action. The H2O2, then, in the presence of horseradish peroxidase (HRP), reacts with Amplex Red reagent to generate the red-fluorescent oxidation product resorufin. The assay was read at a wavelength of 492 nm using a BioTek FLx800 microplate reader (2).

BCAA assay.The presence of branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs) was determined using a BCAA kit (BioVision Research Products, CA) as per the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, the amino acid standard supplied with the kit was diluted to generate 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 nmol/well in a 96-well plate. The OD450 value at each concentration was used to establish a standard curve. The P. gingivalis strains were grown to an OD600 of 0.9 and centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 10 min. The bacterial cells (2 × 106) were homogenized with 100 μl of assay buffer. Aliquots of the homogenized samples (50 μl) were added to the wells in duplicate. Fifty microliters of reaction mix (assay buffer, 46 μl; enzyme mix, 2 μl; substrate, 2 μl) was added to each well, and the plate was incubated for 30 min at room temperature. A background control was performed by replacing the enzyme mix with 2 μl of the assay buffer. The OD450 of the background was subtracted from the test sample readings and the result was expressed as percent activity.

Determination of acetyltransferase activity.The assay for determination of acetyltransferase activity was carried out using an acetyltransferase assay kit (Stressgen) as per the manufacturer's instruction. Briefly, in a 96-well plate, various acetyl-CoA acceptor substrates, including isoleucine, leucine, alanine, valine, cysteine, arginine, methionine, threonine, and glycine, were used at a 100 μM final concentration. The reaction mixture was made up of 25 μl of 1× transferase assay buffer, 25 μl of the acetyltransferase, 25 μl of the acceptor amino acids, and 25 μl of the 1× reaction mix (supplied in the kit). The plate was covered with a foil sealer and incubated for 30 min with constant shaking in an orbital shaker. Fifty microliters of the positive control (supplied in the kit) was added to appropriate wells, followed by the addition of 50 μl of ice-cold isopropyl alcohol to each well. Finally, 100 μl of the 1× detection solution (supplied in the kit) was added to each well. The plate was covered with a foil sealer and further incubated for 10 min at room temperature without shaking. The plate was then read at 380-nm excitation and 520-nm emission wavelengths. The test was performed in triplicate, and the mean of the relative fluorescence unit at 380-nm excitation and 520-nm emission versus the enzyme concentration was plotted. The signal-to-noise ratio was calculated from the relative fluorescence unit of a blank with buffer alone.

Quantification of intracellular acetyl-CoA level.Twenty milliliters of exponential-phase cultures (OD660, 0.8) was harvested and washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Cell pellets were resuspended in 1 ml of PBS, lysed using a French press, and then centrifuged at 10,000 × g. The supernatant was neutralized with saturated KHCO3 and centrifuged for 5 min at 10,000 × g at 4°C. The level of acetyl-CoA in the cell extract was quantified using a PicoProbe acetyl-CoA assay kit (BioVision Research Products, Mountain View, CA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Experiments were repeated in triplicate using three independent samples. An acetyl-CoA standard curve was generated using various concentrations (0 to 1,000 pmol/μl) of the acetyl-CoA standard provided. The fluorescence was measured using excitation and emission wavelengths of 535 and 589 nm, respectively. The background values were subtracted from the standard, and the concentration of the samples was calculated using KC4 software and a Biotek-FLx 800 spectrophotometer.

Static biofilm formation assays.Static biofilm formation was assayed using the protocol of Hinsa and O'Toole (22) with slight modification. Briefly, an overnight culture was diluted with fresh BHI medium to obtain 5 × 107 CFU/ml. The cells were aliquoted into the wells of a 96-well microtiter plate (260 μl per well) and incubated anaerobically at 37°C for 24 h. The supernatant of the culture was aspirated and then washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (150 mM NaCl, 3 mM KCl, 10 mM Na2HPO4, and 1.5 mM KH2PO4, pH 7.4). The biofilms were stained by incubation of each well with 100 μl of 0.1% crystal violet for 5 min. The plate was then washed twice with distilled water and destained with 95% ethanol (200 μl per well) for 5 min. The solubilized crystal violet was transferred to a new microtiter plate, and the OD540 was measured. Biofilm formation was qualitatively determined to be proportional to the absorbance of the crystal violet.

Standard antibiotic protection assay.Invasion was quantified using the standard antibiotic protection assay (11). Briefly, bacteria were harvested from solid agar plates, washed three times in PBS, and then adjusted to 107 CFU/ml of bacteria (confirmed by colony count) in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium. Epithelial cell monolayers were washed three times with PBS, infected with bacteria at a multiplicity of infection of 1:100 (105 epithelial cells), and then incubated at 37°C for 90 min under a 5% CO2 atmosphere. Nonadherent bacteria were removed by washing with PBS, while cell surface-bound bacteria were killed with metronidazole (200 μg/ml, 60 min). After removal of antibiotic, the internalized bacteria were released by osmotic lysis in sterile distilled water. Lysates were serially diluted, plated (in duplicate) on BHI agar, and incubated for 6 to 10 days. The number of bacterial cells recovered was expressed as a percentage of the original inoculum. The number of adherent bacteria was obtained by subtracting the number of intracellular bacteria from the total number of bacteria obtained in the absence of metronidazole (6).

Production of rabbit polyclonal antibodies against VimA protein.Expression and purification of rVimA in Escherichia coli were done as previously reported (64). The purified rVimA (25 μg/lane) was separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) using NuPAGE 4 to 12% bis-Tris gels. A total of approximately 12 mg of the VimA protein was excised from the gels, placed in 1× PBS, and stored at −80°C. The frozen gel slices were sent to Zymed Laboratories Inc. (South San Francisco, CA) for the production of polyclonal rabbit VimA antibodies by using the manufacturer's standard protocol. The dilutions and efficiencies of the antibodies were tested in the laboratory with the purified rVimA.

Immunofluorescence assay.The indirect immunofluorescence test was performed as previously reported (31) using anti-FimA (33) and anti-VimA antibodies. Briefly, coverslip cultures of HeLa cells were grown by seeding 105 cells/ml in 6-well plates (Nunc). After incubation at 37°C for 2 days, the confluent monolayers on coverslips were fixed in chilled acetone. Slides were washed twice in 0.05 M PBS (pH 7.2) for 15 min. The cells were incubated with anti-VimA antibody (1:1,000) for 40 min. The coverslips were washed twice in 0.05 M PBS (pH 7.2) for 15 min and then further incubated for 1 h with 1:1,000 fluorescein-labeled goat anti-rabbit IgG (Sigma-Aldrich). The smears were washed again, and coverslips were mounted using 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole. The cells were viewed using a Zeiss G42-110-Axioskop microscope equipped with incident light for fluorescence microscopy.

Purification of chimeric VimA His-tagged protein and pull-down assay.Purification of the His-tagged VimA chimera protein was carried out using nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid magnetic agarose beads (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) as previously reported (21). The protein pull-down assay was performed using a Dynabeads His-tag isolation and pull-down kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Approximately 75 μg of the purified His-tagged VimA chimera was incubated with the Dynabeads. The beads with attached VimA chimera were washed with wash/interaction buffer (50 mM NaH2PO4, 300 mM NaCl, 50 mM imidazole, and 0.005% Tween 20) and incubated with cell lysate from P. gingivalis W83. As a negative control, the lysates from P. gingivalis were incubated with the magnetic beads without the attached His-tagged VimA chimera. After incubation, the unbound proteins were eliminated by repeated washing in wash/interaction buffer. Proteins were eluted off the beads using the His elution buffer.

