Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Infection and Immunity
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Molecular Pathogenesis

Ferric Uptake Regulator and Its Role in the Pathogenesis of Nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae

Alistair Harrison, Estevan A. Santana, Blake R. Szelestey, David E. Newsom, Peter White, Kevin M. Mason
S. M. Payne, Editor
Alistair Harrison
The Center for Microbial Pathogenesis, The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, The Center for Microbial Interface Biology, and Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Estevan A. Santana
The Center for Microbial Pathogenesis, The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, The Center for Microbial Interface Biology, and Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Blake R. Szelestey
The Center for Microbial Pathogenesis, The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, The Center for Microbial Interface Biology, and Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David E. Newsom
The Center for Microbial Pathogenesis, The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, The Center for Microbial Interface Biology, and Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter White
The Center for Microbial Pathogenesis, The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, The Center for Microbial Interface Biology, and Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kevin M. Mason
The Center for Microbial Pathogenesis, The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, The Center for Microbial Interface Biology, and Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. M. Payne
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.01227-12
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae (NTHi) is a commensal microorganism of the human nasopharynx, and yet is also an opportunistic pathogen of the upper and lower respiratory tracts. Host microenvironments influence gene expression patterns, likely critical for NTHi persistence. The host sequesters iron as a mechanism to control microbial growth, and yet iron limitation influences gene expression and subsequent production of proteins involved in iron homeostasis. Careful regulation of iron uptake, via the ferric uptake regulator Fur, is essential in multiple bacteria, including NTHi. We hypothesized therefore that Fur contributes to iron homeostasis in NTHi, is critical for bacterial persistence, and likely regulates expression of virulence factors. Toward this end, fur was deleted in the prototypic NTHi clinical isolate, 86-028NP, and we assessed gene expression regulated by Fur. As expected, expression of the majority of genes that encode proteins with predicted roles in iron utilization was repressed by Fur. However, 14 Fur-regulated genes encode proteins with no known function, and yet may contribute to iron utilization or other biological functions. In a mammalian model of human otitis media, we determined that Fur was critical for bacterial persistence, indicating an important role for Fur-mediated iron homeostasis in disease progression. These data provide a profile of genes regulated by Fur in NTHi and likely identify additional regulatory pathways involved in iron utilization. Identification of such pathways will increase our understanding of how this pathogen can persist within host microenvironments, as a common commensal and, importantly, as a pathogen with significant clinical impact.

INTRODUCTION

Most bacteria have an absolute requirement for extracellular sources of iron. Although iron and heme are limited within the host, bacteria are able to grow in these iron-restricted environments due to the activity of uptake mechanisms with great avidity for iron-containing moieties (1). Tight regulation of iron uptake and utilization is critical for bacterial survival. Excess iron, however, is highly toxic to a bacterium, particularly as a consequence of oxidative stress. Free iron facilitates production of toxic hydroxyl radicals via the Fenton reaction which are produced endogenously and by the host (2, 3).

The ferric uptake regulator, Fur, was originally described as an iron-responsive repressor of transcription of genes involved in iron import (4). Under high-iron conditions, Fur, along with the corepressor Fe(II), binds to a conserved DNA sequence (Fur box) upstream of a regulated gene and inhibits binding of RNA polymerase to prevent transcription. Upon decrease in iron levels, Fe(II) releases from Fur, Fur dissociates from the promoter region, and transcription is initiated (5). There are, however, multiple examples of a lack of correlation between Fur-dependent regulation of gene expression and the presence of a consensus Fur box (6–9). In addition, Fur-dependent positive regulation of gene expression can occur indirectly through small RNAs (sRNAs) such as RyhB, PrrF, or NrrF (10–12). Although primarily described to function in iron homeostasis, Fur-dependent gene regulation extends beyond transcriptional repression of genes involved in iron import. Fur increases transcription of genes involved in more diverse biological roles, such as resistance to oxidative stress, pH homeostasis, quorum sensing, type III secretion, and chemotaxis (5, 9, 13, 14). Further, not all iron utilization genes are regulated by Fur, suggesting that additional mechanisms of regulation of iron utilization remain undiscovered.

Nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae (NTHi) is a major cause of otitis media (OM), sinusitis, and exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and bronchitis, among others (15). Normally, a commensal resident in the nasopharynx, NTHi can be displaced from this commensal niche and cause disease. Since iron availability is restricted by the host (16), we hypothesized that the control of expression of genes with roles in iron import would be critical for NTHi persistence.

The uptake of iron and iron-containing moieties is essential for Haemophilus, which lacks the ability to synthesize heme (17, 18). The fur gene has been identified in Haemophilus strain Rd, the biogroup aegyptius strain F3031, and the prototypical NTHi strain, 86-028NP (19–21). Moreover, strain 86-028NP contains multiple genes that encode proteins with putative roles in the uptake of iron-containing moieties (20). These iron and heme uptake systems appear to overlap functionally, implying either subtle differences in specificity, or the importance of redundant systems for this critical function.

Since regulation of iron uptake and utilization is essential for NTHi survival, we sought to globally define the Fur regulon in NTHi. We used both microarray and proteomic analyses to show that a number of classic iron utilization proteins are regulated by Fur. In addition, Fur was shown to regulate expression of multiple genes that encode proteins annotated as having hypothetical functions. In an experimental model of human otitis media, we demonstrated that Fur contributes to long-term survival in vivo. Defining the regulatory mechanisms that equip NTHi to persist in host microenvironments will be important to better understand Haemophilus biology and to design rational strategies to combat and/or prevent disease caused by NTHi.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains and culture media used.Strains and plasmids used are listed in Table 1. NTHi strain 86-028NP, recovered from the nasopharynx of a child with chronic OM, has been well characterized both in vitro (22, 23) and in chinchilla models of OM (24, 25). The genome sequence has been published (20).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

Bacterial strains and plasmids

For routine culturing, strains were grown on chocolate II agar plates (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA). The 86-028NPΔfur::Tn903(pTS-fur) strain in which fur could be overexpressed was cultured on chocolate agar plates containing 200 μg of spectinomycin/ml. For routine liquid culture, all cells were grown in BHI supplemented with 2 μg of NAD/ml and 2 μg of heme/ml (sBHI). Alternatively, cells were grown in an iron-depleted defined iron source (DIS) medium, a modification of a defined medium developed by Hasan et al. and Coleman et al. (26, 27) and previously used for culture of strain 86-028NP (28). As needed, DIS medium was supplemented with human hemoglobin at a concentration of 10 μg/ml of medium. Cells were iron depleted by growing at 37°C for 16 h in DIS medium. Iron-depleted cells were then transferred to DIS medium supplemented with 10 μg of human hemoglobin/ml and grown at 37°C with shaking at 50 rpm.

To analyze transcriptional responses to changes in iron concentration, bacteria were grown to mid-log phase in DIS medium supplemented with 10 μg of human hemoglobin/ml, as previously outlined. Cultures were then split into two and 2,2′-bipyridine added, at a final concentration of 500 μM, to one aliquot (29). After 15 min at 37°C with shaking at 50 rpm, the cells were removed from both aliquots for RNA purification. Cells were also removed from both aliquots for plating to determine that chelation was not affecting cell viability.

Construction of a strain 86-028NPΔfur::Tn903 mutant.The chloramphenicol resistance gene in pKD3 (30) was excised with SwaI and PvuII and replaced with the HincII fragment from Tn903, which contains a kanamycin resistance gene, to generate pKD3kan. Bipartite PCR primers were designed. Primer 1 contained 19 bp of homology to the P1 binding site adjacent to the FLP recognition target (FRT) site 3′ of the kanamycin resistance gene and a second region of 51 bp, homologous to the intergenic region upstream of fur, as well as the 3′ end of the upstream gene, fldA. Primer 2 had 17 bp of homology to the P2 binding site adjacent to the FRT site 5′ of the kanamycin resistance gene, and a second region of 52 bp, homologous to the 3′ 24 bp of fur, as well as the adjacent 3′ intergenic region downstream of fur. Using these two primers, the kanamycin resistance gene from pKD3kan was amplified. The resulting PCR product and a cosmid-size clone of strain 86-028NP DNA that contained the fur gene were simultaneously transformed into the recombineering Escherichia coli strain DY380, previously incubated at 42°C to inactivate the temperature-sensitive repressor cI857. This allowed expression of the recombination genes exo, bet, and gam to facilitate recombination of the kanamycin gene-containing PCR product into the cosmid-sized clone. The fur gene was thus deleted. The construct was then purified from strain DY380, and the region surrounding the deleted fur gene was amplified by PCR. The amplicon was transformed into strain 86-028NP using the MIV method (31). fur mutants were selected on a gradient of heme derived by pouring a slope of GC agar supplemented with 2 μg of heme/ml, 2 μg of β-NAD/ml, and 20 μg of kanamycin/ml, overlaid with a flat surface of GC agar supplemented with 2 μg of β-NAD/ml and 20 μg of kanamycin/ml. The identity of the fur mutant was confirmed by PCR and sequencing.

Construction of marked strains.To distinguish strains in a competition model of experimental OM, 86-028NP and 86-028NPΔfur::Tn903 were marked. 86-028NP was transformed with pGZRS-39A, a Haemophilus-Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae shuttle vector that contains the kanamycin resistance gene from Tn903 (32). 86-028NPΔfur::Tn903 was transformed with pSPEC1, a variant of pGZRS-39A, in which the kanamycin resistance gene was replaced by a spectinomycin resistance gene (28). The number of parental cells and the number of fur mutant cells could thus be enumerated in a mix of strains by plating an aliquot of cells on chocolate agar plates which contained 200 μg of spectinomycin/ml and a second aliquot on chocolate plates which contained 20 μg of kanamycin/ml. The numbers of kanamycin-resistant cells and the numbers of spectinomycin-resistant cells were approximately equal to the total number of viable cells within each effusion. Plasmids could also be purified from cells isolated from effusions (data not shown). The plasmids were thus maintained in vivo. These observations confirmed data that showed pGZRS-39A is stably maintained by strain 86-028NP during experimentally induced OM in chinchillas (25, 33).

