Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Infection and Immunity
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Cellular Microbiology: Pathogen-Host Cell Molecular Interactions

The Mycobacterium tuberculosis SecA2 System Subverts Phagosome Maturation To Promote Growth in Macrophages

Jonathan Tabb Sullivan, Ellen F. Young, Jessica R. McCann, Miriam Braunstein
J. L. Flynn, Editor
Jonathan Tabb Sullivan
aDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ellen F. Young
aDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jessica R. McCann
aDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
bDepartment of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Miriam Braunstein
aDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. L. Flynn
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.05987-11
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig 1
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1

    Reversal of the ΔsecA2 mutant apoptosis phenotype does not rescue growth in macrophages or mice. (A) Nonactivated BMDM were infected with the H37Rv, ΔsecA2, ΔsecA2 plus psecA2 (complemented strain), or ΔsecA2 plus α-sodA strain of M. tuberculosis, and intracellular replication was monitored as described in the text. The data shown are plotted on a linear scale and are representative of two experiments; the points represent means of triplicate wells, and the error bars represent standard deviations (SD). *, P < 0.05 by Student's t test. (B) Lung and spleen burdens in mice infected through the aerosol route at an initial dose of ∼200 CFU/lung with H37Rv or the ΔsecA2 or ΔsecA2-plus-α-sodA strain. We determined CFU counts by plating lung or spleen homogenates at various time points for viable bacteria. The data shown are from a single experiment; the bars represent the mean organ burdens from four mice, and the error bars represent SD. *, P < 0.05 by Student's t test. d, day(s); p.i., postinfection.

  • Fig 2
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 2

    M. tuberculosis autofluorescence can be used to identify bacilli by microscopy. The M. tuberculosis strains used in this study carrying a GFP expression plasmid were grown to mid-log phase and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS. The fixed bacteria were loaded into the well of a chambered coverslip and visualized in the CFP and GFP channels on a wide-field fluorescence microscope. Autofluorescence in the CFP channel is compared to GFP fluorescence in strains expressing GFP from a plasmid. The overlap is demonstrated in the merged images, where yellow indicates a positive correlation.

  • Fig 3
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 3

    Compared to H37Rv, the ΔsecA2 mutant is enriched in LysoTracker-positive phagosomes. Nonactivated BMDM were infected with H37Rv, the ΔsecA2, mutant or the complemented strain (A); H37Rv, ΔsecA2, or ΔeccD1 (B); or BCG Pasteur or a ΔsecA2 mutant on the BCG Pasteur background (C). At the indicated times, the slides were stained with LysoTracker and scored for LysoTracker-positive phagosomes, as described in the text. Also shown in panel A are representative images from at least three independent experiments (LT, LysoTracker). The bars represent mean percentages of bacterium-containing phagosomes that stain positive for LysoTracker; The error bars represent SD of three replicate wells, with each well having >100 phagosomes scored. *, P ≤ 0.05 by Student's t test compared to the WT.

  • Fig 4
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 4

    Not all M. tuberculosis mutants with intracellular growth defects are enriched in LysoTracker-positive phagosomes. Nonactivated BMDM were infected with the H37Rv, ΔsecA2, or ΔleuD (A) or H37Rv, ΔsecA2, mce1A::tn, mce2F::tn, or rv0199::tn (B) strain. At the indicated times, the slides were stained with LysoTracker and scored for LysoTracker-positive phagosomes as described in the text. Shown are representative data from at least three independent experiments. The bars represent mean percentages of bacterium-containing phagosomes that stain positive for LysoTracker; the error bars represent SD of three replicate wells. *, P ≤ 0.05 by Student's t test compared to H37Rv.

  • Fig 5
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 5

    Compared to H37Rv, the ΔsecA2 mutant is enriched in phagosomes positive for late endocytic/lysosomal markers. Nonactivated BMDM were infected with H37Rv or the ΔsecA2, complemented ΔsecA2, or ΔeccD1 mutant for 24 h and immunofluorescently stained for markers of phagosome maturation as described in the text. (A) V-ATPase. (B) CD63. (C) Rab7. A representative of three independent experiments is shown. The bars represent mean percentages of bacterium-containing phagosomes that stain positive for marker; the error bars represent SD of three replicate wells, with each well having >100 phagosomes scored. *, P ≤ 0.05 by Student's t test compared to H37Rv. Representative microscopy images for each set of markers are shown.

