Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Infection and Immunity
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Molecular Pathogenesis

Site-Specific Mutation of the Sensor Kinase GraS in Staphylococcus aureus Alters the Adaptive Response to Distinct Cationic Antimicrobial Peptides

Ambrose L. Cheung, Arnold S. Bayer, Michael R. Yeaman, Yan Q. Xiong, Alan J. Waring, Guido Memmi, Niles Donegan, Siyang Chaili, Soo-Jin Yang
F. C. Fang, Editor
Ambrose L. Cheung
aDepartment of Microbiology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Arnold S. Bayer
bDivision of Infectious Diseases, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California, USA
cThe David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael R. Yeaman
bDivision of Infectious Diseases, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California, USA
cThe David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
dDivision of Molecular Medicine, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yan Q. Xiong
bDivision of Infectious Diseases, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California, USA
cThe David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alan J. Waring
bDivision of Infectious Diseases, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California, USA
cThe David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
dDivision of Molecular Medicine, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Guido Memmi
aDepartment of Microbiology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Niles Donegan
aDepartment of Microbiology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Siyang Chaili
bDivision of Infectious Diseases, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Soo-Jin Yang
bDivision of Infectious Diseases, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California, USA
cThe David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
F. C. Fang
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.02480-14
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

The Staphylococcus aureus two-component regulatory system, GraRS, is involved in resistance to killing by distinct host defense cationic antimicrobial peptides (HD-CAPs). It is believed to regulate downstream target genes such as mprF and dltABCD to modify the S. aureus surface charge. However, the detailed mechanism(s) by which the histidine kinase, GraS, senses specific HD-CAPs is not well defined. Here, we studied a well-characterized clinical methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strain (MW2), its isogenic graS deletion mutant (ΔgraS strain), a nonameric extracellular loop mutant (ΔEL strain), and four residue-specific ΔEL mutants (D37A, P39A, P39S, and D35G D37G D41G strains). The ΔgraS and ΔEL strains were unable to induce mprF and dltA expression and, in turn, demonstrated significantly increased susceptibilities to daptomycin, polymyxin B, and two prototypical HD-CAPs (hNP-1 and RP-1). Further, P39A, P39S, and D35G-D37G-D41G ΔEL mutations correlated with moderate increases in HD-CAP susceptibility. Reductions of mprF and dltA induction by PMB were also found in the ΔEL mutants, suggesting these residues are pivotal to appropriate activation of the GraS sensor kinase. Importantly, a synthetic exogenous soluble EL mimic of GraS protected the parental MW2 strain against hNP-1- and RP-1-mediated killing, suggesting a direct interaction of the EL with HD-CAPs in GraS activation. In vivo, the ΔgraS and ΔEL strains displayed dramatic reductions in achieved target tissue MRSA counts in an endocarditis model. Taken together, our results provide new insights into potential roles of GraS in S. aureus sensing of HD-CAPs to induce adaptive survival responses to these molecules.

INTRODUCTION

Host defense against Staphylococcus aureus infections involves rapid immune responses, which include neutrophils (PMNs), effector proteins such as complement, and cationic antimicrobial peptides (CAPs) that are part of the innate immune system (1–3). Different host defense CAPs (HD-CAPs) are expressed in distinct human tissues and are integral to mitigating bacterial infections, including those caused by S. aureus (3–5).

Endovascular infections caused by S. aureus are among the most common staphylococcal clinical syndromes and are associated with high morbidity and mortality rates (6–8). The persistence and progression of endovascular S. aureus infections, such as infective endocarditis (IE), necessitate the pathogen to resist the microbicidal actions of HD-CAPs (6, 8), including those of PMNs (e.g., neutrophil defensins, such as hNP-1) and platelets (e.g., the family of thrombin-induced platelet microbicidal proteins [tPMPs]), as well as clinically utilized CAPs (e.g., calcium-daptomycin). Of importance, S. aureus appears to deploy a number of mechanisms to subvert inhibition or killing by HD-CAPs, including changes in cytoplasmic membrane (CM) biophysics or energetics, perturbations in surface charge, and modifications of the phospholipid repertoire (9–12).

Two-component regulatory systems (TCRS) have come to the forefront of the staphylococcal “virulon” as signal transduction systems commonly employed by S. aureus to sense and respond to potentially noxious external stimuli (13). In this pathogen, the GraRS TCRS (also termed antibiotic peptide sensor [APS]) is involved in promoting resistance to distinct HD-CAPs by upregulating target genes such as mprF and dltABCD. In turn, the proteins encoded by the genes modify the net positive surface charge of the S. aureus envelope (14–17). The protein MprF is a lysyl-phosphatidylglycerol (L-PG) synthase, which attaches positively charged lysine molecules onto negatively charged phosphatidylglycerol (PG) within the S. aureus CM. In addition, MprF also functions as an outer CM flippase for L-PG, translocating the lysinylated PG to the outer CM leaflet (9, 18, 19). The dltABCD operon also contributes to the net surface positive charge by covalently incorporating d-alanine to cell wall teichoic acids (16, 20).

The expression of GraRS-mediated effector genes appears to be preferentially induced by certain HD-CAPs, such as tPMP-1 (platelets) and polymyxin B, in vitro. This observation raised the notion that this TCRS selectively senses and responds to HD-CAPs having specific structural or mechanistic determinants (14, 15, 17). Mutagenesis studies have revealed that a graS mutation abolished the induction of mprF and dltABCD genes, further supporting the notion of GraS as a sensor kinase for selective CAPs in S. aureus (14, 15, 17). A comparative alignment of the GraS protein sequences of S. aureus versus Staphylococcus epidermidis revealed a common motif consisting of two transmembrane segments flanking a 9-amino-acid extracellular loop (14). Of note, Li et al. demonstrated that differences in induction by CAPs between S. aureus and S. epidermidis were due to structural changes within the respective loop motifs of the GraS histidine kinase (14). These findings suggested that the extracellular loop is an important determinant for the ability of the GraS protein to detect and transduce S. aureus adaptive responses to certain HD-CAPs.