Overexpression of fur in the 86-028NPΔfur::Tn903 mutant.fur was overexpressed from pTS, a tetracycline-inducible E. coli-Haemophilus shuttle vector, which was constructed as follows. A 788-bp region containing the tet repressor/promoter of pRSM2947 (34) was amplified with primers that contained an engineered SpeI restriction site at the 5′ end of the tet repressor/promoter. A 303-bp region of the multiple cloning site (MCS) from the pET-30b expression vector (EMD Chemicals, San Diego, CA) was excised with XbaI and BlpI. The tet repressor/promoter fragment and the MCS-containing fragment were then ligated via the XbaI/SpeI compatible ends. The ends of the resulting construct were blunted and phosphorylated with an End-It DNA End-Repair kit (Epicentre, Madison, WI), cloned into pSMART-LCKan (Lucigen, Middleton, WI), and transformed into the E. cloni strain of E. coli (Lucigen). To maintain a unique NdeI site in the MCS, site-directed mutagenesis was used to mutate the NdeI site at the 3′ end of tetR. This resulted in a single point mutation, which changed the fourth A of the NdeI site to T and did not alter the encoded amino acid sequence. The 1.2-kb fragment containing the spectinomycin gene was excised from pSpecR by BamHI restriction digest and cloned into the BamHI site of the MCS. The region of DNA, which included the tet promoter/repressor, MCS, and spectinomycin resistance gene flanked by terminators from within the pSMART-LCKan vector backbone, was PCR amplified. The PCR amplicon was then ligated to a fragment of pLS88 (35, 36), a broad-range vector that replicates in Haemophilus, as follows. The origin of replication and kanamycin resistance gene of pLS88, was PCR amplified with primers designed with 5′ BamHI restriction sites. The pLS88 amplicon was digested with BamHI (Fermentas, Glen Burnie, MD), and the ends were blunted and phosphorylated with the End-It DNA End-Repair kit and ligated with the blunt-ended PCR product containing the tet promoter and spectinomycin resistance gene from the pSMART-based construct. The resultant construct was transformed into H. influenzae Rd KW20. Plasmids were prepared from transformants that exhibited both kanamycin and spectinomycin resistance and characterized by restriction analysis. The spectinomycin resistance gene was removed from the construct by BamHI digestion and the construct was then self-ligated. Finally, site-directed mutagenesis was used to remove a NotI site in the pLS88 backbone. The resultant plasmid was named pT. To generate pT-fur, the coding sequence of fur was PCR amplified with primers that generated an NdeI site 5′ of fur and a BamHI site 3′ of fur. fur was then cloned between NdeI and BamHI in pT. In the course of these studies, it was then necessary to reintroduce the spectinomycin resistance gene back into pT. PCR primers containing BglII restriction sites were used to amplify pT-fur without the Tn903 cassette. The spectinomycin resistance gene from pSPECR (37) was then excised using BglII and ligated to the pTΔTn903-fur fragment. The ligation product was transformed into electrocompetent DH10B (Invitrogen), and transformants selected on LB agar containing 50 μg of spectinomycin/ml. The resulting pTS-fur construct was then transformed into the 86-028NPΔfur::Tn903 mutant by electroporation, and transformants were selected on chocolate agar containing 200 μg of spectinomycin/ml.

RNA isolation.Strains were grown statically for 16 h at 37°C in DIS medium. Cells were then diluted into DIS medium supplemented with 10 μg of human hemoglobin/ml and grown for four generations at 37°C in air with shaking at 50 rpm. Ten-milliliter aliquots of cells were removed and pelleted at 4°C for 15 min at 3,220 × g and RNA purified using TRIzol reagent (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY) as outlined in Mason et al. (25). The RNA concentration was determined using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Products, Wilmington, DE), and each sample was carefully analyzed for integrity using an Agilent 2100 bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) to confirm the absence of degraded RNA. Only samples that passed this initial quality control were used in subsequent analyses.

Array manufacturing.Expression analyses were performed using custom arrays printed commercially by Agilent Technologies. Agilent's SurePrint technology uses phosphoramadite chemistry in combination with high-performance Hewlett-Packard inkjet technology for in situ synthesis of 60-mer oligonucleotides. Using Agilent eArray, a strain 86-028NP custom microarray was designed that contained probes for every known open reading frame (ORF). Each ORF was represented by three probes to ensure complete coverage of each transcript. The SurePrint technology prints eight arrays, with 15,000 elements per array, on a single slide, ensuring low technical variability across samples in a given experiment.

Hybridization procedures, data processing, and analysis.Array hybridizations were performed by the Biomedical Genomics Core facility, The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital (http://genomics.nchresearch.org/). Four sets of biological replicates were generated for microarray analyses. Agilent's One-Color microarray-based gene expression analysis labeling protocol (Agilent Technologies) was used to label samples with Cy3 using a random primed amino-allyl reverse transcription approach to generate labeled cDNA. After purification, the labeled test (fur mutant) and control (parent) samples were denatured and hybridized to the array overnight. Microarray slides were then washed and scanned with an Agilent G2505C microarray scanner at a 2-μm resolution. Images were analyzed with Feature Extraction 10.9 (Agilent Technologies). Median foreground intensities were obtained for each spot and imported into the mathematical software package “R”. “R” was used for all data input, diagnostic plots, normalization, and quality checking steps of the analysis process using scripts developed by the genomics core. Briefly, the data set was filtered to remove positive control elements and elements which were flagged as bad. Using the negative controls on the arrays, the background threshold was determined, and all values less than this value were flagged; local background correction was not performed since this has been shown to only introduce noise. The data were then normalized by the LOESS method using the LIMMA (linear models for microarray data) package in “R” as described previously (38). Finally, the median value for the replicate probes was used as the expression measurement for that given ORF. Complete statistical analysis was then performed in “R” using both the LIMMA and the Siggenes Bioconductor packages. The SAM (significance analysis of microarrays) statistical analysis package was used to identify genes differentially expressed due to the loss of Fur (http://www-stat.stanford.edu/∼tibs/SAM/ [39]). With SAM, the false discovery rate (FDR) and q-value method were used to measure the expected proportion of false positives in the set of all differential expression calls (40). A two-class unpaired analysis with a FDR of 10% was used to maximize sensitivity without significantly impacting accuracy. The q-values (FDR) for each gene were determined and then combined with a fold change cutoff (i.e., less than or equal to −2-fold downregulation or greater than or equal to 2-fold upregulation) to identify the final list of differentially expressed transcripts. Of the different statistical approaches for analysis of array data, this approach is considered the most robust. All microarray data are MIAME compliant and the transcriptional data has been deposited into the MIAME compliant database, GEO, under accession number GSE39874 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE39874).

qRT-PCR.Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) was used to confirm the relative expression of a subset of genes identified by microarray analyses. This utilized RNA samples obtained from strain 86-026NP, strain 86-028NPΔfur::Tn903, the overexpressing strain 86-028NPΔfur::Tn903(pTS-fur), and strain 86-028NP with or without iron chelation. qRT-PCR was performed with a one-step QuantiTect SYBR green RT-PCR kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). Three biological replicates and three technical replicates were performed for each gene analyzed. Fold changes were calculated. All threshold cycle (CT) values were normalized to the endogenous control gyrA. Relative quantitation was calculated from the median CT value using ΔΔCT, and statistical significance was determined using the Student two-tailed t test. A fold change in gene expression of >2-fold, with a P value of <0.05, was assessed as being significant.

Proteomic analyses of the Fur regulon in strain 86-028NP.Strain 86-026NP and strain 86-028NPΔfur::Tn903 were grown statically for 16 h at 37°C in DIS medium supplemented with 5 μg of PPIX/ml. Cells were then diluted into either 250 ml of DIS medium supplemented with 10 μg of human hemoglobin/ml or 250 ml of BHI supplemented with 2 μg of NAD/ml and 2 μg of heme/ml. In each case, cells were grown for four generations at 37°C in air with shaking at 50 rpm. The cells were harvested by centrifugation at 3,220 × g and fractionated into cytoplasmic, sarcosyl-soluble (inner membrane-enriched) and sarcosyl-insoluble (outer membrane-enriched) fractions (41, 42). Fractions were resolved on 7.0% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) polyacrylamide gels, fixed, and stained with Coomassie brilliant blue R250. Protein bands to be analyzed were excised and stored in 5% acetic acid. Proteins were digested in-gel with trypsin and the peptides analyzed by capillary-liquid chromatography-nanospray tandem mass spectrometry using a Thermo Finnigan LTQ mass spectrometer equipped with a nanospray source operated in positive ion mode (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA). Protein identifications were made using Mascot Daemon (Matrix Science, Boston, MA) using the guidelines determined by Carr et al. (43).