  • Fig 6
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 6

    MyD88 has no effect on ΔsecA2 mutant phagosome trafficking or intracellular growth. (A) Nonactivated BMDM derived from C57BL/6 or MyD88−/− mice were infected with H37Rv or the ΔsecA2 mutant. At 24 h postinfection, the slides were stained with LysoTracker or antibodies to CD63, Rab7, or V-ATPase and scored for marker-positive bacterium-containing phagosomes as described in the text. The bars represent mean percentages of bacterium-containing phagosomes that stain positive for marker; the error bars represent SD of three replicate wells. n.s., not significant. There are no significant differences between C57BL/6 and MyD88−/− macrophages infected with the ΔsecA2 mutant. (B) Nonactivated BMDM from C57BL/6 (open symbols) or MyD88−/− (closed symbols) mice were infected with H37Rv or the ΔsecA2 mutant, and intracellular replication was monitored as described. The data shown are plotted on a linear scale and are from a representative experiment out of three; the points are means of three replicate wells, and the error bars represent SD. *, P ≤ 0.05 by student's t test compared to H37Rv.

  • Fig 7
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 7

    Growth of the ΔsecA2 mutant is inhibited by phagosome acidification. (A) LysoTracker-positive phagosomes in BMDM infected with H37Rv or the ΔsecA2 mutant and treated with bafilomycin A1 or concanamycin A. Shown are the lowest inhibitor concentrations that bring ΔsecA2 LysoTracker-positive phagosomes to H37Rv levels. ND, not determined. (B) Nonactivated BMDM treated with bafilomycin A1 or vehicle control (DMSO) were infected with H37Rv or the ΔsecA2 or ΔleuD mutant, and intracellular replication was monitored as described. Shown is a representative of four independent experiments. The bars represent the mean fold growth over 5 days of three replicate wells plus SD. *, P < 0.05 by Student's t test. (C) Data from the experiment described in panel B combined with three independent experiments to show the fold effect of bafilomycin A1 on intracellular growth compared to untreated macrophages. The bars represent the mean fold effect of bafilomycin A1 in four individual experiments plus the standard errors of the mean (SEM). *, P < 0.05 by Student's t test compared to H37Rv. (D and E) As in panels B and C, with concanamycin A or DMSO. (D) Shown is a representative of three experiments. (E) The bars represent the mean fold effect of concanamycin in three experiments plus SEM. *, P < 0.05 by Student's t test compared to H37Rv.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Table 1

    Mycobacterium strains used

    StrainDescriptionReference or source
    M. tuberculosis
        H37RvWild typeTrudeau Institute
        mc23112H37Rv ΔsecA26
        MBTB74H37Rv ΔsecA2 attB::secA2This study
        MBTB109H37Rv ΔsecA2 attB::αsodA25, this study
        mc23032H37Rv ΔleuD26
        MBTB3H37Rv ΔeccD1This study
        PM638H37Rv ΔblaC18
        MBTB204PM638; mce1A::tn40
        MBTB156PM638; mce2F::tn40
        MBTB183PM638; rv0199::tn40
        MBTB157H37Rv; gfpThis study
        MBTB158mc23112; gfpThis study
        MBTB159MBTB74; gfpThis study
        MBTB390mc23032; gfpThis study
    M. bovis BCG
        BCG PasteurWild typeStaten Serum Institut
        MB544BCG Pasteur ΔsecA2This study
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
The Mycobacterium tuberculosis SecA2 System Subverts Phagosome Maturation To Promote Growth in Macrophages
Jonathan Tabb Sullivan, Ellen F. Young, Jessica R. McCann, Miriam Braunstein
Infection and Immunity Feb 2012, 80 (3) 996-1006; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.05987-11

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Infection and Immunity article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Mycobacterium tuberculosis SecA2 System Subverts Phagosome Maturation To Promote Growth in Macrophages
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Infection and Immunity
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Infection and Immunity.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
The Mycobacterium tuberculosis SecA2 System Subverts Phagosome Maturation To Promote Growth in Macrophages
Jonathan Tabb Sullivan, Ellen F. Young, Jessica R. McCann, Miriam Braunstein
Infection and Immunity Feb 2012, 80 (3) 996-1006; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.05987-11
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About IAI
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #IAIjournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0019-9567; Online ISSN: 1098-5522