In the present study, we utilized isogenic graS deletion (ΔgraS) and nonameric extracellular loop (ΔEL) mutants of a well-characterized clinical S. aureus strain, MW2, to investigate potential mechanism(s) by which GraS senses specific HD-CAPs. In addition, key residues in the EL of GraS predicted to mediate detection of HD-CAPs were mutated to evaluate residue-specific functions of GraS. These strains were then used to examine the contribution of the entire graS locus, as well as the EL and specific residues thereof in relation to (i) the induction of mprF and dlt expression by sublethal concentrations of a range of HD-CAPs in vitro, (ii) the modulation of net cell surface charge in S. aureus, (iii) in vitro susceptibility to HD-CAPs of distinct structure and tissue origin, and (iv) potential in vivo correlates of virulence during the induction and maintenance of a prototypical endovascular infection (infective endocarditis [IE]).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains and culture conditions.Strains used in this study are listed in Table 1. All S. aureus strains were grown in either tryptic soy broth (TSB; Difco Laboratories, Detroit, MI) or Mueller-Hinton broth (MHB; Difco Laboratories) as indicated, depending on the individual experiments. Escherichia coli DH5α was grown in Luria-Bertani medium (Fisher Scientific). Liquid cultures were grown in Erlenmeyer flasks at 37°C with shaking (250 rpm) in a volume that was no greater than 10% of the flask volume. All antibiotics were purchased from either Sigma Chemical Co. or Fisher Scientific and were used at the following concentrations: ampicillin, 100 μg/ml; erythromycin, 3 μg/ml; chloramphenicol, 5 μg/ml.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Strains used in this study

CAPs.Human neutrophil peptide-1 (hNP-1), a prototypical α-defensin, was purchased from Peptide International (Louisville, KY). RP-1 (an 18-amino-acid congener modeled in part upon α-helical microbicidal domains of the platelet factor 4 family of platelet kinocidins) was synthesized and authenticated as detailed before (21, 22). The antistaphylococcal mechanisms of RP-1 recapitulate those of native thrombin-induced platelet microbicidal protein 1 (tPMP-1) (21). Polymyxin B (PMB) was purchased from Sigma Chemicals Co. (St. Louis, MO). Peptides hNP-1 and RP-1 were used for both in vitro killing assays and gene induction studies for the study strains, as described before (17). PMB was employed in selected gene induction experiments. The above-described cationic antimicrobial peptides (CAPs) differ in source, primary structures, mechanisms of action, and net positive charge (range, +4 to + 6 at pH 7.0) (21, 23).

Preparation of soluble GraS.The EL sensor domain of GraS features a 9-amino-acid motif (DYDFPIDSL) that is hypothesized to detect certain HD-CAPs and initiate transduction of response regulator functions of GraSR (14, 17). To test this concept, we synthesized a soluble peptide representing this sensor domain and assessed its ability to modify S. aureus responses to various peptides. To enhance biological functionality, the soluble trimeric GraS EL mimetic was synthesized to contain three sensor motifs interposed by diglycine hinges. Thus, the full-length synthetic trimeric sensor peptide sequence was NH2-DYDFPIDSLGGDYDFPIDSLGGDYDFPIDSL-COOH.

A nonsense (scrambled) peptide of the same composition, but with randomized sequence, was also synthesized as a control. Both of these polypeptides were generated by solid-phase 9-fluorenyl-methyloxycarbonyl (Fmoc) chain assembly and purified using reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and the purified product (>95%) was authenticated by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectroscopy, as we have detailed previously (24).

Antibiotics/CAP susceptibility testing.The MICs to PMB were determined by the standardized microdilution assay in MHB medium, following CLSI protocols, using ∼1 × 105 CFU/ml in 96-well microtiter plates with MIC assessments performed at 48 h (25). The MICs to daptomycin (DAP), vancomycin (VAN), and oxacillin (OX) were determined by standard micro-Etest according to the manufacturer's recommended protocols. A minimum of three independent experimental runs were performed to determine MICs to each antibiotic.

Standard MIC testing in nutrient broth may underestimate CAP activities (23, 26). Accordingly, in vitro bactericidal assays were carried out with hNP-1 and RP-1 as described previously by using a 2-h microdilution method in Eagle's minimal essential medium (9, 23). These assays were performed with hNP-1 (10 μg/ml) and RP-1 (1 μg/ml) using an initial inoculum of 5 × 103 CFU S. aureus cells (9, 23). These CAP concentrations were selected based on extensive pilot studies showing their inability to completely eradicate the starting inoculum of the parental MW2 strain over the 2-h exposure period. Data were calculated and expressed as the relative percentage of surviving CFU (±standard deviation [SD]) of CAP-exposed versus CAP-unexposed cells. A minimum of three independent studies were performed for each CAP.

DNA manipulations.Genomic DNA was isolated from S. aureus as described previously (27). Plasmid DNA purification was performed using a Wizard Plus kit from Promega, Inc. (Madison, WI). The restriction enzymes and T4 DNA ligase used in this study were purchased from New England BioLabs (Beverly, MA). Preparation and transformation of Escherichia coli DH5α were accomplished using the method described by Inoue et al. (28). Electroporation of recombinant plasmids into S. aureus was carried out using the procedures of Shenk and Laddaga (29).

Construction of S. aureus mutants.All mutant strains were generated in an S. aureus MW2 background with in-frame deletion of target genes by allelic replacement, using the temperature-sensitive plasmid pMAD as described previously (15, 30). S. aureus MW2 (USA400), a prototypical clinical methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) isolate, has been well characterized genotypically (e.g., available genome sequence information) and is virulent in vivo in animal models (31–33). Briefly, PCR was used to amplify an ∼2-kb fragment comprising a 1-kb fragment upstream and another 1-kb fragment downstream of graS using genomic DNA as the template. The PCR fragment was cloned into pMAD, resulting in pMAD-graS. The recombinant shuttle vector was transformed first into E. coli, then into RN4220 as an intermediary, and finally into S. aureus strain MW2 (34). Specific mutations of individual residues within the EL loop of graS were introduced by PCR using primers with altered nucleotides, cloned into pMAD, and transformed into S. aureus MW2. Allelic exchanges were performed as described previously (30). Selected mutants were subsequently complemented by reintroducing pMAD-graS into the chromosome by homologous recombination, as described previously (30). All the mutant strains created were confirmed with PCR and sequencing.

Preparation of RNA.To assess CAP induction of mprF and dlt by CAPs, RNA samples were isolated from cultures of the strains exposed to hNP-1, RP-1, or PMB. Briefly, overnight cultures of the strain sets were used to inoculate 10 ml of MHB to an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.1 and allowed to grow for 2.5 h (∼1 × 108 to 5 × 108 CFU/ml) before the addition of peptide. For transcription induction, CAPs were used at the following exposure concentrations in artificial conditions in vitro: hNP-1, 30 μg/ml; PMB, 30 μg/ml (∼0.25× MIC). The cultures were incubated for an additional 30 min before the RNA was harvested. The sublethality of these CAP concentrations over the 30-min exposure period (≥90% survival) was confirmed by quantitative culture as described before (17). Total cellular RNA was isolated from the S. aureus cell pellets by using the RNeasy kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) and the FASTPREP FP120 instrument (BIO 101, Vista, CA), according to the manufacturer's recommended protocols.

