Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Infection and Immunity
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Cellular Microbiology: Pathogen-Host Cell Molecular Interactions

Galectin-3 Is a Target for Proteases Involved in the Virulence of Staphylococcus aureus

Jonas Elmwall, Jakub Kwiecinski, Manli Na, Abukar Ahmed Ali, Veronica Osla, Lindsey N. Shaw, Wanzhong Wang, Karin Sävman, Elisabet Josefsson, Johan Bylund, Tao Jin, Amanda Welin, Anna Karlsson
Nancy E. Freitag, Editor
Jonas Elmwall
aDepartment of Rheumatology and Inflammation Research, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jonas Elmwall
Jakub Kwiecinski
aDepartment of Rheumatology and Inflammation Research, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
bDepartment of Microbiology, Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Manli Na
aDepartment of Rheumatology and Inflammation Research, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Abukar Ahmed Ali
aDepartment of Rheumatology and Inflammation Research, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Veronica Osla
aDepartment of Rheumatology and Inflammation Research, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lindsey N. Shaw
cDepartment of Cell Biology, Microbiology and Molecular Biology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Lindsey N. Shaw
Wanzhong Wang
dDepartment of Medical Biosciences, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karin Sävman
ePerinatal Center, Department of Physiology and Neuroscience, and Department of Pediatrics, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elisabet Josefsson
aDepartment of Rheumatology and Inflammation Research, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
fMölnlycke Health Care, Gothenburg, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Johan Bylund
gDepartment of Oral Microbiology and Immunology, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tao Jin
aDepartment of Rheumatology and Inflammation Research, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Tao Jin
Amanda Welin
aDepartment of Rheumatology and Inflammation Research, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anna Karlsson
aDepartment of Rheumatology and Inflammation Research, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Anna Karlsson
Nancy E. Freitag
University of Illinois at Chicago
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.00177-17
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Staphylococcus aureus is a major cause of skin and soft tissue infection. The bacterium expresses four major proteases that are emerging as virulence factors: aureolysin (Aur), V8 protease (SspA), staphopain A (ScpA), and staphopain B (SspB). We hypothesized that human galectin-3, a β-galactoside-binding lectin involved in immune regulation and antimicrobial defense, is a target for these proteases and that proteolysis of galectin-3 is a novel immune evasion mechanism. Indeed, supernatants from laboratory strains and clinical isolates of S. aureus caused galectin-3 degradation. Similar proteolytic capacities were found in Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates but not in Staphylococcus saprophyticus. Galectin-3-induced activation of the neutrophil NADPH oxidase was abrogated by bacterium-derived proteolysis of galectin-3, and SspB was identified as the major protease responsible. The impact of galectin-3 and protease expression on S. aureus virulence was studied in a murine skin infection model. In galectin-3+/+ mice, SspB-expressing S. aureus caused larger lesions and resulted in higher bacterial loads than protease-lacking bacteria. No such difference in bacterial load or lesion size was detected in galectin-3−/− mice, which overall showed smaller lesion sizes than the galectin-3+/+ animals. In conclusion, the staphylococcal protease SspB inactivates galectin-3, abrogating its stimulation of oxygen radical production in human neutrophils and increasing tissue damage during skin infection.

INTRODUCTION

Staphylococcus aureus is a versatile human pathogen that causes infection in a wide range of tissues and is a major cause of both superficial and fatal infections (1, 2). This bacterium modulates immune responses through the expression of an orchestra of virulence factors (2, 3), including the following four major proteases (Table 1): the metalloprotease aureolysin (Aur), the cysteine proteases staphopain A (ScpA) and staphopain B (SspB), and the serine protease V8 protease (SspA) (4, 5). They are encoded under the three operons aur, scp, and ssp as proenzymes that are partly activated by each other or by autocatalysis (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material) (4, 6–8). Their functions are not fully defined, although many observations suggest important roles in pathogenesis (5, 9).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Description of S. aureus proteases

Galectin-3 is a member of a family of soluble β-galactoside-binding lectins present in many species (10). It exhibits significant regulatory functions both in host defense against infection and in aseptic inflammation (11–13). Several findings suggest that galectin-3 participates in antimicrobial defense, having opsonizing and bacteriostatic properties or inducing infection-reducing effects in the host (14–16), but there are also data showing that galectin-3 can contribute to microbial pathogenesis, e.g., by promoting adhesion to host cells or increasing the tissue-destructive response of inflammatory cells (14, 15, 17, 18). Galectin-3 is produced in epithelia and by several immune cells and is released by monocytes and macrophages in response to bacterial lipopolysaccharide (19, 20). The lectin has been proposed to facilitate the transmigration of neutrophils, the most abundant circulating leukocyte, from blood into tissue during the initial steps of inflammation (16, 21). Galectin-3 also induces activation of the neutrophil NADPH oxidase, producing reactive oxygen species (ROS) (22, 23), and can opsonize apoptotic neutrophils to facilitate their clearance by macrophages (24).

Galectin-3 ligand binding is mediated through the C-terminal carbohydrate recognition domain (CRD), a globular structure that is highly preserved within the galectin family (10). In addition to the CRD, galectin-3 has a collagen-like N-domain that is sensitive to proteolytic cleavage (25). This N-domain is essential for oligomerization of galectin-3 and for many of the galectin-3-induced effects in inflammation (14, 22, 26). There are proteases known to cleave galectin-3; human neutrophil elastase and matrix metalloproteinases-2, -7, and -9 can proteolytically process the lectin (25, 27, 28), a feature shared by proteases from protozoa (29) and bacteria (26, 30, 31). Hence, N-terminal cleavage of galectin-3 could be suggested as a regulatory mechanism in infection and inflammation. Whether such galectin-3 processing is achieved by S. aureus proteases has so far not been investigated.

We found that the S. aureus protease staphopain B (SspB) had the capacity to cleave galectin-3, thereby inhibiting the neutrophil-activating ability of the lectin. Furthermore, galectin-3-cleaving activity was common among clinical isolates of S. aureus. In an in vivo murine model of S. aureus skin infection, severe tissue damage was associated with SspB expression, but only in galectin-3-expressing mice, suggesting that proteolytic processing of galectin-3 may contribute to bacterial virulence.

RESULTS

Neutrophil activation induced by galectin-3 is abrogated by factors secreted by S. aureus.To investigate whether galectin-3 is a target for S. aureus proteases, we used galectin-3-induced activation of human neutrophils as a readout (22). Neutrophils responded to activation by galectin-3 with a significant level of production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), in the same range as for the well-known neutrophil agonist phorbol myristate acetate (PMA) (Fig. 1A, inset). Upon preincubation of the lectin with S. aureus strain 8325-4 supernatant for 48 h, the ability of galectin-3 to trigger ROS production in neutrophils was abolished (Fig. 1A). Immunoblotting of the supernatant–galectin-3 mixture with an anti-CRD antibody showed that the original 32-kDa galectin-3 had been fully degraded by the supernatant and that the protein was instead present as a 16-kDa fragment. Thus, the N-terminal domain had been proteolytically cleaved, and the fragment consisted solely of the CRD (Fig. 1B). This explains the abrogation of the neutrophil-activating capacity of galectin-3 by the supernatant, as it is shown that the N-terminal domain is necessary for such activation (22).

