Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Infection and Immunity
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Host Response and Inflammation

CD4+ T Cells Promote Antibody Production but Not Sustained Affinity Maturation during Borrelia burgdorferi Infection

Rebecca A. Elsner, Christine J. Hastey, Nicole Baumgarth
S. Ehrt, Editor
Rebecca A. Elsner
aCenter for Comparative Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA
bMicrobiology Graduate Group, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christine J. Hastey
aCenter for Comparative Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA
bMicrobiology Graduate Group, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nicole Baumgarth
aCenter for Comparative Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA
bMicrobiology Graduate Group, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA
cDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Ehrt
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.02471-14
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

CD4 T cells are crucial for enhancing B cell-mediated immunity, supporting the induction of high-affinity, class-switched antibody responses, long-lived plasma cells, and memory B cells. Previous studies showed that the immune response to Borrelia burgdorferi appears to lack robust T-dependent B cell responses, as neither long-lived plasma cells nor memory B cells form for months after infection, and nonswitched IgM antibodies are produced continuously during this chronic disease. These data prompted us to evaluate the induction and functionality of B. burgdorferi infection-induced CD4 TFH cells. We report that CD4 T cells were effectively primed and TFH cells induced after B. burgdorferi infection. These CD4 T cells contributed to the control of B. burgdorferi burden and supported the induction of B. burgdorferi-specific IgG responses. However, while affinity maturation of antibodies against a prototypic T-dependent B. burgdorferi protein, Arthritis-related protein (Arp), were initiated, these increases were reversed later, coinciding with the previously observed involution of germinal centers. The cessation of affinity maturation was not due to the appearance of inhibitory or exhausted CD4 T cells or a strong induction of regulatory T cells. In vitro T-B cocultures demonstrated that T cells isolated from B. burgdorferi-infected but not B. burgdorferi-immunized mice supported the rapid differentiation of B cells into antibody-secreting plasma cells rather than continued proliferation, mirroring the induction of rapid short-lived instead of long-lived T-dependent antibody responses in vivo. The data further suggest that B. burgdorferi infection drives the humoral response away from protective, high-affinity, and long-lived antibody responses and toward the rapid induction of strongly induced, short-lived antibodies of limited efficacy.

INTRODUCTION

Tick-borne infections with the Lyme disease agent Borrelia burgdorferi induce chronic nonresolving infections that result in tissue inflammation, most frequently so-called Lyme arthritis and myocarditis and, in some humans and nonhuman primates, but not mice, the inflammation of the central nervous system (1−3). The presence of gamma interferon (IFN-γ)-producing CD4 T cells has been associated mostly with increased tissue pathology in humans and mice (4−7), and the treatment of mice with anti-interleukin-12 (IL-12) monoclonal antibody (MAb) reduced arthritis development in C3H mice (6). Thus, much focus on CD4 T cell responses to B. burgdorferi has been on their pathological and proinflammatory role.

Early studies provided evidence both for and against a positive role of T cells in the course of B. burgdorferi-induced disease (4, 8, 9), leading some to conclude that CD4 T cells are largely dispensable for the control of B. burgdorferi infection (4, 8). However, while the anti-IL-12 treatment reduced tissue pathology, it also increased the B. burgdorferi tissue burden (6), and the lack of IFN-γ was shown to increase joint swelling (10). Others reported that the adoptive transfer of IFN-γ-secreting CD4+ T cells into B. burgdorferi-infected T-cell-deficient mice promoted carditis resolution (11). Thus, together these data suggest that CD4 T cells can play an immune-enhancing role against B. burgdorferi by activating cellular immune response components, such as macrophages, thereby reducing tissue-spirochete burden, albeit at the cost of causing tissue damage.

Another important function of CD4 T cells is their ability to enhance antibody-mediated immunity by driving affinity maturation and the development of long-lived plasma cells and memory B cells (12, 13). Strong evidence links infection-induced, antibody-mediated immunity to the control of B. burgdorferi tissue burden and to disease resolution (4, 14, 15) but not to the clearance of B. burgdorferi infection (16, 17). Paradoxically, existing literature suggests that the presence of CD4 T cells does not measurably enhance the disease-ameliorating humoral response to B. burgdorferi (8), which may be explained by an induction of strong disease-resolving T cell-independent B cell responses (8, 18). However, it appears unlikely that the protective B cell response to B. burgdorferi, a highly complex pathogen expressing many immunogenic surface antigens (19), is confined to T-independent antibody responses alone. Indeed, previous studies identified Arthritis-related protein (Arp; GenBank accession no. AF050212) of B. burgdorferi N40 to be dependent on conventional T cell help in C57BL/6 mice (20). Such antibodies were shown previously to resolve arthritis development (21).

Studies with multiple pathogens have demonstrated a specific role for CD4 T follicular helper (TFH) cells in the activation of B cells (22), including the induction of germinal centers, hallmarks of T-dependent B cell responses and birthplaces of long-term humoral immunity (23). Our recent studies suggested that germinal center responses were nonfunctional after primary B. burgdorferi infection, as long-lived antibody-secreting plasma cells (18) and memory B cells (R. A. Elsner, C. J. Hastey, and N. Baumgarth, unpublished data) were not induced for months after infection (18). Importantly, a coadministered influenza vaccine antigen similarly failed to induce long-term immunity when given during B. burgdorferi infection (Elsner et al., unpublished). Thus, these studies pointed to specific deficits in the T-dependent B cell responses against B. burgdorferi.

Here, we sought to directly assess the impact of B. burgdorferi infection on the induction and functionality of CD4 T cells, particularly the induction of the TFH cells. The study confirms our previous findings on the inability of T-dependent B. burgdorferi-specific germinal center-derived antibodies to be maintained in the long term after B. burgdorferi infection. While CD4 T cell responses appeared effectively primed and TFH cells were induced following B. burgdorferi infection, affecting a reduction of B. burgdorferi tissue burden, they differed in functionality from TFH cells induced following immunization with B. burgdorferi. Infection-induced TFH cells showed a greater in vitro propensity to drive rapid B cell differentiation but not proliferation, mirroring the induction of rapid short-lived, instead of long-lived, T-dependent antibody responses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Borrelia burgdorferi, recombinant proteins, and qPCR.Low-passage-number aliquots of B. burgdorferi sensu stricto strain cN40 were cultured in modified Barbour-Stoenner-Kelley II medium at 33°C. Spirochetes were enumerated at mid-log phase using a Petroff-Hauser bacterial counting chamber (Baxter Scientific) and were used to infect SCID mice or for in vitro assays. Recombinant Arp from B. burgdorferi cN40 was generated in-house as previously described (24). Recombinant DbpA from cN40 was produced by GenScript. The detection of the number of FlaB copies per mg of tissue by quantitative PCR (qPCR) was done as previously described (18).