Quantification of transcript levels by qRT-PCR.Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) analyses were performed as described previously (35). Briefly, 2 μg of DNase-treated RNA was reverse transcribed using the SuperScript III first-strand synthesis kit (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's protocols. Quantification of cDNA levels was performed by following the instructions of the Power SYBR green master mix kit (Applied Biosystems) on an ABI PRISM 7000 Sequence detection system (Applied Biosystems). The primers used to amplify mprF were qRT-mprF-F and qRT-mprF-R (17). The dltA and gyrB genes were similarly detected using respective specific primers as described before (35).

Determination of net cell surface charge.To estimate relative positive cell surface charge that may contribute to HD-CAP resistance (9, 12, 16, 19, 36), cytochrome c binding assays were performed as described before by spectrophotometric assay (OD530) (15, 37). The binding of cytochrome c (pI = 10; Sigma) is approximated from the amount of the polycation remaining within reaction mixture supernatants following exposure to a study strain for 15 min. Larger amounts of residual cytochrome c in the supernatants correlate with a more relatively positive surface charge (9, 12, 15, 38). A minimum of three independent experiments was performed for each strain-CAP combination.

CM fluidity analyses.It has been shown that CM biophysical characteristics affect the interaction of S. aureus with HD-CAPs (11, 39). Principal among these parameters is the CM order, a composite measure of the fluidity versus rigidity properties of PL bilayers. The comparative CM orders of study strains were determined by fluorescence polarization spectroscopy using the fluorescent probe 1,6-diphenyl-1,3,5-hexatriene (DPH) as described before (11, 40). Data were quantified from the polarization index (±SD) (9, 23), in which there is an inverse relationship between the polarization index and CM fluidity/rigidity (i.e., higher index indicates greater CM rigidity) (9, 11, 38, 41). These assays were performed at least six times for each strain on separate days.

Experimental rabbit IE model.Animals were maintained in accordance with the American Association for Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care criteria. The Animal Research Committee (IACUC) of the Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center approved these animal studies.

A well-characterized catheter-induced rabbit model of aortic IE was used as described previously (16, 42, 43) to assess the role of GraS EL sensor on relative S. aureus virulence in vivo. Briefly, female New Zealand White rabbits (2.0 to 2.5 kg body weight; Harlan Laboratories, Indianapolis, IN) underwent indwelling transcarotid-transaortic valve catheterization with a polyethylene catheter (to induce sterile aortic valve vegetations). Twenty-four hours after catheter placement, animals were infected intravenously (i.v.) with ∼1 × 106 CFU/animal, a 95% infective dose (ID95) for the parental MW2 strain as established in pilot studies.

For virulence comparisons, five strains were studied: the parental MW2, its graS knockout (ΔgraS strain), the EL knockout (ΔEL strain), a D→G substitution EL mutant (in which 3 aspartic acid [D] residues are substituted with glycines [G] in the EL sensor), and the respective graRS-complemented strains. At the time of sacrifice, cardiac vegetations, kidneys, and spleens were aseptically excised and quantitatively cultured as detailed before (44). Virulence assessments were then based on comparisons of the S. aureus CFU densities of the infecting strains in three target tissues. The mean log10 CFU/g of tissue (±SD) was calculated for each target tissue in each group for statistical comparisons. The lower limit of microbiologic detection in the target tissues is ≤1 log10 CFU/g of tissue.

For verification of plasmid (pEPSA5) maintenance within the ΔgraS complemented strain during in vivo studies, all tissue samples from animals infected with this construct were quantitatively cultured in the presence and absence of chloramphenicol (10 μg/ml; plasmid selection marker). These studies confirmed stability of the plasmid during animal passage (data not shown).

Statistical analysis.S. aureus tissue CFU densities among the various groups were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance (ANOVA) test with the Tukey post hoc correction for multiple comparisons. Significance was determined at P values of <0.05.

RESULTS

In vitro CAP susceptibility profiles.To determine the role of GraS sensor kinase and to identify critical residues of extracellular loop (EL) in resistance to structurally distinct host defense CAPs, we compared the in vitro susceptibility profiles of the ΔgraS and ΔEL mutants and the four EL point-mutated constructs (D37A, P39A, P39S, and D35G D37G D41G strains) to the parental MW2 against DAP, PMB, RP-1, or hNP-1. Site-specific D→A, D→G, P→A, or P→S amino acid substitutions were designed to alter charge (D→A, D→G) propensity for secondary structure stability (P→A) or conservation of hydrogen bond potential (P→S).

As shown in Table 2, deletion of the entire graS open reading frame (ORF) in the MW2 parental strain resulted in significantly increased susceptibilities to calcium-DAP and PMB compared to those of the parental MW2 strain (P < 0.01). Notably, the EL sensor mutant (ΔEL mutant) also exhibited significantly increased susceptibilities to DAP and PMB, suggesting that the 9-amino-acid extracellular sensing loop of the GraS histidine kinase is important for CAP resistance in S. aureus. Similarly, susceptibilities of both the ΔgraS and ΔEL strains to hNP-1 and RP-1 were significantly higher than those of the parental MW2 (P < 0.001; Fig. 1A and B). Complementation of the ΔgraS and ΔEL strains with a graRS-expressing plasmid restored parental-level susceptibilities to all four CAPs tested in most assays.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2

MICs of the study strains

FIG 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1

In vitro susceptibilities of the S. aureus strain set to hNP-1 (A) and RP-1(B). In vitro bacterial survival assays were carried out with hNP-1 (10 μg/ml) and RP-1 (1 μg/ml) as described previously using a 2-h microdilution method (9, 23). These data represent the means (±SD) from three independent experiments. *, P < 0.01; **, P < 0.05 compared to the MW2 parental strain.

Next, we used the mutant strains that have either single mutations (D37A, P39A, and P39S) or triple mutations (D35G D37G D41G) in the EL of GraS. In contrast to the two deletion mutants described above (ΔgraS and ΔEL strains), most of the point-mutated EL constructs demonstrated only a moderate reduction in MICs to DAP and PMB (Table 2). Of note, the exception to this pattern was D37A, which had no apparent effect on MICs of DAP or PMB. However, the P39A, P39S, and D35G D37G D41G mutant constructs showed significantly increased susceptibilities to hNP-1 and RP-1 relative to those of the parental MW2 strain (Fig. 1). Interestingly, the D37A mutant resulted in enhancement of resistance to hNP-1 and RP-1-induced killing in vitro (P < 0.01 and P < 0.05 compared to MW2, respectively).