SDS-PAGE and immunoblot analysis.SDS-PAGE was performed with a 4 to 12% bis-Tris separating gel in MOPS (morpholinepropanesulfonic acid)-SDS running buffer according to the manufacturer's instructions (NuPAGE Novex gels; Invitrogen). Samples were prepared (65% sample, 25% 4× NuPAGE lithium dodecyl sulfate (LDS) sample buffer, 10% NuPAGE reducing agent), heated at 72°C for 10 min, and then electrophoresed at 200 V for 65 min in an XCell SureLock minicell system (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). The protein bands were visualized by staining with Simply Blue Safe stain (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). The separated proteins were then transferred to BioTrace nitrocellulose membranes (Pall Corporation) using a semidry Trans-Blot apparatus (Bio-Rad) at 15 V for 25 min. The blots were probed with VimA-specific antibodies. Immunoreactive proteins were detected by the procedure described in the Western Lightning chemiluminescence reagent plus kit (Perkin-Elmer Life Sciences, MA). The secondary antibody was the goat anti-rabbit IgG (heavy plus light chains)–horseradish peroxidase conjugate (Zymed Laboratories, CA).

2D-PAGE analysis.Two-dimensional (2D) gel electrophoresis was carried out using 2D gel strips (7 cm) of pI 3 to 10 in a Protean isoelectric focusing cell (Bio-Rad) following the method of Poznanovic et al. (46). Briefly, the protein concentration of the sample was measured using a Bio-Rad spectrophotometer. The protein samples were diluted to a final concentration of 350 μg protein, and 20 μl of the sample was added to solubilization buffer {7 M urea, 2 M thiourea, 2% [wt/vol] 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)-dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonate, 65 mM dithiothreitol [DTT], 0.002% bromophenol blue, 1% [wt/vol] Zwittergent 3-10}. The first-dimension immobilized pH gradient (IPG) strip was run by adding 100 μl of the diluted sample in the rehydration buffer (2 ml, 730 mg DTT, 70 mg iodoacetamide) for 8 h at voltage gradients of 3 h at 300 V, 5 h at linear gradients of 300 to 3,500 V, and 18 h at 3,500 V. After equilibration, the IPG strips were loaded on the gel and the gel was electrophoresed at 200 V and 0.3 A for 4 to 5 h and then stained with Coomassie simply blue strain.

LPS isolation from whole bacterial cells.Isolation of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) was carried using the Tri Reagent isolation reagent (67). Lyophilized bacterial cells (1 to 10 mg) were suspended in 200 ml of the Tri Reagent. For complete cell homogenization, the cell suspension was incubated at room temperature for about 10 to 15 min. After incubation, 20 ml of chloroform per mg of cells was added to create a phase separation. The mixture was then vigorously vortexed and further incubated at room temperature for an additional 10 min. The resulting mixture was centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 10 min to separate the aqueous and organic phases. The aqueous phase was transferred into a new 1.5-ml centrifuge tube. The mixture was vortexed, further incubated at room temperature for 10 min, and then centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 10 min. The upper aqueous phases from both steps were combined. Two additional water extraction steps were repeated to ensure complete removal of LPS from the organic phase. The combined aqueous phases were dried using a SpeedVac concentrator (Savant Instruments Inc., NY).

Lipid A isolation.Lipid A was isolated from crude LPS by mild acid hydrolysis (8). LPS was dissolved in 500 ml of 1% SDS in 10 mM sodium acetate (pH adjusted to 4.5 with 4 M HCl) and then placed in an ultrasound bath until the sample was dissolved. It was then heated at 100°C for 1 h. The mixture was dried by use of the SpeedVac. SDS was removed by washing the mixture with 100 ml of distilled water and 500 ml of acidified ethanol (prepared by combining 100 ml 4 M HCl with 20 ml 95% ethanol), followed by centrifugation (2,000 × g for 10 min). The sample was then washed again with 500 ml of (nonacidified) 95% ethanol and centrifuged (2,000 × g for 10 min). The centrifugation and washing steps were repeated. Finally, the sample was lyophilized to give fluffy white solid lipid A. To the freeze-dried content, 10 to 14 ml of solvents was added in the sequence chloroform, methanol, and water to achieve a final chloroform/methanol/water ratio of 1:2:0.8 (vol/vol/vol). Samples were shaken for 15 s immediately following the addition of each solvent and allowed to stand for about 18 h, with occasional shaking by hand. Phase separation of the mass-solvent mixtures was achieved by adding chloroform and water to obtain a final chloroform/methanol/water ratio of 1:1:0.9 (vol/vol/vol), and the lipid A content was estimated (48).

Preparation of lipid A-associated proteins.The extracellular material was removed by suspending the bacteria in saline, the mixture was stirred gently for 1 h at 4°C, and the bacteria were harvested by centrifugation. The endotoxin was extracted from the surface-washed P. gingivalis by the method of Morrison and Leive (39). Briefly, bacterial cells were suspended in 0.15 M NaCl at 4°C, and an equal volume of butanol was added. The suspension was mixed thoroughly at 4°C for 10 min and centrifuged at 35,000 × g for 20 min. The aqueous phase was removed, and the butanol, together with the insoluble residue, was further extracted twice with approximately half of the initial volume of saline. The combined aqueous phases were centrifuged to remove any insoluble residues and dialyzed against distilled water at 4°C for 48 h, using a Slide-A-Lyzer dialysis cassette (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL). This crude preparation, which contained both lipid A-associated proteins and lipopolysaccharide, was resuspended in water and ultracentrifuged at 100,000 × g for 3 h. The lipid A-associated proteins were prepared by the method of Yi and Hackett (67). Briefly, 90% phenol was added to the endotoxin suspended in pyrogen-free distilled water, and the mixture was extracted at 68°C for 20 min. After cooling, the phenol phase, which contains the lipid A-associated proteins, was separated by centrifugation at 35,000 × g and the aqueous phase was removed and dialyzed against distilled water for 42 h. The protein content of the lipid A-associated protein was determined using bovine serum albumin as a standard in an Eppendorf biophotometer. The carbohydrate content was determined by the method of Dubois et al. (10) using glucose as the standard.

MS and data analysis.An LCQ Deca XP Plus system (Thermo Scientific) with nanoelectrospray technology (New Objective) was used to analyze the peptides extracted from each gel piece (21). The four-part protocol used for the mass spectrometry (MS) and MS/MS analyses included one full MS analysis (from 450 to 1,750 m/z), followed by three MS/MS events using data-dependent acquisition, where the most intense ion from a given full MS scan was subjected to collision-induced dissociation, followed by the second and third most intense ions. The nanoflow buffer gradient was extended over 45 min in conjunction with the cycle, repeating itself every 2 s, using a 0 to 60% acetonitrile gradient from buffer B (95% acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid) developed against buffer A (2% acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid) at a flow rate of 250 to 300 nl/min, with a final 5-min 80% bump of buffer B before equilibration. In order to move the 20-μl sample from the autosampler to the nanospray unit, flow-stream splitting (1:1,000) and a Scivex 10 port automated valve (Upchurch Scientific, Oak Harbor, WA), together with a Michrom nanotrap column, were used. The spray voltage and current were set at 2.2 kV and 5.0 μA, respectively, with a capillary voltage of 25 V in positive ion mode. The spray temperature used for peptides was 160°C. Data collection was achieved using Xcalibur software (Thermo Electron), and the data were then screened with Bioworks software, version 3.1. MASCOT software (Matrix Science) was used for each analysis to produce unfiltered data and out files. Statistical validation of peptide and protein findings was achieved using X TANDEM (www.thegmp.org) and SCAFFOLD (version 2; Proteome Software) meta-analysis software. The presence of two different peptides at a probability of at least 95% was required for consideration of a positive identification. Confirmation of individual peptide matches was achieved using the BLAST database (www.oralgen.lanl.gov).

