Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Infection and Immunity
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Molecular Pathogenesis

Delineating the Physiological Roles of the PE and Catalytic Domains of LipY in Lipid Consumption in Mycobacterium-Infected Foamy Macrophages

Pierre Santucci, Sadia Diomandé, Isabelle Poncin, Laetitia Alibaud, Albertus Viljoen, Laurent Kremer, Chantal de Chastellier, Stéphane Canaan
Sabine Ehrt, Editor
Pierre Santucci
aAix-Marseille Univ, CNRS, LISM, IMM FR3479, Marseille, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sadia Diomandé
aAix-Marseille Univ, CNRS, LISM, IMM FR3479, Marseille, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Isabelle Poncin
aAix-Marseille Univ, CNRS, LISM, IMM FR3479, Marseille, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laetitia Alibaud
cCNRS UMR5235, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Albertus Viljoen
dInstitut de Recherche en Infectiologie de Montpellier (IRIM), Université de Montpellier, CNRS UMR9004, Montpellier, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laurent Kremer
dInstitut de Recherche en Infectiologie de Montpellier (IRIM), Université de Montpellier, CNRS UMR9004, Montpellier, France
eInserm, IRIM, Montpellier, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Laurent Kremer
Chantal de Chastellier
bCentre d'Immunologie de Marseille-Luminy, Aix Marseille Université UM2, Inserm, U1104, CNRS UMR7280, Marseille, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stéphane Canaan
aAix-Marseille Univ, CNRS, LISM, IMM FR3479, Marseille, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Stéphane Canaan
Sabine Ehrt
Weill Cornell Medical College
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.00394-18
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Within tuberculous granulomas, a subpopulation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis resides inside foamy macrophages (FM) that contain abundant cytoplasmic lipid bodies (LB) filled with triacylglycerol (TAG). Upon fusion of LB with M. tuberculosis-containing phagosomes, TAG is hydrolyzed and reprocessed by the bacteria into their own lipids, which accumulate as intracytosolic lipid inclusions (ILI). This phenomenon is driven by many mycobacterial lipases, among which LipY participates in the hydrolysis of host and bacterial TAG. However, the functional contribution of LipY's PE domain to TAG hydrolysis remains unclear. Here, enzymatic studies were performed to compare the lipolytic activities of recombinant LipY and its truncated variant lacking the N-terminal PE domain, LipY(ΔPE). Complementarily, an FM model was used where bone marrow-derived mouse macrophages were infected with M. bovis BCG strains either overexpressing LipY or LipY(ΔPE) or carrying a lipY deletion mutation prior to being exposed to TAG-rich very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL). Results indicate that truncation of the PE domain correlates with increased TAG hydrolase activity. Quantitative electron microscopy analyses showed that (i) in the presence of lipase inhibitors, large ILI (ILI+3) were not formed because of an absence of LB due to inhibition of VLDL-TAG hydrolysis or inhibition of LB-neutral lipid hydrolysis by mycobacterial lipases, (ii) ILI+3 profiles in the strain overexpressing LipY(ΔPE) were reduced, and (iii) the number of ILI+3 profiles in the ΔlipY mutant was reduced by 50%. Overall, these results delineate the role of LipY and its PE domain in host and mycobacterial lipid consumption and show that additional mycobacterial lipases take part in these processes.

INTRODUCTION

With more than 10 million new cases and 1.7 million deaths in 2016, tuberculosis (TB), caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis, remains one of the most devastating diseases worldwide (1). This serious illness is not fully treatable with current medication. Prognosis of the disease depends on the host's ability to contain the bacilli at the site of infection within granulomas. Tuberculous granulomas are complex and dynamic immunological structures that generate a wide range of microenvironments (2, 3) that are assumed to drastically affect the tubercle bacillus physiological properties (3, 4). Inside the high diversity of TB pulmonary lesions found during active disease or latent infection, a distinct bacterial subpopulation appears associated with a specific cell type consisting of foamy macrophages (FM) characterized by the presence of numerous triacylglycerol (TAG)-filled lipid bodies (LB) in their cytosol (2, 5, 6). To date, the exact role of FM in TB pathogenesis remains elusive; however, these specialized lipid-rich cells have been described in both experimentally infected animals and patients, suggesting that they play an essential role in granuloma formation and maturation processes. Several independent studies have demonstrated that pathogenic mycobacteria are able to survive in a slow or nonreplicating state during in vitro FM infection (5, 7). These experimental observations prompted the authors to propose that FM also promotes M. tuberculosis intracellular survival for extensive periods in vivo, although this remains to be demonstrated. A better understanding of how mycobacteria interact with and persist within FM is important to decipher this complex host-pathogen cross talk that may sustain latent TB and, eventually, to identify new pharmacological approaches to control both active and latent TB. It is well known that storage of large amounts of neutral lipids in the form of intracytosolic lipid inclusions (ILI) is one of the main characteristics of persistent mycobacteria (8). ILI are mainly composed of TAG resynthesized by mycobacterial TAG synthases from free fatty acids (FFA) coming from the hydrolysis of host TAG (9–12). Host lipid transfer to the phagosomal lumen occurs via mycobacterium-induced fusion between LB and phagosomes (7). Lipids within ILI seem to serve as a source of carbon and energy prior to reactivation of dormant bacilli (11, 13).

Although the origin of the ILI-containing lipids has become the focus of intense research (5, 10, 11, 14, 15), the catalytic steps involved in the formation of mycobacterial ILI are not completely understood (16, 17). It is obvious, however, that hydrolysis of host TAG released into the phagosome involves specific mycobacterial lipolytic enzymes, either secreted by the bacilli into the phagosomal lumen or associated with the outermost layer of the mycobacterial cell wall (16, 18–20), whereas lipolytic enzymes involved in hydrolysis of ILI-containing TAG must be located in the mycobacterial cytosol (11, 21, 22). Among the many mycobacterial lipases found in M. tuberculosis, LipY (Rv3097c) appears as a major player in the degradation of TAG within ILI under in vitro growth conditions mimicking dormancy (11, 21, 22). LipY belongs to the hormone-sensitive lipase family and displays an N-terminal PE domain that is specific to pathogenic mycobacterial species (21–23). Relevant studies demonstrated that PE proteins are exported to the cell wall via the type VII secretion system ESX-5 after recognition of the specific amino acid sequence YxxxD/E, contained in the N-terminal PE domain (18, 24–26). Among the enzymes of the PE family, only two members, PE-PGRS11 (or Rv0754), a functional phosphoglycerate mutase (27), and LipY, have been biochemically characterized. LipY was proposed to be a major contributor to the breakdown of stored TAG (21, 22). In addition, a recombinant Mycobacterium smegmatis strain overexpressing the full-length LipY exhibited reduced TAG hydrolytic activity compared to that of a LipY variant shortened by its N-terminal PE domain, LipY(ΔPE), suggesting that the PE domain negatively modulates the activity of LipY (22, 28).

In the present study, the experimental model system of very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL)-driven FM (7) was used to delineate the physiological role of the PE domain of LipY in the hydrolysis of both host-derived TAG and mycobacterial TAG within ILI. Reasons for choosing this model system have been described in detail elsewhere (7, 12, 14, 29). After internalization of VLDL by receptor-mediated endocytosis, the neutral lipids of this lipoprotein will undergo hydrolysis in lysosomes (Ly). This will provide fatty acids for the subsequent biosynthesis of neutral lipids, including TAG, between the two leaflets of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), where LB, consisting of a phospholipid monolayer encapsulating neutral lipids, form. This model system generates defined conditions for inducing the formation or removal of LB, which triggers ILI formation or consumption and helps delineate the role of host cell or mycobacterial lipases in these processes.

We first show that addition of lipase inhibitors during exposure of infected cells to VLDL inhibits the accumulation of lipids in the form of ILI by affecting either the macrophage lysosomal TAG hydrolase and, hence, LB formation or mycobacterial lipases involved in the hydrolysis of host TAG delivered to phagosomes. We next demonstrate the modulatory role of its N-terminal PE domain on LipY function by, as a first approach, comparing the catalytic activities of purified LipY and LipY(ΔPE) variants using a range of lipids with various chain lengths. As a second approach, we used quantitative electron microscopy (EM) methods to examine differences in mycobacterial ILI formation in bone marrow-derived mouse macrophages (BMDM) exposed to VLDL to become foamy after they were infected with M. bovis BCG strains overexpressing different LipY variants or in which the lipY gene was deleted. This study indicates that other lipases, in addition to LipY, are involved in ILI formation. Removal of VLDL normally leads to the loss of TAG-containing ILI (7). When lipase inhibitors were added after exposure to VLDL, no loss of ILI occurred, a result that emphasizes the participation of several lipolytic enzymes in the hydrolysis of bacterial cytosolic TAG.

RESULTS

ILI formation depends on lipid processing by macrophage and mycobacterial lipases.Previously, we have shown the dependence of ILI formation on the presence of LB in the host, confirmed the finding that host TAG provided the bulk of lipid for ILI formation, and demonstrated that VLDL-derived TAG must first be processed by host lysosomal lipases (7). The requirement of host lipases for the release of fatty acids had been tested by exposing M. avium-infected macrophages for 24 h to VLDL in the presence of the antiobesity drug tetrahydrolipstatin (THL or orlistat). THL inhibits human digestive lipases within the gastrointestinal tract (30) as well as a variety of other serine hydrolases (31, 32), including mycobacterial LipY, a major enzyme responsible for hydrolysis of ILI-containing TAG (21).

