Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Infection and Immunity
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Fungal and Parasitic Infections

Functional Comparison of Plasmodium falciparum Transmission-Blocking Vaccine Candidates by the Standard Membrane-Feeding Assay

Kazutoyo Miura, Eizo Takashima, Bingbing Deng, Gregory Tullo, Ababacar Diouf, Samuel E. Moretz, Daria Nikolaeva, Mahamadou Diakite, Rick M. Fairhurst, Michael P. Fay, Carole A. Long, Takafumi Tsuboi
J. H. Adams, Editor
Kazutoyo Miura
aLaboratory of Malaria and Vector Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eizo Takashima
bDivision of Malaria Research, Proteo-Science Center, Ehime University, Matsuyama, Ehime, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bingbing Deng
aLaboratory of Malaria and Vector Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gregory Tullo
aLaboratory of Malaria and Vector Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ababacar Diouf
aLaboratory of Malaria and Vector Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Samuel E. Moretz
aLaboratory of Malaria and Vector Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daria Nikolaeva
aLaboratory of Malaria and Vector Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mahamadou Diakite
cFaculty of Medicine, Pharmacy and Odontostomatology, University of Bamako, Bamako, Mali
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rick M. Fairhurst
aLaboratory of Malaria and Vector Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael P. Fay
dBiostatistics Research Branch, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carole A. Long
aLaboratory of Malaria and Vector Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Takafumi Tsuboi
bDivision of Malaria Research, Proteo-Science Center, Ehime University, Matsuyama, Ehime, Japan
eVenture Business Laboratory, Ehime University, Matsuyama, Ehime, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. H. Adams
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.01056-13
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Recently, there has been a renewed interest in the development of transmission-blocking vaccines (TBV) against Plasmodium falciparum malaria. While several candidate TBVs have been reported, studies directly comparing them in functional assays are limited. To this end, recombinant proteins of TBV candidates Pfs25, Pfs230, and PfHAP2 were expressed in the wheat germ cell-free expression system. Outbred CD-1 mice were immunized twice with the antigens. Two weeks after the second immunization, IgG levels were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and IgG functionality was assessed by the standard membrane-feeding assay (SMFA) using cultured P. falciparum NF54 gametocytes and Anopheles stephensi mosquitoes. All three recombinant proteins elicited similar levels of antigen-specific IgG judged by ELISA. When IgGs purified from pools of immune serum were tested at 0.75 mg/ml in the SMFA, all three IgGs showed 97 to 100% inhibition in oocyst intensity compared to control IgG. In two additional independent SMFA evaluations, anti-Pfs25, anti-Pfs230, and anti-PfHAP2 IgGs inhibited oocyst intensity in a dose-dependent manner. When all three data sets were analyzed, anti-Pfs25 antibody showed significantly higher inhibition than the other two antibodies (P < 0.001 for both), while there was no significant difference between the other two (P = 0.15). A proportion of plasma samples collected from adults living in an area of malaria endemicity in Mali recognized Pfs230 and PfHAP2. This is the first study showing that the HAP2 protein of P. falciparum can induce transmission-blocking antibody. The current study supports the possibility of using this system for a comparative study with multiple TBV candidates.

INTRODUCTION

Global malaria deaths, mostly caused by Plasmodium falciparum, dropped from an estimated 1.8 million in 2005 to 1.2 million in 2010 (1). This reduction in mortality has been largely attributed to the expanded application of antimalarial drugs, insecticide-treated nets, and indoor insecticide spraying. Due to increased resistance of parasites to antimalarials and of mosquito vectors to insecticides, vaccines and other new control measures will be required to achieve malaria control and elimination. In recent years, there has thus been a renewed interest in the development of transmission-blocking vaccines (TBVs). TBVs are designed to induce antibodies in human hosts against sexual-stage malaria antigens or to antigens found in the mosquito vector. TBV-induced antibodies, which are ingested by Anopheles mosquitoes along with gametocytes in the blood, act by inhibiting parasite development in the mosquito.

The Malaria Eradication Research Agenda (malERA) consultative group recently proposed the concept of a “vaccine that interrupts malaria transmission” (VIMT) (2). In addition to the “classical” TBVs, VIMTs include preerythrocytic and asexual blood stage vaccines that may indirectly reduce parasite transmission. Among the preerythrocytic vaccines, RTS,S/AS01 is the most advanced vaccine, and it has recently been evaluated in a large phase 3 trial in African children. However, the vaccine efficacy in reducing the incidence of clinical malaria in 6- to 12-week-old children over 14 months was only 30% (3), suggesting that additional approaches will be necessary to control malaria.