FIG 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1

Galectin-3-induced ROS production in neutrophils is prevented by secreted factors from S. aureus strain 8325-4. (A) Galectin-3 (400 μg/ml) was incubated in the presence or absence of 2.5% S. aureus 8325-4 culture supernatant for 48 h. The preincubated galectin-3 was added to TNF-α-primed neutrophils at a 1:10 dilution. Production of ROS (y axis; AU, arbitrary units) was followed over time by isoluminol-amplified chemiluminescence. The results of a representative experiment out of six experiments are shown. The inset shows a comparison of the levels of ROS production upon stimulation with galectin-3 (40 μg/ml) and with PMA (50 nM), a well-defined and potent NADPH oxidase activator. (B) Galectin-3 incubated with or without culture supernatant (see above) was subjected to immunoblotting with an antibody directed toward the CRD. For reference, recombinant galectin-3 (32 kDa) and CRD (16 kDa) are shown. (C) Primed neutrophils were exposed to galectin-3 (40 μg/ml) in the presence or absence of culture supernatant without prior incubation or to culture supernatant only, and ROS production was measured as described above.

To ensure that the culture supernatant did not interfere with the chemiluminescence (CL) detection system per se, supernatant was added together with galectin-3 to neutrophils in the CL mixture without preincubation. The supernatant had no effect on the galectin-3-induced ROS production (Fig. 1C). Also, preincubation of horseradish peroxidase (HRP), the included peroxidase, with culture supernatant did not inhibit the CL response (data not shown).

Galectin-3 cleavage by S. aureus 8325-4 supernatant is inhibited by staphostatin B.Specific protease inhibitors (Table 1) were employed to identify the galectin-3-cleaving agents in the culture supernatant. S. aureus 8325-4 is a commonly used laboratory strain that carries a deletion in the rsbU gene, which causes an upregulation of proteases (4). The cleavage of galectin-3 by strain 8325-4 supernatants was preserved in the presence of protease inhibitors with one exception: when SspB was inhibited by SspC, no apparent cleavage could be distinguished, indicating that SspB has galectin-3-cleaving properties (Fig. 2A). This was supported by the corresponding experiment in the neutrophil activation system, i.e., the incubation of galectin-3 and culture supernatant in the presence or absence of SspC; the protease inhibitor totally rescued the galectin-3-induced response (Fig. 2B).

FIG 2
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2

Specific S. aureus proteases are responsible for cleavage of galectin-3 into lower-mass fragments. (A) Culture supernatants from S. aureus strain 8325-4 were incubated with galectin-3 (100 μg/ml) in the presence or absence of protease inhibitor ScpB, SspC, EDTA, or Pefabloc at the given concentrations for 1 h at 37°C. The samples were then analyzed for content of galectin-3 and fragments thereof by immunoblotting using the anti-CRD antibody. (B) Culture supernatants (diluted 1:40) from strain 8325-4 were incubated with galectin-3 (400 μg/ml) in the presence or absence of SspC (8 μM). The mixture was added to TNF-α-primed neutrophils at a 1:10 dilution, and ROS production (y axis; AU, arbitrary units) was followed over time by isoluminol-amplified CL. (C) Galectin-3 (2 μM; 640 μg/ml) was incubated at 37°C with or without 0.2 μM isolated S. aureus protease ScpA, SspB, Aur, or SspA in KRG with 1% BSA for the indicated times. Samples were analyzed as described above. All samples were analyzed on the same blot that was then cut and reassembled with the lanes in another order, to increase legibility. (D) Galectin-3 (400 μg/ml) was preincubated with SspB (4 μM) for 24 h at 37°C. The proteolytic activity of SspB was then inactivated by the addition of SspC (8 μM; necessary due to cytotoxic effects of SspB at the given concentrations) before the mixture was added to neutrophils at a 1:10 dilution. ROS production was measured as described above.

Staphopain A, staphopain B, and aureolysin from S. aureus cleave galectin-3 into specific fragment patterns.The stand-alone ability of the four proteases to cleave galectin-3 was tested using SspA, SspB, ScpA, and Aur isolated from S. aureus. The galectin-3-only sample showed minor but visible fragmentation formed already during the preparation of the lectin. In the presence of ScpA or SspB, additional midsize and CRD-only fragments of galectin-3 were produced (Fig. 2C). Aur cleaved galectin-3 into mostly higher-molecular-mass fragments, suggesting that it primarily digested the more distant parts of the N-terminal collagen-like domain. Thus, ScpA and Aur, aside from SspB, apparently have galectin-3-processing capacity, despite the fact that their corresponding inhibitors did not block galectin-3 cleavage in culture supernatants (Fig. 2A). SspA showed little or no degradation of galectin-3.

The ability of galectin-3 to activate neutrophils was totally abrogated after incubation of the lectin with purified SspB (Fig. 2D), in line with the effect seen for galectin-3 incubated with bacterial supernatant (Fig. 1A). For this experiment, galectin-3 was incubated with SspB for 24 h, since the galectin-3 incubated with SspB for 40 min still contained substantial amounts of full-length lectin (32 kDa) (Fig. 2B).

Galectin-3 is cleaved by S. aureus 8325-4 strains expressing staphopain B.We verified the above-described findings using culture supernatants of S. aureus 8325-4 and 8325-4 Δaur, ΔsspA, ΔsspB, and ΔscpA mutant strains that each lacked one of the proteases (Table 2). The ΔsspB and ΔsspA strains lost all apparent galectin-3-cleaving activity, while the other mutants were still able to process the lectin (Fig. 3). SspB is downstream from SspA both in transcription and in activation (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material) (4, 8). The other proteases are partly or fully autoactivated (4, 6–8), which supports the idea that SspB is the protease that cleaves galectin-3 in strain 8325-4. The Δaur strain supernatant still had a reduced level of cleavage of galectin-3, explained by inefficient SspB activation, as full activity of its activator, SspA, requires processing by Aur (8).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2

Protease expression of S. aureus strain 8325-4 and mutant strains

FIG 3
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 3

Galectin-3 is cleaved by S. aureus strains expressing SspB. Culture supernatants from strain 8325-4 and ΔscpA, ΔsspB, ΔsspAB, and Δaur mutants were incubated with galectin-3 (100 μg/ml) for 1 or 2 h, and the content of galectin-3 and fragments thereof in each was analyzed by immunoblotting with anti-CRD antibody.

In summary, although isolated ScpA, SspB, and Aur all have proteolytic specificity toward galectin-3, the above-described data identify SspB as the galectin-3-cleaving protease of S. aureus 8325-4 and, thereby, also the inhibitor of galectin-3-mediated ROS production.

Clinical isolates of S. aureus from skin infections and invasive infections show various levels of galectin-3 cleavage.In culture supernatants from clinical isolates of S. aureus from invasive infections and superficial skin infections, digestion of galectin-3 was seen in several samples from both groups, with various degrees of efficiency (Fig. 4A). This indicates that the galectin-3 processing may be part of a virulence-determining system in vivo. In fact, a closer analysis of the galectin-3 processing by clinical S. aureus strains suggests that ScpA and SspB, and to some extent Aur, also may cleave galectin-3 when acting cooperatively (Fig. S3).