Electron microscopy.Transmission electron microscopy was performed using an FEI Tecnai G2 transmission electron microscope by the method of Harris (18). Briefly, Formvar-coated carbon grids were prepared; the Formvar support was removed by placing the grids in an atmosphere of solvent vapor. The grids were then placed on a wire mesh in a glass petri dish with carbon tetrachloride below the wire mesh. Five to 10 ml of the sample was placed under the carbon side of a 4- by 5-mm square of mica (approximately twice the size of an electron microscope grid). The grid was washed in 0.5% acetic acid and then acetone. The carbon film was broken to free the specimen grid, after which the grid was placed in stain solution–neutral 1% aqueous phosphotungstic acid for 30 s. After it was blotted dry, the grid was examined using the Tecnai transmission electron microscope.

Ultrathin sections were made by the method described by Massey (38). After a 2-h incubation with bacteria, the HeLa cell monolayers were washed four times in PBS and detached from the plastic surface with trypsin. The cell slurry was then immediately centrifuged for 4 min at 15,000 × g. The cell pellet was washed twice with PBS and fixed with 2.5% gluteraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate. Cells were pelleted and postfixed in 1% OsO4 in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate for 1 h, and the ultrathin sections were contrasted with lead citrate and uranyl acetate before examination using the FEI Technai G2 transmission electron microscope.

RESULTS

VimA displays a similar phenotype in a different genetic background of P. gingivalis.Inactivation of the vimA gene in P. gingivalis W83 resulted in a non-black-pigmented isogenic mutant, designated P. gingivalis FLL92, which showed reduced levels of proteolytic, hemagglutinating, and hemolytic activities (1, 43). To further confirm this phenotype in a different genetic background, a vimA deletion mutant in the P. gingivalis ATCC 33277 strain was constructed by allelic exchange mutagenesis. Following electroporation and plating on selective medium, several erythromycin-resistant colonies were detected after 5 to 7 days of incubation. To compare their phenotypic properties with those of the wild-type ATCC 33277 strain, all mutants were plated on brucella blood agar plates. In contrast to the wild type, all the isogenic mutants had a non-black-pigmented, nonhemolytic phenotype. PCR amplification of chromosomal DNA showed that the vimA gene was missing in those isogenic mutants, in comparison to the wild type and vimA-defective mutant complemented with the wild-type gene. One randomly chosen mutant, designated FLL451, was chosen for further study (see Fig. S1A in the supplemental material). The mutation was further confirmed by DNA sequencing (data not shown). Because of the use of a transcriptional terminator-less ermF cassette, inactivation of vimA did not have any polar effects on the expression of its downstream genes (see Fig. S1B in the supplemental material). The generation time for P. gingivalis ATCC 33277 was 10 h, in contrast to 18 h for the FLL451 vimA mutant. Complementation of FLL451 with the wild-type gene, which was confirmed using RT-PCR (see Fig. S1B in the supplemental material), restored the wild-type phenotype.

Construction of vimA chimera.To determine gene dosage effects and to facilitate purification of the VimA protein from the native background, a vimA chimera was constructed in the fimA locus, which is nonfunctional in P. gingivalis W83 (40, 41) (see Fig. S1D in the supplemental material). The VimA chimeric strain, designated P. gingivalis FLL406, displayed a non-black-pigmented phenotype compared to the wild type. The generation time for P. gingivalis FLL406 was similar to that of the wild-type strain. There was an overexpression of the vimA transcript in P. gingivalis FLL406 (see Fig. S1E in the supplemental material). Purification of the expected 39-kDa VimA protein was confirmed using Western blotting and mass spectrometry (data not shown).

Overexpression of VimA affects gingipain activity in P. gingivalis.To determine if the vimA gene dosage could affect protease activity, P. gingivalis FLL92, FLL406, FLL451, FLL451c, and wild-type strains were evaluated. Consistent with previous observations (1, 43, 63, 64), the vimA-defective mutants P. gingivalis FLL92 and FLL451 from the genetic backgrounds of W83 and ATCC 33277, respectively, showed a dramatic reduction in gingipain activities. Complementation of the vimA defect in P. gingivalis FLL451 restored gingipain activity to the wild-type levels (Fig. 1A). Gingipain activity in the vimA chimeric strain (P. gingivalis FLL406) was increased by approximately 15% compared to that in the wild type (Fig. 1A). In the vimA-defective strains, non-gingipain protease activity was slightly decreased in contrast to that in the wild-type strains (Fig. 1B). Taken together, these results suggest that nongingipain activities are likely not VimA dependent.

Fig 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1

Gingipain, non-gingipain protease, and sialidase activities of P. gingivalis strains. P. gingivalis strains were grown to exponential phase (OD600, 0.8) in BHI broth with supplements. (A) Gingipain activity of P. gingivalis strains were tested against BAPNA (N-α-benzyl-dl-arginine-p-nitroanilide) (Rgp) and ALNA (acetyl-Lys-p-nitroanilide-HCl) (Kgp) using whole-cell culture. FLL451 showed the lowest Rgp and Kgp activities, which were lower than those of FLL92 by 50% (Rgp) and 20% (Kgp) (P < 0.001). FLL406 showed an approximately 15% increase (P < 0.05).The results shown are from three independent experiments. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.001. (B) Non-gingipain protease activity of P. gingivalis strains was estimated using a fluorescence resonance energy transfer-based assay method. Sialidase activity was tested using an Amplex Red neuraminidase assay kit. A 15 to 17% reduction in the total protease and sialidase activity was noted in FLL451 in comparison with FLL92. In FLL406, the total protease and sialidase activities were significantly increased (P < 0.05). The results shown are from three independent experiments. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.001.

VimA can modulate sialidase activity in P. gingivalis.The VimA protein can interact with the sialidase protein from P. gingivalis (2, 64). Furthermore, sialidase may be involved in the posttranscriptional regulation of the gingipains (2). Similar to the vimA defect in the W83 genetic background (FLL92), P. gingivalis FLL451 showed a significant decrease in sialidase activity compared to the wild type. This activity was restored to wild-type levels in the isogenic strain complemented with the wild-type vimA gene (Fig. 1B).

vimA can regulate the biofilm-forming capacity of P. gingivalis ATCC 33277.Because P. gingivalis W83 is a poor biofilm former, the effect of the vimA gene on the biofilm-forming capacity of P. gingivalis ATCC 33277 was evaluated. As shown in Fig. 2, FLL451, the vimA-defective isogenic mutant of P. gingivalis ATCC 33277, had a five times higher biofilm-forming capacity (P < 0.001) than the parent strain. Complementation of P. gingivalis FLL451 with the wild-type gene restored the biofilm-forming capacity to the wild-type level (Fig. 2). P. gingivalis FLL406, which carries an additional copy of the vimA gene, showed no change in its ability to form a biofilm compared to the parent P. gingivalis W83.

Fig 2
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2

Biofilm-forming capacity of P. gingivalis ATCC 33277 is reduced compared with that of vimA mutant FLL451. FLL451 showed a five times higher biofilm-forming capacity (∗, P < 0.001). The complemented strain, FLL451c, was found to restore the activity to that of the wild type. Both the P. gingivalis W83 and FLL406 strains showed very low biofilm-forming capacities.

vimA can modulate the invasive capacity of P. gingivalis.The invasive capacity of P. gingivalis and the vimA-defective isogenic mutants was determined. HeLa cells incubated with P. gingivalis FLL92 showed a decrease in invasion of approximately 19% compared to the wild type. P. gingivalis FLL451 showed an increase in invasion of 30% compared to the wild type. The vimA chimeric strain, P. gingivalis FLL406, showed a 40% increase in invasion compared to the wild type (Fig. 3). Fluorescence-labeled anti-VimA specific antibodies confirmed the absence of the VimA protein in epithelial cells infected with FLL92 and FLL451. This is in contrast to HeLa cells infected with FLL406, which showed intense pericellular fluorescence (see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material).