Of the classical TBV candidates, only P. falciparum surface protein 25 (Pfs25) and the Plasmodium vivax homolog Pvs25 have been tested in phase 1 clinical trials (4, 5). These existing TBV candidates and formulations were not optimal because they induced insufficient levels of functional antibodies in humans and/or showed some safety concerns (the specific antigen-adjuvant combination, not the antigen per se, was thought to cause the adverse reactions) (5). Therefore, further development of effective and safe TBVs is necessary.

The standard membrane-feeding assay (SMFA) has been widely used to assess the transmission-blocking potential of test antibodies. In this assay, a mixture of cultured P. falciparum gametocytes and test antibodies is fed to Anopheles mosquitoes through a membrane-feeding apparatus, and approximately 1 week later the mosquitoes are dissected to enumerate oocysts in their midguts. Multiple antigens have been identified as TBV candidates (reviewed in reference 6); however, few have directly compared them in functional assays, such as the SMFA.

We previously showed that recombinant Pfs25 and Pfs230 proteins, produced in the wheat germ cell-free (WGCF) expression system, could elicit functional antibodies as assessed in the SMFA (7, 8). In the present report, the PfHAP2 recombinant protein was also expressed in the WGCF system, and these three candidates were compared head-to-head by a qualified SMFA (9). The protein of a rodent ortholog, Plasmodium berghei HAP2, has previously shown to induce functional antibody (10), but this is the first study showing the transmission-blocking activity of anti-PfHAP2 antibody in P. falciparum. While all three IgGs showed significant inhibition in the SMFA, the anti-Pfs25 IgG exerted the greatest effect among them.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Construct design and production and purification of recombinant proteins.Amino acid sequences for Pfs25 (amino acids [aa] 24 to 193; PF3D7_1031000), Pfs230 (aa 443 to 1132, Pfs230C; PF3D7_0209000), and PfHAP2 (aa 195 to 684; PF3D7_1014200) were obtained from the NCBI protein database (Table 1). For Pfs25, full-length sequences without the N terminus signal peptide and C-terminal glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor signal sequences were used. For Pfs230, region C (Pfs230C), against which antibodies have been shown to inhibit parasite development, was used (8, 11). For PfHAP2, a region covering the P. berghei ortholog (aa 355 to 609) (10) was used, as the antibody against the fragment of P. berghei HAP2 has been shown to inhibit parasite development (10). The antigen sequences were codon optimized for expression in wheat (GenScript, Piscataway, NJ), and the XhoI restriction site with the start codon at the N terminus and the hexa-histidine tag (His tag) followed by the stop codon and the NotI site was introduced at the C terminus. Each synthetic gene was cloned between the XhoI and NotI sites of the pEU-E01-MCS plasmid, which is designed specifically for the WGCF protein expression system (CellFree Sciences, Matsuyama, Japan). In the case of PfHAP2, the synthetic gene fragment was cloned into pEU-E01-GST vector (CellFree Sciences) between XhoI and NotI sites for the production of the glutathione S-transferase (GST)-fused HAP2 protein. As a control, His-tagged GST (HisGST) was produced using pEU-E01-GST vector without an additional fusion partner.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

Construct design and purification method of the three TBV candidates and control protein expressed in the wheat germ cell-free system

We used the WGCF protein expression system to synthesize recombinant proteins as described previously (7). Pfs25 and Pfs230C recombinant proteins were synthesized and affinity purified using an Ni-Sepharose column (GE Healthcare, Camarillo, CA) and subsequently eluted by imidazole. The GST-fused PfHAP2 and HisGST were captured using glutathione-Sepharose 4B columns (GE Healthcare) and subsequently eluted by glutathione. After affinity purification of Pfs25, Pfs230C, and HisGST, we further applied size exclusion chromatography using a Superdex 200 10/300 GL column (GE Healthcare). The fractions containing the target were pooled.

The recombinant proteins were analyzed by a 12.5% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) under reducing conditions, and the bands were visualized with Coomassie brilliant blue R-250. The protein samples were stored in aliquots at −80°C until used.

Animal immunization.The animal study was performed in compliance with National Institutes of Health (NIH) guidelines and under an Animal Care and Use Committee-approved protocol (LMVR 10E). CD-1 mice (n = 10 per group) were immunized intraperitoneally with 25 μg recombinant protein formulated with Montanide ISA720 (SEPPIC Inc., Fairfield, NJ) on day zero. The mice were then booster-immunized subcutaneously with 10 μg recombinant protein formulated with Montanide ISA720 on day 28. The serum samples were collected on days 0 and 42. Due to a technical problem, two serum samples were not collected on day 42 for one mouse each in the Pfs25 and HisGST groups.