Mice, infections, and immunizations.Female C57BL/6J (B6), BALB/cByJ (BALB/c), male or female B6.CB17-Prkdcscid/SzJ (B6-SCID), and CBySmn.CB17-Prkdcscid/J (BALB/c-SCID) mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory. Breeder pairs of BLIMP-yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) reporter mice (25) were a kind gift of M. C. Nussenzweig (Rockefeller University). TS-1 BALB/c mice (breeder pairs kindly provided by A. Caton, The Wistar Institute) express a transgenic influenza virus hemagglutinin-specific T cell receptor (TCR) (influenza virus strain A/Puerto Rico/34/8, H1N1) (26). B6-SCID and BALB/c-SCID mice were infected by subcutaneous injection between the shoulders with 1 × 104 or 1 × 106 B. burgdorferi spirochetes, respectively. After 2 to 5 weeks, ear tissue pieces from infected SCID mice were transplanted beneath the skin of the right hind leg of recipient C57BL/6 or BALB/cByJ mice for study (24). For B. burgdorferi immunization, mice were given a single subcutaneous injection in the right hind leg of 5 × 103 heat-killed and sonicated bacteria emulsified in complete Freund's adjuvant (Difco Laboratories). For influenza virus immunization, 1,000 hemagglutinating units (HAU) of influenza virus A/PR8 (H1N1) in 100 μl phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) was mixed with 100 μl of incomplete Freund's adjuvant (Difco Laboratories) or Imject alum (Thermo Scientific), and two subcutaneous injections of 100 μl each were given on both sides of the tail base. Mice were maintained in microisolator cages under specific-pathogen-free conditions (available upon request). The University of California, Davis, Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee approved all experimental protocols.

In vivo CD4 depletion.Three days prior to infection, B6 mice were injected intraperitoneally with 0.3 mg of either rat anti-mouse CD4 (clone GK1.5) MAb or polyclonal rat IgG control Ab (Sigma). Anti-CD4 was purified in-house from tissue culture supernatants by protein G affinity chromatography. Following infection, mice were given twice-weekly 0.1-mg doses of antibodies. On days 0 and 28 postinfection, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from tail vein blood to confirm CD4 T cell depletion by fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS) analysis with anti-CD4-Alexa 750-allophycocyanin (APC) (clone RM4-5; eBioscience). CD4 T cells also were quantified in spleen and right inguinal lymph node samples at day 60 postinfection.

Flow cytometry.Cells were prepared and stained as previously described (27) with the following antibodies, generated in-house unless otherwise specified: CD19-Cy5-phycoerythrin (PE), CD3-fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC), CD80-Cy5.5-PE, CD4-Alexa 750-APC (clone RM4-5; eBioscience), biotinylated anti-TS-1-transgene (clone 6.5-1), streptavidin-QDot605 (Molecular Probes), CD3-Alexa 750-APC (eBioscience), CD44-APC (eBioscience), CD11a-Cy7-PE (BD Biosciences), CD4-Cy5.5-PE (in-house and eBioscience), ICOS-FITC (clone 7E.17G9; BD Pharmingen; conjugated in-house), CD3-eFluor780-APC (eBioscience), CXCR5-Biotin (BD Pharmingen), CXCR4-APC (BD Biosciences), PD-1-PE (eBioscience), CTLA-4-PE (eBioscience), CD45R-Cy5.5-PE, CD19-APC, CD4-FITC, and CD4-APC. When indicated, cells were stained for active caspase-3-PE (BD Biosciences) by following the manufacturer's instructions. Surface staining was followed by staining with the dead cell discriminator Live/Dead fixable violet (Invitrogen). Cells were washed and resuspended for FACS analysis. Samples were run on either a FACSAria or Fortessa instrument (BD Biosciences). Data were analyzed using FlowJo software (Tree Star Inc.).

ELISA.B. burgdorferi Arp- and DbpA-specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) were performed as described above using 2.5 μg/ml Arp and 0.5 to 1 μg/ml DbpA as a coating, revealing bound serum IgG with goat anti-mouse IgG (Southern Biotech). B. burgdorferi-specific IgG was measured using a cocktail of 2.5 μg/ml each of Arp, DbpA, OspC, and BmpA and revealing serum antibodies with goat anti-mouse IgG (Southern Biotech) (18). For index ELISAs, immediately following a 2-h incubation with serum, duplicate wells were incubated with PBS or 6 M urea (in PBS) for 5 min. Detection steps were as described previously (18), except that for all subsequent wash steps, plates were washed 5 times with PBS (omitting the previously described PBS-Tween and distilled water wash steps). The avidity index was calculated as the ratio of antibody detected with urea wash to total antibody detected by PBS wash; in other words, the ratio of high avidity to total antibody in the serum. An avidity index of 1 indicates that antigen-specific antibodies were fully retained during the high-stringency urea wash.

T cell priming.Lymph nodes collected from infected or immunized mice at the indicated days posttreatment were pooled and homogenized between the ends of two frosted glass slides. Live cells were counted by Trypan dye exclusion and plated at the indicated cell numbers. CD4+ cells from spleens of naive TS-1 mice were enriched by depletion of unwanted cells using antibodies against CD8α, CD19, CD11b, and CD49b (BioLegend) and anti-biotin MicroBeads (Miltenyi Biotec). CD4+ cell purities ranged from 85 to 91% as assessed by FACS analysis. CD4+ cells were washed in PBS and labeled with 0.5 μM carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (CFSE; Molecular Probes) for 10 min, immediately followed by adding 10 to 12 ml staining media. Cells were washed once more with staining media and resuspended in cell culture media (RPMI [Gibco] containing 100 U/ml penicillin/100 μg/ml streptomycin/0.292 mg/ml l-glutamate [Gibco] and 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum [Gibco]), and live cells were counted. Graded numbers of CD4+ cells plus 200 HAU heat-killed influenza virus were added to the culture. Cells were cultured for 4 days at 37°C with 5% CO2. Cells were stained with anti-CD4 and antibody 6.5-2, specific for the TS-1 transgene, and the dead cell exclusion dye Live/Dead fixable violet (Invitrogen).

T cell-B cell coculture.B cells were enriched from day 10-immunized B6 mice by magnetic depletion (autoMACS; Miltenyi Biotech) of unwanted cells (CD4, CD8a, CD11b, and T-cell receptor γ/δ [eBioscience]). T cells were enriched from mice at day 10 of infection or immunization by depletion of unwanted cells (CD19, CD8a, CD11b, and CD49b [eBioscience]). B and T cell purities were determined to be >91%. B cells were labeled with CFSE, washed, and resuspended in cell culture media, and 2.5 × 105 B cells were added per well to 96-well plates. Graded numbers of CD4+ T cells were added to culture wells in triplicate, along with 1 × 106 heat-killed (60°C 1 h) culture-grown B. burgdorferi, and cultured for 4 days. Supernatants were collected for antibody detection by ELISA, and cells were washed and stained for flow cytometry. CFSE dilution on CD45R+ B cells was analyzed using the FlowJo Proliferation Platform to determine the frequency of cells that underwent at least one division and the average number of divisions of proliferating cells. For BLIMP-YFP expression, cultures were established as described above but as single rather than triplicate wells, and ICOS+ CD4+ T cells were FACS sorted from B. burgdorferi-infected or -immunized mice; influenza virus-immunized mice served as a negative (noncognate) control. For this, 2.5 × 107 B. burgdorferi-immunized B cells/ml were pulsed for 1.5 h with either 1 × 108/ml B. burgdorferi or 1,000 HAU/ml heat-inactivated influenza virus (noncognate control) and cultured as described above. After 4 days, supernatants were collected to determine antibody concentration by ELISA, and cells were stained for flow cytometry.