In the present work, we applied the above-described procedure to cells infected with wild-type M. bovis BCG. As described in our previous study (7), endocytosis of VLDL and transfer to lysosomes were not affected by THL, but TAG and derivatives in VLDL were not degraded as usual. These lipids were easily recognized by their electron transparency and were seen to fill the entire lumen of most lysosomes, leaving only small spaces with the usual electron-dense lysosomal contents (Fig. 1A). This was not observed when infected cells were exposed to VLDL only, in which case lysosomes keep their normal electron-dense appearance (Fig. 1B). In the presence of THL, very few, if any, LB were observed, with an average value of approximately 0.32 LB per cell (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). As expected, with this extremely low level of LB (approximately 23 times less than that of the untreated cells), mycobacterial profiles with large ILI filling most of the mycobacterial cytoplasm (defined as ILI+3 in reference 7) were infrequent (Fig. 1C), as opposed to when LB were formed in the presence of VLDL only (Fig. 1D). A quantitative evaluation (Fig. 1G) showed that the amount of ILI+3 and medium sized ILI (ILI+2) profiles remained low, less than 1% and 23% ± 1.1%, respectively, in the presence of THL versus 25% ± 7.4% and 45% ± 2%, respectively, in the absence of this lipase inhibitor. Consequently, the level of ILI+1/− profiles (no or few small ILI of 0.1 µm in width at most, as defined in reference 7) was 2.5-fold higher in the presence of THL (with THL, 78% ± 9.6%; without, 31% ± 0.5%).

FIG 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1

Addition of lipase inhibitors during exposure to VLDL affects host LB formation and accumulation of mycobacterial lipids in the form of ILI. At day 6 postinfection with WT M. bovis BCG, BMDM were exposed for 24 h to VLDL in the absence or presence of lipase inhibitors. The cells were then processed for EM and analyzed for host LB and mycobacterial ILI formation. (A, B, and E) Morphological appearance of host LB and lysosomes (Ly). (A) Exposure to VLDL and THL. LB are scarce and Ly are filled with electron-translucent lipids (Ly+). (B) Exposure to VLDL only. Cells contain many LB and Ly retain their normal appearance (Ly−), with dense contents only. (E) Exposure to VLDL and MmPPOX. LB are present and most Ly either retain their normal appearance or contain small amounts of lipids in the form of lipid droplets (Ly+/−). (C, D, and F) Morphological appearance of ILI within mycobacterial profiles. (C) Exposure to VLDL and THL. No ILI+3 mycobacterial profiles are seen. (D) Exposure to VLDL only. Many mycobacterial profiles are ILI+3. (F) Exposure to VLDL and MmPPOX. ILI remained small, and no ILI+3 mycobacterial profiles were observed. Bars in panels A to F, 0.5 μm. (G) Dependence of steady-state levels of ILI+3, ILI+2, and ILI+1/− profiles on the absence or presence of lipase inhibitors. Error bars indicate the standard deviations (SD) based on the results from 2 to 4 independent experiments. For each experiment, 150 to 300 profiles were examined for each treatment. Statistical analysis was performed by using two-tailed Student's t test. Results were compared to those for an untreated sample. **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001.

These results suggest that mycobacterial lipases were unable to process TAG in the VLDL core directly and that VLDL-derived TAG first had to be processed by lysosomal lipases in order to hydrolyze TAG into diacylglycerides (DAG), monoacylglycerides (MAG), and FFA for subsequent reprocessing into TAG and accumulation in LB. Because no LB were formed, it was not possible to gain information on the role of mycobacterial lipases in host TAG hydrolysis. However, THL has also been reported as a nonspecific inhibitor of a wide range of serine hydrolases from both mammals and bacterial species (13, 19, 33, 34), and therefore one cannot exclude that mycobacterial enzymes are also inhibited by THL, thereby impacting ILI formation.

We then resorted to the oxadiazolone inhibitor MmPPOX, known to inhibit a variety of mycobacterial serine hydrolases, including those of the hormone-sensitive lipase (HSL) family (35) and, more specifically, LipY (18, 23). After exposure of M. bovis BCG-infected cells to VLDL in the presence of MmPPOX, host lysosomes were not affected in the same way as that during THL treatment. Here, most lysosomes retained their usual electron-dense appearance. Less than 25% of the lysosomes contained small lipid droplets (Fig. 1E), and only 10% were filled with TAG and derivatives, as in the case of macrophages exposed to VLDL with THL. Notably, with MmPPOX the relative number of LB per cell was 6 to 7 times higher than that with a THL treatment (Fig. S1), with an average value of 2.1 LB per cell (leading to a 3.5-fold reduction in LB content compared to that of an untreated sample). These data suggest that host lysosomal lipases were poorly affected by MmPPOX. As a result, VLDL-derived TAG could be broken down into di- and monoglycerides and fatty acids for reprocessing into TAG and accumulation in LB.

Strikingly, during MmPPOX treatment mycobacterial profiles with large ILI were not observed (Fig. 1F). A quantitative evaluation of mycobacterial profiles containing the different categories of ILI showed that those with large (ILI+3) and medium-sized (ILI+2) ILI reached less than 5% and 20%, respectively, of the amount generated by cell exposure to VLDL in the absence of MmPPOX (Fig. 1G). These data suggest that the cell surface-exposed mycobacterial lipases involved in hydrolysis of host TAG delivered to wild-type M. bovis BCG-containing phagosomes are involved in ILI formation and that MmPPOX appears to inhibit the mycobacterial lipases more efficiently than THL. By comparing the LB/ILI relative ratios from the two treated samples, a clear difference in the effects of the two inhibitors was observed, where LB/ILI+3 and LB/ILI+2 ratios were 9.8 and 12.4 times higher, respectively, in MmPPOX- than in THL-treated samples (Fig. S1).

Altogether, these data further support that, in our system, VLDL has to be processed by host lipases in order to newly synthesize host LB and that these neutral lipid-rich organelles have to be delivered within mycobacterium-containing phagosomes for subsequent hydrolysis into free fatty acids, which will allow ILI formation. However, these experiments do not allow us to identify the specific mycobacterial lipase(s) involved in this process, although the LipY form associated with the mycobacterial surface remains the most likely candidate.

Biochemical characterization of rLipY and rLipY(ΔPE).The LipY hydrolase from M. tuberculosis has a dual location, first in the mycobacterial cytosol, where it has direct access to ILI for subsequent lipid hydrolysis (21, 22), and second at the mycobacterial cell surface in a truncated/mature form following removal of its N-terminal PE domain (18, 21, 22, 36). This dual localization has been explained by Daleke et al. (18), who demonstrated that the PE domain of LipY is essential for secretion by ESX-5 (18, 25, 26). It is not known, however, whether this secretion also requires additional partners, such as PPE proteins, which are known to form pairs with PE proteins. Mishra et al. proposed that the PE domain not only plays a role in the recognition by ESX-5 for secretion of LipY but also contributes to the enzymatic activity of the protein (22). Overexpression of LipY(ΔPE), a LipY version lacking its N-terminal PE domain, in M. smegmatis was associated with increased activity compared to that of the strain overexpressing the full-length protein (22). Nevertheless, whether lack of the PE domain directly affects LipY activity or whether the increased activity of LipY(ΔPE) results from an indirect effect, presumably due to the absence of a possible partner, remains unknown. To address this issue, we compared the enzymatic activities of purified LipY and recombinant LipY(ΔPE) [rLipY(ΔPE)] proteins.

Because the Escherichia coli expression system failed to express large amounts of LipY in an active form, we opted for the M. smegmatis mc2155 groEL1ΔC strain as a surrogate host, which allowed the production of around 30 mg of pure and active recombinant LipY from a 400-ml culture volume (Fig. 2A). Regarding rLipY(ΔPE), 9 mg of pure (Fig. 2A) and active enzyme were obtained from equivalent cultures, indicating that the PE domain is not needed for proper folding of the protein. This was confirmed by further biochemical analyses and circular dichroism spectrum determination of both recombinant enzymes (data not shown). The lower rLipY(ΔPE) yield could rely on the absence of the PE domain that exposes the lipid binding site of LipY, promoting a higher degree of interactions between molecules and excessive protein aggregation.

FIG 2
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2

Purification and structural modeling of LipY and LipY(ΔPE). (A) Protein purity assessed by SDS-PAGE. Six micrograms of protein was loaded onto a 12% polyacrylamide gel and stained with Instant Blue solution. Lane 1, rLipY; lane 2, rLipY(ΔPE). MW, molecular weight standards (10 μg; Euromedex). (B) Alignment of the LipY and LipY(ΔPE) amino acid sequences. The secondary structures identified from the corresponding 3D models are indicated above the sequences using the same color codes as in the structural models depicted in panel C. PE domain is in blue, linker unit is in green, and catalytic domain is in pink. Black stars below the sequence indicate the catalytic triad. (C) Overall view of the structural models of LipY and LipY(ΔPE). On the left, the LipY and LipY(ΔPE) 3D models were generated by I-TASSER software. The PE domain is represented in blue, and in both cases, the catalytic triad composed of serine (Ser309), aspartic acid (Asp383), and histidine (His414) residues is also indicated. The green part represents the polypeptide linking the catalytic domain to the PE domain. The black arrow shows the displacement of the linker after deletion of the PE domain, leading to a large opening of the active site and allowing a better accommodation of the substrates.