Fur binding assay.Strains 86-028NPΔfur::Tn903 and 86-028NPΔfur::Tn903(pTS-fur) were grown in sBHI. When the cells were in mid-log phase, 200 ng of anhydrotetracycline/ml of medium was added to induce fur expression. After 1 h of Fur induction, the cells were harvested by centrifugation at 5,700 × g for 15 min and resuspended in Fur-binding buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 1 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol, 50 mM KCl, 100 μM MnCl2, 5% glycerol). The cells were mechanically disrupted by using Lysing B Matrix (MP Biomedicals, Solon, OH), the lysing beads were removed by pelleting at 3,220 × g for 5 min, and the membrane-containing fraction was removed by centrifugation at 147,000 × g for 60 min. Using biotinylated primers, the promoter regions of Fur-regulated genes that contained predicted Fur boxes were amplified by PCR. To generate the hfeA promoter region containing a scrambled Fur box sequence, the predicted Fur box sequence was scrambled using Shuffle DNA (http://bioinformatics.org/sms/). Virtual Footprint (http://prodoric.tu-bs.de/vfp/) was then used to ensure the scrambled Fur box sequence no longer contained a predicted Fur box. A biotinylated hfeA promoter region containing a scrambled Fur box was then constructed using an adaptation of the gene splicing method developed by Horton et al. (44). Briefly, the promoter regions immediately 5′ and 3′ of the hfeA Fur box were amplified, with the primers proximal to the Fur box having 3′ overhangs with complementary sequences that contained the scrambled Fur box sequence. The resulting PCR products were column purified and then mixed. These products acted as primers for each other in a third PCR and thus amplified the hfeA promoter region containing a scrambled Fur box. The resultant biotinylated PCR product was gel purified. One hundred nanograms of all biotinylated PCR products was gently mixed with 100 μg of the cytoplasmic enriched supernatants in 1 ml of Fur-binding buffer containing 50 μg of sheared salmon sperm DNA/ml. After mixing for 60 min at room temperature, 50 μl of streptavidin-coated agarose beads (Life Technologies) was added to the lysate-PCR product mix, followed by mixing for 30 min at room temperature. The beads were then pelleted by centrifugation at 20,800 × g for 1 min and washed three times with 1 ml of Fur-binding buffer containing 50 μg of sheared salmon sperm DNA/ml and then two times with 1 ml of Fur-binding buffer. Washed beads were boiled in Laemmli sample buffer, and the proteins were resolved on 4.0 to 20.0% SDS-polyacrylamide gradient gels and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. The membrane was probed with an anti-Pseudomonas Fur polyclonal antibody (a generous gift from Michael Vasil).

Animal infection model.To determine whether fur expression impacts the course of experimental OM, strain 86-028NPΔfur::Tn903 and the parent strain, 86-028NP, were marked and then monitored in competition for survival in adult chinchillas (Chinchilla lanigera; Rauscher's Chinchilla Ranch, LaRue, OH) with no previous evidence of middle ear disease as determined by video otoscopy and tympanometry. Briefly, NTHi strains were grown on chocolate agar containing 200 μg of spectinomycin/ml or 20 μg of kanamycin/ml and then incubated overnight at 37°C in 5% CO2. Bacteria were suspended in pyrogen-free sterile saline (Hospira, Inc., Lake Forest, IL) to an optical density at 600 nm of 0.25. Cultures were then serially diluted in pyrogen-free saline, and approximately 300 bacteria were introduced via the transbullar route, bilaterally into the middle ears of the chinchillas. At each time point, chinchillas were anesthetized, and middle ear fluids removed by epitympanic tap of the inferior bullae. Tympanic fluids were serially diluted in sterile saline and plated on chocolate agar, as well as on chocolate agar containing 200 μg of spectinomycin/ml or 20 μg of kanamycin/ml. Animal care and all procedures were performed in concordance with institutional and federal guidelines and were conducted under an approved protocol (AR08-00027).

RESULTS

Characterization of Fur in NTHi strain 86-028NP.The fur gene (NTHI0284) in strain 86-028NP encodes a protein orthologous to Fur proteins from Escherichia coli, Vibrio cholerae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Helicobacter pylori, sharing 63, 58, 54, and 34% amino acid identity, respectively (Fig. 1). The Fur crystal structures from these microorganisms have been solved and contain a series of α-helices and β-sheets characteristic of a typical, DNA-binding, winged helix-turn-helix motif. In addition, Fur from V. cholerae, P. aeruginosa, and H. pylori have an N-terminal DNA-binding domain and a C-terminal dimerization domain (45–48). The Fur protein from NTHi strain 86-028NP contains residues (D103 and R109) predicted to be important for both Fur dimerization and DNA-binding affinity (46) and a tyrosine (Y55) predicted to be essential for DNA binding (45). The Fur protein from NTHi strain 86-028NP also contains four cysteines in the dimerization domain predicted to be involved in zinc coordination (45, 47). Finally, the Fur protein from NTHi strain 86-028NP contains an HHDH motif in the region where the DNA-binding domain overlaps with the dimerization domain and two glutamic acids and a histidine within the dimerization domains. These residues are also predicted to play a role in zinc coordination (46–48). Importantly, all aforementioned residues were conserved in all functionally characterized Fur proteins. This similarity in homology suggests that functional parallels between Fur from strain 86-028NP and those from P. aeruginosa, E. coli, V. cholerae, and H. pylori can likely be drawn.

Fig 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1

CLUSTAL W alignment of the deduced amino acid sequence of Fur from NTHi strain 86-028NP, E. coli K-12, P. aeruginosa, H. pylori, and V. cholerae. Amino acids determined to be important in zinc coordination are marked. Open triangles indicate aspartate, arginine (P. aeruginosa), and tyrosine (E. coli) residues. Stars indicate cysteines (H. pylori and E. coli). Open squares show glutamic acids (P. aeruginosa, H. pylori, and V. cholerae). The open circle shows a zinc-coordinating histidine (P. aeruginosa, H. pylori, and V. cholerae). The zinc coordinating HHDH motif is identified using a square bracket (P. aeruginosa, H. pylori, and V. cholerae).

Generation and characterization of an NTHi fur mutant.Akerley et al. used a genome-wide mutagenesis screen designed to identify essential genes in H. influenzae strain Rd. This screen revealed that fur was not essential but was required for optimal growth under the conditions used (49). Although fur mutants have been identified and characterized in many organisms (see, for example, references 9, 50, and 51), the construction and characterization of an NTHi fur mutant have not been reported. A fur mutant was therefore constructed in the clinical isolate 86-028NP. We predicted that a fur mutant would be impaired in its ability to control iron levels, with the attendant problems of iron toxicity. Therefore, to isolate a fur mutant, transformants were plated on agar containing a gradient of heme. Transformants grew primarily in the middle of the heme gradient, while the parental strain's zone of growth was wider, suggesting that the deletion of fur impairs the ability of strain 86-028NP to maintain iron homeostasis across a range of heme concentrations.

We next determined the impact the loss of Fur had on the growth of strain 86-028NP. The fur mutant grew on chocolate agar supplemented with 2 μg of heme/ml, with a colony size slightly smaller than strain 86-028NP. It was previously reported that NTHi strains grew well in BHI medium supplemented with 10 μg of human hemoglobin/ml (52). Therefore, strains 86-028NP and 86-028NPΔfur::Tn903 were iron depleted and then transferred to DIS medium containing 10 μg of human hemoglobin/ml and grown at 37°C in air with shaking at 50 rpm. The loss of Fur had no significant effect on growth in hemoglobin-supplemented DIS medium (data not shown). These conditions were thus used to grow cells for subsequent analyses.

Determination of the Fur regulon in NTHi strain 86-028NP.The Fur regulon in strain 86-028NP was defined by microarray, in which global differences in amounts of transcript between strain 86-028NP and its isogenic fur mutant, 86-028NPΔfur::Tn903, were compared. Using a 10% FDR and a cutoff of >2-fold induction, 38 genes were upregulated in the fur mutant, relative to the parent strain (Table 2, M/P). These data suggest that expression of these 38 genes is directly, or indirectly, repressed by Fur in the parent strain. Conversely, 35 genes in the fur mutant were downregulated ≥2-fold compared to the parent strain (Table 2, M/P), indicating that gene expression would be upregulated by Fur in the parent strain. Interestingly, we identified Fur-regulated genes that encode 14 uncharacterized proteins (Table 3). Fur-dependent regulation of gene expression of a subset of genes that represented 11 of the 14 Fur-regulated operons was confirmed by qRT-PCR analyses (Table 4). In addition, overexpression of fur in the fur mutant background repressed the transcriptional levels of a subset of genes normally repressed by Fur (Table 4). These observations indicated that changes in gene transcription were due to the loss of Fur and that the identified genes are indeed Fur regulated. Finally, we compared our microarray data to previously published data that monitored transcriptional responses of three Haemophilus strains following transition from heme-depleted to heme-replete medium (Table 2, the NTHi, type b, and Rd columns) (53). There was a strong correlation between changes in gene expression due to the loss of Fur in strain 86-028NP with quantitation of changes in gene expression due to an increase in available iron and heme, an in vitro analog for increased repression of gene expression by Fur (53).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2

Fur-regulated genes in NTHi strain 86-028NP

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3

Fur-regulated genes that encode proteins with hypothetical functions in NTHi strain 86-028NP

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 4

Confirmation of Fur-regulated genes in NTHi strain 86-028NPa

The functions of the proteins encoded by the genes identified as Fur-regulated could be broadly divided into four groups: (i) iron and heme utilization, (ii) proteins with hypothetical functions, (iii) IgA-specific serine endopeptidase, and (iv) ferritin-like proteins.

(i) Iron and heme utilization.As expected, the expression of the majority of genes with predicted roles in either iron or heme utilization was regulated by Fur. When the genome of strain 86-028NP was annotated, orthologs of five major iron utilization systems were identified: hitABC, which encode a ferric iron ABC transport system; hxuABC, which encode heme and heme-hemopexin binding proteins; hfeABCD, which encode a second iron ABC transport system; tbpA and tbpB, which encode transferrin-binding proteins; and hgpB, hgpC, and hgpD, which encode three hemoglobin-haptoglobin binding proteins (20). hxuA and hfeA were flagged in the analysis as saturated on the array, so expression changes were determined by qRT-PCR. Increased expression of both hfeA and hxuA in strain 86-028NPΔfur::Tn903, relative to strain 86-028NP, was demonstrated by qRT-PCR, which indicated that the expression of these genes is indeed repressed by Fur (Table 4). Moreover, the overexpression of fur repressed the expression of hfeA and hxuA below parental levels, further supporting Fur's role in the regulation of these genes (Table 4).

hgpC and hgpD, which encode hemoglobin binding proteins C and D, respectively, have previously been shown to contribute to iron or heme utilization, and yet gene expression was not regulated by Fur. Both hgpC and hgpD have tetranucleotide repeats within their coding regions that generate frameshifts (20). These frameshifts will cause early termination of translation and a concomitant disruption of transcription in both the parent and the fur mutant (54). We therefore did not detect altered expression of either hgpC or hgpD in the fur mutant. In contrast, the expression of hgpB was demonstrated to be Fur regulated. However, hgpB was upregulated in the parent strain compared to its isogenic fur mutant, suggesting that hgpB expression was induced by Fur rather than repressed (Table 2). hgpB also has tetranucleotide repeats within its coding region, but the gene is in frame, as originally sequenced (20). However, we would presume that it is phase variable (55). To determine whether phase variation was occurring in hgpB due to the loss of Fur, genomic DNA was purified from both strains 86-028NP and 86-028NPΔfur::Tn903 after growth on chocolate plates. Sequence analysis showed that in 86-028NPΔfur::Tn903 hgpB gained a tetranucleotide repeat (Fig. 2A). This extra repeat would generate a frameshift 3′ of the repeat region leading to termination of translation and degradation of hgpB's transcript. Additional transcriptional analyses indicated that expression of hgpB was actually repressed by Fur. The transcript levels for hgpB were ∼3-fold higher in the fur mutant 5′ of the tetranucleotide repeats, but expression of hgpB in the fur mutant decreased ∼4-fold below the parental levels, 3′ of the tetranucleotide repeats (Fig. 2B). This is indicative of degradation of the hgpB transcript due to premature termination of its translation in the fur mutant.