FIG 4
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 4

Clinical isolates of S. aureus and S. epidermidis but not S. saprophyticus cleave galectin-3. Culture supernatants of 10 strains of S. aureus isolated from invasive infections and 10 strains from superficial skin infections (A) or of isolates of two strains each of S. saprophyticus (S. sapro A and S. sapro B) and S. epidermidis (S. epid A and S. epid B) (B) were incubated with galectin-3 (100 μg/ml) for 16 h (A) or 1, 2, and 5.5 h (B). Galectin-3 fragmentation was analyzed by immunoblotting using the anti-CRD antibody.

In the presence of culture supernatants of two coagulase-negative staphylococci, Staphylococcus saprophyticus and Staphylococcus epidermidis, a clear distinction in galectin-3 cleavage capacities could be observed (Fig. 4B). S. saprophyticus showed no tendency to cleave galectin-3, while the more virulent S. epidermidis digested a large portion of the full-length galectin-3 into CRD and at least one other midsize fragment (Fig. 4B).

Galectin-3 aggravates skin lesions in an in vivo skin abscess model with S. aureus strain 8325-4.In order to investigate the influence of galectin-3 and S. aureus SspB expression in vivo, we used a murine infection model. As galectin-3 is highly prevalent in epithelium (19), we chose to study subcutaneous skin infection rather than invasive infection. In the chosen murine model of S. aureus-induced skin infection (32, 33), wild-type (Gal-3+/+) and galectin-3 knockout (Gal-3−/−) mice were challenged with the wild-type strain 8325-4 and the ΔsspB mutant, as illustrated in Fig. S2A.

Immunohistochemical analysis of skin sections collected on the third day of infection from Gal-3+/+ mice was performed for healthy and infected skin regions. In healthy skin (Fig. 5A), galectin-3 staining was strongly positive in the adnexa or squamous epithelial cells. Dermal macrophages and stromal fibroblasts were positively stained, while adipocytes, myocytes, and vascular epithelium were negative for galectin-3 staining. The patterns are consistent with previous studies of galectin-3 in human epidermal tissue (19).

FIG 5
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 5

SspB enhances S. aureus virulence in a skin infection model in the presence of galectin-3. Gal-3+/+ or Gal-3−/− mice were injected with 1 × 107 CFU of S. aureus 8325-4 or the ΔsspB mutant on either flank and observed for 3 days, after which they were sacrificed. (A and B) Skin biopsy specimens of healthy skin (A) and S. aureus 8325-4-infected lesions (B). Histological biopsy specimens were immunohistochemically analyzed for galectin-3 using an anti-galectin-3 antibody. (A) 1, muscle tissue; 2, fat tissue; 3, squamous epithelial cells; 4, adnexa epithelial cells; 5, dermal macrophages or dendritic cells. (B) 6, normal tissue; 7, infiltrating macrophages; 8, S. aureus cells; 9, necrotic tissue. (C) Bacterial loads in skin biopsy specimens collected at day 3 were determined by viable count. (D) Lesion sizes caused by strain 8325-4 and the ΔsspB mutant, respectively, were recorded, and the sizes at day 3 are shown. Horizontal bars designate median values. Statistical analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test to compare the two strains inoculated on the same mouse and the Mann-Whitney test to compare the strains between the two groups of mice. Data from the two experiments are pooled. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ns, no significant difference.

In the infected skin (Fig. 5B), galectin-3 staining was lost within the necrotic region. A strong intensity of galectin-3 staining was instead seen lining the outer region of the lesion, accompanying the presence of inflammatory cells, as well as colocalizing with the bacteria in the central part of the lesion. Similar patterns of galectin-3 staining were seen when strain 8325-4 was exchanged for the ΔsspB mutant, although the lesions were significantly smaller (see below). Furthermore, staining for CRD (detecting both full-length galectin-3 and CRD) gave the same patterns as for full-length galectin-3 (data not shown).

The weight loss of the mice was minimal, as expected for such a mild and localized infection; it did not differ between the Gal-3+/+ and Gal−/− mice (Fig. S2B). The bacterial-load assessment at day 3 showed significantly higher CFU counts for strain 8325-4 than for the ΔsspB mutant (Fig. 5C). The difference, however, was significant only among the Gal-3+/+ mice. In Gal-3+/+ mice, the lesion sizes were significantly larger than the lesions in the mice lacking galectin-3 (Fig. 5D). Furthermore, the lesions caused by strain 8325-4 were clearly larger than those induced by the ΔsspB strain, but again, the difference was only significant in the presence of galectin-3 (Fig. 5D). Altogether, the data suggest that SspB is in fact a virulence factor and that its function as such is dependent on the presence of galectin-3.

DISCUSSION

Galectin-3 is emerging as a regulator of inflammation that also has a direct impact on infection (11–13). We have previously shown that galectin-3 induces ROS production in tissue neutrophils (22), an effect that may contribute not only to bacterial killing but also to collateral tissue destruction, and there are numerous examples of galectin-3 regulating inflammatory processes and infections in vivo (14–18, 21, 29). The function of galectin-3 is dependent on its collagen-like N-terminal domain, and cleavage of this domain by human or pathogen proteases may attenuate galectin-3 function and thereby influence inflammatory regulation and bacterial virulence (25–28, 30, 31). This study was undertaken to investigate whether S. aureus proteases suggested to be associated with virulence can modulate the function of galectin-3 and, if so, to characterize any role that this phenomenon plays in S. aureus pathogenicity.

The four major proteases of S. aureus are well preserved among clinical strains (34) and are emerging as determinants of S. aureus virulence (5, 9, 35). The proteases have described targets, but there is no consensus in the literature as to their biological importance. There are, however, some clues as to their function; in line with cleaving extracellular matrix and clot-forming proteins, they facilitate tissue destruction and modulate secreted and surface-associated virulence factors (36, 37). These activities promote detachment from colonized tissues, dissipation of biofilms, and hiding from detection by immune cells (5, 37, 38). Many immunomodulating mechanisms of the proteases have been identified (3), including effects on phagocyte chemotaxis and phagocytosis of S. aureus (37, 39–42). Furthermore, the proteases have been shown to inactivate human protease inhibitors (e.g., α1-antitrypsin), to cleave phagocyte “do-not-eat-me” surface receptors (CD31), to inhibit complement activation (9), and to induce phagocyte cell death (42, 43). We now add the processing of galectin-3 as a possible staphylococcal immunomodulating function.

In our first experiments, we used the laboratory strain 8325-4, which carries a deletion in the control gene rsbU upstream from scp, ssp, and aur, to ensure high expression of all four proteases (4, 44). In bacterial supernatants, the main galectin-3-cleaving protease was SspB, shown by using specific protease inhibitors and purified proteases, as well as mutant S. aureus strains. The ScpA and Aur proteases also had galectin-3-processing capacity in isolation, but this activity appeared minor within culture supernatants compared to that of SspB, as neither mutants nor inhibitors had any obvious impact on the cleavage.