Fig 3
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 3

Invasion of epithelial cells by various strains of P. gingivalis. Less invasion (16% less) was noted in FLL92 (**, P < 0.05) than the wild type (ATCC 33277). FLL451 showed higher invasion (*, P < 0.01) than P. gingivalis wild-type ATCC 33277. FLL406 vimA chimera was 35% more invasive than P. gingivalis W83 (***, P < 0.01).

VimA mediates cytoskeleton change during invasion.Ultrastructural studies of epithelial cells infected with the P. gingivalis isogenic mutants revealed a unique pattern of invasion. In contrast to the wild type (Fig. 4A and B), epithelial cells infected with the vimA mutant FLL92 revealed the formation of an envelope-like covering during invasion (Fig. 4C and D). FLL451 also showed a similar envelope-like structure during invasion (Fig. 4E) and even after entry into the epithelial cells (Fig. 4F).

Fig 4
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 4

Ultrastructural studies on the invasion of P. gingivalis strains. (A) Invasion of epithelial cells by P. gingivalis ATCC 33277 showing invasion into the cells; (B) invasion of P. gingivalis W83 showing intact morphology of the pathogen; (C) P. gingivalis mutant FLL92 showing formation of an envelope-like covering (arrow) during invasion; (D) P. gingivalis mutant FLL92 inside the epithelial cell showing intact protective covering (arrow); (E) P. gingivalis mutant FLL451 showing a thick envelope covering during invasion; the envelope was noticed while the pathogen was in contact with the epithelial cells; (F) P. gingivalis mutant FLL451 inside the epithelial cell showing intact protective covering (arrow).

VimA in silico analysis.Orthologs of vimA are present in many anaerobic bacteria, such as Clostridium botulinum, Rhodobacter sphaeroides, and Parabacteroides distasonis (see Fig. S3 in the supplemental material). Phylogenetic analysis of VimA shows relatedness to the exopolysaccharide biosynthesis protein cluster. In addition, homology with the acetyl-CoA transferase proteins of clostridial species, Rhodobacter sphaeroides, Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, Fusobacterium nucleatum, E. coli, and the other acetyl-CoA transferase (PG1254), the CoA transferase (PG1013), and the transpeptidase (PG0794) from P. gingivalis was observed (see Fig. S4 in the supplemental material). The strongest relatedness of VimA was observed with the hypothetical proteins of Ralstonia eutropha and Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Among the acetyltransferases from P. gingivalis, VimA was most closely related to the lipid A biosynthesis transferase (PG2222), in addition to a transpeptidase (PG0794) and alanine N-acetyltransferase (PG1254) (see Fig. S5 in the supplemental material). Common motifs, including SXGXLXSX, LPXTX, and LSXTA, were identified among these closely related transferase enzymes from P. gingivalis (see Fig. S6 in the supplemental material).

In silico protein modeling of VimA showed an alpha/beta/alpha structural domain that is conserved among the acetyl-CoA N-acetyltransferase (Nat) superfamily (see Fig. S7A in the supplemental material). A specific acetyl-CoA transferase signature was noted between amino acid positions 116 and 281 (see Fig. S7B in the supplemental material). Two protein-sorting signals were predicted at the 85th and 103rd positions (see Fig. S7C in the supplemental material). A characteristic pilin motif (WXXXVXVYPK) identified in Gram-positive bacteria (36) and involved in protein sorting was also identified as a variant with replacement of lysine with similar hydrophilic amino acids. These motifs were identified at the 11th (WXXXVXGFDE) and 21st (WXXXVXEEEG) positions (see Fig. S7D in the supplemental material). Although a putative cleavage site is observed at the 17th amino acid position, no N-terminal signal sequence is predicted; thus, VimA is likely a nonsecretory protein.

VimA mediates CoA transfer to isoleucine.Because VimA is predicted to have an acetyltransferase domain, in addition to its close relatedness to an amino acid acetyltransferase, its ability for CoA transfer to various amino acids as an acceptor substrate was determined. Interrogation of the P. gingivalis genome revealed the presence of several proteases that can release different amino acids from various protein substrates that may act as major CoA acceptors (www.oralgen.lanl.gov). Of the 11 most significant amino acids evaluated, transfer of CoA to isoleucine was reduced by more than 90% in the two vimA mutants, FLL92 and FLL451, compared to the wild-type strains (Fig. 5A). CoA transfer was restored to the wild-type level in the vimA-defective mutant complemented with the wild-type gene. There was a slight increase of transfer of CoA to isoleucine in the vimA chimeric strain (FLL406) compared with the wild type.

Fig 5
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 5

(A) CoA-transferring activity among P. gingivalis strains. Isoleucine was found to be significantly (**, P < 0.001) transferred less among the two vimA mutants, FLL92 and FLL451. (B) Estimation of branched-chain amino acids in P. gingivalis strains. FLL451 showed an approximately 15% reduction in the branched-chain amino acid content compared with FLL92 (*, P < 0.05). FLL406 showed a significant increase (**, P < 0.001). (C) Estimation of acetyl-CoA in P. gingivalis strains. Acetyl-CoA assay was performed using a PicoProbe acetyl-CoA assay kit. The concentrations of the samples were calculated using the standard curve with the help of the TM4 software package. *, P < 0.001; **, P < 0.05.

VimA is involved in branched-chain amino acid metabolism.Due to the alteration in the transfer of CoA to isoleucine, the vimA-defective mutants were evaluated for estimation of the presence of branched-chain amino acids. In contrast to the wild-type strains, there was a reduction in branched-chain amino acids of approximately 40% in P. gingivalis FLL92 and FLL451 (Fig. 5B). In P. gingivalis FLL451c, the level of branched-chain amino acids was similar to that in the wild type. In the vimA chimeric strain (FLL406), there was a slight increase in the branched-chain amino acids compared with the wild type (Fig. 5B).

VimA regulates the level of acetyl-CoA in P. gingivalis.Similar to E. coli, most of the enzymes involved in isoleucine degradation could be identified in the genome of P. gingivalis. However, a homolog of the enzyme with EC number 2.3.1.9 that has acetyl-CoA acetyltransferase function was not observed in the P. gingivalis genome. Because all the other appropriate enzymes for the associated pathways (outlined in Fig. 6) are present in the genome of P. gingivalis (http://www.oralgen.lanl.gov/), we hypothesize that VimA may provide the missing acetyl-CoA acetyltransferase function. To determine if VimA influences the generation of acetyl-CoA, we analyzed the intracellular level of acetyl-CoA in both the wild-type and isogenic vimA-defective mutants from different genetic backgrounds. The result indicated that the level of acetyl-CoA was significantly decreased in the mutants compared to that in the wild type (Fig. 5C), implying that a reduced amount of 2-methyl acetoacetyl-CoA was converted to acetyl-CoA in the mutant.

Fig 6
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 6

Metabolic pathway of P. gingivalis showing involvement of VimA in isoleucine degradation pathway. The genes involved in each reaction (Rxn) are shown in boxes. The table shows the enzyme classifications and the corresponding gene products and ORF annotations.