Fig 2
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2

The expression of hemoglobin-haptoglobin binding protein B is regulated by both Fur and phase variation. (A) The coding sequence for HgpB (red) contains 12 tetranucleotide repeats (TR) at the 5′ end. In the fur mutant, hgpB contains an extra tetranucleotide repeat, which generated a frameshift. These data are derived from three independent sequencing experiments. (B) qRT-PCR analyses using primers that hybridized upstream of the tetranucleotide repeats (5′) showed that expression of hgpB is classically Fur repressed. Conversely, qRT-PCR analyses using primers that hybridized downstream of the tetranucleotide repeats (3′) showed that the frameshift generated by phase variation reduced the transcription of hgpB in the fur mutant, relative to the parent. **, P < 0.05, while the P value for the 3′ data was 0.08. The data was generated using a Student paired t test, with a two-tailed distribution.

In addition to the described major iron utilization systems, strain 86-028NP also possesses orthologs of genes encoding a hemin receptor and the proteins TonB, ExbB, and ExbD, which energize transport across the outer membrane. The expression of all four genes was repressed by Fur (Table 2). hbpA encodes a protein that was originally defined as a heme-binding lipoprotein but was subsequently characterized as a glutathione-binding protein (56). The expression of hbpA is greater in the parent strain compared to the fur mutant (Table 2). The genes hup, which encodes a heme utilization protein, hemH, which encodes a ferrochelatase, and NTHI2035, which encodes an Mn2+ and Fe2+ transporter of the NRAMP family, were all insensitive to Fur regulation.

(ii) Genes that encode proteins with hypothetical functions.Fur repressed the expression of 11 genes, which encode proteins with hypothetical functions. Moreover, Fur contributed to the activation of expression of three genes that also encode proteins with hypothetical functions (Table 3). This subset of Fur-regulated genes has not been previously identified as candidate members of the Fur regulon in other species. Thus, it was of interest to determine potential functions of these proteins in strain 86-028NP. PHYRE2 (57), EMBL InterProScan (58), and PSORTb (59) protein sequence, structure, and motif databases were interrogated using the translated sequences of these Fur-regulated, hypothetical protein-encoding genes (Table 3). Genes whose expression was repressed by Fur encode proteins with homology to those with roles in DNA and metal binding, type III secretion, methylation, and sugar epimerization. Further, genes whose expression was increased by Fur include NTHI1344, which encodes a protein predicted to have a C terminus structurally similar to the adhesins YadA from Yersinia and UspA2 from Moraxella, whereas NTHI0364 encodes a predicted ribosomal binding protein. None of the hypothetical proteins listed have a predicted signal peptide.

(iii) IgA-specific serine endopeptidase.NTHI1164 encodes an IgA-specific serine endopeptidase that is predicted to have a role in cleavage of IgA1 at the mucosal surface (60). Th expression of NTHI1164 was repressed by Fur in strain 86-028NP (Table 2).

(iv) Ferritin-like proteins.The expression of NTHI1773 and NTHI1772, which encode the ferritin-like proteins FtnA and FtnB, respectively, was activated by Fur in strain 86-028NP (Table 2).

Fur-regulated genes are responsive to changes in iron levels.We would predict that Fur-regulated genes are responsive to changes in available iron levels. To confirm this, we grew 86-028NP to mid-log phase in DIS supplemented with 10 μg of human hemoglobin/ml. An aliquot of cells was then subjected to iron chelation using 2,2′-bipyridine. A second aliquot of cells was not chelated. After 15 min of treatment, the cells were removed, added to TRIzol, and RNA purified. qRT-PCR analyses were then carried out on a subset of Fur-regulated genes (Table 4). We also monitored the transcription of genes involved in regulating outer membrane stress to ensure that the chelation treatment was not causing membrane stress (data not shown). The majority of genes tested responded to the chelation of iron as expected. If a gene's expression was repressed by Fur, the same gene's expression increased after iron chelation. Strikingly, the increase in gene expression due to iron chelation was greater than that observed in the fur mutant, perhaps reflecting the cell's immediate response to the loss of iron. Conversely, genes whose expression was positively regulated by Fur had their expression decreased after iron chelation (Table 4).

Differential protein expression of iron and hemoglobin-regulated proteins in strain 86-028NP and a strain 86-028NP fur mutant.To complement transcriptional analyses of the fur mutant, we also determined how protein expression was impacted by loss of Fur. Strain 86-028NP and its isogenic fur mutant were grown to mid-log phase in sBHI (Fig. 3A) or DIS medium supplemented with 10 μg of human hemoglobin/ml (Fig. 3B) and then fractionated. Since several of the Fur-regulated genes are predicted to encode proteins with outer membrane localizations, we resolved outer-membrane-enriched fractions by SDS-PAGE. Obvious changes in protein profiles were observed between the parent and the mutant strain under both growth conditions. Several differentially expressed proteins were chosen for further identification by tandem mass spectrometry microsequencing. The mutant cells demonstrated increased expression of hxuB, hxuC, and tbpA. Importantly, these data also showed that hgpB was expressed at a greater level in the strain 86-028NP parent relative to the fur mutant. This is consistent with our transcriptional data demonstrating that, due to phase variation, hgpB expression was reduced in the fur mutant, relative to the parent strain. These data further support our findings that Fur regulates expression of genes with roles in iron utilization in strain 86-028NP.

Fig 3
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 3

Regulation of protein expression by Fur as demonstrated by PAGE analyses. Dysregulation of protein expression in sarcosyl-insoluble membrane fractions of strain 86-028NP (P) and a strain 86-028NP fur mutant (M) when grown in either sBHI (A) or DIS medium supplemented with human hemoglobin (B) was demonstrated.

Identification of a strain 86-028NP-specific Fur consensus binding site.The regulon prediction function of Virtual Footprint was used to scan the strain 86-028NP genome for Fur boxes, using the P. aeruginosa position weight matrix (61). Of the 73 Fur-regulated genes identified in strain 86-028NP (Table 2), 37 possessed a predicted Fur-binding site. Twelve of these genes with predicted Fur boxes would be monocistronic, while 25 genes with predicted Fur boxes would be presumed to be within operons. Predicted Fur boxes associated with Fur-regulated genes were used to generate a sequence logo (Fig. 4A) (62). Escolar et al. determined that the consensus Fur box from E. coli could be comprised of either two 9-bp palindromic repeats, or three 6-bp repeats, the third of which is inverted (63). The strain 86-028NP consensus Fur box conformed to this model (Fig. 4B). Interestingly, for five genes whose expression was increased by Fur (NTHI0207, NTHI1818, and the NTHI1979/1980 and NTHI1226/1227/1229/1230 gene clusters), the predicted Fur boxes were distal of the regulated genes predicted promoter regions. This distal location for Fur boxes has previously been shown to be a characteristic of genes positively regulated directly by Fur (8, 9). We then determined that Fur bound promoter regions of select Fur-regulated genes using a pull-down method adapted from Deng et al. (64). Biotinylated PCR products of the promoter regions of select Fur-regulated genes that contain predicted Fur boxes were generated. Moreover, to show the specificity of Fur binding to DNA, a similar biotinylated amplicon was generated in which the sequence of the predicted Fur box was scrambled. Each PCR product was mixed with cytoplasmic enriched fractions from either strain 86-028NPΔfur::Tn903 or the fur mutant strain after induction of fur expression. Biotinylated PCR products were then isolated in a pulldown assay. For all of the promoter regions tested, a band that corresponded to Fur was enriched relative to either the promoter region of sxy, which is not Fur regulated and does not contain a predicted Fur box, or a control in which no DNA was added (Fig. 4C). Also, there was a loss in enrichment of bound Fur in the reaction where the Fur box was scrambled (Fig. 4D). Of interest is the observation that the PCR product generated that contained a predicted Fur box distal to nrfA also bound Fur, supporting the hypothesis that Fur can directly, positively regulate gene expression using distal Fur boxes (Fig. 4C) (8, 9).