Statistical analysis.All graphs and statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism software, version 5 (GraphPad Software). P values were calculated as indicated in the figure legends, and P < 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

T cells contribute to the control of bacterial burden and affinity maturation but fail to maintain the proportion of high-avidity antibodies.We began our analysis of CD4+ T cell function during B. burgdorferi infection by studying the effects of depleting CD4+ cells over the course of 60 days of infection of B6 mice with host-adapted N40 spirochetes (24). The efficiency of depletion was confirmed by FACS analysis (Fig. 1A). Compared to controls, mice depleted of CD4+ cells had significantly higher copy numbers of B. burgdorferi flagellin DNA in the urinary bladder and heart base (Fig. 1B). Results in the tibiotarsus did not reach significance. These studies demonstrate that CD4+ T cells are important for the control of bacterial burden.

FIG 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1

CD4+ T cells affect bacterial burden. C57BL/6 (B6) mice were infected with B. burgdorferi and depleted of CD4+ T cells (CD4 depl.; open circles) or treated with rat IgG (control, filled circles) for 60 days. (A) PBMCs, lymph nodes, or spleens were taken at the indicated time points and stained for CD4+ cells to confirm depletion. (B) Bacterial burden was quantified by qPCR for flaB copy number in the indicated tissues. Blad., bladder; R. Tibiotar., right tibiotarsus. (C) Serum antigen (Ag)-specific antibodies were quantified by ELISA. The percentage of Ag-specific antibodies for each mouse compared to the means of the control mice is reported. Symbols represent individual mice (n = 3 each group), with bars indicating the means ± standard deviations (SD)/group. Significance (NS, not significant) for each tissue was calculated using Student's t test.

CD4+ T cells can provide help for the generation of B. burgdorferi-specific antibodies after infection, and antibodies are crucial in regulating B. burgdorferi tissue burden and disease manifestations (21). The IgG response to a prototypic B. burgdorferi antigen, arthritis-related protein (Arp) of B. burgdorferi, which was shown previously to protect from arthritis development, was completely dependent on CD4 T cells, as CD4 T cell removal reduced IgG responses to Arp to undetectable levels (Fig. 1C). IgG responses to DbpA appeared T independent, while BmpA-IgG responses were somewhat increased in CD4 T-deficient mice. Consistent with these data, a previous study with T cell-deficient TCRβ/δ−/− mice also found a lack of T dependence of the DbpA response (20). Furthermore, repeated immunization with recombinant DbpA from cN40 failed to induce measurable CD4 T cell responses (data not shown). While the responses to OspC were reduced in the CD4-depleted mice, this reduction did not reach statistical significance (Fig. 1C). However, additional experiments with CD40L−/− mice showed this response to be dependent in part on conventional T cell help (data not shown). Thus, CD4 T cells importantly affect the magnitude and composition of the humoral response to B. burgdorferi, suggesting that the increased B. burgdorferi load observed in CD4-depleted mice (Fig. 1A) likely is due at least in part to altered antigen-specific serum IgG responses (Fig. 1C).

To further address the effects of CD4 T cells on the quality of the B. burgdorferi-specific serum IgG responses, we examined to what extent affinity maturation, a T cell-dependent process that occurs largely in germinal centers, is evident after B. burgdorferi infection. Due to its complete dependence on CD4 T cells, we focused on IgG responses to Arp. DbpA-specific T cell-independent antibodies served as a control (Fig. 1C) (8, 20). We utilized a method for detecting changes in the overall avidity of B. burgdorferi antigen-specific serum antibodies over time by comparing antibody binding after high- and low-stringency washes. Arp-specific antibody avidity increased for the first 6 to 8 weeks of infection of B6 mice but declined for the next 10 weeks despite continued increases in serum levels of these antibodies (Fig. 2A). As expected, the T-independent DbpA-specific antibody response did not increase in avidity over the course of infection (Fig. 2B).

FIG 2
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2

T-dependent Arp-specific antibodies undergo affinity maturation, but high-avidity antibodies are not maintained. (A and B) Arp-specific (A) and DbpA-specific (B) IgG avidity indexes were calculated by establishing the ratio of IgG bound to Ag in the presence/absence of a high-salt wash for serum samples from B6 mice collected at the indicated times after B. burgdorferi infection (solid line, left y axis). These are compared to the total Arp-specific (A) and DbpA-specific (B) IgG detected in the PBS wash (dashed line, right y axis). Points represent means ± SD (n = 4) from one experiment.

Thus, affinity maturation of IgG to the T-dependent antigen Arp was induced but not efficiently maintained either because of stronger increases in low-avidity responses or a cessation of high-avidity antibody production. The latter is consistent with our previous findings that germinal center responses decline, starting 3 weeks after B. burgdorferi infection, and fail to develop T-dependent B cell memory and long-lived plasma cells (18). These data demonstrate that CD4 T cells provide help for early antibody production and participate in antibody affinity maturation. However, these responses are not sustained, causing only short-lived induction of high-avidity antibody responses. Since high-avidity B cell responses are dependent on effective T cell help, we sought to systematically assess CD4+ T cell priming and expansion and B cell helper function during B. burgdorferi infection to determine whether B. burgdorferi reduces CD4 priming or affects their functionality during infection.

Lymph node cells from B. burgdorferi-infected mice support CD4+ T cell priming.To measure the ability of antigen-presenting cells from lymph nodes of B. burgdorferi-infected mice to prime naive T cells, we cultured them with an unrelated antigen (influenza virus) and naive CFSE-labeled influenza virus-specific TS-1 transgenic CD4 T cells in vitro and assessed T cell proliferation by FACS. Lymph node antigen-presenting cells from B. burgdorferi-immunized mice served as controls. Because the TS-1 transgenic mice are inbred BALB/c mice, these studies used BALB/c mice. TS-1 proliferation was induced in an antigen dose-dependent manner, and priming with antigen-presenting cells from B. burgdorferi-infected lymph nodes was indistinguishable from priming induced by lymph node cells from immunized animals (Fig. 3A).

FIG 3
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 3

Lymph node cells from B. burgdorferi-infected mice support CD4 T cell priming. (A) At day 10 of B. burgdorferi infection or immunization of BALB/c mice, lymph node cell suspensions were cultured at the indicated ratios with naive, CFSE-labeled, transgenic T cells specific for influenza virus APR/8 hemagglutinin and heat-killed whole virus to assess the ability of the lymph node antigen-presenting cell environment to prime T cells. The frequency of TS-1 cells that proliferated (in diluted CFSE) is shown. Each symbol represents one culture well, and the P value was calculated using Student's t test. One representative experiment of three is shown. (B) CCR7 mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) of ICOS− and ICOS+ lymph node T cells from B6 mice 10 days after B. burgdorferi infection (open symbols) or immunization (filled symbols). Symbols represent individual mice (n = 4), and bars indicate the means for each group.