The specific activities of rLipY and rLipY(ΔPE) were determined by using a range of lipid substrates differing in their chain lengths and by combining titrimetric and spectrophotometric techniques. Regardless of the lipid substrates used, rLipY(ΔPE) exhibited higher specific activities (1.2 to 2.5 times depending on the substrate) than rLipY (Table 1). Both proteins were preferentially active on short-chain emulsified MAG and TAG, i.e., monobutyrin (61.0 ± 2.0 and 92.0 ± 5.0 U/mg, respectively) and tributyrin (129.0 ± 6.0 and 267.0 ± 24.0 U/mg, respectively), and displayed the same chain length specificity, since their respective specific activities decreased gradually as the substrate chain length increased (Table 1). These results unambiguously show that the lipase activity of LipY is significantly enhanced in the absence of its PE domain, consistent with previous findings (22). Moreover, LipY has a nonspecific lipase activity able to hydrolyze DAG and MAG as well as TAG. Therefore, LipY has the potential to degrade total host TAG, converting them into glycerol and free fatty acids, products that can subsequently be directly absorbed by the bacteria.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Specific activities of rLipY and rLipY(ΔPE) on various lipid substratesa

The N terminus contains 4 α-helices (α1 to α4), all lacking in LipY(ΔPE) (Fig. 2B). Molecular modeling was performed, allowing us to propose the overall structures of both the full-length and the truncated LipY protein (Fig. 2C) and to address whether these secondary structures alter the optimal recognition and/or binding of the substrates to LipY. The α1 to α4 helices of the PE domain are connected to a linker unit composed of three helices (α5 to α7), presumably providing a high degree of flexibility to the PE and core (C-terminal) domains. The latter, comprising the active site of LipY, belongs to the α/β hydrolase fold family and is composed of a central β-sheet (β1 to β8 strands) surrounded by nine α-helices. Similar to most lipases, the catalytic serine (Ser309) is located in a nucleophile elbow between the β5 strand and the α13 helix. The presence of the PE domain (Fig. 2C) clearly reduces the accessibility of the active site to the substrate. Removal of the PE domain allows the linker portion (green) to move to the side of the catalytic domain, thus opening access to the active site. This large opening presumably allows a better accommodation of the lipid substrates into the active site, thereby contributing to the increased enzymatic activity of LipY(ΔPE).

Distribution of ILI profiles in M. bovis BCG strains overexpressing various LipY variants in VLDL-driven FM.To investigate the functional contribution of the PE domain of LipY in host TAG hydrolysis and consequently ILI formation, macrophages were infected with various M. bovis BCG strains for 6 days before being exposed to VLDL for 24 h to induce FM formation (7). The strains used in this experiment were the wild-type BCG strain (WT), which is characterized by the native expression of LipY and was used as a reference, and three other recombinant BCG strains harboring distinct pMV261-derived constructs, leading to the overproduction of LipY, LipY(ΔPE), or LipY(ΔPE) in which Ser309 was replaced by an Ala residue [LipY(ΔPE)S309A], yielding a catalytically inactive protein (22). Cells were then fixed and processed for EM, and profiles of intracellular mycobacteria were examined for the presence and extent of ILI formation in both VLDL-treated and untreated macrophages. As before (7), intracellular mycobacteria were divided into 4 categories according to their ILI size (Fig. 3A to D): ILI− profiles had no ILI (Fig. 3A), ILI+1 profiles displayed a few small ILI of 0.1 μm in width at most (Fig. 3B), ILI+2 profiles displayed several ILI of approximately 0.2 to 0.3 μm in width (Fig. 3C), and ILI+3 profiles displayed several ILI of approximately 0.4 to 0.5 μm in width and occupied most of the mycobacterial cytoplasm (Fig. 3D). The relative abundance of each type of ILI profile was scored on approximately 200 different mycobacterial profiles per sample (Fig. 3E). As expected, in the absence of exposure to VLDL, 95% of the M. bovis BCG profiles were ILI+1/− regardless of the strain (data not shown). In contrast, after a 24-h exposure to VLDL, ILI+2 and ILI+3 were predominantly present among the different M. bovis BCG strains (Fig. 3E), as already found with M. avium (7). Further examination of the quantitative data showed that both the WT and the LipY-overexpressing strain displayed similar amounts of ILI profiles of each category, with ILI+3 at 27% ± 4.8% and 25% ± 4.1%, ILI+2 at 43% ± 3% and 40% ± 4.1%, and ILI+1/− at 29% ± 3.9% and 35% ± 6.8%. Likewise, and as expected, the relative abundance of the 4 types of ILI profiles in the strain overexpressing the catalytically inactive form LipY(ΔPE)S309A was similar to those scored in the WT strain and the strain overexpressing LipY (Fig. 3E). In sharp contrast with these strains, overexpression of LipY(ΔPE) resulted in a substantial drop in the percentage of ILI+3 (15% ± 4.4% versus 27% ± 4.8%) and a concomitant increase in ILI+1/− profiles (50% ± 7.5% versus 29% ± 3.9%) compared to the WT strain. Determination of the ILI3+/ILI+1/− ratio profiles showed that overexpression of LipY(ΔPE) triggers important changes in the intracellular pool of ILI compared with that of the full-length LipY or the inactive form, LipY(ΔPE)S309A (Fig. 3E). These data are fully consistent with the increased in vitro activity of rLipY(ΔPE) over rLipY (Table 1).

FIG 3
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 3

Distribution of ILI profiles in M. bovis BCG strains overexpressing various LipY variants in VLDL-driven FM. BMDM were infected with BCG strains overexpressing different LipY variants. After exposure to VLDL for 24 h, cells were fixed and processed for EM. Bacterial profiles were divided into 4 different categories in terms of the presence and size of ILI (ILI−, ILI+1, ILI+2, and ILI+3). (A) ILI− indicates no ILI. (B) ILI+1 indicates fewer than 5 small ILI up to 0.1 μm in width. (C) ILI+2 indicates several ILI, 0.2 to 0.3 μm in width. (D) ILI+3 indicates several ILI, 0.4 to 0.5 μm in width and extending across the full width of the M. bovis BCG cytosol. Bars in panels A to D, 0.5 μm. (E) Comparative analysis of the percentage of each category of ILI profiles in wild-type (WT) versus M. bovis BCG strains overexpressing different LipY variants [LipY, LipY(ΔPE), and LipY(ΔPE)S309A]. Error bars indicate the standard deviations based on the results of 2 to 4 independent experiments. For each experiment, 100 to 250 profiles were examined for each strain. Statistical analysis was performed by using two-tailed Student's t test. Results were compared to those for the WT strain. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01. (F) Comparative analysis of ILI3+/ILI1+/− ratios in WT and LipY-overexpressing strains. Ratios were calculated by dividing the percentage of ILI3+ bacteria by the percentage of ILI1+/− bacteria collected from between 2 and 4 independent experiments. Error bars indicate the standard deviations, and statistical analysis was performed by using two-tailed Student's t test. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01.

Additional mycobacterial lipases contribute to host TAG hydrolysis and ILI formation.Despite the primary role of LipY in host lipid hydrolysis, it is very likely that additional mycobacterial lipases participate in this process, a hypothesis emphasized by the fact that the genome of M. tuberculosis encodes at least 24 putative lipases (19, 20, 23, 37, 38). To test this hypothesis, macrophages were infected with a lipY-deleted M. bovis BCG mutant before being exposed to VLDL for 24 h. The cells were then fixed and processed for EM, and profiles of intracellular mycobacteria were examined for the presence and extent of ILI formation in both the WT and mutant strains. The profiles of the mutant clearly displayed smaller ILI than those of the WT strain (Fig. 4A versus C). The relative abundance of each category of ILI was then scored on approximately 150 different mycobacterial profiles per sample (Fig. 4E). Although all categories of ILI were found in the profiles of the ΔlipY mutant, the percentage of ILI+3 profiles was reduced by approximately 50% (16% ± 5.8% versus 35% ± 2.9%) with a concomitant increase in the percentage of ILI+1/− (46% ± 10.9% versus 27% ± 5.5%) with respect to the WT strain. Functional complementation of the ΔlipY mutant was performed with pMV261::lipY, which allows constitutive expression of the full-length lipY, leading to the ΔlipY::Comp strain. Production of the protein was confirmed by immunoblotting using polyclonal antibody directed against the M. tuberculosis LipY protein (Fig. 4D). As mentioned earlier (18, 22), LipY is not produced by wild-type M. bovis BCG in vitro under standard growth conditions, explaining the lack of a reactive band in the corresponding crude lysate. In contrast, a specific immunoreactive band was detected in the ΔlipY::Comp strain, indicating that LipY is constitutively produced in this strain. Thus, the ΔlipY::Comp strain was used to infect macrophages for 6 days before being exposed to VLDL for 24 h. Analysis of the ILI profile indicates that complementation restores the WT phenotype, characterized by 39% ± 5.3% and 23% ± 4.2% for ILI3+ and ILI+1/−, respectively (Fig. 4B and E). Likewise, the ILI3+/ILI+1/− ratio was severely impacted in the ΔlipY strain and was restored upon functional complementation of the mutant, clearly confirming the impact of the lipY deletion on intrabacterial lipid accumulation (Fig. 4F).

FIG 4
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 4

LipY and additional mycobacterial lipases contribute to host TAG hydrolysis and ILI formation. At day 6 postinfection with M. bovis BCG WT, ΔlipY, or ΔlipY complemented (ΔlipY::Comp) strains, BMDM were exposed for 24 h to VLDL. The cells were then processed for EM and analyzed for mycobacterial ILI formation. (A) BMDM infected with the ΔlipY strain. Most of the ILI profiles were small. (B) BMDM infected with the ΔlipY::Comp strain. Numerous large ILI were observed. (C) BMDM infected with WT M. bovis BCG. ILI+3 profiles were abundant. Bars, 0.5 μm (A and C) and 1 μm (B). (D) Western blot analysis of WT, ΔlipY, and ΔlipY::Comp strains. Equal amounts of lysates were immunoblotted, and full-length LipY was detected using a polyclonal antibody. GroEL2 was included as a loading control. (E) Comparative evaluation of the percentage of each category of ILI profiles formed in either the WT or the ΔlipY strain. Error bars indicate the standard deviations based on the results of 2 to 4 independent experiments. For each experiment, 150 to 300 profiles were examined for each treatment. Statistical analysis was performed with two-tailed Student's t test. Results were compared to those for the WT strain. *, P < 0.05. (F) Comparative analysis of ILI3+/ILI1+/− ratios of WT, ΔlipY, and ΔlipY::Comp strains. Ratios were calculated by dividing the percentage of ILI3+ with the percentage of ILI1+/− bacteria collected from between 2 and 4 independent experiments. Error bars indicate the SD, and statistical analysis was performed with two-tailed Student's t test. *, P < 0.05.