The proteolytic patterns of galectin-3 produced by the clinical isolates indicate that the in vivo situation is more complex. The degree of cleavage varied between strains, and it appears that more than one protease may participate in galectin-3 processing in vivo, as discussed briefly in the legend to Fig. S3 in the supplemental material. Whether this influences the outcome in vivo can presently only be speculated upon. Our data indicate that the invasive strains, when grown in vitro, are more likely to cleave galectin-3 than are noninvasive strains. The clinical strains also appear to produce additional, larger fragments apart from the 16-kDa CRD fragment. Whether these intermediate fragments have biological function will be investigated in future studies.

We also investigated the coagulase-negative staphylococci S. epidermidis and S. saprophyticus for galectin-3-degrading capacity. S. epidermidis, expressing proteases homologous to S. aureus Aur, SspA, and ScpA (5, 45), exhibited galectin-3-cleaving capacity that could be inhibited by ScpB (Fig. S3), indicating a close relationship with ScpA. Thus, the ability to cleave galectin-3 appears to be a preserved function in adherent staphylococcal species; both S. epidermidis and S. aureus form biofilms on medical devices (2, 5), and it may be hypothesized that galectin-3 processing is associated not only with superficial skin infection but also with graft-related infection. S. saprophyticus, commonly causing urinary tract infection, lacked galectin-3-processing capacity even though galectin-3 is present throughout the urinary tract (46), in line with the lack of any known exoprotease expression in this species (47).

The importance of S. aureus proteases in promoting infection in vivo is supported by the fact that ΔsspB or ΔsspA ΔsspB mutants show reduced virulence, while augmented SspB expression results in increased virulence in murine models of systemic or local infection (4, 48, 49). Our results showing that an ΔsspB strain displays attenuated virulence during skin infection are in total accordance with this; the lesions were smaller and the bacterial counts lower for the SspB-lacking strain than for the SspB-expressing 8325-4. Interestingly, the difference in virulence between SspB-expressing and SspB-deficient S. aureus strains was dependent on the presence of galectin-3 in the host; in the Gal-3+/+ mice, the protease-expressing bacteria generated larger lesions and higher bacterial burdens than the ΔsspB bacteria, while both strains caused similar, and minor, tissue destruction in the Gal-3−/− mice. Thus, galectin-3 does not appear to increase the inflammatory response to infection per se, since the lesion size was independent of the presence of galectin-3 when SspB was not present. Hence, galectin-3 expression has to be combined with protease activity to result in the observed increase in lesion size/inflammation.

The contribution of galectin-3/CRD to the bacterially induced tissue damage in the skin infection model probably involves several different mechanisms, on which we can only speculate at this point. The epithelial damage by the bacteria per se, enhanced by protease expression, induces an augmented inflammatory activation and recruitment of neutrophils, the most important cell type in fighting S. aureus skin infection (3). Neutrophil migration into infected tissue has previously been shown to be affected by galectin-3 (16, 50), which is produced in increased amounts during infectious/inflammatory processes (14, 16). Neutrophil activation by galectin-3, enhanced after extravasation of the cells into tissue, may contribute to tissue destruction by the production of toxic oxygen radicals and cytokines and the release of neutrophil proteases (15, 22, 25). Another mechanism could involve the cleavage of galectin-3 by SspB (as shown here) and by neutrophil-released metalloproteases and serine proteases (25, 27, 28), impairing the production of immunomodulatory ROS, as well as galectin-3-dependent opsonophagocytic processes, possibly resulting in impaired infection control and aggravated tissue destruction (14, 15, 24). Furthermore, protease-cleaved galectin-3 (CRD) may possibly have proinflammatory effects per se, contributing to inflammatory tissue damage, as seen in other disease models (51–54). These suggested mechanisms can appear to work in opposite directions, but opposing functions are well-known phenomena in the galectin field. For example, systemic Neisseria infection is dampened in Gal-3 knockout mice, while streptococcal pneumonia is instead significantly enhanced (14, 15). Furthermore, galectin-3 may have several different functions in one and the same model (15), and it is not always clear how the combination of different mechanisms ends up giving the result achieved (11).

Whether SspB-processed galectin-3, i.e., CRD, is present in the skin of the infected mice cannot be stated with certainty. When probing healthy skin with the antibody that detects full-length galectin-3, intense staining was seen in the epithelium, the initial point of attack for the bacteria. Galectin-3 was also present at the lesion site, both around the infecting S. aureus bacteria and in the surrounding tissue lining the necrotic area, meaning that galectin-3 is available for interaction with secreted bacterial products during all phases of infection. To determine the presence of processed galectin-3 (CRD), a CRD-recognizing antibody was used, detecting both full-length galectin-3 and processed CRD. This staining was largely similar to that of galectin-3 only (by the N terminus-directed antibody M3/38). Since the antibodies cannot be compared with regard to staining intensity, the conclusion that all staining is due to galectin-3 should not be drawn, but rather, it should be concluded that all processed galectin-3 (CRD), if present in the tissue, colocalizes with the full-length galectin-3. The relative levels of full-length galectin-3 and CRD, however, cannot be determined.

In conclusion, our data imply that galectin-3 processing is an active feature of S. aureus virulence. The S. aureus protease SspB can cleave the immunomodulatory protein galectin-3, thereby not only causing inactivation of galectin-3-dependent biological functions but also resulting in the appearance of a novel protein, the CRD, which so far has no determined biological effects and is an exciting subject for future studies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Chemicals and reagents.Isolated proteases (SspA, SspB, ScpA, and Aur) and recombinant inhibitors (SspC and ScpB) were from Preparitis (Krakow, Poland). Pefabloc SC was from Boehringer Mannheim GMBH (Mannheim, Germany). Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), EDTA, sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), glycerol, and isoluminol were from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Bromophenol blue was from LKB-Produkter AB (Stockholm, Sweden). Formaldehyde, paraffin, eosin, and hematoxylin were from Histolab Products AB (Gothenburg, Sweden), and H2O2 from Acros Organics (Geel, Belgium). Bovine serum albumin (BSA) was from Roche Diagnostic (Mannheim, Germany), Ficoll-Paque was from Fisher Scientific GTF AB (Gothenburg, Sweden), and dextran from Pharmacosmos (Holbaek, Denmark). Affinity-purified polyclonal chicken anti-CRD antibody was produced by Capra Science (Ängelholm, Sweden); the antibody was produced in chickens because of the low immunogenicity between mammal CRDs (10). Horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated donkey anti-chicken antibody was from Abcam (Cambridge, United Kingdom), while HRP-conjugated rabbit anti-rat antibody was from Dako (Stockholm, Sweden). Mini-Protean TGX polyacrylamide precast gels and the Clarity Western ECL kit were from Bio-Rad Laboratories (Sundbyberg, Sweden).

Bacterial strains and growth conditions.The S. aureus laboratory strains that were used in this study were strain 8325-4 and ΔscpA, ΔsspA, ΔsspB, and Δaur mutants thereof (Table 2) (4). Two clinical isolates each of S. saprophyticus and S. epidermidis were kindly provided by the Department of Clinical Bacteriology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden. Ten clinical isolates each of S. aureus from invasive infections and superficial skin infections were a kind gift from Gunnar Jacobsson (32, 55), Department of Infectious Diseases, Skaraborg Hospital, Skövde, Sweden. All strains were kept in 15% glycerol at −80°C for long-term storage.