Primed T cells downregulate CCR7 expression to migrate toward B cell follicles (28). Therefore, we quantified CCR7 expression by flow cytometry as a measure of in vivo priming efficiency. The results showed that activated ICOS+ T cells downregulated CCR7 expression by day 10 of B. burgdorferi infection as efficiently as control T cells from immunized B6 mice (Fig. 3B). Thus, antigen-presenting cells from B. burgdorferi-infected mice appeared capable of strong CD4 T cell priming.

B. burgdorferi infection induces strong CD4 T cell activation.We next began to assess the quality of T cell help induced during B. burgdorferi infection by examining markers of T cell exhaustion and suppression. Follicular T helper (TFH) cells are the major CD4+ T cell population interacting with B cells. TFH cells (CD3+ CD4+ ICOS+) coexpressing CXCR4 and CXCR5 localize to germinal centers (TGC; X5+ X4+) (27). Thus, the expression of these two chemokine receptors can distinguish germinal center-resident TFH from non-germinal-center TFH cells, and the latter only express CXCR5 (X5+ X4−) (27). Both TFH and TGC cells were induced by B. burgdorferi infection (Fig. 4A).

FIG 4
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 4

B. burgdorferi infection induces strong CD4 T cell activation. (A) Representative FACS plots illustrating CXCR5+ PD-1hi TFH and CXCR5+ CXCR4+ TGC populations in lymph nodes at day 15 of B. burgdorferi infection of B6 mice. Further analysis of CXCR5+ CXCR4+ TGC cells showed a homogeneously PD-1hi population, with the PD-1 MFI remaining constant during germinal collapse. Time points represent means ± SD from four mice for one experiment. (B) Representative FACS plots from lymph nodes at day 21 of B. burgdorferi infection showing CTLA-4 expression on total CD4+ T cells (top) and CXCR5+ CXCR4+ TGC cells (bottom). The frequency of CTLA-4+ cells among TGC cells compared to naive ICOS− T cells was determined by FACS analysis. Each symbol and lines represent the means ± SD from four mice for each time point for one experiment. (C) The analysis was done as shown in panel B for active caspase-3.

Because PD-1 overexpression is a sign of T cell exhaustion in chronic infection (29), we monitored its expression on lymph node T cell subsets over the course of B. burgdorferi infection in B6 mice. As expected, PD-1 expression was highest on TGC cells, lower on non-germinal-center TFH and total activated ICOS+ cells, and not expressed on the largely naive ICOS− T cells (Fig. 4A). Germinal center responses drastically decline between days 15 and 60 of B. burgdorferi infection (18). The expression of PD-1 on CD4 T cells did not increase over this time (Fig. 4A). We also found that the frequency of CD4+ T cells coexpressing the inhibitory molecule CTLA-4+ actually was lower at days 21 and 30 than at day 10 of infection (Fig. 4B). Finally, we examined the frequency of active caspase-3+ apoptotic T cells during germinal center decline and again found that the frequency was, if anything, lower than that on day 10 for each T cell population (Fig. 4C). Therefore, it appears that the failure to maintain germinal center responses during B. burgdorferi infection is not due to the presence of exhausted or suppressive T cells or the death of large numbers of activated T cells.

FoxP3+ Treg numbers are comparable to those of immunized controls.Regulatory TFH cells coexpressing FoxP3 have been shown to regulate germinal center B cell responses (30; reviewed in reference 22). The strong induction of regulatory T cells during B. burgdorferi infection could lead to a suppression of T-dependent B cell responses. However, no significant difference in the frequency of FoxP3+ CD4+ Treg was notable at day 10 of B. burgdorferi infection compared to the level for immunized B6 controls (Fig. 5A). Although the frequency of FoxP3+ cells among TGC and ICOS+ populations did rise slightly over days 21 and 30 (Fig. 5B), the overall number of these cells was very low compared to that of the ICOS− FoxP3+ cells (Fig. 5C). Collectively, these data do not support a strong role for Treg-mediated suppression after B. burgdorferi infection as a mechanism by which germinal center responses might be terminated.

FIG 5
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 5

FoxP3+ Treg numbers are comparable to those of immunized controls. (A) FoxP3+ Treg populations were compared in lymph nodes from B6 mice at day 10 after B. burgdorferi immunization or infection. Shown are the frequencies of FoxP3+ cells among CD4+ T cells, with each symbol representing one mouse and the means ± SD. Student's t test did not show a significant difference between the populations. This was repeated at day 15 after infection/immunization with the same results (data not shown). (B and C) The frequency (B) and number (C) of FoxP3+ cells of each indicated CD4+ T cell subset were quantified by flow cytometry at the indicated days postinfection to assess the kinetics of Treg populations. Symbols and lines represent the means ± SD from four mice.

CD4+ T cells promote antibody secretion over B cell proliferation.Since the presence of exhausted or suppressive T cell populations did not seem to explain the failure to sustain germinal center responses in vivo after B. burgdorferi infection, we next assessed the functional capacity of CD4+ T cells to provide help to B cells in vitro. For this, we cultured B cells from lymph nodes of immunized control mice with T cells from either B. burgdorferi-infected or B. burgdorferi-immunized B6 mice and compared their abilities to provide cognate help for B cell proliferation and differentiation. Similar numbers of B cells initiated division in culture with CD4 T cells from day 10 B. burgdorferi-immunized or -infected lymph nodes (Fig. 6C). However, CD4+ T cells from infected mice supported significantly fewer rounds of B cell division than CD4+ T cells from immunized control mice (Fig. 6B and D), resulting in significantly lower frequencies of CFSElow B cells (Fig. 6A and E). This indicated that CD4+ T cells from B. burgdorferi-infected mice are less effective in supporting B cell proliferation than those taken from immunized mice.

FIG 6
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 6

B. burgdorferi infection-induced CD4+ T cells promote B cell antibody secretion and differentiation but not B cell proliferation. (A to F) Antigen-pulsed B cells from B. burgdorferi-immunized (A to E) or B. burgdorferi-infected (F) B6 mice were cultured with the indicated number of T cells from B. burgdorferi-immunized (Imm T) or B. burgdorferi-infected (Inf T) mice for 4 days. Each symbol represents the means ± SD from triplicate culture wells; P values were calculated by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Shown is one representative experiment of three. (A and D) B cell proliferation was assessed by CFSE dilution. FlowJo Proliferation Platform analysis (B) calculated the frequency of B cells in the initial culture that underwent at least one division (C), as well as the average number of divisions of proliferating B cells (E). (F) Antibody concentrations in the supernatants were determined by ELISA. (G) B cells from B. burgdorferi (Bb)-immunized BLIMP-1-YFP reporter mice were cultured as described for panels A to F, and BLIMP-1 expression was assessed after 4 days. Shown are representative FACS plots pregated on live, CD19+ cells identifying BLIMP-1+ single B cells and CD4+ CD19+ doublets. (H) Frequency of live BLIMP-1+ cells among CD19+ cells (left) and CD19+ CD4+ doublets (right). Each symbol represents one culture well at decreasing numbers of CD4+ T cells. The P value was calculated by Student's t test using paired observations.