Effect of GraS EL mutations on induction of mprF and dltABCD expression.To assess the role of the GraS EL and specific amino acids therein on the transcriptional response, mutant strains were exposed to subinhibitory concentrations of hNP-1 or PMB in vitro, and transcription levels of mprF and dltA genes were measured (Fig. 2 and 3). Consistent with previous experiments (17), the expression of mprF and dltA was significantly upregulated by PMB (∼4.7- and 5.5-fold higher than in the absence of PMB, respectively; Fig. 3A and B) but not substantially by hNP-1 (Fig. 2A and B) in the parental MW2 strain. As expected, the ΔgraS and ΔEL strains showed no induction of mprF and dltA transcription by PMB (Fig. 3A and B), confirming the essential role of the EL of GraS in inducing downstream target gene expression. Complementation of the ΔgraS and ΔEL strains with a graRS-expressing plasmid restored the inducibility of mprF expression by PMB (Fig. 3A). In contrast to mprF expression, induction of the dltA transcription by PMB in these two complemented strains was restored only partially (Fig. 3B).

FIG 2
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2

Induction of mprF (A) and dltA (B) transcription by hNP-1. Gene expression analyses were performed on RNA samples from cultures of the study strains exposed to hNP-1 (30 μg/ml) for 30 min during exponential growth. MHA, CAP-free medium alone; 3D▶3G, D35G D37G D41G strain. *, P < 0.01 compared to condition without hNP-1 treatment.

FIG 3
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 3

Induction of mprF (A) and dltA (B) transcription by polymyxin B. Gene expression analyses were performed on RNA samples from cultures of the study strains exposed to polymyxin B (30 μg/ml) for 30 min during exponential growth. MHB, CAP-free medium alone; 3D▶3G, D35G D37G D41G strain. *, P < 0.01 compared to the condition without hNP-1 treatment.

Consistent with a previous publication (17), vancomycin (2 μg/ml) and oxacillin (50 μg/ml) did not induce expression of mprF and dltA in any of the tested strains (data not shown).

Next, we studied critical residues within the EL of GraS that may be involved in the induction of graRS-regulated genes upon exposure to HD-CAPs. To do so, qRT-PCR analyses were performed on RNA samples from EL mutant strains, in the presence and absence of hNP-1 or PMB. Surprisingly, enhanced induction of both mprF and dltA expression by hNP-1 was observed in the D37A strain (∼2- and 3-fold induction versus medium-only control, respectively), while all the other EL point-mutated strains (P39A, P39S, and D35G D37G D41G constructs) showed no induction at all. Similar to hNP-1 induction, the D37A mutant strain exhibited a significantly enhanced level of induction of both mprF and dltA transcription in response to CAPs compared to those of the parental MW2 strain (P < 0.01). These observations suggested that the aspartic acid (D) at position 37 may be important for CAP induction of the GraRS TCRS. Although expression of mprF and dltA in the P39A, P39S, and D35G D37G D41G variants was induced by PMB, levels of induction were significantly reduced compared with those of MW2. Replacement of three aspartic acids within the EL with glycine residues (D35G D37G D41G) resulted in the most significant impact on induction of mprF and dltA transcription by PMB. Similar induction profiles of mprF and dltA expression were observed when the cultures were incubated with a lower concentration of PMB (∼0.1× MIC; data not shown). Collectively, these data indicated that induction of mprF and dltA gene expression by specific CAPs is dependent on the sensor kinase, GraS, and, more specifically, likely involves anionic residues (i.e., aspartic acid) within the EL of GraS.

Net cell surface charge.GraRS positively regulates expression of mprF and dltABCD, both of which are critical for maintaining overall positive surface charge in S. aureus (14, 16, 17, 36, 45, 46). Therefore, we sought to determine the relative surface charge of the isogenic strain set in the present study. As shown in Fig. 4, deletion of graS or the EL of graS in MW2 corresponded to increased net cytochrome c binding compared to the isogenic parental MW2 or respective complemented strains (i.e., less positive surface charge; P < 0.001). Reductions in the net positive surface charge were also observed in D37A (P < 0.05), P39A, and D35G D37G D41G (P < 0.01) strains, with the highest reduction seen for the latter variant strain.

FIG 4
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 4

Binding of positively charged cytochrome c to whole S. aureus cells. The graph shows the percentage of cytochrome c unbound after 15 min of incubation with S. aureus at room temperature. Data represent the means (±SD) from three independent experiments. The MW2 parental strain was normalized to 100%. *, P < 0.01; **, P < 0.05 compared to the MW2 parental strain.

CM fluidity/rigidity.CM fluidity analyses revealed no substantial differences among the 9 study strains (data not shown).

Protection of S. aureus from CAP killing by a soluble exogenous GraS EL mimetic.To assess whether the exogenous soluble EL of GraS contributes to S. aureus subversion of the antistaphylococcal effects of HD-CAPs, susceptibility assays to hNP-1 and RP-1 were performed in the presence of the soluble EL mimetic peptide. As shown in Fig. 5A and B, the exogenous EL (10 μg/ml), but not the nonsense peptide, enhanced survival of all the strains tested against both hNP-1 (10 μg/ml) and RP-1 (1 μg/ml). To ensure that this protection of cells from HD-CAP killing by the exogenous soluble EL mimetic was not related to a direct impact of this synthetic peptide on induction of mprF and dltABCD, we performed qRT-PCR analyses on the MW2 and ΔgraS strains either in the presence of the soluble EL or nonsense peptide control. Resulting data confirmed that transcription of mprF and dltA was not independently affected by either synthetic peptide (not shown).

FIG 5
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 5

Effect of soluble exogenous GraS EL mimetic on survival of S. aureus cells upon exposure to hNP-1 (A) or RP-1 (B). In vitro bacterial survival assays were carried out with hNP-1 (10 μg/ml) and RP-1 (1 μg/ml) using the 2-h microdilution method (9, 23). The data were calculated and expressed as the relative percentage of surviving CFU of CAP-exposed versus CAP-unexposed cells. Data represent the means (±SD) from three independent experiments. M, medium-only control; GraS, synthetic trimeric GraS EL; Scramble, random nonsense peptides. *, P < 0.01 compared to the medium-only control.