VimA is involved in alteration of lipid A content.Isoleucine plays an important role in lipid biosynthesis (52). Modification in the lipid profile of the isogenic mutants of P. gingivalis was determined. As shown in Table 2, there was an approximately 65% reduction in the lipid A content of FLL92 (P < 0.001) and a 38% reduction in FLL451 (P < 0.001) compared with their respective wild-type strains. P. gingivalis FLL406 showed a 12% increase in the lipid A content. Taken together, there was a significant reduction in the lipid A content in the two vimA-defective mutants FLL92 and FLL451.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2

Lipid A, protein, and carbohydrate compositions of P. gingivalis strains

VimA alters lipid A-associated proteins of P. gingivalis.Lipid A-associated proteins were assessed by SDS-PAGE. P. gingivalis ATCC 33277 showed several high-molecular-mass protein bands at between 39 and 85 kDa that were more intense than the bands in wild-type P. gingivalis W83. While the two vimA mutants FLL92 and FLL451 showed similar profiles, two additional protein bands at 50 and 25 kDa were observed in FLL451. Protein bands with molecular masses of 20, 18, and 12 kDa were unique to the two vimA mutants. The vimA chimeric strain FLL406 showed a strong 39-kDa band but was missing several high-molecular-mass bands in comparison with the P. gingivalis W83 and ATCC 33277 wild types (Fig. 7A). The 39-kDa band observed in the chimeric strain was present in both wild-type strains but missing in the vimA-defective isogenic strains. Furthermore, this protein band immunoreacted with the anti-VimA antibody (Fig. 7B). Taken together, the data suggest that the VimA protein may be lipid A associated.

Fig 7
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 7

(A) Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of the lipid A-associated proteins of P. gingivalis strains. Lane 1, P. gingivalis W83; lane 2, FLL92 (P. gingivalis vimA mutant in W83); lane 3, FLL451 (P. gingivalis vimA mutant in ATCC 33277; protein bands found in excess in comparison with FLL92 are shown within a circle); lane 4, FLL406 (P. gingivalis vimA chimera in W83); lane 5, P. gingivalis ATCC 33277. All the lanes show protein bands and their corresponding molecular masses (in kDa). All lanes contain 35 μg of protein. Arrows, 39-kDa VimA protein present in the wild-type and chimeric strains of P. gingivalis; *, proteins absent in comparison with FLL451. (B) Immunoblot analysis was carried out with a Western lightning chemiluminescence reagent plus kit (Perkin-Elmer Life Sciences) with VimA-specific primary antibody. Goat anti-rabbit IgG (heavy plus light chain)–horseradish peroxidase conjugate (Zymed Laboratories) was used as the secondary antibody. The contents of the lanes match those described for panel A.

Interaction of VimA with specific proteins containing putative sorting motifs.The recombinant VimA protein, purified from E. coli, interacted with several P. gingivalis proteins, including the gingipains (64). Using the purified P. gingivalis VimA chimera in a pull-down assay with the cell lysate from W83, interaction with proteins from this organism was evaluated by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (Fig. 8). In addition to the expected 39-kDa protein, several other spots were observed. Identification of the protein spots by mass spectrometry showed the VimA interaction with proteins belonging to multiple functional groups (Table 3). Amino acid sequence alignment revealed a putative LXXTG sorting motif for all the proteins except PG0738, LuxR, PG0671, PG1348, PG1315, and PG1108. It is noteworthy that the TonB-dependent receptor (PG0707), putative lipoprotein (PG1948), glycosyltransferase (PG1346), conserved hypothetical protein (PG0410), and alanyl-tRNA synthetase (PG1246) showed this characteristic sorting motif (Table 3). These proteins were also found to contain a C-terminal hydrophilic tail. The LXXTG motif was missing in VimA but showed a C-terminal putative sorting domain and N-terminal pilin motifs known to be involved in protein sorting. VimA-interacting proteins reported earlier (64) showed similar predicted sorting motifs in HtrA, PG2096 (conserved hypothetical protein), and in PG1246 (alanyl-tRNA synthetase).

Fig 8
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 8

2D-PAGE showing VimA-interacting proteins. The His tag-purified VimA protein was subjected to protein pull-down assay using P. gingivalis W83 total cell lysate and subjected to 2D gel electrophoresis. A total of 21 proteins were identified (Table 3).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3

Mass spectrometry analysis of the proteins interacting with VimA showing similarity to sorting motifs by sequence analysis

DISCUSSION

Earlier reports have documented the multifunctional role of VimA in P. gingivalis (44, 64). Collectively, these results suggest that in P. gingivalis the VimA protein affects gingipain maturation, sialidase activity, autoaggregation, hemolysis, hemagglutination, LPS synthesis, capsular synthesis, fimbrial phenotypic expression, and oxidative stress resistance and plays a role in the glycosylation and anchorage of several surface proteins (1, 2, 43, 44, 63, 64). In this study, several of these phenotypic characteristics were confirmed in a different P. gingivalis genetic background. The importance of VimA to these phenotypic characteristics was further highlighted by the increase in sialidase and gingipain activities in the vimA chimeric strain. The relatively unaffected nongingipain activities in the vimA-defective mutants and VimA chimeric strain would be consistent with a VimA-specific regulatory role in gingipain biogenesis (64). These observations further support the vital role of VimA in the pathogenesis of P. gingivalis.

The absence of VimA also appeared to increase phenotypic properties in P. gingivalis that have been reported to be important virulence traits in this organism. The increase in the biofilm-forming capacity in P. gingivalis FLL451 could be associated with the increase in autoaggregation (44). The role of bacterial autoaggregation in initial biofilm formation has been previously reported (30). The autoaggregation in the vimA-defective mutants may be directly related to aberrantly expressed proteins on the cell surface. This would be consistent with a previous report that documented the presence, absence, and relative abundance of several membrane proteins in the vimA-defective mutant (44, 64). Additionally, it is also likely that the downregulation of gingipain and sialidase activities in the vimA-defective mutants could lead to a defect in protein maturation of cell surface proteins. These defects could give rise to other protein-protein interactions leading to increased autoaggregation (51). The decrease in capsule formation could also contribute to increased autoaggregation. The relative significance of this enhanced autoaggregation and biofilm-forming capacity in the vimA-defective mutant raises questions on their role in the virulence potential of P. gingivalis. It is noteworthy that the vimA-defective mutant of P. gingivalis showed reduced virulence in a mouse model (1). In this study, the invasive capacity of the vimA-defective isogenic mutant in the W83 genetic background was reduced from that in the wild type. The importance of VimA to this process was further highlighted by the significant increase of invasion of HeLa cells by the VimA chimeric strain. In contrast to FLL92, there was an increase in invasion of the vimA-defective mutant in the P. gingivalis ATCC 33277 genetic background, which could have been due to the presence of intact fimbria. The role of fimbria in host cell invasion by P. gingivalis is well documented (42). On the other hand, we cannot rule out the possibility of other cell surface changes in the vimA-defective mutant in the P. gingivalis ATCC 33277 genetic background that may trigger a host cell response to enhance its invasive ability. P. gingivalis FLL451 was shown to be surrounded by a large extracellular matrix during the invasion of HeLa cells. While the composition of this extracellular matrix is unclear, it could likely involve host and/or bacterial membrane lipids. VimA has been shown to play a role in lipid biosynthesis; however, its impact on host-bacterium interaction is unknown. These observations taken together could suggest that decreased capsule formation and gingipain and sialidase activities, in addition to the increased sensitivity to oxidative stress, are more significant to the pathogenic potential in the P. gingivalis W83 genetic background than a phenotype involving increased autoaggregation and perhaps biofilm formation. The effect of VimA on these virulence attributes clearly has interstrain variation. Its impact on virulence in other P. gingivalis genetic backgrounds is currently under further investigation in our laboratory.