Bacteria grown overnight in 1.5 ml tryptic soy broth (TSB) were diluted 1:1,000 in 15 ml fresh TSB and incubated overnight. To obtain bacterium-free supernatants, the cultures were centrifuged at 4,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C and supernatants were filtered through 0.2-μm double sterile filters (Acrodisc syringe filter; VWR, Sweden), aliquoted, and stored at −80°C.

To prepare bacteria for the murine skin infection model, S. aureus 8325-4 and 8325-4 ΔsspB overnight cultures were diluted 1:100 in fresh TSB and incubated for another 16 h. The bacteria were harvested by centrifugation, resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; pH 7.2) with 5% BSA and 10% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), and stored at −80°C. The concentration of bacteria was determined by viable counts.

Production of recombinant galectin-3 and CRD.Recombinant galectin-3 and CRD were produced in Escherichia coli and purified as previously described (22, 26).

Isolation of neutrophils.Neutrophils from healthy blood donors were separated from buffy coats, obtained from the Sahlgrenska University Hospital Blood Centre, Gothenburg, as described by Bøyum et al. (56), and diluted to a concentration of 1 × 107 cells/ml in Krebs-Ringer phosphate buffer (KRG; pH 7.3) with 1 mM Ca2+.

Neutrophil production of ROS.Neutrophil NADPH oxidase-derived reactive oxygen species (ROS) were measured using an isoluminol-amplified chemiluminescence system as previously described (57). Neutrophils (5 × 106 cells/ml) primed with TNF-α (10 ng/ml at 37°C for 20 min) in KRG with 1 mM Ca2+ were stimulated with galectin-3, and ROS release was recorded over time; the results are given in arbitrary units (AU).

Proteolytic digestion of galectin-3.Galectin-3 was incubated for different times with various dilutions of isolated S. aureus proteases (SspA, SspB, ScpA, and Aur) or culture supernatants, as stated in each figure legend. Where indicated, culture supernatants were premixed with protease inhibitors (Pefabloc, SspC, ScpB, or EDTA) (5, 58) prior to the addition of galectin-3. For experiments where the readout was activation of neutrophils, the lectin was incubated for a longer time (48 h) with diluted (0.25%) supernatant in order to avoid cytotoxic effects of undiluted supernatants (data not shown).

SDS-PAGE and Western blotting.Galectin-3 and fragments thereof were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting, using a chicken anti-human polyclonal CRD antibody (2.2 μg/ml) and a donkey anti-chicken IgG HRP-labeled secondary antibody (described in detail in the supplemental material).

In vivo skin abscess model.Galectin-3 knockout mice on the 129/Sv background (59) were backcrossed for four generations with C57BL/6 mice to generate 97.75% C57BL/6 mice (60). Wild-type (Gal-3+/+) and galectin-3 deficient (Gal-3−/−) mice were bred as heterozygotes, controlled by continuous genotyping (60). To obtain animals for the present study, homozygote animals were bred for three generations. The animals were maintained in the animal facility at the Department of Rheumatology and Inflammation Research, University of Gothenburg. The study was approved by the Gothenburg Ethical Committee for Animal Research.

A skin infection model modified from previous studies (32, 33) was performed in Gal-3+/+ and Gal-3−/− mice in parallel, using S. aureus strains 8325-4 and 8325-4 ΔsspB from the premade batches. Mice at the age of 9 to 15 weeks and of both genders were used for experiments. Age and sex were matched between wild-type and knockout animals.

The bacteria were washed in PBS, and the concentration was adjusted to 2 × 108 CFU/ml. The backs and both flanks of the mice were shaved, and 50-μl amounts of strains 8325-4 and 8325-4 ΔsspB were injected subcutaneously on either flank on the same mouse (see Fig. S2A in the supplemental material). Two days after injection, the mice were weighed, and the areas of the lesions formed were measured. In the first experiment, nearly half of the mice from each group were sacrificed at day 3. Skin biopsy specimens of the infected areas were collected and homogenized, and the bacterial loads were assessed by viable count. The remaining mice were studied for another 7 days to record the recovery after infection. No differences in lesion sizes or weight changes were detected between the two mouse strains during healing up until day 10 (data not shown). In the second experiment, all mice were sacrificed at day 3. Biopsy specimens from two Gal-3+/+ mice were used for histological analysis (described in detail in the supplemental material), while the remaining biopsy specimens were analyzed for bacterial loads.

Statistical analysis.Differences in lesion sizes and bacterial loads were analyzed using the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test for comparisons of paired samples and the Mann-Whitney test for comparisons between groups. Statistical analyses were performed in Prism software (version 6.05; GraphPad, La Jolla, CA, USA).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the Swedish Medical Research Council, the King Gustaf V 80-year foundation, the Swedish government under the ALF-agreement, Arne and IngaBritt Lundberg Foundation, The Swedish Rheumatology Association, the Swedish Medical Society, Stiftelsen Clas Groschinskys Minnesfond, the Scandinavian Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy Foundation, Rune och Ulla Amlövs Stiftelse för Neurologisk och Reumatologisk Forskning, the Adlerbertska Foundation, Stiftelsen Professor Nanna Svartz Fond, the Göteborg Medical Society, the Längmanska Culture Foundation, the Wilhelm and Martina Lundgren Foundation, the Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation, and the Swedish government under the TUA agreement, and the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Disease (AI80626 and AI90350).

We acknowledge Gunnar Jacobsson, Department of Infectious Diseases, Skaraborg Hospital, Skövde, for kindly providing clinical isolates of S. aureus and Malin Magnusson, Department of Rheumatology and Inflammation Research, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Sweden, for assistance with histological samples.

We confirm that we have no conflicts of interest.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 6 March 2017.
    • Accepted 13 April 2017.
    • Accepted manuscript posted online 24 April 2017.
  • Supplemental material for this article may be found at https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.00177-17 .

  • Copyright © 2017 American Society for Microbiology.

All Rights Reserved .