Comparative in vivo virulence.In the comparative virulence assessments, the ΔgraS and ΔEL strains exhibited dramatically lower CFU densities in all three target tissues than those in animals infected by the parental MW2 strain (reductions ranging from ∼5 to 6 log10 CFU/g versus MW2). Moreover, for all tested S. aureus strains, CFU densities in cardiac vegetations were significantly higher than those in kidney and spleens at 24 h postinfection (P < 0.01) (Table 3). The ΔgraS complementation strain resulted in return to near-parental bacterial densities in all three target tissues. Paralleling our in vitro gene expression profiles and HD-CAP susceptibility data, the D35G D37G D41G mutant strain showed only a modest reduction in target tissue counts and failed to reach statistical significance.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 3

Comparative in vivo virulence of study strains

DISCUSSION

HD-CAPs have evolved as integral components of the innate immune system. However, successful pathogens such as S. aureus have developed a variety of adaptive resistance strategies to circumvent the antimicrobial effects of a wide range of HD-CAPs. Recently, we and others have shown that the TCRS GraRS plays a pivotal role in resistance of S. aureus to distinct CAPs by functioning as a CAP sensor. Transcription of graRS-regulated genes, such as mprF and dltABCD, has been shown to be dependent on specific HDP/CAPs (14, 17), indicating additional mechanisms of target gene regulation via distinct CAP stimuli. For example, our studies (17) and those of Li et al. (14) demonstrated graRS-mediated regulation of the downstream mprF and dltABCD genes, the products of which are important for surface charge maintenance in S. aureus. In these prior investigations, it was demonstrated that a relatively selective range of CAPs appear to activate the graRS system in S. aureus (e.g., LL-37, RP-1, or PMB but not hBD-3 or hNP-1) (14, 17). Furthermore, we previously found that vraFG (a putative ABC efflux pump downstream of graRS) (15) could also alter the expression of mprF and dltABCD via an autocrine system involving graRS, indicating interdependency of graRS-vraFG expression (17).

GraRS homologs exist in Listeria spp. and S. epidermidis. For example, the GraS homolog in S. epidermidis is also involved in CAP sensing and activation of downstream target genes. Although there is a significant structural homology (70% at the amino acid level) between GraS sensor kinases of S. epidermidis and S. aureus, sequence divergence exists in the 9-amino-acid EL flanked by two transmembrane segments at the N terminus. Moreover, when the GraS loop of S. aureus is replaced with that of S. epidermidis in a parental S. aureus strain, GraS was activated rather “promiscuously” (instead of selectively) upon exposure to a large cadre of HD-CAPs, mirroring the loop donor S. epidermidis isolate. Thus, these domain swapping studies indicated that the nonameric GraS EL of S. aureus is important in the CAP-selective induction of GraRS-regulated genes. However, the amino acid residue-specific contributions within the nonameric EL to CAP-selective activation of GraRS TCRS are unknown.

In the present investigation, we used a well-characterized MRSA strain, MW2, and its isogenic graS deletion (ΔgraS) mutant as well as a graS mutant specifically devoid of the 9 amino acid EL (ΔEL strain). In addition, mutagenesis of individual residues within the EL (D37A, P39A, P39S, and D35G D37G D41G) was introduced in the MW2 parental strain. These strategic substitutions were designed to alter physicochemical properties believed to be integral to CAP-S. aureus interactions (e.g., charge, secondary structure, hydrogen bonding propensity), while preserving net biochemical context of the target EL sequence.

A number of interesting findings emerged from these investigations. First, the ΔgraS strain as well as the ΔEL strain displayed significantly increased susceptibilities to calcium-DAP (a positively charged lipopeptide antibiotic) and PMB (a highly cationic peptide of bacterial origin) compared to those of the parental MW2 and respective complemented strains. In addition, the two deletion mutants (ΔgraS and ΔEL strains) also displayed dramatically enhanced in vitro susceptibilities to the two prototypical HD-CAPs (hNP-1 and RP-1), implying a requisite role for the 9-amino-acid EL of GraS in sense and response mechanisms correlating with resistance to selective CAPs. Furthermore, in vitro CAP susceptibility assays of the P39A, P39S, and D35G D37G D41G EL point mutant strains demonstrated moderate reduction in susceptibilities to all tested CAPs. These specific data further suggest that the proline (at position 39 in GraS) and the two aspartic acid residues (at positions 37 and 41 in GraS) are important for graRS-mediated CAP sensing. It is important to emphasize that these specific residues are absent in the S. epidermidis EL counterpart of the GraS protein. These findings imply that the GraS sensor function involves both charge and three-dimensional conformation in its capacity to detect and transduce activation of GraR-mediated adaptive responses to HD-CAPs. Further studies on the EL residue-specific impacts on GraS CAP sensing characteristics are in progress.

Second, since previous studies have shown regulation of mprF and dltABCD by the graRS-vraFG regulatory network, we examined the ability of the study strains to induce mprF and dltA expression upon exposure to hNP-1 or PMB by qRT-PCR. Previously, we have demonstrated that the expression of the graRS-mediated effector genes, mprF and dltABCD, was induced upon exposure to PMB but not by hNP-1. As anticipated, all tested strains showed either no or only minimal induction of mprF and dltA expression upon exposure to hNP-1, except for the D37A mutant. The significant induction of mprF and dltA expression by hNP-1 in the D37A mutant (Fig. 2A and B) suggests that the aspartic acid residues in EL affect CAP specificity of GraS. Furthermore, the D37A mutant displayed enhanced induction of mprF and dltA expression by PMB compared to that of the parental MW2 strain. This outcome suggests that the D37 residue contributes to the magnitude of activation of GraS sensor for target gene expression, and the D37A mutation may represent a “gain-in-function” substitution. The enhanced transcription of mprF and dltA in D37A correlated with the enhanced survival of the mutant strain in hNP-1 and RP-1 killing assays (Fig. 1A and B). However, the present analyses failed to reveal the expected impacts on surface charge, despite enhanced expression of mprF and dltABCD in the D37A mutant. In contrast, reduction of mprF and dltA induction by PMB was found in the P39A, P39S, and D35G D37G D41G mutants, indicating these latter residues are fundamental to the appropriate activation of the GraS sensor kinase.

Third, our in vitro data led us to evaluate the in vivo virulence impacts of specific mutations in the graRS operon in the rabbit IE model. Achievable target organ bacterial densities were found to be dramatically reduced in animals infected with either the ΔgraS or ΔEL mutants. Both hNP-1 (prototypic neutrophil HD-CAP) and secreted mammalian platelet microbicidal proteins (represented by the synthetic congener, RP-1) play crucial roles in bacterial clearance in endovascular infections. These functions are believed to include (i) platelet-mediated clearance of bacteria from vegetations by way of secreted kinocidins and (ii) neutrophil-mediated clearance of bacteria from within hematogenous abscesses in target organs, such as kidneys and spleens, as a result of intracellular HD-CAPs (e.g., hNP-1), in combination with traditional neutrophil-based oxidative antimicrobial mechanisms. Thus, the inability to induce mprF and dlt expression in the various graS mutants, and in turn their increased susceptibilities to HD-CAPs, may explain their highly significant reductions in bacterial fitness in the IE model. In contrast, but consistent with our in vitro data on CAP susceptibility and induction of mprF and dltA expression, the virulence impacts of the D35G D37G D41G EL mutant were rather modest. It should be mentioned that in previous work from our laboratories (16), individual knockouts of dltA and mprF in a different background S. aureus strain yielded significant albeit rather modest impacts on virulence in the same experimental IE model (16). These latter data speak to the key role of graS in virulence networks beyond dltA and mprF.