A mismatch in antigen specificity might have led to decreases in B cell proliferation, as B. burgdorferi surface antigen expression in the host-adapted spirochetes used for infections likely is somewhat different from the culture-grown spirochetes used for immunization. However, no significant differences in the initiation of B cell divisions were noted (Fig. 6C), and similarly reduced levels of B cell proliferation were observed in cocultures with both T and B cells from infected B6 mice compared to cocultures with T cells from immunized mice and B cells from infected mice (data not shown). Furthermore, and remarkably, while CD4+ T cells from infected mice consistently provided poor help for B cell proliferation, they induced significantly more antibody secretion by B cells than their counterparts isolated from B. burgdorferi-immunized mice (Fig. 6F). Thus, differences in the quality of T cell help exist between CD4 T cells isolated from B. burgdorferi-immunized mice and those from B. burgdorferi-infected mice.

Because strong antibody production is found in vivo in the lymph nodes of mice early after B. burgdorferi infection (18, 24), we aimed to further assess the functional impact of CD4 T cells from infected mice on B cell differentiation to antibody-producing cells. High levels of antibody secretion are associated with differentiation to plasma cells driven by the expression of the transcription factor BLIMP-1 (reviewed in reference 31). Using a Blimp-1 reporter mouse, we showed that T cells from B. burgdorferi-infected B6 mice induced more B cell expression of BLIMP-1 than immunized mice. While this difference did not quite reach statistical significance (P = 0.07) (Fig. 6H, left), when we focused on CD4 T cell/CD19+ B cell conjugates, which formed strongly in cultures with B. burgdorferi-specific T and B cells but not in control cultures with influenza virus-specific CD4 T cells (Fig. 6G), the frequency of BLIMP-1+ B cells among doublets was significantly higher for T cells from B. burgdorferi-infected mice (P < 0.05) (Fig. 6H, right). Stable B-T conjugate formation previously has been reported to occur in vivo between B cells and cytokine-secreting TFH cells (32). These data suggest that helper CD4 T cells in B. burgdorferi infection support the rapid differentiation of B cells to antibody-secreting cells over the continued proliferation of B cells. Given the lack of effects noted on B cells from influenza virus-immunized mice, the provided help likely is cognate in nature and not due to nonspecific B cell activation.

DISCUSSION

B cell responses are crucial for host defense against many extracellular pathogens (33), including infections with B. burgdorferi (20, 34). B. burgdorferi-specific antibodies reduce B. burgdorferi tissue burden and disease manifestations, such as arthritis, myocarditis, and neuroinflammation (1–3, 20, 34). We showed previously that T-dependent and T-independent B. burgdorferi-specific antibodies are rapidly and strongly induced in extrafollicular areas of the lymph node within the first week of infection, providing early B. burgdorferi-specific antibodies (18). T-dependent germinal centers also were established by about 2 weeks after the infection (18). This is consistent with data from our study here that showed strong CD4 T cell activation and their differentiation to TFH cells, including to CXCR4+ CXCR5+ TGC cells (Fig. 4). This initial germinal center response likely is responsible for the generation of affinity-matured serum IgG (Fig. 2). Thus, early T-dependent B cell activation events appear to be initiated in the lymph nodes of B. burgdorferi-infected mice.

However, similar to the germinal center responses, which rapidly involute within 3 to 4 weeks after B. burgdorferi infection (18), affinity-matured antibody levels begin to decline after about 6 weeks (Fig. 1); thus, it appears that affinity-matured IgG ceases to be produced at about the same time as germinal centers begin to disappear from the lymph nodes of infected mice (18). This is consistent with previous findings that long-lived plasma cells are not induced after B. burgdorferi infection. Thus, any antibody secretion from cells that have successfully undergone affinity maturation would be provided by short-lived plasmablasts/cells.

Interestingly, a previous study demonstrated that the passive protective capacity of immune serum initially rises after infection but then begins to decline despite increasing levels of total B. burgdorferi-specific IgG (35). While there likely are multiple mechanisms at play, our data suggest that the early outputs of the germinal center responses increased the protective capacity due to their increased avidity, but that the production of such higher avidity antibodies is not maintained. The decline in germinal center responses occurred despite the ongoing presence of antigen (18), and as we show here, it was not associated with a lack or disappearance of TGC cells, a strong induction of regulatory FoxP3-positive TGC cells, or the presence of suppressive or exhausted CD4 T cells (Fig. 4). Thus, a lack of T cell activation or TFH cell differentiation is unlikely to be responsible for the previously observed failure to induce functional long-lived high-affinity T-dependent B cell responses during B. burgdorferi infection. Studies in humans (36), mice (37), and dogs (38) provide evidence that late in the infection the immune response eventually shifts toward the generation of long-lived antibodies and memory B cells. However, by then the bacteria are disseminated and may no longer be fully accessible to these later responses.

The failure to induce fully functional germinal center responses after B. burgdorferi infection explains the clinical observations that humans and animals, particularly those living in areas where the infection is endemic, can be reinfected frequently (39, 40). They also explain the challenge in using serological evaluation of patient sera to test for prior exposure to B. burgdorferi (2, 41–43). IgG responses to B. burgdorferi are known to severely decline following antibiotic treatment (41), and this in fact is sometimes used as a sign of effective treatment (44). Thus, B. burgdorferi serodiagnostics may greatly underestimate the number of prior exposures, not necessarily because the available tests are of low quality but because of the pathophysiology of the B. burgdorferi infection-induced B cell responses. Whether CD4 T cell responses, which we show here to be induced by the infection, develop memory and provide a more suitable diagnostic target remains to be determined. The lack of defined major histocompatibility complex class II-restricted CD4 T cell epitopes, for use with studies in mice and humans, currently is hindering progress in this regard.

Consistent with the in vivo induction of mainly short-lived extrafollicular B cell responses resulting in rapid antibody production after B. burgdorferi infection, the in vitro helper function of the B. burgdorferi-specific CD4 T cells appeared to be skewed toward providing effective help for B cell differentiation to plasma cells but less support of ongoing strong B cell proliferation (Fig. 6). When we compared the expression of numerous cytokines, including IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, and IL-21, known to be critical for germinal center function from purified CD4+ T cells of lymph nodes at days 10 and 21 after infection and after immunization, we did not observe significant differences (data not shown). Thus, the mechanisms underlying these differential effects of CD4 T cells on B cell help remain to be elucidated. The data provide the intriguing possibility that the interaction of B cells with infection-induced CD4 TFH cells promotes their rapid differentiation and premature exit from germinal centers in vivo rather than their ongoing proliferation and resulting affinity maturation.