A defect in LPS biosynthesis in P. gingivalis can influence attachment of the gingipains to the cell surface, autoaggregation, and biofilm formation (53, 54, 56). Several genes, including porR, gftB, rfa, ugdA, vimE, and vimF, have shown the importance of the O side chain polysaccharide (O-LPS) and anionic polysaccharide (A-LPS) in these processes (50, 53, 61–63, 66). A defect in some of these genes resulted in a complete loss of surface-associated gingipain proteinases, strong autoaggregation, and a marked increase in biofilm formation. In a previous study, analysis of cell surface lipopolysaccharides isolated from the parent strain W83 and isogenic mutant grown under the same conditions showed that the LPS of FLL92 was truncated compared to that of the wild type (63). Removal of the lipid A from the LPS resulted in a polysaccharide profile of FLL92 in which the LPS was shorter than that of the parent strain, also suggesting that in the absence of VimA, polysaccharide modification could result in loss of surface-associated gingipain proteinases, strong autoaggregation, and a marked increase in biofilm formation. In this study, our phylogenetic analysis predicted that VimA may have an acetyl-CoA transferase function. VimA was found to mediate CoA transfer to isoleucine. In addition, there was a reduction in branched-chain amino acids and lipid A content in the P. gingivalis mutants from either the W83 or ATCC 33277 genetic background. The metabolic pathway of isoleucine degradation is known to provide the substrate (acetyl-CoA) that is important in lipid biosynthesis (35). The lower level of acetyl-CoA observed in the mutants than the wild type supports the acetyl-CoA transferase function of VimA. This could help to explain the VimA-dependent effect on lipid A biosynthesis possible via fatty acid chain elongation (5, 58). It is noteworthy that some of the proteins (PG1346, PG1347, and PG1348) that are predicted to play a role in lipid biosynthesis interacted with the purified VimA. It is also likely that the VimA protein could function in other pathways leading to lipid biosynthesis. This is under further investigation in the laboratory.

Protein pull-down assays using the His-tagged chimeric VimA showed several proteins that contained conserved LXXTG or LPXTG motifs. These predicted putative sorting motifs were present in all the membrane or extracellular proteins that interacted with VimA. In Gram-positive bacteria, cell wall-anchoring surface proteins are known to carry LPXTG, a sortase recognition motif (9). Sortases are transpeptidase enzymes that covalently connect their substrates to a target molecule (reviewed in reference 20). While a similar system has not yet been described for Gram-negative bacteria, it is tempting to speculate that the VimA protein could be a prototype for this type of protein sorting. Furthermore, it is likely that this mechanism for protein sorting may explain the aberrantly expressed proteins observed in the vimA-defective mutant (44). It is noteworthy that many of the proteins that interacted with the chimeric VimA protein of P. gingivalis had putative sorting signatures with characteristics similar to those of Gram-positive bacteria (9) (Fig. 9A). It is also likely that the proteins with the consensus EXGXTX sequence and a HISXXGXG signature near the polar tail (Fig. 9B; see Fig. S8 in the supplemental material) could be important in sorting and can act as a sortase substrate. This would be similar to other observations in P. gingivalis, where a group of surface proteins, including RgpB, with a common C-terminal domain (CTD) was shown to be exported by a novel secretion system to the surface, where they are covalently attached (54). It was proposed that the CTD acts as a site of recognition by a P. gingivalis processing enzyme(s), possibly a novel sortase-like enzyme that cleaves the CTD sequence and attaches the C-terminal carbonyl to a sugar amine of a novel anionic lipopolysaccharide which can be modulated by its level of acylation (9, 19, 45). The identity of a specific sortase-like enzyme or recognition motif is unknown. Though VimA did not contain any recognizable sorting motifs, it was found to possess an N-terminal cleavage site and pilin motif, which are generally found to be involved in protein sorting (16). A recently proposed mechanism for protein sorting into the outer membrane vesicles of P. gingivalis showed a critical role for LPS and its level of acylation in this process (19). None of the most abundant proteins identified from the outer membrane vesicles were similar to those that interacted with the VimA chimera. It is unclear if they carry any specific sorting signals or use a similar putative VimA-dependent mechanism. In Gram-positive bacteria, multiple sortase systems have been described (9). However, in Gram-negative bacteria there is a gap in such information, and this gap requires further exploration. Only recently have sortase homologs been identified in Gram-negative bacteria (45), and it is likely that in P. gingivalis there may be multiple systems, some of which may have novel characteristics.

Fig 9
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 9

Schematic representation of the sortase in Gram-positive bacteria and in P. gingivalis. (A) Sortase showing characteristic N-terminal signal sequence, a sortase motif of LPXTG, followed by the cell wall-signaling motif. The C-terminal end bears a polar tail. (B) Sortase protein of P. gingivalis showing characteristic N-terminal signal sequence, a sortase motif of L(P/T/S)X(T/N/D)G, followed by the cell wall-signaling motif bearing two consensus signature sequences, EXGXTX and HISXXGXG. The C-terminal end bears a polar tail.

In summary, our data further support a multifunctional role for VimA (Fig. 10). Its role in modulating virulence in P. gingivalis could possibly occur through its involvement in acetyl-CoA transfer, lipid A synthesis, and possible protein sorting/transfer/anchorage. Because acetyltransferases can also have translational repressor activity (59), we cannot rule out this likely function for VimA due to its altered protein phenotype. Collectively, our observations suggest that VimA as a therapeutic target could have important implications. This is being further investigated in the laboratory.

Fig 10
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 10

Proposed mechanistic role of VimA in virulence modulation. VimA is an acetyl-CoA acetyltransferase found to be involved in the isoleucine degradation pathway, leading to acetyl-CoA. The acetyl-CoA substrate can be used in fatty acid elongation, an important step in lipid A synthesis. PG1343 (lipoate protein ligase) and PG1948 (lipoprotein) could be involved in binding of protein to the lipid A by means of lipoylation (PG1343) and N-terminal linkages (PG1948) (60). In addition, lipoprotein PG1948 could also be C-terminally linked with the LPS associated with the peptidoglycan. Alteration in these linkages could affect the integrity of these structures, resulting in the lack of anchoring of the gingipains (64) and hence their appropriate biogenesis. It is also likely that the lipid A-associated proteins are important in gingipain biogenesis. Acetylation via acetyl-CoA, which is known to affect protein function in bacteria (59), could control various protein functions, such as gingipain activation, thus leading to virulence modulation.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by Loma Linda University and Public Health Service grants DE-13664 and DE-019730 from NIDCR (to H.M.F.).

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 11 October 2011.
    • Returned for modification 6 November 2011.
    • Accepted 22 November 2011.
    • Accepted manuscript posted online 5 December 2011.
  • Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/IAI.06062-11.