ELISA.The standardized methodology for performing the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) has been described previously (12). The absorbance of each test sample was converted into ELISA units using a standard curve generated by serially diluting the standard in the same plate. The ELISA unit value of a standard was assigned as the reciprocal of the dilution giving an optical density at 405 nm (OD405) of 1 in a standardized assay. The minimal detection level of IgG in this study was 26 ELISA units.

Plasma samples from Malian adults (n = 45) were collected from a study approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Pharmacy and Odontostomatology, University of Bamako, and the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) (13). Individual written informed consent was obtained from all participants. The study is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov, number NCT00669084. American sera (n = 24) were purchased from Interstate Blood Bank, Inc. (Memphis, TN). The Malian and American adult samples were tested at 1:100 dilution, and the direct OD value was used as a final readout, instead of ELISA units. An individual Malian sample with an OD value greater than the mean plus 3 standard deviations (SD) of the pool of American samples was considered a “positive” sample.

IgG purification.IgGs from mouse serum (pooled by antigen group) were purified via protein G affinity chromatography (Pierce, Rockford, IL) according to the manufacturer's instructions and adjusted to a final concentration of 8 mg/ml in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Based on the serum ELISA result, serum samples from individual mice showing titers less than the mean minus 3 SD of the group of mice were excluded from the pool of serum used for IgG purification (one mouse each in the Pfs230C and PfHAP2 groups).

SMFA.The standardized methodology for performing the SMFA has been described previously (9). Briefly, gametocyte cultures (16 to 18 days old) of the P. falciparum NF54 line (initially provided by Steve Hoffman, Sanaria, Rockville, MD) were adjusted to 0.15 to 0.2% stage V gametocytemia at 50% hematocrit. Sixty microliters of a test sample (a defined concentration of purified mouse IgG in 1× PBS) was mixed with 200 μl of the gametocyte mixture, and the final mixture was immediately fed to ∼50 female Anopheles stephensi (Nijmegen strain, 3 to 6 days old) mosquitoes through a membrane-feeding apparatus. Mosquitoes were kept for 8 days and dissected (n = 20 per sample) to enumerate oocysts in their midguts. Only midguts from mosquitoes with any eggs at the time of dissection were analyzed.

Statistical analysis.ELISA units among the three groups were compared by a Kruskal-Wallis test.

Percent inhibition of mean oocyst intensity (PIm) was calculated by the following formula: 100 × [1 − (mean number of oocysts in the test group)/(mean number of oocysts in the HisGST group)], where the confidence interval of the percent inhibition is estimated from the model described below. Similarly, percent inhibition of prevalence (PIp) was calculated as follows: 100 × [1 − (proportion of mosquitoes with any oocysts in the test group)/(proportion of mosquitoes with any oocysts in the HisGST group)].

We used a negative binomial model with zero inflation (14). When there were no observed oocysts in any of the dissected mosquitoes (i.e., the anti-Pfs25 IgG tested at 0.75 mg/ml in the first and second feeding experiments), we changed the oocyst count to 1 for the first of the mosquitoes in that group so the model would converge and give conservative P values and lower confidence limits (but we kept the PIm estimate as 100%). We tested for significance of PIm using that model and for PIp by repeatedly using Fisher's exact test. We used Holm's adjusted P values method (15) to correct for testing significance for five groups (the data from two other groups are not presented in this report, as described in Discussion). To compare the transmission-blocking activities of different IgGs, we modeled the data from three feeding experiments as previously described (9); we estimated the effect for each IgG sample in terms of its square root concentration, and we included random effect for feeds and the membrane feeding apparatuses. Each IgG term was analyzed as to whether it was different from zero to determine the dose-dependent inhibition, and the IgG terms of different groups were compared to test the difference in transmission-blocking activities.

All statistical tests were performed in R (version 2.15.2) or Prism 5 (GraphPad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA). P values of <0.05 were considered significant.

RESULTS

Production and characterization of recombinant proteins.We used the WGCF expression system to synthesize recombinant proteins representing three TBV candidates. The yields and solubilities of all three TBV candidates and HisGST were deemed satisfactory for performing head-to-head comparisons of their transmission-blocking activity. Since the recombinant HisGST, Pfs25, and Pfs230C proteins were purified using affinity chromatography followed by size exclusion chromatography, 12.5% SDS-PAGE resolved these three proteins into single bands of predicted sizes (Fig. 1). On the other hand, since the PfHAP2 purification used affinity chromatography only (because of the low recovery after the size exclusion chromatography), relatively small amounts of low-molecular-mass proteins were visible in the preparation (Fig. 1).

Fig 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1

SDS-PAGE of purified TBV candidates. Recombinant proteins were synthesized in a wheat germ cell-free expression system. Purified fractions of three TBV proteins and one control protein (HisGST) were resolved by 12.5% SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions and stained with Coomassie brilliant blue R-250. Horizontal lines represent molecular mass markers.