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Diekema DJ,
    2. Pfaller MA,
    3. Schmitz FJ,
    4. Smayevsky J,
    5. Bell J,
    6. Jones RN,
    7. Beach M
    , SENTRY Participants Group. 2001. Survey of infections due to Staphylococcus species: frequency of occurrence and antimicrobial susceptibility of isolates collected in the United States, Canada, Latin America, Europe, and the Western Pacific region for the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program, 1997-1999. Clin Infect Dis32(Suppl 2):S114–S132. doi:10.1086/320184.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    1. Foster TJ
    . 2005. Immune evasion by staphylococci. Nat Rev Microbiol3:948–958. doi:10.1038/nrmicro1289.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    1. McGuinness WA,
    2. Kobayashi SD,
    3. DeLeo FR
    . 2016. Evasion of neutrophil killing by Staphylococcus aureus. Pathogens5:E32. doi:10.3390/pathogens5010032.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. 4.↵
    1. Shaw L,
    2. Golonka E,
    3. Potempa J,
    4. Foster SJ
    . 2004. The role and regulation of the extracellular proteases of Staphylococcus aureus. Microbiology150:217–228. doi:10.1099/mic.0.26634-0.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    1. Dubin G
    . 2002. Extracellular proteases of Staphylococcus spp. Biol Chem383:1075–1086. doi:10.1515/BC.2002.116.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Nickerson N,
    2. Ip J,
    3. Passos DT,
    4. McGavin MJ
    . 2010. Comparison of staphopain A (ScpA) and B (SspB) precursor activation mechanisms reveals unique secretion kinetics of proSspB (staphopain B), and a different interaction with its cognate staphostatin, SspC. Mol Microbiol75:161–177. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06974.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Nickerson NN,
    2. Joag V,
    3. McGavin MJ
    . 2008. Rapid autocatalytic activation of the M4 metalloprotease aureolysin is controlled by a conserved N-terminal fungalysin-thermolysin-propeptide domain. Mol Microbiol69:1530–1543. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06384.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    1. Nickerson NN,
    2. Prasad L,
    3. Jacob L,
    4. Delbaere LT,
    5. McGavin MJ
    . 2007. Activation of the SspA serine protease zymogen of Staphylococcus aureus proceeds through unique variations of a trypsinogen-like mechanism and is dependent on both autocatalytic and metalloprotease-specific processing. J Biol Chem282:34129–34138. doi:10.1074/jbc.M705672200.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Jusko M,
    2. Potempa J,
    3. Kantyka T,
    4. Bielecka E,
    5. Miller HK,
    6. Kalinska M,
    7. Dubin G,
    8. Garred P,
    9. Shaw LN,
    10. Blom AM
    . 2014. Staphylococcal proteases aid in evasion of the human complement system. J Innate Immun6:31–46. doi:10.1159/000351458.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Leffler H,
    2. Carlsson S,
    3. Hedlund M,
    4. Qian Y,
    5. Poirier F
    . 2004. Introduction to galectins. Glycoconj J19:433–440. doi:10.1023/B:GLYC.0000014072.34840.04.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    1. Baum LG,
    2. Garner OB,
    3. Schaefer K,
    4. Lee B
    . 2014. Microbe-host interactions are positively and negatively regulated by galectin-glycan interactions. Front Immunol5:284. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2014.00284.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Vasta GR
    . 2009. Roles of galectins in infection. Nat Rev Microbiol7:424–438. doi:10.1038/nrmicro2146.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    1. Liu FT,
    2. Yang RY,
    3. Hsu DK
    . 2012. Galectins in acute and chronic inflammation. Ann N Y Acad Sci1253:80–91. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06386.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    1. Quattroni P,
    2. Li Y,
    3. Lucchesi D,
    4. Lucas S,
    5. Hood DW,
    6. Herrmann M,
    7. Gabius HJ,
    8. Tang CM,
    9. Exley RM
    . 2012. Galectin-3 binds Neisseria meningitidis and increases interaction with phagocytic cells. Cell Microbiol14:1657–1675. doi:10.1111/j.1462-5822.2012.01838.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Farnworth SL,
    2. Henderson NC,
    3. Mackinnon AC,
    4. Atkinson KM,
    5. Wilkinson T,
    6. Dhaliwal K,
    7. Hayashi K,
    8. Simpson AJ,
    9. Rossi AG,
    10. Haslett C,
    11. Sethi T
    . 2008. Galectin-3 reduces the severity of pneumococcal pneumonia by augmenting neutrophil function. Am J Pathol172:395–405. doi:10.2353/ajpath.2008.070870.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    1. Bhaumik P,
    2. St-Pierre G,
    3. Milot V,
    4. St-Pierre C,
    5. Sato S
    . 2013. Galectin-3 facilitates neutrophil recruitment as an innate immune response to a parasitic protozoa cutaneous infection. J Immunol190:630–640. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1103197.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Kleshchenko YY,
    2. Moody TN,
    3. Furtak VA,
    4. Ochieng J,
    5. Lima MF,
    6. Villalta F
    . 2004. Human galectin-3 promotes Trypanosoma cruzi adhesion to human coronary artery smooth muscle cells. Infect Immun72:6717–6721. doi:10.1128/IAI.72.11.6717-6721.2004.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Woodward AM,
    2. Mauris J,
    3. Argueso P
    . 2013. Binding of transmembrane mucins to galectin-3 limits herpesvirus 1 infection of human corneal keratinocytes. J Virol87:5841–5847. doi:10.1128/JVI.00166-13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Larsen L,
    2. Chen HY,
    3. Saegusa J,
    4. Liu FT
    . 2011. Galectin-3 and the skin. J Dermatol Sci64:85–91. doi:10.1016/j.jdermsci.2011.07.008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Liu FT,
    2. Hsu DK,
    3. Zuberi RI,
    4. Kuwabara I,
    5. Chi EY,
    6. Henderson WR Jr
    . 1995. Expression and function of galectin-3, a beta-galactoside-binding lectin, in human monocytes and macrophages. Am J Pathol147:1016–1028.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  21. 21.↵
    1. Nieminen J,
    2. St-Pierre C,
    3. Bhaumik P,
    4. Poirier F,
    5. Sato S
    . 2008. Role of galectin-3 in leukocyte recruitment in a murine model of lung infection by Streptococcus pneumoniae. J Immunol180:2466–2473. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.180.4.2466.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Karlsson A,
    2. Follin P,
    3. Leffler H,
    4. Dahlgren C
    . 1998. Galectin-3 activates the NADPH-oxidase in exudated but not peripheral blood neutrophils. Blood91:3430–3438.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Yamaoka A,
    2. Kuwabara I,
    3. Frigeri LG,
    4. Liu FT
    . 1995. A human lectin, galectin-3 (epsilon bp/Mac-2), stimulates superoxide production by neutrophils. J Immunol154:3479–3487.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  24. 24.↵
    1. Karlsson A,
    2. Christenson K,
    3. Matlak M,
    4. Bjorstad A,
    5. Brown KL,
    6. Telemo E,
    7. Salomonsson E,
    8. Leffler H,
    9. Bylund J
    . 2009. Galectin-3 functions as an opsonin and enhances the macrophage clearance of apoptotic neutrophils. Glycobiology19:16–20. doi:10.1093/glycob/cwn104.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. 25.↵
    1. Nieminen J,
    2. St-Pierre C,
    3. Sato S