Lastly, recently published studies by Li et al. (45) demonstrated that antisera raised against the EL of GraS rendered S. epidermidis unable to induce downstream target genes in response to human β-defensin 3. Consistent with our present data, these findings suggest the importance of the EL sensor in the interaction with HD-CAPs. Moreover, our findings that the exogenous soluble EL mimetic of GraS protects S. aureus against hNP-1 or RP-1 suggest that direct interactions of the EL with the HD-CAP(s) are required for triggering of the graRS-mediated sense-response system. These data suggest that the graRS-mediated protection against antistaphylococcal effects of CAPs necessitates the interaction of EL of GraS with HD peptides of the innate immune system.

The current study offers important new insights into the potential roles of the GraRS TCRS in sense-and-response adaptations for S. aureus survival to specific HD-CAPs or cationic anti-infectives. This investigation also advances our understanding of the role of specific residues within the GraS sensing loop in the outcome of infections based on the specific host contexts that S. aureus may encounter in vivo. We also recognize the limitations of these studies, including (i) only one genetic background was investigated, (ii) a limited cadre of HD and other CAPs were evaluated, (iii) an incomplete set of EL point mutants was assessed, and (iv) assessment of the impact on in vivo virulence was restricted to a single animal model (IE). These limitations are currently being addressed in our laboratories.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (AI-39108 to A.S.B., AI-111661 to M.R.Y., AI-97657 to Y.Q.X., and AI-91801 to A.L.C.) and the American Heart Association (12BGIA11780035 to S.-J.Y.).