Immunogenicity of TBV candidates.CD-1 mice (n = 10 per group) were immunized with Pfs25, Pfs230C, PfHAP2, or the control protein HisGST. On day zero, antibody levels in serum pools from each group of mice were below the limit of detection (<26 ELISA units; data not shown). On day 42, IgG levels in serum samples from each mouse were determined by ELISA. Median IgG levels ranged from 42,308 to 88,255 ELISA units (Fig. 2) and did not differ significantly among the three TBV groups (P = 0.245 by a Kruskal-Wallis test). Since PfHAP2 was expressed as a GST fusion protein, levels of anti-GST IgG were determined for the PfHAP2 group. The median level of anti-GST antibody of the PfHAP2 group was 32,927, while that of the HisGST group was 35,280.

Fig 2
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2

Three TBV candidates are equally immunogenic. CD-1 mice (n = 10 per group) were immunized with Pfs25, Pfs230C, or PfHAP2, and their levels of specific IgG for homologous antigen were determined by ELISA. IgG responses below the limit of detection (26 ELISA units) were assigned a value of 26 ELISA units. Box and whisker plots (10th to 90th percentiles) are shown.

We then tested IgG subclasses for each TBV group on day 42 (Fig. 3). In general, IgG1 responses were predominant in all three TBV groups (Fig. 3). IgG2a and IgG2b responses showed no consistent patterns among TBV groups, despite their exposure to the same adjuvant (Montanide ISA720), and IgG3 responses were uniformly low. On day 42, the median ratios of IgM to total IgG levels were lower than 0.13 in all TBV groups (data not shown).

Fig 3
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 3

IgG responses to TBV candidates are predominantly IgG1. In sera from mice immunized with TBV candidates, the levels of total IgG, IgG1, IgG2a, IgG2b, and IgG3 for homologous antigen were measured by ELISA. For individual sera, the ratio of each IgG subclass response to the total IgG response was calculated. Box and whisker plots (10th to 90th percentiles) are shown.

Transmission-blocking activity of purified IgGs.To determine whether TBV antigen-specific IgGs can block transmission of P. falciparum to mosquitoes, IgGs were purified from sera pooled within each TBV group. P. falciparum NF54 gametocytes were then mixed with purified IgGs (final concentration, 0.75 mg/ml), and the mixture was fed to Anopheles stephensi (Nijmegen strain) mosquitoes. In the control HisGST group, the mean (standard deviation) number of oocysts per mosquito was 14.5 (9.1) and 95% (19/20) of mosquitoes had oocysts (Table 2). The percent inhibitions of mean oocyst intensity (PIm) and the 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were 100 (98 to 100), 98 (95 to 99), and 97 (94 to 99) for the Pfs25, Pfs230C, and PfHAP2 groups, respectively. The three groups also showed significant reduction in prevalence (Holm's adjusted P < 0.001 for all by Fisher's test) compared to the HisGST group.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2

Transmission-blocking activities of pooled IgGs from mice immunized with TBV candidatesa

Since the three IgGs had shown functional activity at 0.75 mg/ml in the first SMFA, two additional SMFAs were performed (Fig. 4). IgGs were tested at 0.75, 0.15, and 0.03 mg/ml in the second SMFA and at 0.75, 0.38, 0.19, and 0.09 mg/ml in the third SMFA. When the square root of total IgG level was plotted against the ratio of the mean oocyst count in control and test samples (log scale), the data showed an approximate linear relationship (Fig. 4), as seen previously for an anti-Pfs25 monoclonal antibody (9). While all three anti-TBV IgGs showed significant dose-dependent inhibition in SMFA (Holm's adjusted P < 0.001 for all), anti-Pfs25 IgGs showed significantly higher inhibition than anti-Pfs230C and anti-PfHAP2 IgGs (Holm's adjusted P < 0.001 for both). Anti-Pfs230C and anti-PfHAP2 IgGs showed no significant difference in transmission-blocking activity (Holm's adjusted or unadjusted P = 0.17). These data indicate that Pfs25 elicits the most effective IgG response of the three TBV candidates expressed in the WGCF system.

Fig 4
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 4

Dose-dependent inhibition of oocyst formation by anti-TBV IgGs in the SMFA. Purified anti-Pfs25, anti-Pfs230C, and anti-PfHAP2 IgGs were tested at 0.75 mg/ml in the first SMFA, at 0.75, 0.15, and 0.03 mg/ml in the second SMFA, and at 0.75, 0.38, 0.19, and 0.09 mg/ml in the third SMFA. Mean oocyst numbers of anti-HisGST IgG tested at 0.75 mg/ml (14.5, 15.2, and 48.6 oocysts per mosquito in the first, second, and third SMFAs, respectively) were used as controls. The square root of total IgG level is shown on the x axis. The ratios of mean oocyst counts in control and test samples are plotted on a log scale along the left y axis, and the associated PIm value is plotted along the right y axis. Data points from the same SMFA are connected by dotted lines for the second and third SMFAs.