Fig 4
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 4

Characterization of strain 86-028NP-specific consensus Fur DNA binding site. (A) The model shows the frequencies of bases at each position (relative heights of the letters) and the degree of sequence conservation (total height of the letter stack). (B) The strain 86-028NP predicted Fur box is highly homologous to that derived for E. coli by Escolar et al. (63). Like the E. coli Fur box, the strain 86-028NP predicted Fur box can be considered to be two 9-bp inverted repeats (B, upper panel) or three repeats of 6 bp (two directed and one inverted) of the invariable sequence (B, lower panel). (C) The promoter regions of Fur-regulated genes bound Fur. Biotin-labeled DNA that contained predicted Fur boxes were mixed with cytoplasmic enriched extracts from either 86-028NPΔfur::Tn903 (−) or 86-Δfur::Tn903(pTS-fur) in which Fur expression was induced (+). Biotinylated DNA was subsequently isolated with streptavidin beads and resolved by PAGE. Fur that copurified with DNA was identified by Western blotting with an anti-Pseudomonas Fur antibody. Three replicate experiments were carried out, and a representative example is shown. An asterisk (*) indicates a nonspecific band that was used as a loading control. (D) To confirm that the binding of Fur to promoter regions was dependent on a predicted Fur box, the Fur binding assay was repeated with the hfeA promoter region with its predicted Fur box, as well as the hfeA promoter region in which the predicted Fur box had been scrambled.

Fur contributes to the long-term survival of NTHi in vivo.Transcriptome analysis demonstrated that Fur is a master regulator of gene expression, specifically those genes involved in the uptake of iron and iron-containing moieties into NTHi strain 86-028NP. The ability of bacteria to carefully regulate iron uptake is critical within the host; the nutritional requirements for iron and heme must be balanced by the need to minimize the toxic effects of free iron. We thus hypothesized that maintenance of this control via Fur would be critical for long-term survival in the host. To test this hypothesis, we utilized a competition model with strain 86-028NP(pGZRS-39A) and strain 86-028NPΔfur::Tn903(pSPEC1). A cohort of five chinchillas was infected with a 1:1 mixture of strain 86-028NP(pGZRS-39A) and strain 86-028NPΔfur::Tn903(pSPEC1). Bacterial survival in the middle ear was monitored over a 10-day period. On day 4, there was an ∼5-log increase in the titer of strain 86-028NP(pGZRS-39A) and an ∼3-log increase in the titer of strain 86-028NPΔfur::Tn903(pSPEC1). Strikingly, after day 4 the fur mutant was not recovered. Conversely, the parent was maintained throughout the course of infection at consistently high levels (Fig. 5A). We quantified bacterial load colonizing the middle ear mucosae on day 10. The parent was recovered from 6 of 10 ears, with an average titer of 5.3 × 103 CFU/mg of tissue (Fig. 5B). The fur mutant could not be recovered from any animal. These data indicate that Fur is required for long-term infection of the middle ear space. The in vivo impairment of strains lacking Fur suggests that careful regulation of iron import is required for persistence in the host.

Fig 5
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 5

Fur is required for the persistence of NTHi strain 86-028NP when in competition with its parent in a chinchilla model of otitis media. (A) Five chinchillas were infected with a 1:1 mix of NTHi strain 86-028NP and NTHi strain 86-028NPΔfur::Tn903. Middle ear fluids were recovered by epitympanic tap on days 4, 7, and 10 postinfection, and the CFU were quantified by plating on selective media. By day 7, the fur mutant could not be recovered from any animal, while the parent persisted for the course of the experiment. (B) Ten days after infection, the fur mutant could not be recovered from middle ear mucosae. The data are expressed as the number of CFU/mg of homogenized mucosa. Two asterisks (**) denote P < 0.05, while one asterisk (*) denotes P < 0.001 as determined by a two-tailed Mann-Whitney U test.

DISCUSSION

It has been almost 100 years since the initial observation that H. influenzae requires the heme component of blood for growth (65, 66). H. influenzae is unable to synthesize heme but can utilize ferrochelatase to catalyze the insertion of iron into protoporphyrin IX, the precursor of heme (67), or mediate heme uptake directly from the environment (68–71). The role of Fur in iron homeostasis of H. influenzae has not been explicitly described. NTHi is a commensal of the human nasopharynx, and yet can transit from this niche to cause diseases of the upper and lower airways. As a strict human pathogen, NTHi is in an iron-restricted environment in the host and subject to assault by the host immune response during infection. NTHi must therefore carefully balance the need to acquire scarce sources of iron while minimizing the generation of hydroxyl radicals via the iron-mediated Fenton reaction. Thus, how NTHi balances these two competing needs, particularly via Fur-dependent gene regulation, is important in the context of pathogenesis.

The generation of a fur mutation in Haemophilus has been elusive, despite evidence suggesting that Fur is not essential in H. influenzae strain Rd (49). However, we successfully deleted fur from strain 86-028NP. In Haemophilus parasuis and Mannheimia haemolytica Fur is essential to withstand oxidative stress generated by superoxide (72, 73). Expression of the sole superoxide dismutase (SOD) gene was not Fur regulated in strain 86-028NP, so the loss of Fur in this strain may not affect its ability to withstand superoxide-generated oxidative stress. This stands in contrast to Fur-dependent regulation of SOD in E. coli, Neisseria meningitidis, and Burkholderia pseudomallei (6, 74, 75).

Fur regulon in NTHi.Microarray analyses of strain 86-028NPΔfur::Tn903 identified a Fur regulon consisting of 73 genes, both repressed or increased in expression in the presence of Fur (Table 2). Although Fur regulated the expression of the majority of genes with predicted roles in iron homeostasis, the regulation of the genes that encode the hemoglobin-haptoglobin binding proteins was not as hypothesized. All three hgp genes possess predicted Fur boxes in their promoter regions. The presence of Fur boxes as well as their predicted roles in iron homeostasis suggests that expression of the hgp genes should be repressed by Fur. That they do not appear to be so regulated is due to tetranucleotide repeats within the coding sequences of hgpC and hgpD. These repeats generate frameshifts that would increase termination of translation and lead to an increase in transcript degradation (54). Thus, hgpC and hgpD appear to be insensitive to the loss of Fur. hgpB also possesses tetranucleotide repeats, but the gene is in frame in the parent strain and is repressed by Fur (Fig. 2). However, in the fur mutant, hgpB had been subject to phase variation and generated a frameshift. The hgpB transcript was therefore reduced in amount, 3′ of the repeat region in the fur mutant (Fig. 2). Hgp proteins have demonstrated redundancies in function (71). Further, H. influenzae can import hemoglobin via the heme utilization protein, Hup (76). NTHi strain 86-028NP possesses an ortholog of hup, and the concentration of hemoglobin we used was greater than the limiting conditions used by Morton et al. (20, 71). Thus, despite the lack of expression of all three hemoglobin-haptoglobin binding proteins, we observed a minor effect on growth of the fur mutant compared to that of the parental strain in medium replete with hemoglobin. The Hansen group demonstrated phase variation of an ortholog of hgpA upon passage of NTHi in medium containing hemoglobin (68). We hypothesize, therefore, that unrestricted expression of genes involved in iron homeostasis would result in conditions of iron overload and the selection of HgpB–off-phase variants. The regulation of hgpB, hgpC, and hgpD gene expression may be finely and differentially regulated for optimal heme uptake and utilization via both Fur regulation and phase variation.

We demonstrated that the expression of NTHI1164, which encodes a predicted IgA-specific serine endopeptidase known to contribute to Haemophilus virulence (77–79), is repressed by Fur and possesses a predicted Fur box in strain 86-028NP (Table 2). Little is known about the regulation of IgA1 protease expression in Haemophilus, although the iga1 gene in a Brazilian purpuric fever isolate of H. influenzae biogroup aegyptius strain F3031 has a predicted Fur box. However, H. aegyptius iga1 expression was not responsive to changes in iron availability under all of the conditions tested (80). This suggests a role of Fur in the regulation of expression of the gene encoding IgA-specific serine endopeptidase in strain 86-028NP.

We identified a number of Fur-repressed genes that encode proteins with no defined functions (Table 3) but are predicted to encode DNA-binding proteins, a methyltrasferase, an epimerase, and a metal-binding protein. Likewise, we identified genes that encode hypothetical proteins whose expression is increased by Fur yet also lack a clear indication of biological function in NTHi. It has previously been shown that Fur-mediated increase in gene expression often occurs as a method of iron-sparing, a Fur-dependent regulatory mechanism to minimize nonessential use of iron and/or heme by bacteria. This has classically been described as a secondary level of regulation through sRNAs (81). For example, under low-iron conditions, Fur-based repression of the sRNA RyhB is relieved in both E. coli and V. cholerae (82). RyhB can then bind to its mRNA targets and mediate RNase E-dependent degradation of the mRNA. Of interest is the finding that the majority of RyhB-targeted mRNAs in E. coli encode nonessential iron-containing proteins. Thus, under low-iron conditions, iron is spared for incorporation into essential proteins (10). None of the hypothetical proteins identified whose expression is increased in the presence of Fur are predicted to contain iron or heme. Therefore, positive regulation of gene expression by Fur in these cases would not be predicted as a method of iron sparing or iron or heme utilization. However, the role of RhyB in the regulation of gene expression independent of iron or heme is known. In V. cholerae RhyB regulates the expression of enzymes involved in amino acid synthesis, as well as porins (83, 84). Also, in Shigella spp. RhyB represses the expression of the regulator VirB. RhyB thus modulates expression of the VirB regulon, which is critical in Shigella pathogenesis (85, 86). Shigella is possibly using RhyB, through Fur, to sense host iron and thus modulate in vivo expression of the VirB regulon. Genes of the VirB regulon are therefore only expressed when optimal for the bacteria. In NTHi, Fur-regulated genes that encode hypothetical proteins may similarly play a role in pathogenesis. The absence of obvious relationships between the hypothetical proteins and iron or heme suggest a method of in vivo sensing akin to that observed in the Fur-dependent regulation of the VirB regulon in Shigella, either directly by Fur, or via an sRNA. Elucidation of the uncharacterized proteins' actual functions will thus be of great interest.