Taken collectively, these results reveal the major contribution of LipY in the breakdown of host-derived TAG within the phagosomal lumen and highlight the role of additional mycobacterial lipases in hydrolysis of host TAG and accumulation of TAG in the form of large ILI.

Consumption of TAG within ILI correlates with the reduction of LB and the activity of cytosolic mycobacterial lipases.To dissect the physiological link between LB in FM and ILI in mycobacteria, we had previously investigated whether the formation of large ILI (ILI+3) could be reversed by removal of VLDL (7). After exposure of infected macrophages to VLDL for 24 h, the infected cells had been washed and reincubated in fresh medium without lipoprotein. Within 24 h after removal of VLDL, infected cells had lost their LB and ILI+3 were no longer visible in the mycobacterial profiles (7), demonstrating the direct link between the presence/absence of LB and ILI formation/consumption. The same method was applied to M. bovis BCG-infected cells and the present work yielded comparable results (Fig. 5D).

FIG 5
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 5

Consumption of TAG within ILI correlates with the activity of cytosolic mycobacterial lipases. At day 6 postinfection with WT M. bovis BCG, BMDM were exposed to VLDL for 24 h and then reincubated in VLDL-free culture medium alone or with THL or MmPPOX for 24 h. The cells were then processed for EM and the percentage of each category of ILI profiles was assessed. (A) VLDL for 24 h followed by a 24-h chase in medium devoid of inhibitors. Cells contain few ILI+3 profiles. (B) VLDL for 24 h followed by a 24-h chase in medium with THL. Cells still contain ILI+3 profiles. (C) VLDL for 24 h followed by a 24-h chase in medium with MmPPOX. Cells still contain ILI+3 profiles. Bars, 0.5 μm (A and B) and 0.7 μm (C). (D) Quantitative evaluation of the percentage of each category of ILI profiles immediately after a 24-h exposure to VLDL (no I, 0 h) or after a 24-h chase in culture medium without inhibitor (no I, 24 h), with THL (THL, 24 h), or with MmPPOX (MmPPOX, 24 h). Error bars indicate the standard deviations based on the results of 2 to 3 independent experiments. For each experiment, 150 to 300 profiles were examined for each treatment. Statistical analysis was performed by using two-tailed Student's t test. Results without inhibitors were compared to the no I, 0-h condition (#, P < 0.05; ##, P < 0.01), whereas results with the inhibitors were compared to the no I, 24-h condition (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01).

To determine whether mycobacterial lipases were involved in ILI consumption, we applied the same chase strategy but in the absence or presence of lipase inhibitors. After exposure of WT M. bovis BCG-infected cells to VLDL for 24 h to allow ILI formation, the cells were washed and reincubated in fresh medium without lipoprotein but in the absence or presence of either THL or MmPPOX for an additional 24 h. The morphological appearance of the M. bovis BCG profiles was observed under the EM (Fig. 5). In the absence of a lipase inhibitor, ILI+3 profiles were seldom encountered (Fig. 5A). In contrast, many ILI+3 profiles were encountered during a chase in the presence of either THL (Fig. 5B) or MmPPOX (Fig. 5C). Scoring of the relative amount of each category of ILI profiles under each condition showed, as before (7), that the percentage of ILI+3 profiles was reduced by 90% when cells were chased in medium without inhibitors (Fig. 5D). In contrast, when the chase medium contained either THL or MmPPOX, approximately 80 to 90% of the ILI+3 profiles were retained (Fig. 5D). The fact that at 24 h the relative abundance of ILI+3 was 5 times higher in the presence of THL or MmPPOx (21% ± 0.6% and 23% ± 0.8%, respectively) than in the absence of lipase inhibitors (3.6% ± 0.8%) indicates that ILI consumption is indeed dependent on mycobacterial lipase activity. These results are in agreement with previous studies showing that hydrolysis of mycobacterial ILI is associated with the decrease of LB in the host (7) and the presence of a (several) mycobacterial lipase(s) (13, 37) and, in particular, LipY (11, 21, 22).

DISCUSSION

In previous work, VLDL was used as a source of lipids to generate FM (7), since it is well known that such cells play a major role in the persistence and reactivation phases of TB within granulomas (5, 6, 11, 39). Quantitative analyses of detailed EM observations performed after exposure of M. avium-infected cells to VLDL had shown that macrophages became foamy and mycobacteria formed large ILI for which host TAG was essential. Lipid transfer occurred via mycobacterium-induced fusion between LB and phagosomes. This experimental tool clearly constitutes a well-defined cellular system in which to study changed metabolic states of intracellular mycobacteria that may relate to persistence and reactivation of TB. As a follow-up to this proof of concept, this FM model was used here to demonstrate the extensive accumulation of ILI inside M. bovis BCG and to investigate in detail the role of host lipases in LB formation, without which there can be no transfer of host TAG to mycobacterium-containing phagosomes, as well as the physiological role of the mycobacterial lipase LipY in the degradation of TAG inside mycobacterium-containing phagosomes and mycobacterial ILI. By a variety of approaches, we analyzed the contribution of macrophage and bacterial lipases in LB and ILI formation/degradation and propose the following model, depicted in Fig. 6.

FIG 6
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 6

Proposed model for LipY in vivo activity as a function of its localization. The PE domain of LipY functions as a secretion signal recognized by the ESX-5 secretion system. (1) Endocytic uptake of VLDL composed of phospholipids (P), triglycerides (T), and cholesterol (C) and transfer to lysosomes (Ly). (2) Hydrolysis of TAG in VLDL and formation of TAG-rich host LB after release of free fatty acids (FA) from Ly. (3) Fusion of LB with the membrane of mycobacterium-containing phagosomes. Host TAG is released into the phagosomal lumen during this process. (4) During its translocation across the mycobacterial cell envelope via ESX-5, the LipY N-terminal PE domain is cleaved off. After secretion into the phagosome, LipY(ΔPE) remains closely associated with the mycobacterial outermost surface, where it hydrolyzes host TAG. At this stage, other mycobacterial lipases are likely to be involved in the degradation of the LipY end product, releasing free fatty acids (FA), which are then transported to the mycobacterial cytosol where TAG are resynthesized by the TAG synthases (TGS). TAG then accumulate to form ILI. (5) Under specific conditions, TAG within ILI can be hydrolyzed by cytosolic LipY.

After its internalization by receptor-mediated endocytosis, VLDL is transferred to lysosomes where host lysosomal lipases hydrolyze TAG into its derivatives and free fatty acid that serves to form LB. In a first set of experiments, we used two different families of lipase inhibitors, THL and MmPPOX, which, surprisingly, act by targeting different types of lipases within cells. On the one hand, by exposing infected cells to VLDL in the presence of THL, this lipase inhibitor shows preferences for host lipases, since TAG hydrolysis in lysosomes was blocked. Macrophages were unable to become foamy, and as a result, M. bovis BCG was unable to form ILI. On the other hand, exposure of cells to VLDL in the presence of MmPPOX weakly blocked the host lipases in the lysosomes and consequently did not profoundly affect the formation of LB, but mycobacteria still remained unable to form ILI. Our results suggest that the effect of this inhibitor is more specifically directed against mycobacterial lipases. The fact that these two families of inhibitors target lipases located at different sites could be directly related to their chemical structures and biophysical properties. In contrast to MmPPOX, THL is indeed a highly lipophilic molecule with physicochemical properties similar to those of a diacylglycerol molecule, which makes it soluble in VLDL. By using these two different families of lipase inhibitors, we can study either the host lipases or the mycobacterial lipases. We therefore provide strong evidence that ILI formation (i) involves both host lysosomal and mycobacterial lipases and (ii) is strictly dependent on host LB in our experimental model. In Dictyostelium discoideum, Mycobacterium marinum was found to produce ILI without using TAG as the major carbon source (40, 41). Indeed, the use of a Dictyostelium knockout mutant for both Dgat enzymes (dgat1 and dgat2 genes), which is unable to produce LB, allowed the authors to demonstrate that a resulting excess of free fatty acids is predominantly incorporated into phospholipids, triggering a massive ER-membrane proliferation. Fluorescent and EM approaches coupled with thin-layer chromatography lipid analyses suggested that M. marinum uses phospholipids to build up ILI. This observation leads to a new hypothesis that intracellular mycobacteria have access to a wide range of host lipids, and one cannot exclude the possibility that bacteria in FM have direct access to free fatty acids under conditions other than the experimental conditions of our FM model. Although this hypothesis has to be fully addressed experimentally in future studies, the current knowledge about ILI formation in mycobacteria within FM seems to predominantly rely on host TAG degradation.