IgG responses to three TBV candidates in malaria-exposed Malian adults.Finally, we tested whether naturally acquired antibodies in malaria-exposed Malian adults recognized the three TBV candidates that successfully induced transmission-blocking IgGs in mice. As expected, Malian adult IgGs, except 1 (2%) of 45 tested, do not recognize Pfs25 (Fig. 5A), which is not expressed by gametocytes in humans (16). On the other hand, 23 (51%) and 13 (29%) samples recognized Pfs230C (Fig. 5B) and PfHAP2 (Fig. 5C), respectively. These data suggest that not only Pfs230 but also the PfHAP2 antigen is also expressed by gametocytes in humans.

Fig 5
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 5

IgG responses to three TBV candidates in malaria-exposed Malian adults. Malian adult plasma samples (n = 45) and U.S. adult sera (n = 24) were tested at 1:100 dilution in ELISA. Reverse cumulative distribution plots of Malian samples are shown for Pfs25 (A), Pfs230C (B), and PfHAP2 (C). The dotted line in each panel represents the OD value of the mean plus 3 SD of U.S. adult plasma samples for each protein.

DISCUSSION

While several studies have identified TBV candidates, few have directly compared them in functional assays. To this end, recombinant proteins of TBV candidates Pfs25, Pfs230C, and PfHAP2 were expressed in the WGCF system and tested head-to-head in SMFAs for their ability to induce transmission-blocking antibodies in mice. This is the first study showing that the HAP2 protein of P. falciparum (like the HAP2 homolog of P. berghei) can induce transmission-blocking antibodies. When the anti-Pfs25, anti-Pfs230C, and anti-PfHAP2 IgGs were compared, the anti-Pfs25 IgG showed the highest inhibition in SMFA.

In our recent attempt to express cDNA clones from P. falciparum sporozoites, merozoites, and gametocytes in a high-throughput WGCF system, we found that 84% of them (478/567) yielded soluble protein products (17). Additional work revealed that the WGCF expression system achieves a higher yield of full-length proteins than does an Escherichia coli-based cell-free system (18). Moreover, our success in identifying novel malaria vaccine candidates (7, 8, 19, 20) suggests that recombinant proteins produced in the WGCF system are able to adopt the proper conformations and display the same antigenic epitopes (maybe not all, but at least some of the epitopes) as their native counterparts. Therefore, we believe that the proteins expressed by the WGCF system are preferable for proper assessment and identification of a very large number of immunodominant malaria vaccine candidate antigens. Since the WGCF system can generate a great variety of vaccine candidate antigens and produce large quantities of soluble proteins in a very short time, we decided to use this system in the present study.

SMFA is one of a few biological assays that are widely used to assess the transmission-blocking potential of test antibodies in both preclinical and clinical vaccine development. As currently performed, however, the assay has relatively large intra- and interassay variability, especially when antibodies with relatively weak transmission-blocking activity (i.e., less than 80% inhibition) are tested (9). Since it is impossible to achieve more than 100% inhibition, by definition, the dynamic range of this assay is only 80 to 100% inhibition. Consequently, multiple SMFAs using multiple antibody concentrations may be required to evaluate whether one test antibody is better than another, as performed in this study. Since the dynamic range of the SMFA readouts is narrow, we did not test for additive or synergistic effects between transmission-blocking IgGs in this study. Demonstrating significant additive or synergistic effects, given the assay's variability, is likely to be difficult, unless the effect is very strong or the same IgGs (and a combination of IgGs) are tested in multiple feeds. Further studies to evaluate whether immunization with a mixture of these antigens induces more-effective IgG responses than immunization with a single antigen are anticipated.