While this study focused on the B helper functions of CD4 T cells, CD4 T cell's interaction with innate leukocytes, in particular macrophages, likely is crucially affecting Borrelia burden in addition to their effects on the humoral response. Macrophages are important for the control of the infection. For example, macrophage activation via IFN-γ or its suppression by IL-10 regulate their ability to phagocytose and destroy spirochetes (45–47). Importantly, the type of inflammatory cytokines elaborated by macrophages depends on the type of receptors engaged in the initial phagocytosis of B. burgdorferi (48), and this in turn likely is influenced by the activation stage of the macrophage, which itself is dependent on cytokines, such as IFN-γ, elaborated by CD4 T cells and iNKT cells (47). The outcome of these diverse effects of CD4 T cells on the control of Borrelia-induced disease appears strongly tissue dependent. In joint tissue, the ability of CD4 T cells to increase inflammation likely contributes to Lyme arthritis development (4, 49), while in the heart, the elaboration of IFN-γ by CD4 T cells led to carditis resolution (11). In this context, these cells seemed to function in part by a forward-feedback loop in which IFN-γ production by CD4 T cells or innate cells alters chemokine production that favors the accumulation of CD4 T cells and macrophages at the expense of a strongly neutrophilic infiltrate (50). In keeping with the diverse roles of CD4 T cells, their actions in the regulation of both cellular and humoral immune events clearly affect the course of B. burgdorferi infection in mammalian hosts.

CD4 T cells and T-dependent antibody responses are targets for attack or evasion by many highly successful viral (51, 52), bacterial (53, 54), and parasitic pathogens (55, 56). Thus, reducing the effectiveness of CD4 T cells during B. burgdorferi infection to support long-term humoral immunity and perhaps other mechanisms of immune protection would not be without precedent. This study suggests that the functionality of the helper T cells induced during B. burgdorferi infection is responsible in part for the preponderance of strong, low-affinity antibody responses over long-lived, high-affinity antibody responses to B. burgdorferi infection. Such a shift in the quality of the humoral response would benefit the pathogen. Ultimately, the question is whether the CD4 T cell function during B. burgdorferi infection can be manipulated therapeutically to improve resistance against B. burgdorferi infection.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by NIH/NIAID grants R01 AI073911 and R01 AI051354 and NIH training grants T32-AI060555 and T32-AI074550.

We thank Stephen Barthold (Center for Comparative Medicine, UC Davis) for ongoing support and expert advice regarding experimental design, as well as a member of his laboratory, Sunlian Feng, for supplying recombinant Arp. We acknowledge Abigail Spinner (California National Primate Research Center) for expert technical assistance with flow cytometry and Peter Barry (Center for Comparative Medicine, UC Davis) and laboratory members William Chang, Kim Schmidt, and Meghan Eberhardt for assistance with the avidity index assay.