Among the large number of lipolytic enzymes encoded by the M. tuberculosis genome, LipY remains the only one carrying an N-terminal PE domain, which was subsequently found to be a signal of recognition by the ESX-5 secretion system (18, 26). Here, we investigated whether the PE domain directly participates in the enzyme's TAG activity. Our results are in agreement with a previous study demonstrating that LipY is the enzyme with the highest potential for hydrolyzing TAG stored inside M. tuberculosis (21). The authors extend our earlier report suggesting that the PE domain plays a role in modulating the catalytic activity of LipY (22). Comparison of the catalytic activities of rLipY and rLipY(ΔPE) clearly indicates that LipY(ΔPE) is more active than LipY, regardless of the substrate used. Similar results came from another group who used only one synthetic nonphysiological substrate (28). Our data, therefore, add new insights into the functional role of the PE domain, which is shared by a large number of proteins in pathogenic mycobacteria. Interestingly, Mycobacterium marinum contains a protein homologous to LipY, termed LipYmar, in which the PE domain is replaced by a PPE domain (22). As for LipY, overexpression of LipYmar in M. smegmatis significantly reduced the TAG pool, and this was further pronounced when the PPE domain of LipYmar was removed, suggesting that PE and PPE domains can share similar functional roles. Therefore, given the analogy between LipY and LipYmar, it is conceivable that the PPE domain, like the PE domain, directly modulates the activity of LipYmar and that the lower catalytic activity of LipYmar results from steric hindrance of the PPE domain, altering the recognition/accommodation of TAG within the lipid-binding site. Since, like M. tuberculosis or M. bovis BCG, M. marinum also produces ILI during infection (40 and unpublished data), it is tempting to speculate that LipYmar plays a crucial role in ILI formation during M. marinum infection.

To further delineate the role of the PE domain in modulating the activity of LipY in an infectious context, experiments were carried out by extending our original experimental model of FM (7). BMDM were infected with M. bovis BCG strains overexpressing either LipY or LipY(ΔPE) and exposed to VLDL as a lipid source. Quantitative analyses of EM observations allowed us to perform a detailed investigation on the role of the mycobacterial lipase LipY in the degradation of host TAG transferred to the mycobacterium-containing phagosomes. Importantly, the difference in in vitro activity of LipY and LipY(ΔPE) could be reconciled in this model of infection, where a significant reduction of the ILI+3 category was found with the BCG strain overexpressing LipY(ΔPE). This is consistent with the fact that, in contrast to LipY, which is secreted, LipY(ΔPE) fails to be transported by ESX-5, and as a consequence its accumulation inside mycobacteria boosts ILI degradation (22, 25).

In a previous study (7), we had shown that removal of VLDL induced a rapid decline of both LB and ILI. Here, we show that exposure of infected cells to lipase inhibitors, added during the chase period following an exposure to VLDL, strongly affects TAG hydrolysis within ILI, which remain abundant and large. These results provide evidence that cytosolic LipY is also involved in ILI consumption.

Our data also indicate that the dual localization of LipY affects its activity. Since the PE-containing domain is cleaved off by the ESX-5 secretion system (18), our results suggest that the mycobacterial surface-anchored form of LipY is more active than the intracytosolic full-length protein. From these results, it can be inferred that LipY is more active against host lipids targeted to phagosomes via LB-phagosome fusion than toward TAG stored within ILI. Indeed, as illustrated in Fig. 6, while a fraction of LipY is found in the cytosol, consistent with its role in the catabolism of intracellular TAG in ILI, a significant fraction of mature LipY lacking its PE domain is also localized at the outer surface of the mycobacterial cell envelope, where it catalyzes the breakdown of exogenously available TAG, such as those found within the LB of the FM. This scenario is consistent with the idea that M. tuberculosis depends on fatty acids as a preferred energy source during infection (42), where LipY represents a critical enzyme for the utilization of host lipids. However, the ILI+3 profile in the ΔlipY mutant clearly indicates the active participation of other mycobacterial lipases in this process, a finding consistent with the presence of a large array of genes encoding lipolytic enzymes found in pathogenic mycobacteria (43). Among these, Rv0183 has been shown to exhibit a preference for MAG or DAG and to be localized to the cell wall (19, 44), whereas Cfp21, a secreted cutinase-like enzyme, also expresses TAG lipase activity (20, 38). These two proteins may represent putative candidates which, in addition to LipY, participate in the breakdown of host TAG transferred to phagosomes and the release of free fatty acids, which may be utilized by multiple TAG synthases (45) to carry out the synthesis of TAG in the mycobacterial cytosol (Fig. 6). Utilization of these TAG in ILI is essential for the regrowth of mycobacteria during their exit from hypoxic nonreplicating conditions (37) and reactivation of latent infection to cause an active disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Reagents.Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) and glutaraldehyde grade I (EM grade) were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA), fetal bovine serum (FBS) was from Biowest (Nuaillé, France), phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) was from GIBCO (distributed by Invitrogen, Villebon sur Yvette, France), commercial very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) was from Calbiochem-Merck (Darmstadt, Germany), and osmium tetroxide and Spurr resin were from Electron Microscopy Sciences (distributed by Euromedex, Mundolsheim, France). All bacterial culture media were purchased from Life Technologies (USA).

Bacterial strains and growth conditions.Escherichia coli DH10B cells (Invitrogen) used in cloning experiments were grown at 37°C in Luria-Bertani broth (Invitrogen) or on Luria-Bertani agar plates. Culture media were supplemented with 200 μg/ml hygromycin B. The M. smegmatis mc2155 groEL1ΔC strain (46), used for expression experiments, was routinely grown at 37°C with shaking (220 rpm) in Middlebrook 7H9 medium (Difco) supplemented with 0.05% (vol/vol) Tween 80, 0.2% (vol/vol) glycerol, 0.5% (wt/vol) bovine serum albumin (BSA), and 0.2% (wt/vol) glucose or on Middlebrook 7H11 (Difco) agar plates. The M. bovis BCG Pasteur 1173P2 strain, used for overexpression experiments, was grown at 37°C with shaking (160 rpm) in Middlebrook 7H9 medium supplemented with 0.05% (vol/vol) Tween 80, 0.2% (vol/vol) glycerol, and 10% (vol/vol) albumin dextrose catalase (ADC). Preparation of M. smegmatis and M. bovis BCG electrocompetent cells and electroporation procedures were performed as described previously (47). Transformants were selected on Middlebrook 7H11 agar supplemented with 10% ADC and either 50 μg/ml hygromycin or 50 μg/ml kanamycin. Plates were incubated at 37°C for 3 to 5 days for M. smegmatis and for 3 weeks for M. bovis BCG.

Complementation of M. bovis BCG ΔlipY strain.An M. bovis BCG mutant lacking the lipY gene (ΔlipY mutant) was grown in the presence of 50 μg/ml hygromycin (37). Complementation was performed by introducing pMV261::lipY (22) prior to selection on 7H11 Middlebrook agar medium supplemented with 10% ADC and kanamycin. The presence of the plasmid was checked by PCR, and expression of LipY was confirmed by immunoblotting. Briefly, bacterial lysates from the WT, ΔlipY, and complemented (ΔlipY::Comp) strains were normalized for total protein content, electrophoretically separated on a 12% SDS-PAGE gel, and transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane using a Trans-Blot turbo transfer system (Bio-Rad). Membranes were then saturated with 1% BSA in PBS, 0.1% Tween 20 and probed for 1 h with mouse antiserum raised against LipY at a 1/2,500 dilution. After extensive washing, the membrane was incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated IgG anti-mouse antibodies (Sigma-Aldrich). The GroEL2 protein was used as a protein loading control and was revealed using the HisProbe horseradish peroxidase (HRP) conjugate (Thermo-Scientific), which recognizes the natural polyhistidine sequence present in its C-terminal domain (48, 49). Detection was achieved using the Pierce ECL Western blotting substrate solution (Thermo-Scientific) and visualized using the ChemiDoc MP imaging system (Bio-Rad).

Cloning, expression, and purification of LipY and LipY(ΔPE).The lipY and lipY(ΔPE) genes were amplified by PCR using M. tuberculosis H37Rv genomic DNA and cloned into pSD26 under the control of the acetamide-inducible promoter and carrying a hygromycin resistance cassette (50) or into pMV261 (51) downstream of the hsp60 promoter and containing a kanamycin resistance cassette, as reported previously (22). DNA sequence analysis of each insert was performed by GATC Biotech (Germany).

Expression and purification of recombinant LipY or LipY(ΔPE) were performed as previously reported (52), with some minor modifications. Briefly, M. smegmatis mc2155 groEL1ΔC strains carrying pSD26-lipY and pSD26-lipY(ΔPE) were used to inoculate 10 ml of 7H9 medium containing 50 μg/ml hygromycin. After 3 days of incubation at 37°C with shaking, 10 ml of the preparation was used to inoculate 400 ml of culture medium for large-scale production. Cultures were grown at 37°C with shaking (220 rpm) until an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) between 2.5 and 3 was reached. Expression of recombinant proteins was induced by adding acetamide to a final concentration of 0.2% (wt/vol) for 16 h. Bacteria were harvested, resuspended in ice-cold buffer A (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl) (30 ml) containing 1% N-lauroylsarcosine, and lysed using a French press set to 1,100 lb/in2. After centrifugation, the supernatant (S1) was recovered, while the resulting pellet was resuspended in buffer A (30 ml) and sonicated twice for 30 s with 30-s breaks between each cycle and stirred overnight at 4°C. After centrifugation, the new supernatant (S2) was pooled with S1 supernatant and the mixture was loaded onto a Ni2+-nitrilotriacetic acid resin equilibrated with buffer A. The column was subsequently washed with buffer A without detergent prior to elution with increasing concentrations of imidazole. The eluted fractions were analyzed by performing 12% SDS-PAGE as described previously (53). Fractions containing pure proteins were pooled, dialyzed overnight against buffer A, and concentrated by ultrafiltration to a final concentration of 0.6 mg/ml and stored at −80°C. Theoretical physical properties (molecular mass, extinction coefficient at 280 nm, and isoelectric point) of both proteins containing the His6 tag at the C-terminal position were obtained from the ProtParam tool (http://ca.expasy.org/tools/protparam.html).