Loss of Fur attenuates persistence of NTHi strain 86-028NP in vivo.The Fur regulon in strain 86-028NP contributes to iron homeostasis through the regulation of iron uptake, or possibly through iron-sparing mechanisms as demonstrated by Masse et al. (10), among others. In addition, the Fur regulon also includes a large component of genes that encode proteins with functions we cannot conclusively predict. The presence of this vast regulon, with a core of gene products critical for long-term bacterial survival within the host (87–89), suggests that the loss of fur in strain 86-028NP would contribute to an attenuated phenotype in vivo. In fact, in a chinchilla model of otitis media we demonstrated that strain 86-028NPΔfur::Tn903 was impaired in survival, relative to its parental strain (Fig. 5). The effect of loss of fur on NTHi persistence indicates that the ability of NTHi to carefully regulate iron uptake is critical in host microenvironments whereby nutritional requirements for iron and heme must be balanced by efforts to minimize the toxic effects of free iron. Due to host sequestration of free iron, bacteria possess mechanisms to import and utilize iron and iron-containing proteins for survival in vivo (90). NTHi colonizes the host nasopharynx as a commensal microorganism. Recently, it has been shown that low levels of hemoglobin, detected in nasal passages through microepistaxis, are sufficient to support growth of Staphylococcus aureus (91). Thus, the nasopharynx is an iron-sufficient microenvironment for bacterial colonization. NTHi translocation from the nasopharynx to the normally sterile and immunologically quiescent middle ear space coincides with increased markers of inflammation, including capillary dilation, the development of hemorrhagic foci on the tympanic membrane, and the destruction of the epithelial cell layer. In addition, NTHi-induced OM middle ear effusions are frequently sanguineous, likely a result of these hallmarks of middle ear inflammation (92; B. Szelestey and K. Mason, unpublished observations). NTHi invasion of host epithelial cells may also provide a mechanism of nutrient acquisition when bacteria are exposed to nutrient-limiting conditions in the host (92). NTHi infection of the middle ear coincides with an influx of polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs). PMN influx will be accompanied by the release of H2O2 and superoxide (93, 94). NTHi must therefore carefully regulate iron and iron-containing protein uptake, as a means of attaining necessary iron and heme and as a way of minimizing the effects of hydroxyl radical production, via the Fenton reaction.

In summary, we generated a fur mutant in NTHi strain 86-028NP that enabled the global characterization, at the transcriptional level, of the Fur regulon. We identified a subset of outer-membrane-localized proteins encoded by genes whose expression was Fur regulated. Further, we identified a number of genes that encode proteins of unknown function that are regulated by Fur. These proteins may play a role in iron and/or heme utilization or, critically, may have a yet-to-be-discovered role in virulence. These proteins will be a focus of future investigations. Changes in gene transcription, due to the loss of Fur, have a great impact of the phenotype of the strain 86-028NP fur mutant. A better understanding of Fur-dependent regulation of gene expression and subsequent protein production in response to the environment will reveal how NTHi regulates iron and heme levels to avoid associated toxicity, as well as the role of Fur in controlling expression of proteins to facilitate long-term survival of NTHi within the host. Collectively, these data define a global regulatory system operative in NTHi and during the progress of NTHi disease. Understanding this global regulatory system will give us greater insight into novel ways to approach controlling this pernicious human pathogen.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was funded by NIAID/NIH grant R01-AI077897 to Robert S. Munson, Jr.