We have no conflicts of interest to declare.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 8 August 2014.
    • Returned for modification 5 September 2014.
    • Accepted 3 October 2014.
    • Accepted manuscript posted online 13 October 2014.
  • Copyright © 2015, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Rupprecht TA,
    2. Koedel U,
    3. Fingerle V,
    4. Pfister HW
    . 2008. The pathogenesis of Lyme neuroborreliosis: from infection to inflammation. Mol Med 14:205–212.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    1. Shapiro ED
    . 2014. Clinical practice. Lyme disease. N Engl J Med 370:1724–1731. doi:10.1056/NEJMcp1314325.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Steere AC,
    2. Coburn J,
    3. Glickstein L
    . 2004. The emergence of Lyme disease. J Clin Investig 113:1093–1101. doi:10.1172/JCI21681.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    1. McKisic MD,
    2. Redmond WL,
    3. Barthold SW
    . 2000. Cutting edge: T cell-mediated pathology in murine Lyme borreliosis. J Immunol 164:6096–6099. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.164.12.6096.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Gross DM,
    2. Steere AC,
    3. Huber BT
    . 1998. T helper 1 response is dominant and localized to the synovial fluid in patients with Lyme arthritis. J Immunol 160:1022–1028.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Anguita J,
    2. Persing DH,
    3. Rincon M,
    4. Barthold SW,
    5. Fikrig E
    . 1996. Effect of anti-interleukin 12 treatment on murine Lyme borreliosis. J Clin Investig 97:1028–1034. doi:10.1172/JCI118494.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    1. Lim LC,
    2. England DM,
    3. DuChateau BK,
    4. Glowacki NJ,
    5. Schell RF
    . 1995. Borrelia burgdorferi-specific T lymphocytes induce severe destructive Lyme arthritis. Infect Immun 63:1400–1408.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. McKisic MD,
    2. Barthold SW
    . 2000. T-cell-independent responses to Borrelia burgdorferi are critical for protective immunity and resolution of Lyme disease. Infect Immun 68:5190–5197. doi:10.1128/IAI.68.9.5190-5197.2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Pride MW,
    2. Brown EL,
    3. Stephens LC,
    4. Killion JJ,
    5. Norris SJ,
    6. Kripke ML
    . 1998. Specific Th1 cell lines that confer protective immunity against experimental Borrelia burgdorferi infection in mice. J Leukoc Biol 63:542–549.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Brown CR,
    2. Reiner SL
    . 1999. Experimental Lyme arthritis in the absence of interleukin-4 or gamma interferon. Infect Immun 67:3329–3333.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Bockenstedt LK,
    2. Kang I,
    3. Chang C,
    4. Persing D,
    5. Hayday A,
    6. Barthold SW
    . 2001. CD4+ T helper 1 cells facilitate regression of murine Lyme carditis. Infect Immun 69:5264–5269. doi:10.1128/IAI.69.9.5264-5269.2001.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Deenick EK,
    2. Ma CS
    . 2011. The regulation and role of T follicular helper cells in immunity. Immunology 134:361–367. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2567.2011.03487.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    1. Vinuesa CG,
    2. Linterman MA,
    3. Goodnow CC,
    4. Randall KL
    . 2010. T cells and follicular dendritic cells in germinal center B-cell formation and selection. Immunol Rev 237:72–89. doi:10.1111/j.1600-065X.2010.00937.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    1. Barthold SW,
    2. Sidman CL,
    3. Smith AL
    . 1992. Lyme borreliosis in genetically resistant and susceptible mice with severe combined immunodeficiency. Am J Trop Med Hyg 47:605–613.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Schaible UE,
    2. Gay S,
    3. Museteanu C,
    4. Kramer MD,
    5. Zimmer G,
    6. Eichmann K,
    7. Museteanu U,
    8. Simon MM
    . 1990. Lyme borreliosis in the severe combined immunodeficiency (scid) mouse manifests predominantly in the joints, heart, and liver. Am J Pathol 137:811–820.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    1. Barthold SW,
    2. de Souza MS,
    3. Janotka JL,
    4. Smith AL,
    5. Persing DH
    . 1993. Chronic Lyme borreliosis in the laboratory mouse. Am J Pathol 143:959–971.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  17. 17.↵
    1. Steere AC
    . 1989. Lyme disease. N Engl J Med 321:586–596. doi:10.1056/NEJM198908313210906.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. 18.↵
    1. Hastey CJ,
    2. Elsner RA,
    3. Barthold SW,
    4. Baumgarth N
    . 2012. Delays and diversions mark the development of B cell responses to Borrelia burgdorferi infection. J Immunol 188:5612–5622. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1103735.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Kenedy MR,
    2. Lenhart TR,
    3. Akins DR
    . 2012. The role of Borrelia burgdorferi outer surface proteins. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 66:1–19. doi:10.1111/j.1574-695X.2012.00980.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Barthold SW,
    2. Hodzic E,
    3. Tunev S,
    4. Feng S
    . 2006. Antibody-mediated disease remission in the mouse model of Lyme borreliosis. Infect Immun 74:4817–4825. doi:10.1128/IAI.00469-06.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Feng S,
    2. Hodzic E,
    3. Barthold SW
    . 2000. Lyme arthritis resolution with antiserum to a 37-kilodalton Borrelia burgdorferi protein. Infect Immun 68:4169–4173. doi:10.1128/IAI.68.7.4169-4173.2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Ramiscal RR,
    2. Vinuesa CG
    . 2013. T-cell subsets in the germinal center. Immunol Rev 252:146–155. doi:10.1111/imr.12031.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Shlomchik MJ,
    2. Weisel F
    . 2012. Germinal center selection and the development of memory B and plasma cells. Immunol Rev 247:52–63. doi:10.1111/j.1600-065X.2012.01124.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Tunev SS,
    2. Hastey CJ,
    3. Hodzic E,
    4. Feng S,
    5. Barthold SW,
    6. Baumgarth N
    . 2011. Lymphoadenopathy during Lyme borreliosis is caused by spirochete migration-induced specific B cell activation. PLoS Pathog 7:e1002066. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1002066.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Ohinata Y,
    2. Payer B,
    3. O'Carroll D,
    4. Ancelin K,
    5. Ono Y,
    6. Sano M,
    7. Barton SC,
    8. Obukhanych T,
    9. Nussenzweig M,
    10. Tarakhovsky A,
    11. Saitou M,
    12. Surani MA
    . 2005. Blimp1 is a critical determinant of the germ cell lineage in mice. Nature 436:207–213. doi:10.1038/nature03813.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. 26.↵
    1. Kirberg J,
    2. Baron A,
    3. Jakob S,
    4. Rolink A,
    5. Karjalainen K,
    6. von Boehmer H
    . 1994. Thymic selection of CD8+ single positive cells with a class II major histocompatibility complex-restricted receptor. J Exp Med 180:25–34. doi:10.1084/jem.180.1.25.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Elsner RA,
    2. Ernst DN,
    3. Baumgarth N
    . 2012. Single and coexpression of CXCR4 and CXCR5 identifies CD4 T helper cells in distinct lymph node niches during influenza virus infection. J Virol 86:7146–7157. doi:10.1128/JVI.06904-11.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Haynes NM,
    2. Allen CD,
    3. Lesley R,
    4. Ansel KM,
    5. Killeen N,
    6. Cyster JG
    . 2007. Role of CXCR5 and CCR7 in follicular Th cell positioning and appearance of a programmed cell death gene-1 high germinal center-associated subpopulation. J Immunol 179:5099–5108. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.179.8.5099.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Sharpe AH,
    2. Wherry EJ,
    3. Ahmed R,
    4. Freeman GJ
    . 2007. The function of programmed cell death 1 and its ligands in regulating autoimmunity and infection. Nat Immunol 8:239–245. doi:10.1038/ni1443.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. 30.↵
    1. Lim HW,
    2. Hillsamer P,
    3. Kim CH
    . 2004. Regulatory T cells can migrate to follicles upon T cell activation and suppress GC-Th cells and GC-Th cell-driven B cell responses. J Clin Investig 114:1640–1649. doi:10.1172/JCI22325.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. 31.↵
    1. Calame KL,
    2. Lin KI,
    3. Tunyaplin C
    . 2003. Regulatory mechanisms that determine the development and function of plasma cells. Annu Rev Immunol 21:205–230. doi:10.1146/annurev.immunol.21.120601.141138.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  32. 32.↵
    1. Reinhardt RL,
    2. Liang HE,
    3. Locksley RM
    . 2009. Cytokine-secreting follicular T cells shape the antibody repertoire. Nat Immunol 10:385–393. doi:10.1038/ni.1715.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  33. 33.↵
    1. MacLennan IC,
    2. Toellner KM,
    3. Cunningham AF,
    4. Serre K,
    5. Sze DM,
    6. Zuniga E,
    7. Cook MC,
    8. Vinuesa CG
    . 2003. Extrafollicular antibody responses. Immunol Rev 194:8–18. doi:10.1034/j.1600-065X.2003.00058.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  34. 34.↵
    1. LaRocca TJ,
    2. Benach JL
    . 2008. The important and diverse roles of antibodies in the host response to Borrelia infections. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 319:63–103. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-73900-5_4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  35. 35.↵
    1. Barthold SW,
    2. Bockenstedt LK