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 11 August 2014.
    • Returned for modification 19 August 2014.
    • Accepted 30 September 2014.
    • Accepted manuscript posted online 6 October 2014.
  • Copyright © 2014, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Peschel A
    . 2002. How do bacteria resist human antimicrobial peptides? Trends Microbiol. 10:179–186. doi:10.1016/S0966-842X(02)02333-8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    1. Voyich JM,
    2. Braughton KR,
    3. Sturdevant DE,
    4. Whitney AR,
    5. Said-Salim B,
    6. Porcella SF,
    7. Long RD,
    8. Dorward DW,
    9. Gardner DJ,
    10. Kreiswirth BN,
    11. Musser JM,
    12. DeLeo FR
    . 2005. Insights into mechanisms used by Staphylococcus aureus to avoid destruction by human neutrophils. J. Immunol. 175:3907–3919. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.175.6.3907.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Yeaman MR,
    2. Yount NY
    . 2003. Mechanisms of antimicrobial peptide action and resistance. Pharmacol. Rev. 55:27–55. doi:10.1124/pr.55.1.2.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Ganz T,
    2. Selsted ME,
    3. Lehrer RI
    . 1990. Defensins. Eur. J. Haematol. 44:1–8.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    1. Peschel A,
    2. Sahl H-G
    . 2006. The co-evolution of host cationic antimicrobial peptides and microbial resistance. Nat. Rev. Micro. 4:529–536. doi:10.1038/nrmicro1441.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    1. Moreillon P,
    2. Que Y-A
    . 2004. Infective endocarditis. Lancet 363:139–149. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(03)15266-X.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    1. Moreillon P,
    2. Que Y-A,
    3. Bayer AS
    . 2002. Pathogenesis of streptococcal and staphylococcal endocarditis. Infect. Dis. Clin. North Am. 16:297–318. doi:10.1016/S0891-5520(01)00009-5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    1. Mylonakis E,
    2. Calderwood SB
    . 2001. Infective endocarditis in adults. N. Engl. J. Med. 345:1318–1330. doi:10.1056/NEJMra010082.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    1. Jones T,
    2. Yeaman MR,
    3. Sakoulas G,
    4. Yang SJ,
    5. Proctor RA,
    6. Sahl HG,
    7. Schrenzel J,
    8. Xiong YQ,
    9. Bayer AS
    . 2008. Failures in clinical treatment of Staphylococcus aureus infection with daptomycin are associated with alterations in surface charge, membrane phospholipid asymmetry, and drug binding. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52:269–278. doi:10.1128/AAC.00719-07.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Mishra NN,
    2. McKinnell J,
    3. Yeaman MR,
    4. Rubio A,
    5. Nast CC,
    6. Chen L,
    7. Kreiswirth BN,
    8. Bayer AS
    . 2011. In vitro cross-resistance to daptomycin and host defense cationic antimicrobial peptides in clinical methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 55:4012–4018. doi:10.1128/AAC.00223-11.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Mishra NN,
    2. Yang SJ,
    3. Sawa A,
    4. Rubio A,
    5. Nast CC,
    6. Yeaman MR,
    7. Bayer AS
    . 2009. Analysis of cell membrane characteristics of in vitro-selected daptomycin-resistant strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53:2312–2318. doi:10.1128/AAC.01682-08.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Yang S-J,
    2. Nast CC,
    3. Mishra NN,
    4. Yeaman MR,
    5. Fey PD,
    6. Bayer AS
    . 2010. Cell wall thickening is not a universal accompaniment of the daptomycin nonsusceptibility phenotype in Staphylococcus aureus: evidence for multiple resistance mechanisms. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 54:3079–3085. doi:10.1128/AAC.00122-10.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. West AH,
    2. Stock AM
    . 2001. Histidine kinases and response regulator proteins in two-component signaling systems. Trends Biochem. Sci. 26:369. doi:10.1016/S0968-0004(01)01852-7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    1. Li M,
    2. Cha DJ,
    3. Lai Y,
    4. Villaruz AE,
    5. Sturdevant DE,
    6. Otto M
    . 2007. The antimicrobial peptide-sensing system aps of Staphylococcus aureus. Mol. Microbiol. 66:1136–1147. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05986.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    1. Meehl M,
    2. Herbert S,
    3. Gotz F,
    4. Cheung A
    . 2007. Interaction of the GraRS two-component system with the VraFG ABC transporter to support vancomycin-intermediate resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51:2679–2689. doi:10.1128/AAC.00209-07.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Weidenmaier C,
    2. Peschel A,
    3. Kempf VAJ,
    4. Lucindo N,
    5. Yeaman MR,
    6. Bayer AS
    . 2005. DltABCD- and MprF-mediated cell envelope modifications of Staphylococcus aureus confer resistance to platelet microbicidal proteins and contribute to virulence in a rabbit endocarditis model. Infect. Immun. 73:8033–8038. doi:10.1128/IAI.73.12.8033-8038.2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Yang S-J,
    2. Bayer AS,
    3. Mishra NN,
    4. Meehl M,
    5. Ledala N,
    6. Yeaman MR,
    7. Xiong YQ,
    8. Cheung AL
    . 2012. The Staphylococcus aureus two-component regulatory system, GraRS, senses and confers resistance to selected cationic antimicrobial peptides. Infect. Immun. 80:74–81. doi:10.1128/IAI.05669-11.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Ernst C,
    2. Staubitz P,
    3. Mishra NN,
    4. Yang SJ,
    5. Hornig G,
    6. Kalbacher H,
    7. Bayer AS,
    8. Kraus D,
    9. Peschel A
    . 2009. The bacterial defensin resistance protein MprF consists of separable domains for lipid lysinylation and antimicrobial peptide repulsion. PLoS Pathog. 5:e1000660. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1000660.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Yang S-J,
    2. Xiong YQ,
    3. Dunman PM,
    4. Schrenzel J,
    5. Francois P,
    6. Peschel A,
    7. Bayer AS
    . 2009. Regulation of mprF in daptomycin-nonsusceptible Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53:2636–2637. doi:10.1128/AAC.01415-08.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Bertsche U,
    2. Yang S-J,
    3. Kuehner D,
    4. Wanner S,
    5. Mishra NN,
    6. Roth T,
    7. Nega M,
    8. Schneider A,
    9. Mayer C,
    10. Grau T,
    11. Bayer AS,
    12. Weidenmaier C
    . 2013. Increased cell wall teichoic acid production and d-alanylation are common phenotypes among daptomycin-resistant methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) clinical isolates. PLoS One 8:e67398. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0067398.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Xiong YQ,
    2. Bayer AS,
    3. Elazegui L,
    4. Yeaman MR
    . 2006. A synthetic congener modeled on a microbicidal domain of thrombin-induced platelet microbicidal protein-1 recapitulates staphylocidal mechanisms of the native molecule. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50:3786–3792. doi:10.1128/AAC.00038-06.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Yeaman MR,
    2. Gank KD,
    3. Bayer AS,
    4. Brass EP
    . 2002. Synthetic peptides that exert antimicrobial activities in whole blood and blood-derived matrices. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:3883–3891. doi:10.1128/AAC.46.12.3883-3891.2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Xiong YQ,
    2. Mukhopadhyay K,
    3. Yeaman MR,
    4. Adler-Moore J,
    5. Bayer AS
    . 2005. Functional interrelationships between cell membrane and cell wall in antimicrobial peptide-mediated killing of Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49:3114–3121. doi:10.1128/AAC.49.8.3114-3121.2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Cole AM,
    2. Hong T,
    3. Boo LM,
    4. Nguyen T,
    5. Zhao C,
    6. Bristol G,
    7. Zack JA,
    8. Waring AJ,
    9. Yang OO,
    10. Lehrer RI
    . 2002. Retrocyclin: a primate peptide that protects cells from infection by T- and M-tropic strains of HIV-1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99:1813–1818. doi:10.1073/pnas.052706399.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2012. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; 20th informational supplement. CLSI M100-S22. CLSI, Wayne, PA.
  26. 26.↵
    1. Yeaman MR,
    2. Puentes SM,
    3. Norman DC,
    4. Bayer AS
    . 1992. Partial characterization and staphylocidal activity of thrombin-induced platelet microbicidal protein. Infect. Immun. 60:1202–1209.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Dyer DW,
    2. Iandolo JJ
    . 1983. Rapid isolation of DNA from Staphylococcus aureus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 46:283–285.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Inoue H,
    2. Nojima H,
    3. Okayama H
    . 1990. High efficiency transformation of Escherichia coli with plasmids. Gene 96:23–28. doi:10.1016/0378-1119(90)90336-P.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  29. 29.↵
    1. Schenk S,
    2. Laddaga RA
    . 1992. Improved method for electroporation of Staphylococcus aureus. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 73:133–138.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Arnaud M,
    2. Chastanet A,