Enzyme activity measurements using the pH-stat technique.Enzymatic hydrolysis of emulsions of mono-, di-, and triacylglycerol, namely monobutyrin (MC4), monolein (MC18), diolein (DC18), tributyrin (TC4), and trioctanoin (TC8), were monitored titrimetrically for at least 5 min at 37°C using a pH-stat (Metrohm 718 STAT Titrino; Metrohm Ltd., Herisau, Switzerland). Assays were performed in 2.5 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.5) containing 300 mM NaCl and 3 mM sodium taurodeoxycholate (NaTDC) (23, 54). Free fatty acids released were automatically titrated with 0.1 M NaOH to maintain a fixed endpoint pH value of 7.5. The specific activities of both enzymes were expressed in units per milligram of pure enzyme. One unit corresponds to the release of 1 μmol of fatty acid per minute.

Lipase activity assays on TAG from pomegranate oil.Corning UV 96-well microplates were coated as recently described (55) using TAG from pomegranate oil, containing up to 80% punicic acid (C18:3) equally present at the 3 positions of the glycerol backbone. The lipase activity was measured at 37°C in 10 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.5) containing 150 mM NaCl, 6 mM CaCl2, 1 mM EDTA, 0.001% (wt/vol) 3,5-di-tert-4-butylhydroxytoluene (BHT), and 3 mg/ml β-cyclodextrin (β-CD). The formation of the β-CD/free punicic acid complex was continuously monitored at 275 nm for 60 min.

In silico protein modeling.Three-dimensional (3D) structural models of LipY and LipY(ΔPE) proteins were generated with the automatic protein structure homology modeling server using the I-Tasser software program (56, 57). The alignment of the LipY and LipY(ΔPE) sequences was performed using Multalin multiple-sequence alignment (58), and the result was displayed with ESPript (59). The structural overlay and figures were drawn using the PyMOL Molecular Graphics System (version 1.8.6.0; Schrödinger, LLC).

Infection of BMDM with recombinant M. bovis BCG strains.Bone marrow cells were isolated from the femurs of 6- to 8-week-old C57BL/6 female mice and seeded onto tissue culture dishes (Falcon; Becton Dickinson Labware, Meylan, France) that were 35 mm in diameter (4 × 105 cells per dish). The culture medium was DMEM with high glucose (1 g liter−1) and high carbonate (3.7 g liter−1) concentrations supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS, 10% L-cell conditioned medium (a source of colony-stimulating factor 1, or CSF-1), and 2 mM l-glutamine. Five days after seeding, the adherent cells were washed twice with DMEM and refed with complete medium. Medium was then renewed on day 6. No antibiotics were added. On day 7, the cells were infected for 4 h at 37°C with the wild type or different recombinant M. bovis BCG strains at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 5 for EM studies, washed in 4 changes of ice-cold PBS to eliminate noningested bacteria, and further incubated in complete medium devoid of antibiotics. For long-term cultures, the medium was changed twice a week.

Treatment with VLDL and chase after treatment.After active replication of M. bovis BCG for 6 days, infected macrophages were exposed to VLDL for 24 h. The volume of VLDL was adjusted so as to expose cells (1 × 106 per dish) to 180 μg TAG per ml of medium. In some instances, infected cells were exposed to VLDL simultaneously with either tetrahydrolipstatin (THL; also named Orlistat; 60 μg/ml in ethanol) or MmPPOX (15 μg/ml in ethanol) for 24 h (23). Cells were also exposed to VLDL for 24 h, washed, and incubated in a VLDL-free fresh medium with or without THL or MmPPOX for 24 h.

Processing for conventional EM.Cells were fixed for 1 h at room temperature with 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 7.2) containing 0.1 M sucrose, 5 mM CaCl2, and 5 mM MgCl2, washed with complete cacodylate buffer, and postfixed for 1 h at room temperature with 1% osmium tetroxide in the same buffer devoid of sucrose. They were washed with buffer, scraped off the dishes, concentrated in 2% agar in cacodylate buffer, and treated for 1 h at room temperature with 1% uranyl acetate in 30% methanol. Samples were dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol solutions and embedded in Spurr resin. Thin sections (70 nm thick) were stained with 1% uranyl acetate in distilled water and then with lead citrate.

Quantification and statistical analysis.At the time points indicated in the figures, 150 to 300 intraphagosomal mycobacteria per sample were examined under an EM to score the percentage of each category of M. bovis BCG ILI profiles. The cells were examined at random, and care was taken to avoid serial sections. Histograms represent the means ± standard deviations from at least three independent counts. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 4.03, and differences were considered statistically significant when P values were ≤0.05 using two-tailed Student's t tests.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are grateful to S. Rao (Novartis Institute for Tropical Diseases, Singapore) for the kind gift of the lipY deletion mutant.

P.S. received financial support for his Ph.D. fellowship from the Ministère Français de l'Enseignement Supérieur, de la Recherche et de l'Innovation. We are thankful for the support by the Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (FRM) (DEQ20150331719) to L.K. and Campus France (Paris, France) for the Ph.D. fellowship granted to S.D. This work was supported by core grants from the Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (Inserm) and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) and by grant number ANR-09-MIEN-009-03 from the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (French National Research Agency) to LA., C.D.C., L.K., and S.C.

The EM observations and analyses were performed by C.D.C. and I.P. in the PiCSL EM core facility (Institut de Biologie du Développement, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille), a member of the France-BioImaging French research infrastructure. This work has also benefited from the facilities and expertise of the Platform for Microscopy of IMM (Institut de Microbiologie de la Méditerranée).