One significant limitation of SMFA-based studies is that the transmission-blocking activity measured by SMFA has not been shown to predict TBV efficacy in the field—either at individual or at population levels, since none of the TBV has reached a phase 3 clinical trial to evaluate field efficacy. However, no alternative biological assays, other than direct membrane-feeding assay (where patient blood instead of cultured parasites is the source of gametocytes for the SMFA), are available for preclinical TBV development at this time. Therefore, we believe head-to-head comparisons of transmission-blocking activity using the SMFA are valuable approaches for comparison of multiple TBV candidates. There is a limitation also in the WGCF system. We originally planned to compare five leading TBV candidates, including Pfs48/45 and anopheline alanyl aminopeptidase N (AnAPN1), both of which are potential TBV candidates (21, 22). While both antigens were solubly expressed and equally immunogenic as judged by ELISA, we observed no inhibition in SMFA using antibodies to both candidates under the same study conditions: PIm were −42 (P = 0.129) and −6 (P = 0.755) for the Pfs48/45 and AnAPN1 groups, respectively, when the IgGs were tested at 0.75 mg/ml in a single feeding experiment. Since the original statistical analytic plan was to test five groups, in this report we are presenting Holm's corrected P values for five groups, which are more-conservative estimates. Although there are several possible explanations for the discrepancy from the previous studies, one is that properly folded proteins may not have been efficiently produced in this system. Some modification in the WGCF expression system may be required for certain proteins.

In summary, recombinant Pfs25, Pfs230C, and PfHAP2 proteins expressed in the WGCF system induced functional antibodies in mice. Among these proteins, Pfs25 elicited the highest levels of transmission-blocking antibody. These SMFA results support further development of the TBV candidates.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Andre Laughinghouse, Kevin Lee, Tovi Lehmann, and Robert Gwadz for insectary support. We are very grateful to the Malian adults who provided plasma samples and to Jennifer Anderson, Saibou Doumbia, and Dick Sakai for protocol support in Mali.