    . 2005. Galectin-3 interacts with naive and primed neutrophils, inducing innate immune responses. J Leukoc Biol78:1127–1135. doi:10.1189/jlb.1204702.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. 26.↵
    1. Massa SM,
    2. Cooper DN,
    3. Leffler H,
    4. Barondes SH
    . 1993. L-29, an endogenous lectin, binds to glycoconjugate ligands with positive cooperativity. Biochemistry32:260–267. doi:10.1021/bi00052a033.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. 27.↵
    1. Ochieng J,
    2. Fridman R,
    3. Nangia-Makker P,
    4. Kleiner DE,
    5. Liotta LA,
    6. Stetler-Stevenson WG,
    7. Raz A
    . 1994. Galectin-3 is a novel substrate for human matrix metalloproteinases-2 and -9. Biochemistry33:14109–14114. doi:10.1021/bi00251a020.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Puthenedam M,
    2. Wu F,
    3. Shetye A,
    4. Michaels A,
    5. Rhee KJ,
    6. Kwon JH
    . 2011. Matrilysin-1 (MMP7) cleaves galectin-3 and inhibits wound healing in intestinal epithelial cells. Inflamm Bowel Dis17:260–267. doi:10.1002/ibd.21443.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Pelletier I,
    2. Sato S
    . 2002. Specific recognition and cleavage of galectin-3 by Leishmania major through species-specific polygalactose epitope. J Biol Chem277:17663–17670. doi:10.1074/jbc.M201562200.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Herrmann J,
    2. Turck CW,
    3. Atchison RE,
    4. Huflejt ME,
    5. Poulter L,
    6. Gitt MA,
    7. Burlingame AL,
    8. Barondes SH,
    9. Leffler H
    . 1993. Primary structure of the soluble lactose binding lectin L-29 from rat and dog and interaction of its non-collagenous proline-, glycine-, tyrosine-rich sequence with bacterial and tissue collagenase. J Biol Chem268:26704–26711.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    1. Hsu DK,
    2. Zuberi RI,
    3. Liu FT
    . 1992. Biochemical and biophysical characterization of human recombinant IgE-binding protein, an S-type animal lectin. J Biol Chem267:14167–14174.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. 32.↵
    1. Kwiecinski J,
    2. Jacobsson G,
    3. Karlsson M,
    4. Zhu X,
    5. Wang W,
    6. Bremell T,
    7. Josefsson E,
    8. Jin T
    . 2013. Staphylokinase promotes the establishment of Staphylococcus aureus skin infections while decreasing disease severity. J Infect Dis208:990–999. doi:10.1093/infdis/jit288.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Kwiecinski J,
    2. Jin T,
    3. Josefsson E
    . 2014. Surface proteins of Staphylococcus aureus play an important role in experimental skin infection. APMIS122:1240–1250. doi:10.1111/apm.12295.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  34. 34.↵
    1. Karlsson A,
    2. Arvidson S
    . 2002. Variation in extracellular protease production among clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus due to different levels of expression of the protease repressor sarA. Infect Immun70:4239–4246. doi:10.1128/IAI.70.8.4239-4246.2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    1. Zdzalik M,
    2. Karim AY,
    3. Wolski K,
    4. Buda P,
    5. Wojcik K,
    6. Brueggemann S,
    7. Wojciechowski P,
    8. Eick S,
    9. Calander AM,
    10. Jonsson IM,
    11. Kubica M,
    12. Polakowska K,
    13. Miedzobrodzki J,
    14. Wladyka B,
    15. Potempa J,
    16. Dubin G
    . 2012. Prevalence of genes encoding extracellular proteases in Staphylococcus aureus—important targets triggering immune response in vivo. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol66:220–229. doi:10.1111/j.1574-695X.2012.01005.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Calander AM,
    2. Jonsson IM,
    3. Kanth A,
    4. Arvidsson S,
    5. Shaw L,
    6. Foster SJ,
    7. Tarkowski A
    . 2004. Impact of staphylococcal protease expression on the outcome of infectious arthritis. Microbes Infect6:202–206. doi:10.1016/j.micinf.2003.10.015.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  37. 37.↵
    1. Kolar SL,
    2. Ibarra JA,
    3. Rivera FE,
    4. Mootz JM,
    5. Davenport JE,
    6. Stevens SM,
    7. Horswill AR,
    8. Shaw LN
    . 2013. Extracellular proteases are key mediators of Staphylococcus aureus virulence via the global modulation of virulence-determinant stability. Microbiology Open2:18–34. doi:10.1002/mbo3.55.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  38. 38.↵
    1. Mootz JM,
    2. Malone CL,
    3. Shaw LN,
    4. Horswill AR
    . 2013. Staphopains modulate Staphylococcus aureus biofilm integrity. Infect Immun81:3227–3238. doi:10.1128/IAI.00377-13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. 39.↵
    1. Laarman AJ,
    2. Mijnheer G,
    3. Mootz JM,
    4. van Rooijen WJ,
    5. Ruyken M,
    6. Malone CL,
    7. Heezius EC,
    8. Ward R,
    9. Milligan G,
    10. van Strijp JA,
    11. de Haas CJ,
    12. Horswill AR,
    13. van Kessel KP,
    14. Rooijakkers SH
    . 2012. Staphylococcus aureus staphopain A inhibits CXCR2-dependent neutrophil activation and chemotaxis. EMBO J31:3607–3619. doi:10.1038/emboj.2012.212.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. 40.↵
    1. Laarman AJ,
    2. Ruyken M,
    3. Malone CL,
    4. van Strijp JA,
    5. Horswill AR,
    6. Rooijakkers SH
    . 2011. Staphylococcus aureus metalloprotease aureolysin cleaves complement C3 to mediate immune evasion. J Immunol186:6445–6453. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1002948.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. 41.↵
    1. Smagur J,
    2. Guzik K,
    3. Bzowska M,
    4. Kuzak M,
    5. Zarebski M,
    6. Kantyka T,
    7. Walski M,
    8. Gajkowska B,
    9. Potempa J
    . 2009. Staphylococcal cysteine protease staphopain B (SspB) induces rapid engulfment of human neutrophils and monocytes by macrophages. Biol Chem390:361–371. doi:10.1515/BC.2009.042.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. 42.↵
    1. Smagur J,
    2. Guzik K,
    3. Magiera L,
    4. Bzowska M,
    5. Gruca M,
    6. Thogersen IB,
    7. Enghild JJ,
    8. Potempa J
    . 2009. A new pathway of staphylococcal pathogenesis: apoptosis-like death induced by staphopain B in human neutrophils and monocytes. J Innate Immun1:98–108. doi:10.1159/000181014.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. 43.↵
    1. Potempa J,
    2. Watorek W,
    3. Travis J
    . 1986. The inactivation of human plasma alpha 1-proteinase inhibitor by proteinases from Staphylococcus aureus. J Biol Chem261:14330–14334.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. 44.↵
    1. Horsburgh MJ,
    2. Aish JL,
    3. White IJ,
    4. Shaw L,
    5. Lithgow JK,
    6. Foster SJ
    . 2002. sigmaB modulates virulence determinant expression and stress resistance: characterization of a functional rsbU strain derived from Staphylococcus aureus 8325-4. J Bacteriol184:5457–5467. doi:10.1128/JB.184.19.5457-5467.2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. 45.↵
    1. Dubin G,
    2. Chmiel D,
    3. Mak P,
    4. Rakwalska M,
    5. Rzychon M,
    6. Dubin A
    . 2001. Molecular cloning and biochemical characterisation of proteases from Staphylococcus epidermidis. Biol Chem382:1575–1582. doi:10.1515/BC.2001.192.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. 46.↵
    1. Desmedt V,
    2. Desmedt S,
    3. Delanghe JR,
    4. Speeckaert R,
    5. Speeckaert MM
    . 2016. Galectin-3 in renal pathology: more than just an innocent bystander. Am J Nephrol43:305–317. doi:10.1159/000446376.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  47. 47.↵