    3. Debarbouille M
    . 2004. New vector for efficient allelic replacement in naturally nontransformable, low-GC-content, Gram-positive bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70:6887–6891. doi:10.1128/AEM.70.11.6887-6891.2004.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    1. Burlak C,
    2. Hammer CH,
    3. Robinson M-A,
    4. Whitney AR,
    5. McGavin MJ,
    6. Kreiswirth BN,
    7. DeLeo FR
    . 2007. Global analysis of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus exoproteins reveals molecules produced in vitro and during infection. Cell. Microbiol. 9:1172–1190. doi:10.1111/j.1462-5822.2006.00858.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  32. 32.↵
    1. Ding Y,
    2. Fu Y,
    3. Lee JC,
    4. Hooper DC
    . 2012. Staphylococcus aureus NorD, a putative efflux pump coregulated with the Opp1 oligopeptide permease, contributes selectively to fitness in vivo. J. Bacteriol. 194:6586–6593. doi:10.1128/JB.01414-12.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    1. Voyich JM,
    2. Vuong C,
    3. DeWald M,
    4. Nygaard TK,
    5. Kocianova S,
    6. Griffith S,
    7. Jones J,
    8. Iverson C,
    9. Sturdevant DE,
    10. Braughton KR,
    11. Whitney AR,
    12. Otto M,
    13. DeLeo FR
    . 2009. The SaeR/S gene regulatory system is essential for innate immune evasion by Staphylococcus aureus. J. Infect. Dis. 199:1698–1706. doi:10.1086/598967.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  34. 34.↵
    1. Fu Z,
    2. Tamber S,
    3. Memmi G,
    4. Donegan NP,
    5. Cheung AL
    . 2009. Overexpression of MazFSa in Staphylococcus aureus induces bacteriostasis by selectively targeting mRNAs for cleavage. J. Bacteriol. 191:2051–2059. doi:10.1128/JB.00907-08.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    1. Bertsche U,
    2. Weidenmaier C,
    3. Kuehner D,
    4. Yang S-J,
    5. Baur S,
    6. Wanner S,
    7. Francois P,
    8. Schrenzel J,
    9. Yeaman MR,
    10. Bayer AS
    . 2011. Correlation of daptomycin resistance in a clinical Staphylococcus aureus strain with increased cell wall teichoic acid production and d-alanylation. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 55:3922–3928. doi:10.1128/AAC.01226-10.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    1. Yang SJ,
    2. Kreiswirth BN,
    3. Sakoulas G,
    4. Yeaman MR,
    5. Xiong YQ,
    6. Sawa A,
    7. Bayer AS
    . 2009. Enhanced expression of dltABCD is associated with development of daptomycin nonsusceptibility in a clinical endocarditis isolate of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Infect. Dis. 200:1916–1920. doi:10.1086/648473.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  37. 37.↵
    1. Peschel A,
    2. Otto M,
    3. Jack RW,
    4. Kalbacher H,
    5. Jung G,
    6. Gotz F
    . 1999. Inactivation of the dlt operon in Staphylococcus aureus confers sensitivity to defensins, protegrins, and other antimicrobial peptides. J. Biol. Chem. 274:8405–8410. doi:10.1074/jbc.274.13.8405.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. 38.↵
    1. Mukhopadhyay K,
    2. Whitmire W,
    3. Xiong YQ,
    4. Molden J,
    5. Jones T,
    6. Peschel A,
    7. Staubitz P,
    8. Adler-Moore J,
    9. McNamara PJ,
    10. Proctor RA,
    11. Yeaman MR,
    12. Bayer AS
    . 2007. In vitro susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus to thrombin-induced platelet microbicidal protein-1 (tPMP-1) is influenced by cell membrane phospholipid composition and asymmetry. Microbiology 153:1187–1197. doi:10.1099/mic.0.2006/003111-0.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  39. 39.↵
    1. Mishra NN,
    2. Liu GY,
    3. Yeaman MR,
    4. Nast CC,
    5. Proctor RA,
    6. McKinnell J,
    7. Bayer AS
    . 2011. Carotenoid-related alteration of cell membrane fluidity impacts Staphylococcus aureus susceptibility to host defense peptides. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 55:526–531. doi:10.1128/AAC.00680-10.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. 40.↵
    1. Bayer AS,
    2. Prasad R,
    3. Chandra J,
    4. Koul A,
    5. Smriti M,
    6. Varma A,
    7. Skurray RA,
    8. Firth N,
    9. Brown MH,
    10. Koo S-P,
    11. Yeaman MR
    . 2000. In vitro resistance of Staphylococcus aureus to thrombin-induced platelet microbicidal protein is associated with alterations in cytoplasmic membrane fluidity. Infect. Immun. 68:3548–3553. doi:10.1128/IAI.68.6.3548-3553.2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. 41.↵
    1. Yeaman MR,
    2. Sullam PM,
    3. Dazin PF,
    4. Norman DC,
    5. Bayer AS
    . 1992. Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus-platelet binding by quantitative flow cytometric analysis. J. Infect. Dis. 166:65–73. doi:10.1093/infdis/166.1.65.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  42. 42.↵
    1. Weidenmaier C,
    2. Peschel A,
    3. Xiong Y-Q,
    4. Kristian SA,
    5. Dietz K,
    6. Yeaman MR,
    7. Bayer AS
    . 2005. Lack of wall teichoic acids in Staphylococcus aureus leads to reduced interactions with endothelial cells and to attenuated virulence in a rabbit model of endocarditis. J. Infect. Dis. 191:1771–1777. doi:10.1086/429692.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  43. 43.↵
    1. Xiong Y-Q,
    2. Kupferwasser LI,
    3. Zack PM,
    4. Bayer AS
    . 1999. Comparative efficacies of liposomal amikacin (MiKasome) plus oxacillin versus conventional amikacin plus oxacillin in experimental endocarditis induced by Staphylococcus aureus: microbiological and echocardiographic analyses. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43:1737–1742.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. 44.↵
    1. Xiong YQ,
    2. Fowler JVG,
    3. Yeaman MR,
    4. Perdreau-Remington F,
    5. Kreiswirth BN,
    6. Bayer AS
    . 2009. Phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of persistent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia in vitro and in an experimental endocarditis model. J. Infect. Dis. 199:201–208. doi:10.1086/595738.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  45. 45.↵
    1. Li M,
    2. Lai Y,
    3. Villaruz AE,
    4. Cha DJ,
    5. Sturdevant DE,
    6. Otto M
    . 2007. Gram-positive three-component antimicrobial peptide-sensing system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104:9469–9474. doi:10.1073/pnas.0702159104.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. 46.↵
    1. Yang S-J,
    2. Mishra NN,
    3. Rubio A,
    4. Bayer AS
    . 2013. Causal role of single nucleotide polymorphisms within the mprF gene of Staphylococcus aureus in daptomycin resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 57:5658–5664. doi:10.1128/AAC.01184-13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. 47.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 1999. Four pediatric deaths from community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus—Minnesota and North Dakota,1997–1999. Morb. Wkly. Rep. 48:707–710.
    OpenUrl
  48. 48.
    1. Hanahan D
    . 1983. Studies on transformation of Escherichia coli with plasmids. J. Mol. Biol. 166:557–580. doi:10.1016/S0022-2836(83)80284-8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  49. 49.
    1. Forsyth RA,
    2. Haselbeck RJ,
    3. Ohlsen KL,
    4. Yamamoto RT,
    5. Xu H,
    6. Trawick JD,
    7. Wall D,
    8. Wang L,
    9. Brown-Driver V,
    10. Froelich JM,
    11. C KG,
    12. King P,
    13. McCarthy M,
    14. Malone C,
    15. Misiner B,
    16. Robbins D,
    17. Tan Z,
    18. Zhu Z-y,
    19. Carr G,
    20. Mosca DA,
    21. Zamudio C,
    22. Foulkes JG,
    23. Zyskind JW
    . 2002. A genome-wide strategy for the identification of essential genes in Staphylococcus aureus. Mol. Microbiol. 43:1387–1400. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.02832.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Site-Specific Mutation of the Sensor Kinase GraS in Staphylococcus aureus Alters the Adaptive Response to Distinct Cationic Antimicrobial Peptides
Ambrose L. Cheung, Arnold S. Bayer, Michael R. Yeaman, Yan Q. Xiong, Alan J. Waring, Guido Memmi, Niles Donegan, Siyang Chaili, Soo-Jin Yang
Infection and Immunity Nov 2014, 82 (12) 5336-5345; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.02480-14

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Infection and Immunity article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Site-Specific Mutation of the Sensor Kinase GraS in Staphylococcus aureus Alters the Adaptive Response to Distinct Cationic Antimicrobial Peptides
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Infection and Immunity
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Infection and Immunity.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Site-Specific Mutation of the Sensor Kinase GraS in Staphylococcus aureus Alters the Adaptive Response to Distinct Cationic Antimicrobial Peptides
Ambrose L. Cheung, Arnold S. Bayer, Michael R. Yeaman, Yan Q. Xiong, Alan J. Waring, Guido Memmi, Niles Donegan, Siyang Chaili, Soo-Jin Yang
Infection and Immunity Nov 2014, 82 (12) 5336-5345; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.02480-14
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About IAI
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #IAIjournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0019-9567; Online ISSN: 1098-5522