We thank the members of these EM facilities for expert technical assistance, Jean Pierre Gorvel (Centre d'Immunologie de Marseille-Luminy, Aix-Marseille Université UM2, Inserm, U1104, CNRS UMR7280, Marseille, France) for continuous support and advice and Irène Caire-Brändli for expert technical assistance (she took part in the cellular microbiology experiments and EM observations and analyses under C.D.C.'s supervision). We thank Valéry Matarazzo and members of the INMED laboratory (INSERM-INMED UMR901, Aix-Marseille Université) for providing the femurs of 6- to 8-week-old C57BL/6 female mice. Finally, we kindly thank Jean-François Cavalier (CNRS, UMR7255, Marseille, France) for providing the MmPPOX lipase inhibitor and for fruitful discussions.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 23 May 2018.
    • Returned for modification 8 June 2018.
    • Accepted 3 July 2018.
    • Accepted manuscript posted online 9 July 2018.
  • Supplemental material for this article may be found at https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.00394-18.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    WHO. 2017. Global tuberculosis report. WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.
  2. 2.↵
    1. Irwin SM,
    2. Driver E,
    3. Lyon E,
    4. Schrupp C,
    5. Ryan G,
    6. Gonzalez-Juarrero M,
    7. Basaraba RJ,
    8. Nuermberger EL,
    9. Lenaerts AJ
    . 2015. Presence of multiple lesion types with vastly different microenvironments in C3HeB/FeJ mice following aerosol infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Dis Models Mech 8:591–602. doi:10.1242/dmm.019570.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. 3.↵
    1. Lenaerts A,
    2. Barry CE, III,
    3. Dartois V
    . 2015. Heterogeneity in tuberculosis pathology, microenvironments and therapeutic responses. Immunol Rev 264:288–307. doi:10.1111/imr.12252.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Manina G,
    2. Dhar N,
    3. McKinney JD
    . 2015. Stress and host immunity amplify Mycobacterium tuberculosis phenotypic heterogeneity and induce nongrowing metabolically active forms. Cell Host Microbe 17:32–46. doi:10.1016/j.chom.2014.11.016.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Peyron P,
    2. Vaubourgeix J,
    3. Poquet Y,
    4. Levillain F,
    5. Botanch C,
    6. Bardou F,
    7. Daffe M,
    8. Emile JF,
    9. Marchou B,
    10. Cardona PJ,
    11. de Chastellier C,
    12. Altare F
    . 2008. Foamy macrophages from tuberculous patients' granulomas constitute a nutrient-rich reservoir for M. tuberculosis persistence. PLoS Pathog 4:e1000204. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1000204.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Hunter RL,
    2. Jagannath C,
    3. Actor JK
    . 2007. Pathology of postprimary tuberculosis in humans and mice: contradiction of long-held beliefs. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 87:267–278. doi:10.1016/j.tube.2006.11.003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Caire-Brandli I,
    2. Papadopoulos A,
    3. Malaga W,
    4. Marais D,
    5. Canaan S,
    6. Thilo L,
    7. de Chastellier C
    . 2014. Reversible lipid accumulation and associated division arrest of Mycobacterium avium in lipoprotein-induced foamy macrophages may resemble key events during latency and reactivation of tuberculosis. Infect Immun 82:476–490. doi:10.1128/IAI.01196-13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Garton NJ,
    2. Waddell SJ,
    3. Sherratt AL,
    4. Lee SM,
    5. Smith RJ,
    6. Senner C,
    7. Hinds J,
    8. Rajakumar K,
    9. Adegbola RA,
    10. Besra GS,
    11. Butcher PD,
    12. Barer MR
    . 2008. Cytological and transcript analyses reveal fat and lazy persister-like bacilli in tuberculous sputum. PLoS Med 5:e75. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050075.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Daniel J,
    2. Sirakova T,
    3. Kolattukudy P
    . 2014. An acyl-CoA synthetase in Mycobacterium tuberculosis involved in triacylglycerol accumulation during dormancy. PLoS One 9: e114877. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0114877.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. 10.↵
    1. Daniel J,
    2. Maamar H,
    3. Deb C,
    4. Sirakova TD,
    5. Kolattukudy PE
    . 2011. Mycobacterium tuberculosis uses host triacylglycerol to accumulate lipid droplets and acquires a dormancy-like phenotype in lipid-loaded macrophages. PLoS Pathog 7:e1002093. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1002093.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Kapoor N,
    2. Pawar S,
    3. Sirakova TD,
    4. Deb C,
    5. Warren WL,
    6. Kolattukudy PE
    . 2013. Human granuloma in vitro model, for TB dormancy and resuscitation. PLoS One 8:e53657. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0053657.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. 12.↵
    1. Viljoen A,
    2. Blaise M,
    3. de Chastellier C,
    4. Kremer L
    . 2016. MAB_3551c encodes the primary triacylglycerol synthase involved in lipid accumulation in Mycobacterium abscessus. Mol Microbiol 102:611–627. doi:10.1111/mmi.13482.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Dhouib R,
    2. Ducret A,
    3. Hubert P,
    4. Carriere F,
    5. Dukan S,
    6. Canaan S
    . 2011. Watching intracellular lipolysis in mycobacteria using time lapse fluorescence microscopy. Biochim Biophys Acta 1811:234–241. doi:10.1016/j.bbalip.2011.01.001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Santucci P,
    2. Bouzid F,
    3. Smichi N,
    4. Poncin I,
    5. Kremer L,
    6. De Chastellier C,
    7. Drancourt M,
    8. Canaan S
    . 2016. Experimental models of foamy macrophages and approaches for dissecting the mechanisms of lipid accumulation and consumption during dormancy and reactivation of tuberculosis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 6:122. doi:10.3389/fcimb.2016.00122.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  15. 15.↵
    1. Daniel J,
    2. Kapoor N,
    3. Sirakova T,
    4. Sinha R,
    5. Kolattukudy P
    . 2016. The perilipin-like PPE15 protein in Mycobacterium tuberculosis is required for triacylglycerol accumulation under dormancy-inducing conditions. Mol Microbiol 101:784–794. doi:10.1111/mmi.13422.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  16. 16.↵
    1. Dedieu L,
    2. Serveau-Avesque C,
    3. Kremer L,
    4. Canaan S
    . 2013. Mycobacterial lipolytic enzymes: a gold mine for tuberculosis research. Biochimie 95:66–73. doi:10.1016/j.biochi.2012.07.008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. 17.↵
    1. Singh G,
    2. Jadeja D,
    3. Kaur J
    . 2010. Lipid hydrolizing enzymes in virulence: Mycobacterium tuberculosis as a model system. Crit Rev Microbiol 36:259–269. doi:10.3109/1040841X.2010.482923.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Daleke MH,
    2. Cascioferro A,
    3. de Punder K,
    4. Ummels R,
    5. Abdallah AM,
    6. van der Wel N,
    7. Peters PJ,
    8. Luirink J,
    9. Manganelli R,
    10. Bitter W
    . 2011. Conserved Pro-Glu (PE) and Pro-Pro-Glu (PPE) protein domains target LipY lipases of pathogenic mycobacteria to the cell surface via the ESX-5 pathway. J Biol Chem 286:19024–19034. doi:10.1074/jbc.M110.204966.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Dhouib R,
    2. Laval F,
    3. Carriere F,
    4. Daffe M,
    5. Canaan S
    . 2010. A monoacylglycerol lipase from Mycobacterium smegmatis involved in bacterial cell interaction. J Bacteriol 192:4776–4785. doi:10.1128/JB.00261-10.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Schué M,
    2. Maurin D,
    3. Dhouib R,
    4. N′Goma JC,
    5. Delorme V,
    6. Lambeau G,
    7. Carriere F,
    8. Canaan S
    . 2010. Two cutinase-like proteins secreted by Mycobacterium tuberculosis show very different lipolytic activities reflecting their physiological function. FASEB J 24:1893–1903. doi:10.1096/fj.09-144766.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. 21.↵
    1. Deb C,
    2. Daniel J,
    3. Sirakova TD,
    4. Abomoelak B,
    5. Dubey VS,
    6. Kolattukudy PE
    . 2006. A novel lipase belonging to the hormone-sensitive lipase family induced under starvation to utilize stored triacylglycerol in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Biol Chem 281:3866–3875. doi:10.1074/jbc.M505556200.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Mishra KC,
    2. de Chastellier C,
    3. Narayana Y,
    4. Bifani P,
    5. Brown AK,
    6. Besra GS,
    7. Katoch VM,
    8. Joshi B,
    9. Balaji KN,
    10. Kremer L
    . 2008. Functional role of the PE domain and immunogenicity of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis triacylglycerol hydrolase LipY. Infect Immun 76:127–140. doi:10.1128/IAI.00410-07.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Delorme V,
    2. Diomande SV,
    3. Dedieu L,
    4. Cavalier JF,
    5. Carriere F,
    6. Kremer L,
    7. Leclaire J,
    8. Fotiadu F,
    9. Canaan S
    . 2012. MmPPOX inhibits Mycobacterium tuberculosis lipolytic enzymes belonging to the hormone-sensitive lipase family and alters mycobacterial growth. PLoS One 7:e46493. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0046493.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  24. 24.↵
    1. Abdallah AM,
    2. Gey van Pittius NC,
    3. Champion PA,
    4. Cox J,
    5. Luirink J,
    6. Vandenbroucke-Grauls CM,
    7. Appelmelk BJ,
    8. Bitter W
    . 2007. Type VII secretion–mycobacteria show the way. Nat Rev Microbiol 5:883–891. doi:10.1038/nrmicro1773.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. 25.↵
    1. Abdallah AM,
    2. Verboom T,
    3. Weerdenburg EM,
    4. Gey van Pittius NC,
    5. Mahasha PW,
    6. Jimenez C,
    7. Parra M,
    8. Cadieux N,
    9. Brennan MJ,
    10. Appelmelk BJ,
    11. Bitter W
    . 2009. PPE and PE_PGRS proteins of Mycobacterium marinum are transported via the type VII secretion system ESX-5. Mol Microbiol 73:329–340. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06783.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Daleke MH,
    2. Ummels R,
    3. Bawono P,
    4. Heringa J,
    5. Vandenbroucke-Grauls CM,
    6. Luirink J,
    7. Bitter W
    . 2012. General secretion signal for the mycobacterial type VII secretion pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:11342–11347. doi:10.1073/pnas.1119453109.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Chaturvedi R,
    2. Bansal K,
    3. Narayana Y,
    4. Kapoor N,
    5. Sukumar N,
    6. Togarsimalemath SK,
    7. Chandra N,
    8. Mishra S,
    9. Ajitkumar P,
    10. Joshi B,
    11. Katoch VM,
    12. Patil SA,
    13. Balaji KN
    . 2010. The multifunctional PE_PGRS11 protein from Mycobacterium tuberculosis plays a role in regulating resistance to oxidative stress. J Biol Chem 285:30389–30403. doi:10.1074/jbc.M110.135251.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Garrett CK,
    2. Broadwell LJ,
    3. Hayne CK,
    4. Neher SB
    . 2015. Modulation of the activity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis LipY by its PE domain. PLoS One 10:e0135447. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0135447.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  29. 29.↵
    1. Neyrolles O
    . 2014. Mycobacteria and the greasy macrophage: getting fat and frustrated. Infect Immun 82:472–475. doi:10.1128/IAI.01512-13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Hadvàry P,
    2. Lengsfeld H,
    3. Wolfer H
    . 1988. Inhibition of pancreatic lipase in vitro by the covalent inhibitor tetrahydrolipstatin. Biochemical J 256:357–361. doi:10.1042/bj2560357.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    1. Yang PY,
    2. Liu K,
    3. Ngai MH,
    4. Lear MJ,
    5. Wenk MR,
    6. Yao SQ
    . 2010. Activity-based proteome profiling of potential cellular targets of Orlistat–an FDA-approved drug with anti-tumor activities. J Am Chem Soc 132:656–666. doi:10.1021/ja907716f.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Nelson RH,
    2. Miles JM
    . 2005. The use of orlistat in the treatment of obesity, dyslipidaemia and type 2 diabetes. Expert Opin Pharmacother 6:2483–2491. doi:10.1517/14656566.6.14.2483.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Hadvàry P,
    2. Sidler W,
    3. Meister W,
    4. Vetter W,
    5. Wolfer H
    . 1991. The lipase inhibitor tetrahydrolipstatin binds covalently to the putative active site serine of pancreatic lipase. J Biol Chem 266:2021–2027.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    1. Ravindran MS,
    2. Rao SP,
    3. Cheng X,
    4. Shukla A,
    5. Cazenave-Gassiot A,
    6. Yao SQ,
    7. Wenk MR
    . 2014. Targeting lipid esterases in mycobacteria grown under different physiological conditions using activity-based profiling with tetrahydrolipstatin (THL). Mol Cell Proteomics 13:435–448. doi:10.1074/mcp.M113.029942.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    1. Ben Ali Y,
    2. Chahinian H,
    3. Petry S,
    4. Muller G,
    5. Lebrun R,
    6. Verger R,
    7. Carriere F,
    8. Mandrich L,
    9. Rossi M,
    10. Manco G,
    11. Sarda L,
    12. Abousalham A
    . 2006. Use of an inhibitor to identify members of the hormone-sensitive lipase family. Biochemistry 45:14183–14191. doi:10.1021/bi0613978.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  36. 36.↵
    1. Fishbein S,
    2. van Wyk N,
    3. Warren RM,
    4. Sampson SL
    . 2015. Phylogeny to function: PE/PPE protein evolution and impact on Mycobacterium tuberculosis pathogenicity. Mol Microbiol 96:901–916. doi:10.1111/mmi.12981.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Low KL,
    2. Rao PS,
    3. Shui G,
    4. Bendt AK,
    5. Pethe K,
    6. Dick T,
    7. Wenk MR
    . 2009. Triacylglycerol utilization is required for regrowth of in vitro hypoxic nonreplicating Mycobacterium bovis bacillus Calmette-Guerin. J Bacteriol 191:5037–5043. doi:10.1128/JB.00530-09.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. 38.↵
    1. West NP,
    2. Chow FM,
    3. Randall EJ,
    4. Wu J,
    5. Chen J,
    6. Ribeiro JM,
    7. Britton WJ
    . 2009. Cutinase-like proteins of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: characterization of their variable enzymatic functions and active site identification. FASEB J 23:1694–1704. doi:10.1096/fj.08-114421.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    1. Russell DG,
    2. Cardona PJ,
    3. Kim MJ,
    4. Allain S,
    5. Altare F
    . 2009. Foamy macrophages and the progression of the human tuberculosis granuloma. Nat Immunol 10:943–948. doi:10.1038/ni.1781.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  40. 40.↵
    1. Barisch C,
    2. Paschke P,
    3. Hagedorn M,
    4. Maniak M,
    5. Soldati T
    . 2015. Lipid droplet dynamics at early stages of Mycobacterium marinum infection in Dictyostelium. Cell Microbiol 17:1332–1349.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. 41.↵
    1. Barisch C,
    2. Soldati T
    . 2017. Mycobacterium marinum degrades both triacylglycerols and phospholipids from its dictyostelium host to synthesise its own triacylglycerols and generate lipid inclusions. PLoS Pathog 13:e1006095. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1006095.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  42. 42.↵
    1. Munoz-Elias EJ,
    2. McKinney JD
    . 2006. Carbon metabolism of intracellular bacteria. Cell Microbiol 8:10–22. doi:10.1111/j.1462-5822.2005.00648.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  43. 43.↵
    1. Cole ST,
    2. Brosch R,
    3. Parkhill J,
    4. Garnier T,
    5. Churcher C,
    6. Harris D,
    7. Gordon SV,
    8. Eiglmeier K,
    9. Gas S,
    10. Barry CE, III,
    11. Tekaia F,
    12. Badcock K,
    13. Basham D,
    14. Brown D,
    15. Chillingworth T,
    16. Connor R,
    17. Davies R,
    18. Devlin K,
    19. Feltwell T,
    20. Gentles S,
    21. Hamlin N,
    22. Holroyd S,
    23. Hornsby T,
    24. Jagels K,
    25. Barrell BG
    . 1998. Deciphering the biology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from the complete genome sequence. Nature 393:537–544. doi:10.1038/31159.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  44. 44.↵
    1. Cotes K,
    2. Dhouib R,
    3. Douchet I,
    4. Chahinian H,
    5. de Caro A,
    6. Carriere F,
    7. Canaan S
    . 2007. Characterization of an exported monoglyceride lipase from Mycobacterium tuberculosis possibly involved in the metabolism of host cell membrane lipids. Biochem J 408:417–427. doi:10.1042/BJ20070745.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. 45.↵
    1. Daniel J,
    2. Deb C,
    3. Dubey VS,
    4. Sirakova TD,
    5. Abomoelak B,
    6. Morbidoni HR,
    7. Kolattukudy PE
    . 2004. Induction of a novel class of diacylglycerol acyltransferases and triacylglycerol accumulation in Mycobacterium tuberculosis as it goes into a dormancy-like state in culture. J Bacteriol 186:5017–5030. doi:10.1128/JB.186.15.5017-5030.2004.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. 46.↵
    1. Noens EE,
    2. Williams C,
    3. Anandhakrishnan M,
    4. Poulsen C,
    5. Ehebauer MT,
    6. Wilmanns M
    . 2011. Improved mycobacterial protein production using a Mycobacterium smegmatis groEL1DeltaC expression strain. BMC Biotechnol 11:27. doi:10.1186/1472-6750-11-27.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. 47.↵
    1. Goude R,
    2. Roberts DM,
    3. Parish T
    . 2015. Electroporation of mycobacteria. Methods Mol Biol 1285:117–130. doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-2450-9_7.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  48. 48.↵
    1. Kong TH,
    2. Coates AR,
    3. Butcher PD,
    4. Hickman CJ,
    5. Shinnick TM
    . 1993. Mycobacterium tuberculosis expresses two chaperonin-60 homologs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 90:2608–2612. doi:10.1073/pnas.90.7.2608.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. 49.↵
    1. Ojha A,
    2. Anand M,
    3. Bhatt A,
    4. Kremer L,
    5. Jacobs WR, Jr,
    6. Hatfull GF
    . 2005. GroEL1: a dedicated chaperone involved in mycolic acid biosynthesis during biofilm formation in mycobacteria. Cell 123:861–873. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2005.09.012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  50. 50.↵
    1. Daugelat S,
    2. Kowall J,
    3. Mattow J,
    4. Bumann D,
    5. Winter R,
    6. Hurwitz R,
    7. Kaufmann SH
    . 2003. The RD1 proteins of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: expression in Mycobacterium smegmatis and biochemical characterization. Microbes Infect 5:1082–1095. doi:10.1016/S1286-4579(03)00205-3.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  51. 51.↵
    1. Stover CK,
    2. de la Cruz VF,
    3. Fuerst TR,
    4. Burlein JE,
    5. Benson LA,
    6. Bennett LT,
    7. Bansal GP,
    8. Young JF,
    9. Lee MH,
    10. Hatfull GF,
    11. Snapper SB,
    12. Barletta RG,
    13. Jacobs WR, Jr,
    14. Bloom BR
    . 1991. New use of BCG for recombinant vaccines. Nature 351:456–460. doi:10.1038/351456a0.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  52. 52.↵
    1. Brust B,
    2. Lecoufle M,
    3. Tuaillon E,
    4. Dedieu L,
    5. Canaan S,
    6. Valverde V,
    7. Kremer L
    . 2011. Mycobacterium tuberculosis lipolytic enzymes as potential biomarkers for the diagnosis of active tuberculosis. PLoS One 6:e25078. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0025078.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. 53.↵
    1. Laemmli UK
    . 1970. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227:680–685. doi:10.1038/227680a0.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  54. 54.↵
    1. Point V,
    2. Malla RK,
    3. Diomande S,
    4. Martin BP,
    5. Delorme V,
    6. Carriere F,
    7. Canaan S,
    8. Rath NP,
    9. Spilling CD,
    10. Cavalier JF
    . 2012. Synthesis and kinetic evaluation of cyclophostin and cyclipostins phosphonate analogs as selective and potent inhibitors of microbial lipases. J Med Chem 55:10204–10219. doi:10.1021/jm301216x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. 55.↵
    1. Ulker S,
    2. Placidi C,
    3. Point V,
    4. Gadenne B,
    5. Serveau-Avesque C,
    6. Canaan S,
    7. Carriere F,
    8. Cavalier JF
    . 2015. New lipase assay using pomegranate oil coating in microtiter plates. Biochimie 120:110–118. doi:10.1016/j.biochi.2015.09.004.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  56. 56.↵
    1. Roy A,
    2. Kucukural A,
    3. Zhang Y
    . 2010. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nat Protoc 5:725–738. doi:10.1038/nprot.2010.5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  57. 57.↵
    1. Zhang Y
    . 2008. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics 9:40. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-9-40.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. 58.↵
    1. Corpet F
    . 1988. Multiple sequence alignment with hierarchical clustering. Nucleic Acids Res 16:10881–10890. doi:10.1093/nar/16.22.10881.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  59. 59.↵
    1. Robert X,
    2. Gouet P
    . 2014. Deciphering key features in protein structures with the new ENDscript server. Nucleic Acids Res 42:W320–W324. doi:10.1093/nar/gku316.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  • Copyright © 2018 American Society for Microbiology.