  • Copyright © 2012, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Abaibou H,
    2. et al
    . 2001. vimA gene downstream of recA is involved in virulence modulation in Porphyromonas gingivalis W83. Infect. Immun. 69:325–335.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Aruni W,
    2. et al
    . 2011. Sialidase and sialoglycoproteases can modulate virulence in Porphyromonas gingivalis. Infect. Immun. 79:2779–2791.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Bairoch A
    . 2000. The ENZYME database in 2000. Nucleic Acids Res. 28:304–305.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    1. Brunner J,
    2. et al
    . 2010. The capsule of Porphyromonas gingivalis reduces the immune response of human gingival fibroblasts. BMC Microbiol. 10:5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Bugg TD,
    2. Brandish PE
    . 1994. From peptidoglycan to glycoproteins: common features of lipid-linked oligosaccharide biosynthesis. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 119:255–262.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    1. Castaneda-Roldan EI,
    2. et al
    . 2004. Adherence of Brucella to human epithelial cells and macrophages is mediated by sialic acid residues. Cell. Microbiol. 6:435–445.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    1. Chang A,
    2. Scheer M,
    3. Grote A,
    4. Schomburg I,
    5. Schomburg D
    . 2009. BRENDA, AMENDA and FRENDA the enzyme information system: new content and tools in 2009. Nucleic Acids Res. 37:D588–D592.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    1. Di Fabio JL,
    2. Caroff M,
    3. Karibian D,
    4. Richards JC,
    5. Perry MB
    . 1992. Characterization of the common antigenic lipopolysaccharide O-chains produced by Bordetella bronchiseptica and Bordetella parapertussis. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 76:275–281.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Dramsi S,
    2. Magnet S,
    3. Davison S,
    4. Arthur M
    . 2008. Covalent attachment of proteins to peptidoglycan. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 32:307–320.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    1. Dubois M,
    2. Gilles K,
    3. Hamilton JK,
    4. Rebers PA,
    5. Smith F
    . 1951. A colorimetric method for the determination of sugars. Nature 168:167.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Duncan MJ,
    2. Nakao S,
    3. Skobe Z,
    4. Xie H
    . 1993. Interactions of Porphyromonas gingivalis with epithelial cells. Infect. Immun. 61:2260–2265.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Eley BM,
    2. Cox SW
    . 2003. Proteolytic and hydrolytic enzymes from putative periodontal pathogens: characterization, molecular genetics, effects on host defenses and tissues and detection in gingival crevice fluid. Periodontol. 2000 31:105–124.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    1. Eswar N,
    2. et al
    . 2007. Comparative protein structure modeling using MODELLER. Curr. Protoc. Protein Sci. Chapter 2:Unit 2.
  14. 14.↵
    1. Fletcher HM,
    2. et al
    . 1995. Virulence of a Porphyromonas gingivalis W83 mutant defective in the prtH gene. Infect. Immun. 63:1521–1528.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Gardner RG,
    2. Russell JB,
    3. Wilson DB,
    4. Wang GR,
    5. Shoemaker NB
    . 1996. Use of a modified Bacteroides-Prevotella shuttle vector to transfer a reconstructed beta-1,4-d-endoglucanase gene into Bacteroides uniformis and Prevotella ruminicola B(1)4. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62:196–202.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Gaspar AH,
    2. Ton-That H
    . 2006. Assembly of distinct pilus structures on the surface of Corynebacterium diphtheriae. J. Bacteriol. 188:1526–1533.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Han N,
    2. Whitlock J,
    3. Progulske-Fox A
    . 1996. The hemagglutinin gene A (hagA) of Porphyromonas gingivalis 381 contains four large, contiguous, direct repeats. Infect. Immun. 64:4000–4007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Harris JR
    . 2007. Negative staining of thinly spread biological samples. Methods Mol. Biol. 369:107–142.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Haurat MF,
    2. et al
    . 2011. Selective sorting of cargo proteins into bacterial membrane vesicles. J. Biol. Chem. 286:1269–1276.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Hendrickx AP,
    2. Budzik JM,
    3. Oh SY,
    4. Schneewind O
    . 2011. Architects at the bacterial surface—sortases and the assembly of pili with isopeptide bonds. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 9:166–176.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. 21.↵
    1. Henry LG,
    2. Sandberg L,
    3. Zhang K,
    4. Fletcher HM
    . 2008. DNA repair of 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine lesions in Porphyromonas gingivalis. J. Bacteriol. 190:7985–7993.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Hinsa SM,
    2. O'Toole GA
    . 2006. Biofilm formation by Pseudomonas fluorescens WCS365: a role for LapD. Microbiology 152:1375–1383.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. 23.↵
    1. Horton RM,
    2. Cai ZL,
    3. Ho SN,
    4. Pease LR
    . 1990. Gene splicing by overlap extension: tailor-made genes using the polymerase chain reaction. Biotechniques 8:528–535.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  24. 24.↵
    1. Hou BK,
    2. et al
    . 2004. BioSilico: an integrated metabolic database system. Bioinformatics 20:3270–3272.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. 25.↵
    1. Johnson LS,
    2. Eddy SR,
    3. Portugaly E
    . 2010. Hidden Markov model speed heuristic and iterative HMM search procedure. BMC Bioinformatics 11:431.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Johnson NA,
    2. McKenzie RM,
    3. Fletcher HM
    . 2011. The bcp gene in the bcp-recA-vimA-vimE-vimF operon is important in oxidative stress resistance in Porphyromonas gingivalis W83. Mol. Oral Microbiol. 26:62–77.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Kanehisa M,
    2. Goto S,
    3. Furumichi M,
    4. Tanabe M,
    5. Hirakawa M
    . 2010. KEGG for representation and analysis of molecular networks involving diseases and drugs. Nucleic Acids Res. 38:D355–D360.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. 28.↵
    1. Kato T,
    2. et al
    . 2007. Virulence of Porphyromonas gingivalis is altered by substitution of fimbria gene with different genotype. Cell. Microbiol. 9:753–765.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Kimura M
    . 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 16:111–120.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. 30.↵
    1. Kolenbrander PE,
    2. et al
    . 2006. Bacterial interactions and successions during plaque development. Periodontol. 2000 42:47–79.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. 31.↵
    1. Lai CH,
    2. Listgarten MA,
    3. Shirakawa M,
    4. Slots J
    . 1987. Bacteroides forsythus in adult gingivitis and periodontitis. Oral Microbiol. Immunol. 2:152–157.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Lamont RJ,
    2. Jenkinson HF
    . 1998. Life below the gum line: pathogenic mechanisms of Porphyromonas gingivalis. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62:1244–1263.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    1. Lin X,
    2. Wu J,
    3. Xie H
    . 2006. Porphyromonas gingivalis minor fimbriae are required for cell-cell interactions. Infect. Immun. 74:6011–6015.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    1. Liu Y,
    2. Fletcher HM
    . 2001. Environmental regulation of recA gene expression in Porphyromonas gingivalis. Oral Microbiol. Immunol. 16:136–143.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Mahmud T,
    2. et al
    . 2005. A biosynthetic pathway to isovaleryl-CoA in myxobacteria: the involvement of the mevalonate pathway. Chembiochem 6:322–330.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Mandlik A,
    2. Swierczynski A,
    3. Das A,
    4. Ton-That H
    . 2008. Pili in Gram-positive bacteria: assembly, involvement in colonization and biofilm development. Trends Microbiol. 16:33–40.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  37. 37.↵
    1. Marmur J
    . 1961. A procedure for the isolation of deoxyribonucleic acid from microorganism. J. Mol. Biol. 3:208–218.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  38. 38.↵
    1. Massey BW
    . 1953. Ultra-thin sectioning for electron microscopy. Stain Technol. 28:19–26.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  39. 39.↵
    1. Morrison DC,
    2. Leive L
    . 1975. Fractions of lipopolysaccharide from Escherichia coli O111:B4 prepared by two extraction procedures. J. Biol. Chem. 250:2911–2919.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. 40.↵