We thank Sam Sharpe, Forrest Raffel, and Emily Herfel for excellent technical assistance.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 9 November 2012.
    • Returned for modification 11 December 2012.
    • Accepted 21 January 2013.
    • Accepted manuscript posted online 4 February 2013.
  • Copyright © 2013, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Kadner RJ
    . 2005. Regulation by iron: RNA rules the rust. J. Bacteriol. 187:6870–6873.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Imlay JA
    . 2003. Pathways of oxidative damage. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 57:395–418.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    1. Harrison A,
    2. Bakaletz LO,
    3. Munson J,
    4. Robert S
    . 2012. Haemophilus influenzae and oxidative stress. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2:Article 40.
  4. 4.↵
    1. Ernst JF,
    2. Bennett RL,
    3. Rothfield LI
    . 1978. Constitutive expression of the iron-enterochelin and ferrichrome uptake systems in a mutant strain of Salmonella typhimurium. J. Bacteriol. 135:928–934.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Carpenter BM,
    2. Whitmire JM,
    3. Merrell DS
    . 2009. This is not your mother's repressor: the complex role of Fur in pathogenesis. Infect. Immun. 77:2590–2601.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Grifantini R,
    2. Sebastian S,
    3. Frigimelica E,
    4. Draghi M,
    5. Bartolini E,
    6. Muzzi A,
    7. Rappuoli R,
    8. Grandi G,
    9. Genco CA
    . 2003. Identification of iron-activated and -repressed Fur-dependent genes by transcriptome analysis of Neisseria meningitidis group B. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100:9542–9547.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Mey AR,
    2. Wyckoff EE,
    3. Kanukurthy V,
    4. Fisher CR,
    5. Payne SM
    . 2005. Iron and Fur regulation in Vibrio cholerae and the role of Fur in virulence. Infect. Immun. 73:8167–8178.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Isabella V,
    2. Wright LF,
    3. Barth K,
    4. Spence JM,
    5. Grogan S,
    6. Genco CA,
    7. Clark VL
    . 2008. cis- and trans-acting elements involved in regulation of norB (norZ), the gene encoding nitric oxide reductase in Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Microbiology 154:226–239.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    1. Yu C,
    2. Genco CA
    . 2012. Fur-mediated activation of gene transcription in the human pathogen Neisseria gonorrhoeae. J. Bacteriol. 194:1730–1742.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Masse E,
    2. Salvail H,
    3. Desnoyers G,
    4. Arguin M
    . 2007. Small RNAs controlling iron metabolism. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 10:140–145.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    1. Mellin JR,
    2. Goswami S,
    3. Grogan S,
    4. Tjaden B,
    5. Genco CA
    . 2007. A novel Fur- and iron-regulated small RNA, NrrF, is required for indirect Fur-mediated regulation of the sdhA and sdhC genes in Neisseria meningitidis. J. Bacteriol. 189:3686–3694.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Vasil ML
    . 2007. How we learnt about iron acquisition in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: a series of very fortunate events. Biometals 20:587–601.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    1. Ellermeier JR,
    2. Slauch JM
    . 2008. Fur regulates expression of the Salmonella pathogenicity island 1 type III secretion system through HilD. J. Bacteriol. 190:476–486.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Butcher J,
    2. Sarvan S,
    3. Brunzelle JS,
    4. Couture JF,
    5. Stintzi A
    . 2012. Structure and regulon of Campylobacter jejuni ferric uptake regulator Fur define apo-Fur regulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 109:10047–10052.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Murphy TF,
    2. Faden H,
    3. Bakaletz LO,
    4. Kyd JM,
    5. Forsgren A,
    6. Campos J,
    7. Virji M,
    8. Pelton SI
    . 2009. Nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae as a pathogen in children. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 28:43–48.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    1. Hood MI,
    2. Skaar EP
    . 2012. Nutritional immunity: transition metals at the pathogen-host interface. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 10:525–537.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Evans NM,
    2. Smith DD,
    3. Wicken AJ
    . 1974. Haemin and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide requirements of Haemophilus influenzae and Haemophilus parainfluenzae. J. Med. Microbiol. 7:359–365.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. 18.↵
    1. Stojiljkovic I,
    2. Perkins-Balding D
    . 2002. Processing of heme and heme-containing proteins by bacteria. DNA Cell Biol. 21:281–295.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. 19.↵
    1. Smoot LM,
    2. Bell EC,
    3. Crosa JH,
    4. Actis LA
    . 1999. Fur and iron transport proteins in the Brazilian purpuric fever clone of Haemophilus influenzae biogroup aegyptius. J. Med. Microbiol. 48:629–636.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. 20.↵
    1. Harrison A,
    2. Dyer DW,
    3. Gillaspy A,
    4. Ray WC,
    5. Mungur R,
    6. Carson MB,
    7. Zhong H,
    8. Gipson J,
    9. Gipson M,
    10. Johnson LS,
    11. Lewis L,
    12. Bakaletz LO,
    13. Munson RS Jr
    . 2005. Genomic sequence of an otitis media isolate of nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae: comparative study with H. influenzae serotype d, strain KW20. J. Bacteriol. 187:4627–4636.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Fleischmann RD,
    2. Adams MD,
    3. White O,
    4. Clayton RA,
    5. Kirkness EF,
    6. Kerlavage AR,
    7. Bult CJ,
    8. Tomb JF,
    9. Dougherty BA,
    10. Merrick JM,
    11. McKenney K,
    12. Sutton G,
    13. FitzHugh W,
    14. Fields C,
    15. Gocayne JD,
    16. Scott J,
    17. Shirley R,
    18. Liu L,
    19. Glodek A,
    20. Kelley JM,
    21. Weidman JF,
    22. Phillipps CA,
    23. Spriggs T,
    24. Hedblom E,
    25. Cotton MD,
    26. Utterback TR,
    27. Hanna MC,
    28. Nguyen DT,
    29. Saudek DM,
    30. Brandon RC,
    31. Fine LD,
    32. Fritchman JL,
    33. Fuhrmann JL,
    34. Geoghagen NSM,
    35. Gnehm CL,
    36. McDonald LA,
    37. Small KV,
    38. Fraser CM,
    39. Smith HO,
    40. Venter JC
    . 1995. Whole-genome random sequencing and assembly of Haemophilus influenzae Rd. Science 269:496–512.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Bakaletz LO,
    2. Tallan BM,
    3. Hoepf T,
    4. DeMaria TF,
    5. Birck HG,
    6. Lim DJ
    . 1988. Frequency of fimbriation of nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae and its ability to adhere to chinchilla and human respiratory epithelium. Infect. Immun. 56:331–335.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Carruthers MD,
    2. Tracy EN,
    3. Dickson AC,
    4. Ganser KB,
    5. Munson RS Jr,
    6. Bakaletz LO
    . 2012. Biological roles of nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae type IV pilus proteins encoded by the pil and com operons. J. Bacteriol. 194:1927–1933.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Bakaletz LO,
    2. Leake ER,
    3. Billy JM,
    4. Kaumaya PT
    . 1997. Relative immunogenicity and efficacy of two synthetic chimeric peptides of fimbrin as vaccinogens against nasopharyngeal colonization by nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae in the chinchilla. Vaccine 15:955–961.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. 25.↵
    1. Mason KM,
    2. Munson RS Jr,
    3. Bakaletz LO
    . 2003. Nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae gene expression induced in vivo in a chinchilla model of otitis media. Infect. Immun. 71:3454–3462.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Coleman HN,
    2. Daines DA,
    3. Jarisch J,
    4. Smith AL
    . 2003. Chemically defined media for growth of Haemophilus influenzae strains. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:4408–4410.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Hasan AA,
    2. Holland J,
    3. Smith A,
    4. Williams P
    . 1997. Elemental iron does repress transferrin, haemopexin and haemoglobin receptor expression in Haemophilus influenzae. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 150:19–26.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. 28.↵
    1. Mason KM,
    2. Bruggeman ME,
    3. Munson RS,
    4. Bakaletz LO
    . 2006. The non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae Sap transporter provides a mechanism of antimicrobial peptide resistance and SapD-dependent potassium acquisition. Mol. Microbiol. 62:1357–1372.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  29. 29.↵
    1. Kaur AP,
    2. Lansky IB,
    3. Wilks A
    . 2009. The role of the cytoplasmic heme-binding protein (PhuS) of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in intracellular heme trafficking and iron homeostasis. J. Biol. Chem. 284:56–66.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Datsenko KA,
    2. Wanner BL
    . 2000. One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97:6640–6645.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    1. Barcak GJ,
    2. Chandler MS,
    3. Redfield RJ,
    4. Tomb JF
    . 1991. Genetic systems in Haemophilus influenzae. Methods Enzymol. 204:321–342.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  32. 32.↵
    1. West SE,
    2. Romero MJ,
    3. Regassa LB,
    4. Zielinski NA,
    5. Welch RA
    . 1995. Construction of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae-Escherichia coli shuttle vectors: expression of antibiotic-resistance genes. Gene 160:81–86.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  33. 33.↵
    1. Novotny LA,
    2. Mason KM,
    3. Bakaletz LO
    . 2005. Development of a chinchilla model to allow direct, continuous, biophotonic imaging of bioluminescent nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae during experimental otitis media. Infect. Immun. 73:609–611.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    1. Tracy E,
    2. Ye F,
    3. Baker BD,
    4. Munson RS Jr
    . 2008. Construction of non-polar mutants in Haemophilus influenzae using FLP recombinase technology. BMC Mol. Biol. 9:101. doi:10.1186/1471-2199-9-101.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Dixon LG,
    2. Albritton WL,
    3. Willson PJ
    . 1994. An analysis of the complete nucleotide sequence of the Haemophilus ducreyi broad-host-range plasmid pLS88. Plasmid 32:228–232.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  36. 36.↵
    1. Willson PJ,
    2. Albritton WL,
    3. Slaney L,
    4. Setlow JK
    . 1989. Characterization of a multiple antibiotic resistance plasmid from Haemophilus ducreyi. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 33:1627–1630.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. 37.↵
    1. Whitby PW,
    2. Morton DJ,
    3. Stull TL
    . 1998. Construction of antibiotic resistance cassettes with multiple paired restriction sites for insertional mutagenesis of Haemophilus influenzae. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 158:57–60.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  38. 38.↵
    1. Smyth GK,
    2. Speed T
    . 2003. Normalization of cDNA microarray data. Methods 31:265–273.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  39. 39.↵
    1. Tusher VG,
    2. Tibshirani R,
    3. Chu G
    . 2001. Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98:5116–5121.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. 40.↵
    1. Storey JD
    . 2002. A direct approach to false discovery rates. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol. 64:479–498.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  41. 41.↵
    1. Filip C,
    2. Fletcher G,
    3. Wulff JL,
    4. Earhart CF
    . 1973. Solubilization of the cytoplasmic membrane of Escherichia coli by the ionic detergent sodium-lauryl sarcosinate. J. Bacteriol. 115:717–722.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. 42.↵
    1. Munson RS Jr,
    2. Shenep JL,
    3. Barenkamp SJ,
    4. Granoff DM
    . 1983. Purification and comparison of outer membrane protein P2 from Haemophilus influenzae type b isolates. J. Clin. Invest. 72:677–684.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. 43.↵
    1. Carr S,
    2. Aebersold R,
    3. Baldwin M,
    4. Burlingame A,
    5. Clauser K,
    6. Nesvizhskii A
    . 2004. The need for guidelines in publication of peptide and protein identification data: Working Group on Publication Guidelines for Peptide and Protein Identification Data. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 3:531–533.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  44. 44.↵
    1. Horton RM,
    2. Hunt HD,
    3. Ho SN,
    4. Pullen JK,
    5. Pease LR
    . 1989. Engineering hybrid genes without the use of restriction enzymes: gene splicing by overlap extension. Gene 77:61–68.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  45. 45.↵
    1. Pecqueur L,
    2. D'Autreaux B,
    3. Dupuy J,
    4. Nicolet Y,
    5. Jacquamet L,
    6. Brutscher B,
    7. Michaud-Soret I,
    8. Bersch B
    . 2006. Structural changes of Escherichia coli ferric uptake regulator during metal-dependent dimerization and activation explored by NMR and X-ray crystallography. J. Biol. Chem. 281:21286–21295.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. 46.↵
    1. Pohl E,
    2. Haller JC,
    3. Mijovilovich A,
    4. Meyer-Klaucke W,
    5. Garman E,
    6. Vasil ML
    . 2003. Architecture of a protein central to iron homeostasis: crystal structure and spectroscopic analysis of the ferric uptake regulator. Mol. Microbiol. 47:903–915.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  47. 47.↵
    1. Dian C,
    2. Vitale S,
    3. Leonard GA,
    4. Bahlawane C,
    5. Fauquant C,
    6. Leduc D,
    7. Muller C,
    8. de Reuse H,
    9. Michaud-Soret I,
    10. Terradot L
    . 2011. The structure of the Helicobacter pylori ferric uptake regulator Fur reveals three functional metal binding sites. Mol. Microbiol. 79:1260–1275.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  48. 48.↵
    1. Sheikh MA,
    2. Taylor GL
    . 2009. Crystal structure of the Vibrio cholerae ferric uptake regulator (Fur) reveals insights into metal co-ordination. Mol. Microbiol. 72:1208–1220.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  49. 49.↵