    . 1993. Passive immunizing activity of sera from mice infected with Borrelia burgdorferi. Infect Immun 61:4696–4702.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    1. Fikrig E,
    2. Bockenstedt LK,
    3. Barthold SW,
    4. Chen M,
    5. Tao H,
    6. Ali-Salaam P,
    7. Telford SR,
    8. Flavell RA
    . 1994. Sera from patients with chronic Lyme disease protect mice from Lyme borreliosis. J Infect Dis 169:568–574. doi:10.1093/infdis/169.3.568.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  37. 37.↵
    1. Piesman J,
    2. Dolan MC,
    3. Happ CM,
    4. Luft BJ,
    5. Rooney SE,
    6. Mather TN,
    7. Golde WT
    . 1997. Duration of immunity to reinfection with tick-transmitted Borrelia burgdorferi in naturally infected mice. Infect Immun 65:4043–4047.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. 38.↵
    1. Barthold SW,
    2. Levy SA,
    3. Fikrig E,
    4. Bockenstedt LK,
    5. Smith AL
    . 1995. Serologic responses of dogs naturally exposed to or vaccinated against Borrelia burgdorferi infection. J Am Vet Med Assoc 207:1435–1440.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  39. 39.↵
    1. Nowakowski J,
    2. Nadelman RB,
    3. Sell R,
    4. McKenna D,
    5. Cavaliere LF,
    6. Holmgren D,
    7. Gaidici A,
    8. Wormser GP
    . 2003. Long-term follow-up of patients with culture-confirmed Lyme disease. Am J Med 115:91–96. doi:10.1016/S0002-9343(03)00308-5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  40. 40.↵
    1. Nadelman RB,
    2. Hanincova K,
    3. Mukherjee P,
    4. Liveris D,
    5. Nowakowski J,
    6. McKenna D,
    7. Brisson D,
    8. Cooper D,
    9. Bittker S,
    10. Madison G,
    11. Holmgren D,
    12. Schwartz I,
    13. Wormser GP
    . 2012. Differentiation of reinfection from relapse in recurrent Lyme disease. N Engl J Med 367:1883–1890. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1114362.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  41. 41.↵
    1. Aguero-Rosenfeld ME,
    2. Nowakowski J,
    3. Bittker S,
    4. Cooper D,
    5. Nadelman RB,
    6. Wormser GP
    . 1996. Evolution of the serologic response to Borrelia burgdorferi in treated patients with culture-confirmed erythema migrans. J Clin Microbiol 34:1–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. 42.↵
    1. Hammers-Berggren S,
    2. Lebech AM,
    3. Karlsson M,
    4. Svenungsson B,
    5. Hansen K,
    6. Stiernstedt G
    . 1994. Serological follow-up after treatment of patients with erythema migrans and neuroborreliosis. J Clin Microbiol 32:1519–1525.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. 43.↵
    1. Hofmann H
    . 1996. Lyme borreliosis–problems of serological diagnosis. Infection 24:470–472. doi:10.1007/BF01713052.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  44. 44.↵
    1. Lomholt H,
    2. Lebech AM,
    3. Hansen K,
    4. Brandrup F,
    5. Halkier-Sorensen L
    . 2000. Long-term serological follow-up of patients treated for chronic cutaneous borreliosis or culture-positive erythema migrans. Acta Derm Venereol 80:362–366. doi:10.1080/000155500459312.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  45. 45.↵
    1. Hawley K,
    2. Navasa N,
    3. Olson CM, Jr,
    4. Bates TC,
    5. Garg R,
    6. Hedrick MN,
    7. Conze D,
    8. Rincon M,
    9. Anguita J
    . 2012. Macrophage p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase activity regulates invariant natural killer T-cell responses during Borrelia burgdorferi infection. J Infect Dis 206:283–291. doi:10.1093/infdis/jis332.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. 46.↵
    1. Lazarus JJ,
    2. Kay MA,
    3. McCarter AL,
    4. Wooten RM
    . 2008. Viable Borrelia burgdorferi enhances interleukin-10 production and suppresses activation of murine macrophages. Infect Immun 76:1153–1162. doi:10.1128/IAI.01404-07.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. 47.↵
    1. Olson CM, Jr,
    2. Bates TC,
    3. Izadi H,
    4. Radolf JD,
    5. Huber SA,
    6. Boyson JE,
    7. Anguita J
    . 2009. Local production of IFN-gamma by invariant NKT cells modulates acute Lyme carditis. J Immunol 182:3728–3734. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.0804111.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. 48.↵
    1. Hawley KL,
    2. Olson CM, Jr,
    3. Iglesias-Pedraz JM,
    4. Navasa N,
    5. Cervantes JL,
    6. Caimano MJ,
    7. Izadi H,
    8. Ingalls RR,
    9. Pal U,
    10. Salazar JC,
    11. Radolf JD,
    12. Anguita J
    . 2012. CD14 cooperates with complement receptor 3 to mediate MyD88-independent phagocytosis of Borrelia burgdorferi. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:1228–1232. doi:10.1073/pnas.1112078109.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. 49.↵
    1. Sonderegger FL,
    2. Ma Y,
    3. Maylor-Hagan H,
    4. Brewster J,
    5. Huang X,
    6. Spangrude GJ,
    7. Zachary JF,
    8. Weis JH,
    9. Weis JJ
    . 2012. Localized production of IL-10 suppresses early inflammatory cell infiltration and subsequent development of IFN-gamma-mediated Lyme arthritis. J Immunol 188:1381–1393. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1102359.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. 50.↵
    1. Sabino GJ,
    2. Hwang SJ,
    3. McAllister SC,
    4. Mena P,
    5. Furie MB
    . 2011. Interferon-gamma influences the composition of leukocytic infiltrates in murine Lyme carditis. Am J Pathol 179:1917–1928. doi:10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.06.029.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. 51.↵
    1. Cespedes PF,
    2. Bueno SM,
    3. Ramirez BA,
    4. Gomez RS,
    5. Riquelme SA,
    6. Palavecino CE,
    7. Mackern-Oberti JP,
    8. Mora JE,
    9. Depoil D,
    10. Sacristan C,
    11. Cammer M,
    12. Creneguy A,
    13. Nguyen TH,
    14. Riedel CA,
    15. Dustin ML,
    16. Kalergis AM
    . 2014. Surface expression of the hRSV nucleoprotein impairs immunological synapse formation with T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111:E3214−E3223. doi:10.1073/pnas.1400760111.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. 52.↵
    1. Cubas RA,
    2. Mudd JC,
    3. Savoye AL,
    4. Perreau M,
    5. van Grevenynghe J,
    6. Metcalf T,
    7. Connick E,
    8. Meditz A,
    9. Freeman GJ,
    10. Abesada-Terk G, Jr,
    11. Jacobson JM,
    12. Brooks AD,
    13. Crotty S,
    14. Estes JD,
    15. Pantaleo G,
    16. Lederman MM,
    17. Haddad EK
    . 2013. Inadequate T follicular cell help impairs B cell immunity during HIV infection. Nat Med 19:494–499. doi:10.1038/nm.3109.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. 53.↵
    1. Racine R,
    2. Jones DD,
    3. Chatterjee M,
    4. McLaughlin M,
    5. Macnamara KC,
    6. Winslow GM
    . 2010. Impaired germinal center responses and suppression of local IgG production during intracellular bacterial infection. J Immunol 184:5085–5093. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.0902710.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  54. 54.↵
    1. Srinivasan A,
    2. Nanton M,
    3. Griffin A,
    4. McSorley SJ
    . 2009. Culling of activated CD4 T cells during typhoid is driven by Salmonella virulence genes. J Immunol 182:7838–7845. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.0900382.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  55. 55.↵
    1. Illingworth J,
    2. Butler NS,
    3. Roetynck S,
    4. Mwacharo J,
    5. Pierce SK,
    6. Bejon P,
    7. Crompton PD,
    8. Marsh K,
    9. Ndungu FM
    . 2013. Chronic exposure to Plasmodium falciparum is associated with phenotypic evidence of B and T cell exhaustion. J Immunol 190:1038–1047. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1202438.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  56. 56.↵
    1. Nunes MP,
    2. Fortes B,
    3. Silva-Filho JL,
    4. Terra-Granado E,
    5. Santos L,
    6. Conde L,
    7. de Araujo Oliveira I,
    8. Freire-de-Lima L,
    9. Martins MV,
    10. Pinheiro AA,
    11. Takyia CM,
    12. Freire-de-Lima CG,
    13. Todeschini AR,
    14. Dosreis GA,
    15. Morrot A
    . 2013. Inhibitory effects of Trypanosoma cruzi sialoglycoproteins on CD4+ T cells are associated with increased susceptibility to infection. PLoS One 8:e77568. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0077568.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
CD4+ T Cells Promote Antibody Production but Not Sustained Affinity Maturation during Borrelia burgdorferi Infection
Rebecca A. Elsner, Christine J. Hastey, Nicole Baumgarth
Infection and Immunity Dec 2014, 83 (1) 48-56; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.02471-14

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Infection and Immunity article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
CD4+ T Cells Promote Antibody Production but Not Sustained Affinity Maturation during Borrelia burgdorferi Infection
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Infection and Immunity
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Infection and Immunity.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
CD4+ T Cells Promote Antibody Production but Not Sustained Affinity Maturation during Borrelia burgdorferi Infection
Rebecca A. Elsner, Christine J. Hastey, Nicole Baumgarth
Infection and Immunity Dec 2014, 83 (1) 48-56; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.02471-14
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About IAI
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #IAIjournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0019-9567; Online ISSN: 1098-5522