This study was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, NIH, the PATH Malaria Vaccine Initiative, and MEXT KAKENHI (23117008) and JSPS KAKENHI (23406007) in Japan.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 23 August 2013.
    • Accepted 5 September 2013.
    • Accepted manuscript posted online 16 September 2013.
  • Copyright © 2013, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Murray CJ,
    2. Rosenfeld LC,
    3. Lim SS,
    4. Andrews KG,
    5. Foreman KJ,
    6. Haring D,
    7. Fullman N,
    8. Naghavi M,
    9. Lozano R,
    10. Lopez AD
    . 2012. Global malaria mortality between 1980 and 2010: a systematic analysis. Lancet 379:413–431.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    The malERA Consultative Group on Vaccines. 2011. A research agenda for malaria eradication: vaccines. PLoS Med. 8:e1000398. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000398.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Agnandji ST,
    2. Lell B,
    3. Fernandes JF,
    4. Abossolo BP,
    5. Methogo BG,
    6. Kabwende AL,
    7. Adegnika AA,
    8. Mordmuller B,
    9. Issifou S,
    10. Kremsner PG,
    11. Sacarlal J,
    12. Aide P,
    13. Lanaspa M,
    14. Aponte JJ,
    15. Machevo S,
    16. Acacio S,
    17. Bulo H,
    18. Sigauque B,
    19. Macete E,
    20. Alonso P,
    21. Abdulla S,
    22. Salim N,
    23. Minja R,
    24. Mpina M,
    25. Ahmed S,
    26. Ali AM,
    27. Mtoro AT,
    28. Hamad AS,
    29. Mutani P,
    30. Tanner M,
    31. Tinto H,
    32. D'Alessandro U,
    33. Sorgho H,
    34. Valea I,
    35. Bihoun B,
    36. Guiraud I,
    37. Kabore B,
    38. Sombie O,
    39. Guiguemde RT,
    40. Ouedraogo JB,
    41. Hamel MJ,
    42. Kariuki S,
    43. Oneko M,
    44. Odero C,
    45. Otieno K,
    46. Awino N,
    47. McMorrow M,
    48. Muturi-Kioi V,
    49. Laserson KF,
    50. Slutsker L,
    51. Otieno W,
    52. Otieno L,
    53. Otsyula N,
    54. Gondi S,
    55. Otieno A,
    56. Owira V,
    57. Oguk E,
    58. Odongo G,
    59. Woods JB,
    60. Ogutu B,
    61. Njuguna P,
    62. Chilengi R,
    63. Akoo P,
    64. Kerubo C,
    65. Maingi C,
    66. Lang T,
    67. Olotu A,
    68. Bejon P,
    69. Marsh K,
    70. Mwambingu G,
    71. Owusu-Agyei S,
    72. Asante KP,
    73. Osei-Kwakye K,
    74. Boahen O,
    75. Dosoo D,
    76. Asante I,
    77. Adjei G,
    78. Kwara E,
    79. Chandramohan D,
    80. Greenwood B,
    81. Lusingu J,
    82. Gesase S,
    83. Malabeja A,
    84. Abdul O,
    85. Mahende C,
    86. Liheluka E,
    87. Malle L,
    88. Lemnge M,
    89. Theander TG,
    90. Drakeley C,
    91. Ansong D,
    92. Agbenyega T,
    93. Adjei S,
    94. Boateng HO,
    95. Rettig T,
    96. Bawa J,
    97. Sylverken J,
    98. Sambian D,
    99. Sarfo A,
    100. Agyekum A,
    101. Martinson F,
    102. Hoffman I,
    103. Mvalo T,
    104. Kamthunzi P,
    105. Nkomo R,
    106. Tembo T,
    107. Tegha G,
    108. Tsidya M,
    109. Kilembe J,
    110. Chawinga C,
    111. Ballou WR,
    112. Cohen J,
    113. Guerra Y,
    114. Jongert E,
    115. Lapierre D,
    116. Leach A,
    117. Lievens M,
    118. Ofori-Anyinam O,
    119. Olivier A,
    120. Vekemans J,
    121. Carter T,
    122. Kaslow D,
    123. Leboulleux D,
    124. Loucq C,
    125. Radford A,
    126. Savarese B,
    127. Schellenberg D,
    128. Sillman M,
    129. Vansadia P
    . 2012. A phase 3 trial of RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine in African infants. N. Engl. J. Med. 367:2284–2295.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    1. Malkin EM,
    2. Durbin AP,
    3. Diemert DJ,
    4. Sattabongkot J,
    5. Wu Y,
    6. Miura K,
    7. Long CA,
    8. Lambert L,
    9. Miles AP,
    10. Wang J,
    11. Stowers A,
    12. Miller LH,
    13. Saul A
    . 2005. Phase 1 vaccine trial of Pvs25H: a transmission blocking vaccine for Plasmodium vivax malaria. Vaccine 23:3131–3138.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    1. Wu Y,
    2. Ellis RD,
    3. Shaffer D,
    4. Fontes E,
    5. Malkin EM,
    6. Mahanty S,
    7. Fay MP,
    8. Narum D,
    9. Rausch K,
    10. Miles AP,
    11. Aebig J,
    12. Orcutt A,
    13. Muratova O,
    14. Song G,
    15. Lambert L,
    16. Zhu D,
    17. Miura K,
    18. Long C,
    19. Saul A,
    20. Miller LH,
    21. Durbin AP
    . 2008. Phase 1 trial of malaria transmission blocking vaccine candidates Pfs25 and Pvs25 formulated with montanide ISA 51. PLoS One 3:e2636. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002636.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Pradel G
    . 2007. Proteins of the malaria parasite sexual stages: expression, function and potential for transmission blocking strategies. Parasitology 134:1911–1929.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    1. Tsuboi T,
    2. Takeo S,
    3. Iriko H,
    4. Jin L,
    5. Tsuchimochi M,
    6. Matsuda S,
    7. Han ET,
    8. Otsuki H,
    9. Kaneko O,
    10. Sattabongkot J,
    11. Udomsangpetch R,
    12. Sawasaki T,
    13. Torii M,
    14. Endo Y
    . 2008. Wheat germ cell-free system-based production of malaria proteins for discovery of novel vaccine candidates. Infect. Immun. 76:1702–1708.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Tachibana M,
    2. Wu Y,
    3. Iriko H,
    4. Muratova O,
    5. Macdonald NJ,
    6. Sattabongkot J,
    7. Takeo S,
    8. Otsuki H,
    9. Torii M,
    10. Tsuboi T
    . 2011. N-terminal pro-domain of Pfs230 synthesized using cell-free system is sufficient to induce the complement dependent malaria transmission-blocking activity. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 18:1343–1350.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Miura K,
    2. Deng B,
    3. Tullo G,
    4. Diouf A,
    5. Moretz SE,
    6. Locke E,
    7. Morin M,
    8. Fay MP,
    9. Long CA