All Rights Reserved.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Delineating the Physiological Roles of the PE and Catalytic Domains of LipY in Lipid Consumption in Mycobacterium-Infected Foamy Macrophages
Pierre Santucci, Sadia Diomandé, Isabelle Poncin, Laetitia Alibaud, Albertus Viljoen, Laurent Kremer, Chantal de Chastellier, Stéphane Canaan
Infection and Immunity Aug 2018, 86 (9) e00394-18; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.00394-18

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Infection and Immunity article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Delineating the Physiological Roles of the PE and Catalytic Domains of LipY in Lipid Consumption in Mycobacterium-Infected Foamy Macrophages
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Infection and Immunity
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Infection and Immunity.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Delineating the Physiological Roles of the PE and Catalytic Domains of LipY in Lipid Consumption in Mycobacterium-Infected Foamy Macrophages
Pierre Santucci, Sadia Diomandé, Isabelle Poncin, Laetitia Alibaud, Albertus Viljoen, Laurent Kremer, Chantal de Chastellier, Stéphane Canaan
Infection and Immunity Aug 2018, 86 (9) e00394-18; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.00394-18
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

electron microscopy
lipolysis
lipid bodies
intracytosolic lipid inclusions
Mycobacterium tuberculosis
M. bovis BCG
lipase inhibitor
lipase
lipolytic enzymes

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About IAI
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #IAIjournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0019-9567; Online ISSN: 1098-5522