    1. Akerley BJ,
    2. Rubin EJ,
    3. Novick VL,
    4. Amaya K,
    5. Judson N,
    6. Mekalanos JJ
    . 2002. A genome-scale analysis for identification of genes required for growth or survival of Haemophilus influenzae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99:966–971.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. 50.↵
    1. Delany I,
    2. Ieva R,
    3. Alaimo C,
    4. Rappuoli R,
    5. Scarlato V
    . 2003. The iron-responsive regulator Fur is transcriptionally autoregulated and not essential in Neisseria meningitidis. J. Bacteriol. 185:6032–6041.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  51. 51.↵
    1. Jacobsen I,
    2. Gerstenberger J,
    3. Gruber AD,
    4. Bosse JT,
    5. Langford PR,
    6. Hennig-Pauka I,
    7. Meens J,
    8. Gerlach GF
    . 2005. Deletion of the ferric uptake regulator Fur impairs the in vitro growth and virulence of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae. Infect. Immun. 73:3740–3744.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. 52.↵
    1. Morton DJ,
    2. Madore LL,
    3. Smith A,
    4. Vanwagoner TM,
    5. Seale TW,
    6. Whitby PW,
    7. Stull TL
    . 2005. The heme-binding lipoprotein (HbpA) of Haemophilus influenzae: role in heme utilization. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 253:193–199.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  53. 53.↵
    1. Whitby PW,
    2. Seale TW,
    3. VanWagoner TM,
    4. Morton DJ,
    5. Stull TL
    . 2009. The iron/heme regulated genes of Haemophilus influenzae: comparative transcriptional profiling as a tool to define the species core modulon. BMC Genomics 10:6. doi:10.1186/1471-2164-10-6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. 54.↵
    1. Gowrishankar J,
    2. Harinarayanan R
    . 2004. Why is transcription coupled to translation in bacteria? Mol. Microbiol. 54:598–603.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  55. 55.↵
    1. van der Woude MW
    . 2011. Phase variation: how to create and coordinate population diversity. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 14:205–211.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. 56.↵
    1. Vergauwen B,
    2. Elegheert J,
    3. Dansercoer A,
    4. Devreese B,
    5. Savvides SN
    . 2010. Glutathione import in Haemophilus influenzae Rd is primed by the periplasmic heme-binding protein HbpA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 107:13270–13275.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  57. 57.↵
    1. Kelley LA,
    2. Sternberg MJ
    . 2009. Protein structure prediction on the Web: a case study using the Phyre server. Nat. Protoc. 4:363–371.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  58. 58.↵
    1. Zdobnov EM,
    2. Apweiler R
    . 2001. InterProScan–an integration platform for the signature-recognition methods in InterPro. Bioinformatics 17:847–848.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  59. 59.↵
    1. Yu NY,
    2. Wagner JR,
    3. Laird MR,
    4. Melli G,
    5. Rey S,
    6. Lo R,
    7. Dao P,
    8. Sahinalp SC,
    9. Ester M,
    10. Foster LJ,
    11. Brinkman FS
    . 2010. PSORTb 3.0: improved protein subcellular localization prediction with refined localization subcategories and predictive capabilities for all prokaryotes. Bioinformatics 26:1608–1615.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  60. 60.↵
    1. Mistry D,
    2. Stockley RA
    . 2006. IgA1 protease. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 38:1244–1248.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  61. 61.↵
    1. Munch R,
    2. Hiller K,
    3. Grote A,
    4. Scheer M,
    5. Klein J,
    6. Schobert M,
    7. Jahn D
    . 2005. Virtual Footprint and PRODORIC: an integrative framework for regulon prediction in prokaryotes. Bioinformatics 21:4187–4189.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  62. 62.↵
    1. Crooks GE,
    2. Hon G,
    3. Chandonia JM,
    4. Brenner SE
    . 2004. WebLogo: a sequence logo generator. Genome Res. 14:1188–1190.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  63. 63.↵
    1. Escolar L,
    2. Perez-Martin J,
    3. de Lorenzo V
    . 1999. Opening the iron box: transcriptional metalloregulation by the Fur protein. J. Bacteriol. 181:6223–6229.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  64. 64.↵
    1. Deng WG,
    2. Zhu Y,
    3. Montero A,
    4. Wu KK
    . 2003. Quantitative analysis of binding of transcription factor complex to biotinylated DNA probe by a streptavidin-agarose pulldown assay. Anal. Biochem. 323:12–18.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  65. 65.↵
    1. Winslow CE,
    2. Broadhurst J,
    3. Buchanan RE,
    4. Krumwiede C,
    5. Rogers LA,
    6. Smith GH
    . 1920. The families and genera of the bacteria: final report of the committee of the Society of American Bacteriologists on characterization and classification of bacterial types. J. Bacteriol. 5:191–229.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  66. 66.↵
    1. Thjotta T,
    2. Avery OT
    . 1921. Studies on bacterial nutrition. II. Growth accessory substances in the cultivation of hemophilic bacilli. J. Exp. Med. 34:97–114.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  67. 67.↵
    1. Loeb MR
    . 1995. Ferrochelatase activity and protoporphyrin IX utilization in Haemophilus influenzae. J. Bacteriol. 177:3613–3615.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  68. 68.↵
    1. Cope LD,
    2. Hrkal Z,
    3. Hansen EJ
    . 2000. Detection of phase variation in expression of proteins involved in hemoglobin and hemoglobin-haptoglobin binding by nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae. Infect. Immun. 68:4092–4101.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  69. 69.↵
    1. Fournier C,
    2. Smith A,
    3. Delepelaire P
    . 2011. Haem release from haemopexin by HxuA allows Haemophilus influenzae to escape host nutritional immunity. Mol. Microbiol. 80:133–148.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  70. 70.↵
    1. Mason KM,
    2. Raffel FK,
    3. Ray WC,
    4. Bakaletz LO
    . 2011. Heme utilization by nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae is essential and dependent on Sap transporter function. J. Bacteriol. 193:2527–2535.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  71. 71.↵
    1. Morton DJ,
    2. Whitby PW,
    3. Jin H,
    4. Ren Z,
    5. Stull TL
    . 1999. Effect of multiple mutations in the hemoglobin- and hemoglobin-haptoglobin-binding proteins, HgpA, HgpB, and HgpC, of Haemophilus influenzae type b. Infect. Immun. 67:2729–2739.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  72. 72.↵
    1. Gioia J,
    2. Highlander SK
    . 2007. Identification and characterization of transcriptional regulation of the Mannheimia haemolytica ferric uptake regulator. Vet. Microbiol. 124:298–309.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  73. 73.↵
    1. Bigas A,
    2. Garrido MA,
    3. Badiola I,
    4. Barbe J,
    5. Llagostera M
    . 2006. Non-viability of Haemophilus parasuis fur-defective mutants. Vet. Microbiol. 118:107–116.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  74. 74.↵
    1. Dubrac S,
    2. Touati D
    . 2002. Fur-mediated transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulation of FeSOD expression in Escherichia coli. Microbiology 148:147–156.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  75. 75.↵
    1. Loprasert S,
    2. Sallabhan R,
    3. Whangsuk W,
    4. Mongkolsuk S
    . 2000. Characterization and mutagenesis of fur gene from Burkholderia pseudomallei. Gene 254:129–137.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  76. 76.↵
    1. Morton DJ,
    2. Smith A,
    3. Ren Z,
    4. Madore LL,
    5. VanWagoner TM,
    6. Seale TW,
    7. Whitby PW,
    8. Stull TL
    . 2004. Identification of a haem-utilization protein (Hup) in Haemophilus influenzae. Microbiology 150:3923–3933.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  77. 77.↵
    1. Murphy TF,
    2. Lesse AJ,
    3. Kirkham C,
    4. Zhong H,
    5. Sethi S,
    6. Munson RS Jr
    . 2011. A clonal group of nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae with two IgA proteases is adapted to infection in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. PLoS One 6:e25923. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0025923.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  78. 78.↵
    1. Vitovski S,
    2. Dunkin KT,
    3. Howard AJ,
    4. Sayers JR
    . 2002. Nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae in carriage and disease: a difference in IgA1 protease activity levels. JAMA 287:1699–1705.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  79. 79.↵
    1. Kilian M,
    2. Mestecky J,
    3. Schrohenloher RE
    . 1979. Pathogenic species of the genus Haemophilus and Streptococcus pneumoniae produce immunoglobulin A1 protease. Infect. Immun. 26:143–149.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  80. 80.↵
    1. McGillivary G,
    2. Smoot LM,
    3. Actis LA
    . 2005. Characterization of the IgA1 protease from the Brazilian purpuric fever strain F3031 of Haemophilus influenzae biogroup aegyptius. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 250:229–236.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  81. 81.↵
    1. Masse E,
    2. Vanderpool CK,
    3. Gottesman S
    . 2005. Effect of RyhB small RNA on global iron use in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 187:6962–6971.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  82. 82.↵
    1. Salvail H,
    2. Masse E
    . 2012. Regulating iron storage and metabolism with RNA: an overview of posttranscriptional controls of intracellular iron homeostasis. RNA 3:26–36.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  83. 83.↵
    1. Davis BM,
    2. Quinones M,
    3. Pratt J,
    4. Ding Y,
    5. Waldor MK
    . 2005. Characterization of the small untranslated RNA RyhB and its regulon in Vibrio cholerae. J. Bacteriol. 187:4005–4014.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  84. 84.↵
    1. Mey AR,
    2. Craig SA,
    3. Payne SM
    . 2005. Characterization of Vibrio cholerae RyhB: the RyhB regulon and role of ryhB in biofilm formation. Infect. Immun. 73:5706–5719.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  85. 85.↵
    1. Africa LA,
    2. Murphy ER,
    3. Egan NR,
    4. Wigley AF,
    5. Wing HJ
    . 2011. The iron-responsive Fur/RyhB regulatory cascade modulates the Shigella outer membrane protease IcsP. Infect. Immun. 79:4543–4549.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  86. 86.↵
    1. Murphy ER,
    2. Payne SM
    . 2007. RyhB, an iron-responsive small RNA molecule, regulates Shigella dysenteriae virulence. Infect. Immun. 75:3470–3477.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  87. 87.↵
    1. Palyada K,
    2. Threadgill D,
    3. Stintzi A
    . 2004. Iron acquisition and regulation in Campylobacter jejuni. J. Bacteriol. 186:4714–4729.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  88. 88.↵
    1. Miles S,
    2. Piazuelo MB,
    3. Semino-Mora C,
    4. Washington MK,
    5. Dubois A,
    6. Peek RM Jr,
    7. Correa P,
    8. Merrell DS
    . 2010. Detailed in vivo analysis of the role of Helicobacter pylori Fur in colonization and disease. Infect. Immun. 78:3073–3082.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  89. 89.↵
    1. Gancz H,
    2. Censini S,
    3. Merrell DS
    . 2006. Iron and pH homeostasis intersect at the level of Fur regulation in the gastric pathogen Helicobacter pylori. Infect. Immun. 74:602–614.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  90. 90.↵
    1. Andrews SC,
    2. Robinson AK,
    3. Rodriguez-Quinones F
    . 2003. Bacterial iron homeostasis. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 27:215–237.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  91. 91.↵
    1. Pynnonen M,
    2. Stephenson RE,
    3. Schwartz K,
    4. Hernandez M,
    5. Boles BR
    . 2011. Hemoglobin promotes Staphylococcus aureus nasal colonization. PLoS Pathog. 7:e1002104. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1002104.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  92. 92.↵
    1. Raffel FK,
    2. Szelestey BR,
    3. Beatty WL,
    4. Mason KM
    . 2012. The Haemophilus Sap transporter mediates bacterial-epithelial cell homeostasis. Infect. Immun. 81:43–54.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  93. 93.↵
    1. Kobayashi T,
    2. Robinson JM,
    3. Seguchi H
    . 1998. Identification of intracellular sites of superoxide production in stimulated neutrophils. J. Cell Sci. 111:81–91.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  94. 94.↵
    1. Suchard SJ,
    2. Boxer LA
    . 1994. Exocytosis of a subpopulation of specific granules coincides with H2O2 production in adherent human neutrophils. J. Immunol. 152:290–300.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  95. 95.
    1. Lee EC,
    2. Yu D,
    3. Martinez de Velasco J,
    4. Tessarollo L,
    5. Swing DA,
    6. Court DL,
    7. Jenkins NA,
    8. Copeland NG
    . 2001. A highly efficient Escherichia coli-based chromosome engineering system adapted for recombinogenic targeting and subcloning of BAC DNA. Genomics 73:56–65.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Ferric Uptake Regulator and Its Role in the Pathogenesis of Nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae
Alistair Harrison, Estevan A. Santana, Blake R. Szelestey, David E. Newsom, Peter White, Kevin M. Mason
Infection and Immunity Mar 2013, 81 (4) 1221-1233; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.01227-12

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Infection and Immunity article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Ferric Uptake Regulator and Its Role in the Pathogenesis of Nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Infection and Immunity
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Infection and Immunity.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Ferric Uptake Regulator and Its Role in the Pathogenesis of Nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae
Alistair Harrison, Estevan A. Santana, Blake R. Szelestey, David E. Newsom, Peter White, Kevin M. Mason
Infection and Immunity Mar 2013, 81 (4) 1221-1233; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.01227-12
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About IAI
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #IAIjournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0019-9567; Online ISSN: 1098-5522