    . 2013. Qualification of standard membrane-feeding assay with Plasmodium falciparum malaria and potential improvements for future assays. PLoS One 8:e57909. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0057909.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Blagborough AM,
    2. Sinden RE
    . 2009. Plasmodium berghei HAP2 induces strong malaria transmission-blocking immunity in vivo and in vitro. Vaccine 27:5187–5194.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Williamson KC,
    2. Keister DB,
    3. Muratova O,
    4. Kaslow DC
    . 1995. Recombinant Pfs230, a Plasmodium falciparum gametocyte protein, induces antisera that reduce the infectivity of Plasmodium falciparum to mosquitoes. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 75:33–42.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    1. Miura K,
    2. Orcutt AC,
    3. Muratova OV,
    4. Miller LH,
    5. Saul A,
    6. Long CA
    . 2008. Development and characterization of a standardized ELISA including a reference serum on each plate to detect antibodies induced by experimental malaria vaccines. Vaccine 26:193–200.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    1. Singh K,
    2. Gitti RK,
    3. Diouf A,
    4. Zhou H,
    5. Gowda DC,
    6. Miura K,
    7. Ostazeski SA,
    8. Fairhurst RM,
    9. Garboczi DN,
    10. Long CA
    . 2010. Subdomain 3 of Plasmodium falciparum VAR2CSA DBL3X is identified as a minimal chondroitin sulfate A binding region. J. Biol. Chem. 285:24855–24862.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Skaug H,
    2. Fournier D,
    3. Nielsen A,
    4. Magnusson A,
    5. Bolker B
    . 2012. Generalized linear mixed models using AD Model Builder. The glmmADMB R package version 0.7.3.
  15. 15.↵
    1. Wright SP
    . 1992. Adjusted p-values for simultaneous inference. Biometrics 48:1005–1013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    1. Kaslow DC,
    2. Quakyi IA,
    3. Syin C,
    4. Raum MG,
    5. Keister DB,
    6. Coligan JE,
    7. McCutchan TF,
    8. Miller LH
    . 1988. A vaccine candidate from the sexual stage of human malaria that contains EGF-like domains. Nature 333:74–76.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. 17.↵
    1. Tsuboi T,
    2. Takeo S,
    3. Arumugam TU,
    4. Otsuki H,
    5. Torii M
    . 2010. The wheat germ cell-free protein synthesis system: a key tool for novel malaria vaccine candidate discovery. Acta Trop. 114:171–176.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Rui E,
    2. Fernandez-Becerra C,
    3. Takeo S,
    4. Sanz S,
    5. Lacerda MV,
    6. Tsuboi T,
    7. del Portillo HA
    . 2011. Plasmodium vivax: comparison of immunogenicity among proteins expressed in the cell-free systems of Escherichia coli and wheat germ by suspension array assays. Malar. J. 10:192. doi:10.1186/1475-2875-10-192.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Arumugam TU,
    2. Takeo S,
    3. Yamasaki T,
    4. Thonkukiatkul A,
    5. Miura K,
    6. Otsuki H,
    7. Zhou H,
    8. Long CA,
    9. Sattabongkot J,
    10. Thompson J,
    11. Wilson DW,
    12. Beeson JG,
    13. Healer J,
    14. Crabb BS,
    15. Cowman AF,
    16. Torii M,
    17. Tsuboi T
    . 2011. Discovery of GAMA, a Plasmodium falciparum merozoite micronemal protein, as a novel blood-stage vaccine candidate antigen. Infect. Immun. 79:4523–4532.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Sakamoto H,
    2. Takeo S,
    3. Maier AG,
    4. Sattabongkot J,
    5. Cowman AF,
    6. Tsuboi T
    . 2012. Antibodies against a Plasmodium falciparum antigen PfMSPDBL1 inhibit merozoite invasion into human erythrocytes. Vaccine 30:1972–1980.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. 21.↵
    1. Chowdhury DR,
    2. Angov E,
    3. Kariuki T,
    4. Kumar N
    . 2009. A potent malaria transmission blocking vaccine based on codon harmonized full length Pfs48/45 expressed in Escherichia coli. PLoS One 4:e6352. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0006352.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Dinglasan RR,
    2. Kalume DE,
    3. Kanzok SM,
    4. Ghosh AK,
    5. Muratova O,
    6. Pandey A,
    7. Jacobs-Lorena M
    . 2007. Disruption of Plasmodium falciparum development by antibodies against a conserved mosquito midgut antigen. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104:13461–13466.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Functional Comparison of Plasmodium falciparum Transmission-Blocking Vaccine Candidates by the Standard Membrane-Feeding Assay
Kazutoyo Miura, Eizo Takashima, Bingbing Deng, Gregory Tullo, Ababacar Diouf, Samuel E. Moretz, Daria Nikolaeva, Mahamadou Diakite, Rick M. Fairhurst, Michael P. Fay, Carole A. Long, Takafumi Tsuboi
Infection and Immunity Nov 2013, 81 (12) 4377-4382; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.01056-13

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Infection and Immunity article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Functional Comparison of Plasmodium falciparum Transmission-Blocking Vaccine Candidates by the Standard Membrane-Feeding Assay
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Infection and Immunity
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Infection and Immunity.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Functional Comparison of Plasmodium falciparum Transmission-Blocking Vaccine Candidates by the Standard Membrane-Feeding Assay
Kazutoyo Miura, Eizo Takashima, Bingbing Deng, Gregory Tullo, Ababacar Diouf, Samuel E. Moretz, Daria Nikolaeva, Mahamadou Diakite, Rick M. Fairhurst, Michael P. Fay, Carole A. Long, Takafumi Tsuboi
Infection and Immunity Nov 2013, 81 (12) 4377-4382; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.01056-13
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About IAI
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #IAIjournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0019-9567; Online ISSN: 1098-5522