    1. Nishikawa K,
    2. Duncan MJ
    . 2010. Histidine kinase-mediated production and autoassembly of Porphyromonas gingivalis fimbriae. J. Bacteriol. 192:1975–1987.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. 41.↵
    1. Nishiyama S,
    2. et al
    . 2007. Involvement of minor components associated with the FimA fimbriae of Porphyromonas gingivalis in adhesive functions. Microbiology 153:1916–1925.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  42. 42.↵
    1. Njoroge T,
    2. Genco RJ,
    3. Sojar HT,
    4. Hamada N,
    5. Genco CA
    . 1997. A role for fimbriae in Porphyromonas gingivalis invasion of oral epithelial cells. Infect. Immun. 65:1980–1984.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. 43.↵
    1. Olango GJ,
    2. Roy F,
    3. Sheets SM,
    4. Young MK,
    5. Fletcher HM
    . 2003. Gingipain RgpB is excreted as a proenzyme in the vimA-defective mutant Porphyromonas gingivalis FLL92. Infect. Immun. 71:3740–3747.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. 44.↵
    1. Osbourne DO,
    2. et al
    . 2010. The role of vimA in cell surface biogenesis in Porphyromonas gingivalis. Microbiology 156(Pt 7):2180–2193.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. 45.↵
    1. Pallen MJ,
    2. Lam AC,
    3. Antonio M,
    4. Dunbar K
    . 2001. An embarrassment of sortases—a richness of substrates? Trends Microbiol. 9:97–102.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  46. 46.↵
    1. Poznanovic S,
    2. Schwall G,
    3. Zengerling H,
    4. Cahill MA
    . 2005. Isoelectric focusing in serial immobilized pH gradient gels to improve protein separation in proteomic analysis. Electrophoresis 26:3185–3190.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. 47.↵
    1. Roy F,
    2. Vanterpool E,
    3. Fletcher HM
    . 2006. HtrA in Porphyromonas gingivalis can regulate growth and gingipain activity under stressful environmental conditions. Microbiology 152:3391–3398.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. 48.↵
    1. Saito K,
    2. Sato K
    . 1966. A simple colorimetric estimation of lipids with sodium dichromate. J. Biochem. 59:619–621.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  49. 49.↵
    1. Saitou N,
    2. Nei M
    . 1987. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4:406–425.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  50. 50.↵
    1. Sato K,
    2. et al
    . 2009. Lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis-related genes are required for colony pigmentation of Porphyromonas gingivalis. Microbiology 155:1282–1293.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  51. 51.↵
    1. Schembri MA,
    2. Blom J,
    3. Krogfelt KA,
    4. Klemm P
    . 2005. Capsule and fimbria interaction in Klebsiella pneumoniae. Infect. Immun. 73:4626–4633.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. 52.↵
    1. Schnaitman CA,
    2. Klena JD
    . 1993. Genetics of lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis in enteric bacteria. Microbiol. Rev. 57:655–682.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  53. 53.↵
    1. Shoji M,
    2. et al
    . 2002. Construction and characterization of a nonpigmented mutant of Porphyromonas gingivalis: cell surface polysaccharide as an anchorage for gingipains. Microbiology 148:1183–1191.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  54. 54.↵
    1. Slakeski N,
    2. et al
    . 2011. C-terminal domain residues important for secretion and attachment of RgpB in Porphyromonas gingivalis. J. Bacteriol. 193:132–142.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  55. 55.↵
    1. Smalley JW,
    2. Birss AJ,
    3. Silver J
    . 2000. The periodontal pathogen Porphyromonas gingivalis harnesses the chemistry of the mu-oxo bishaem of iron protoporphyrin IX to protect against hydrogen peroxide. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 183:159–164.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  56. 56.↵
    1. Smalley JW,
    2. Thomas MF,
    3. Birss AJ,
    4. Withnall R,
    5. Silver J
    . 2004. A combination of both arginine- and lysine-specific gingipain activity of Porphyromonas gingivalis is necessary for the generation of the micro-oxo bishaem-containing pigment from haemoglobin. Biochem. J. 379:833–840.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  57. 57.↵
    1. Tamura K,
    2. Dudley J,
    3. Nei M,
    4. Kumar S
    . 2007. MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24:1596–1599.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  58. 58.↵
    1. Tatar LD,
    2. Marolda CL,
    3. Polischuk AN,
    4. van Leeuwen D,
    5. Valvano MA
    . 2007. An Escherichia coli undecaprenyl-pyrophosphate phosphatase implicated in undecaprenyl phosphate recycling. Microbiology 153:2518–2529.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  59. 59.↵
    1. Thao S,
    2. Escalante-Semerena JC
    . 2011. Control of protein function by reversible N(varepsilon)-lysine acetylation in bacteria. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 14:200–204.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  60. 60.↵
    1. Vance DE,
    2. Vance JE
    . 2008. Biochemistry of lipids, lipoproteins and membranes, 5th ed.Elsevier, Oxford, United Kingdom.
  61. 61.↵
    1. Vanterpool E,
    2. Aruni AW,
    3. Roy F,
    4. Fletcher HM
    . 2010. regT can modulate gingipain activity and response to oxidative stress in Porphyromonas gingivalis. Microbiology 156:3065–3072.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  62. 62.↵
    1. Vanterpool E,
    2. Roy F,
    3. Fletcher HM
    . 2005. Inactivation of vimF, a putative glycosyltransferase gene downstream of vimE, alters glycosylation and activation of the gingipains in Porphyromonas gingivalis W83. Infect. Immun. 73:3971–3982.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  63. 63.↵
    1. Vanterpool E,
    2. Roy F,
    3. Sandberg L,
    4. Fletcher HM
    . 2005. Altered gingipain maturation in vimA- and vimE-defective isogenic mutants of Porphyromonas gingivalis. Infect. Immun. 73:1357–1366.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  64. 64.↵
    1. Vanterpool E,
    2. et al
    . 2006. VimA is part of the maturation pathway for the major gingipains of Porphyromonas gingivalis W83. Microbiology 152:3383–3389.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  65. 65.↵
    1. Vriend G
    . 1990. WHAT IF: a molecular modeling and drug design program. J. Mol. Graph. 8:52–56, 29.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  66. 66.↵
    1. Yamaguchi M,
    2. et al
    . 2010. A Porphyromonas gingivalis mutant defective in a putative glycosyltransferase exhibits defective biosynthesis of the polysaccharide portions of lipopolysaccharide, decreased gingipain activities, strong autoaggregation, and increased biofilm formation. Infect. Immun. 78:3801–3812.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  67. 67.↵
    1. Yi EC,
    2. Hackett M
    . 2000. Rapid isolation method for lipopolysaccharide and lipid A from gram-negative bacteria. Analyst 125:651–656.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  68. 68.↵
    1. Yoshimura A,
    2. Kaneko T,
    3. Kato Y,
    4. Golenbock DT,
    5. Hara Y
    . 2002. Lipopolysaccharides from periodontopathic bacteria Porphyromonas gingivalis and Capnocytophaga ochracea are antagonists for human Toll-like receptor 4. Infect. Immun. 70:218–225.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
VimA-Dependent Modulation of Acetyl Coenzyme A Levels and Lipid A Biosynthesis Can Alter Virulence in Porphyromonas gingivalis
A. Wilson Aruni, J. Lee, D. Osbourne, Y. Dou, F. Roy, A. Muthiah, D. S. Boskovic, H. M. Fletcher
Infection and Immunity Jan 2012, 80 (2) 550-564; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.06062-11

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Infection and Immunity article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
VimA-Dependent Modulation of Acetyl Coenzyme A Levels and Lipid A Biosynthesis Can Alter Virulence in Porphyromonas gingivalis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Infection and Immunity
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Infection and Immunity.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
VimA-Dependent Modulation of Acetyl Coenzyme A Levels and Lipid A Biosynthesis Can Alter Virulence in Porphyromonas gingivalis
A. Wilson Aruni, J. Lee, D. Osbourne, Y. Dou, F. Roy, A. Muthiah, D. S. Boskovic, H. M. Fletcher
Infection and Immunity Jan 2012, 80 (2) 550-564; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.06062-11
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About IAI
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #IAIjournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0019-9567; Online ISSN: 1098-5522