    1. Kuroda M,
    2. Yamashita A,
    3. Hirakawa H,
    4. Kumano M,
    5. Morikawa K,
    6. Higashide M,
    7. Maruyama A,
    8. Inose Y,
    9. Matoba K,
    10. Toh H,
    11. Kuhara S,
    12. Hattori M,
    13. Ohta T
    . 2005. Whole genome sequence of Staphylococcus saprophyticus reveals the pathogenesis of uncomplicated urinary tract infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A102:13272–13277. doi:10.1073/pnas.0502950102.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. 48.↵
    1. Coulter SN,
    2. Schwan WR,
    3. Ng EY,
    4. Langhorne MH,
    5. Ritchie HD,
    6. Westbrock-Wadman S,
    7. Hufnagle WO,
    8. Folger KR,
    9. Bayer AS,
    10. Stover CK
    . 1998. Staphylococcus aureus genetic loci impacting growth and survival in multiple infection environments. Mol Microbiol30:393–404. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.01075.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  49. 49.↵
    1. Rice K,
    2. Peralta R,
    3. Bast D,
    4. de Azavedo J,
    5. McGavin MJ
    . 2001. Description of staphylococcus serine protease (ssp) operon in Staphylococcus aureus and nonpolar inactivation of sspA-encoded serine protease. Infect Immun69:159–169. doi:10.1128/IAI.69.1.159-169.2001.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. 50.↵
    1. Sato S,
    2. Ouellet N,
    3. Pelletier I,
    4. Simard M,
    5. Rancourt A,
    6. Bergeron MG
    . 2002. Role of galectin-3 as an adhesion molecule for neutrophil extravasation during streptococcal pneumonia. J Immunol168:1813–1822. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.168.4.1813.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  51. 51.↵
    1. Markowska AI,
    2. Liu FT,
    3. Panjwani N
    . 2010. Galectin-3 is an important mediator of VEGF- and bFGF-mediated angiogenic response. J Exp Med207:1981–1993. doi:10.1084/jem.20090121.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. 52.↵
    1. Mauris J,
    2. Mantelli F,
    3. Woodward AM,
    4. Cao Z,
    5. Bertozzi CR,
    6. Panjwani N,
    7. Godula K,
    8. Argueso P
    . 2013. Modulation of ocular surface glycocalyx barrier function by a galectin-3 N-terminal deletion mutant and membrane-anchored synthetic glycopolymers. PLoS One8:e72304. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0072304.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. 53.↵
    1. Dovizio M,
    2. Maier TJ,
    3. Alberti S,
    4. Di Francesco L,
    5. Marcantoni E,
    6. Munch G,
    7. John CM,
    8. Suess B,
    9. Sgambato A,
    10. Steinhilber D,
    11. Patrignani P
    . 2013. Pharmacological inhibition of platelet-tumor cell cross-talk prevents platelet-induced overexpression of cyclooxygenase-2 in HT29 human colon carcinoma cells. Mol Pharmacol84:25–40. doi:10.1124/mol.113.084988.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  54. 54.↵
    1. Mirandola L,
    2. Yu Y,
    3. Cannon MJ,
    4. Jenkins MR,
    5. Rahman RL,
    6. Nguyen DD,
    7. Grizzi F,
    8. Cobos E,
    9. Figueroa JA,
    10. Chiriva-Internati M
    . 2014. Galectin-3 inhibition suppresses drug resistance, motility, invasion and angiogenic potential in ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol135:573–579. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.09.021.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  55. 55.↵
    1. Jacobsson G,
    2. Dashti S,
    3. Wahlberg T,
    4. Andersson R
    . 2007. The epidemiology of and risk factors for invasive Staphylococcus aureus infections in western Sweden. Scand J Infect Dis39:6–13. doi:10.1080/00365540600810026.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  56. 56.↵
    1. Boyum A
    . 1968. Isolation of mononuclear cells and granulocytes from human blood. Isolation of monuclear cells by one centrifugation, and of granulocytes by combining centrifugation and sedimentation at 1 g. Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl97:77–89.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  57. 57.↵
    1. Bylund J,
    2. Bjornsdottir H,
    3. Sundqvist M,
    4. Karlsson A,
    5. Dahlgren C
    . 2014. Measurement of respiratory burst products, released or retained, during activation of professional phagocytes. Methods Mol Biol1124:321–338. doi:10.1007/978-1-62703-845-4_21.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. 58.↵
    1. Rzychon M,
    2. Sabat A,
    3. Kosowska K,
    4. Potempa J,
    5. Dubin A
    . 2003. Staphostatins: an expanding new group of proteinase inhibitors with a unique specificity for the regulation of staphopains, Staphylococcus spp. cysteine proteinases. Mol Microbiol49:1051–1066. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03613.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  59. 59.↵
    1. Colnot C,
    2. Fowlis D,
    3. Ripoche MA,
    4. Bouchaert I,
    5. Poirier F
    . 1998. Embryonic implantation in galectin 1/galectin 3 double mutant mice. Dev Dyn211:306–313. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0177(199804)211:4<306::AID-AJA2>3.0.CO;2-L.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  60. 60.↵
    1. Doverhag C,
    2. Keller M,
    3. Karlsson A,
    4. Hedtjarn M,
    5. Nilsson U,
    6. Kapeller E,
    7. Sarkozy G,
    8. Klimaschewski L,
    9. Humpel C,
    10. Hagberg H,
    11. Simbruner G,
    12. Gressens P,
    13. Savman K
    . 2008. Pharmacological and genetic inhibition of NADPH oxidase does not reduce brain damage in different models of perinatal brain injury in newborn mice. Neurobiol Dis31:133–144. doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2008.04.003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Galectin-3 Is a Target for Proteases Involved in the Virulence of Staphylococcus aureus
Jonas Elmwall, Jakub Kwiecinski, Manli Na, Abukar Ahmed Ali, Veronica Osla, Lindsey N. Shaw, Wanzhong Wang, Karin Sävman, Elisabet Josefsson, Johan Bylund, Tao Jin, Amanda Welin, Anna Karlsson
Infection and Immunity Jun 2017, 85 (7) e00177-17; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.00177-17

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Infection and Immunity article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Galectin-3 Is a Target for Proteases Involved in the Virulence of Staphylococcus aureus
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Infection and Immunity
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Infection and Immunity.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Galectin-3 Is a Target for Proteases Involved in the Virulence of Staphylococcus aureus
Jonas Elmwall, Jakub Kwiecinski, Manli Na, Abukar Ahmed Ali, Veronica Osla, Lindsey N. Shaw, Wanzhong Wang, Karin Sävman, Elisabet Josefsson, Johan Bylund, Tao Jin, Amanda Welin, Anna Karlsson
Infection and Immunity Jun 2017, 85 (7) e00177-17; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.00177-17
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Bacterial Proteins
Galectin 3
host-pathogen interactions
Serine Endopeptidases
Staphylococcus aureus
galectin-3
Staphylococcus aureus
neutrophils
protease
staphopain
skin infection
virulence
virulence regulation
virulence factors

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About IAI
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #IAIjournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0019-9567; Online ISSN: 1098-5522