Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Infection and Immunity
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Fungal and Parasitic Infections

Peripheral Merozoite Surface Proteins Are Targets of Naturally Acquired Immunity against Malaria in both India and Ghana

Asier Garcia-Senosiain, Ikhlaq Hussain Kana, Susheel Kumar Singh, Bishwanath Kumar Chourasia, Manoj Kumar Das, Daniel Dodoo, Subhash Singh, Bright Adu, Michael Theisen
Jeroen P. J. Saeij, Editor
Asier Garcia-Senosiain
aCentre for Medical Parasitology at Department of International Health, Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen and Department of Infectious Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
bDepartment for Congenital Disorders, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ikhlaq Hussain Kana
aCentre for Medical Parasitology at Department of International Health, Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen and Department of Infectious Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
bDepartment for Congenital Disorders, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Susheel Kumar Singh
aCentre for Medical Parasitology at Department of International Health, Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen and Department of Infectious Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
bDepartment for Congenital Disorders, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bishwanath Kumar Chourasia
aCentre for Medical Parasitology at Department of International Health, Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen and Department of Infectious Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
bDepartment for Congenital Disorders, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Manoj Kumar Das
cNational Institute of Malaria Research, Field Unit, Ranchi (Jharkhand), India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel Dodoo
dNoguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research, College of Health Sciences, University of Ghana, Legon, Accra, Ghana
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Subhash Singh
eIndian Institute of Integrative Medicine, Canal Road, Jammu, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bright Adu
dNoguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research, College of Health Sciences, University of Ghana, Legon, Accra, Ghana
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Theisen
aCentre for Medical Parasitology at Department of International Health, Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen and Department of Infectious Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
bDepartment for Congenital Disorders, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeroen P. J. Saeij
UC Davis School of Veterinary Medicine
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.00778-19
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Development of a successful blood-stage vaccine against Plasmodium falciparum malaria remains a high priority. Immune-epidemiological studies are effective tools for the identification of antigenic targets of naturally acquired immunity (NAI) against malaria. However, differences in study design and methodology may compromise interstudy comparisons. Here, we assessed antibody responses against intact merozoites and a panel of 24 recombinant merozoite antigens in longitudinal cohort studies of Ghanaian (n = 115) and Indian (n = 121) populations using the same reagents and statistical methods. Anti-merozoite antibodies were associated with NAI in both the Indian (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.41, P = 0.020) and the Ghanaian (HR = 0.17, P < 0.001) participants. Of the 24 antigen-specific antibodies quantified, 12 and 8 were found to be protective in India and Ghana, respectively. Using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, a powerful variable subselection technique, we identified subsets of four (MSP6, MSP3.7, MSPDBL2, and Pf12) and five (cMSP33D7, MSP3.3, MSPDBL1, GLURP-R2, and RALP-1) antigens that explained NAI better than the individual antibodies in India (HR = 0.18, P < 0.001) and Ghana (HR = 0.31, P < 0.001), respectively. IgG1 and/or IgG3 subclasses against five antigens from these subsets were associated with protection. Through this comparative study, maintaining uniformity of reagents and methodology, we demonstrate that NAI across diverse geographic regions may result from antibodies to multiple antigenic targets that constitute the peripheral merozoite surface protein complexes.

INTRODUCTION

Plasmodium falciparum malaria remains a major public health problem particularly in Africa and India, where more than 95% of all malaria cases worldwide were reported in 2017 (1).

Naturally acquired immunity (NAI) mediated by immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies against malaria develops over a long period with repeated infections (2–5). Antigenic targets of NAI appear to be conserved across geographically diverse regions since passively transferred IgG from immune West African adults to Thai malaria patients cleared parasitemia and alleviated symptoms (6). However, the mechanisms involved in NAI and the identity of the targets of protective IgG have not been fully elucidated. Since merozoites are exposed to circulating antibodies, merozoite surface proteins (MSPs) are likely targets of NAI (7–9). While immune epidemiological studies have been effective in identifying potential targets of protective antibodies, such studies have also produced conflicting data, with antibodies against the same antigen being protective in some studies but not in others (reviewed in reference 10). Possible reasons for such discrepancies may include (i) study design, (ii) statistical methodology, (iii) endpoint definition, (iv) antibody subclass profiles, (v) malaria transmission intensity, and (vi) ethnicity.

Here, we analyzed the patterns of NAI against P. falciparum malaria in two geographically diverse cohorts, one from India and the other from Ghana, using the same methodology, assay setup, endpoint definition, and statistical models. IgG antibody responses against whole merozoites and a panel of 24 recombinant merozoite proteins produced in a Lactococcus lactis expression system (11) were quantified. We evaluated their protective effect against febrile malaria to identify targets of NAI that transcend different epidemiological regions.

RESULTS

Study design and demographics.While anti-merozoite immunity is well documented in African populations, it is less described in India. Here, we comparatively assessed samples and clinical data from two longitudinal cohort surveys (LCS) conducted in Ghana and India (12, 13). For both study sites, malaria transmission is perennial but peaks during and after the rainy season and was relatively higher in Ghana (the parasite prevalence during LCS was 14.45% in Ghana and 8.36% in India). The peak incidence of febrile malaria occurred in younger children, up to 6 years of age (68.5% of all cases) in Ghana, whereas in India, peak incidence was up to 10 years of age (54.2% of all cases). The mean age of Indian participants (27.5 ± 18.8) was significantly higher than those in Ghana (5.7 ± 2.9; P < 0.001). At baseline (BL), blood samples were drawn from 386 Indian and 669 Ghanaian individuals, who were subsequently monitored for malaria case detection for 13 and 9 months, respectively. This study presents data for 121 Indians (31.3% of those sampled at BL) and 115 Ghanaians (17.2% of those sampled at BL) who were considered definitely exposed based on microscopically detected P. falciparum infection at any point during the respective study periods (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). Of these, 48 (39.6%) and 73 (63.5%) in India and Ghana, respectively, encountered at least one febrile malaria episode during the follow-up, and were termed susceptible to febrile malaria (Table 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
TABLE 1

Demographics of study participants and febrile malaria status during follow-up

Relationship between IgG antibodies against merozoites, parasitemia, and febrile malaria.To minimize the impact of methodological differences, anti-merozoite IgG was measured by flow cytometry-based immunofluorescence assay (FC-IFA) in samples from both cohorts using a common batch of freshly purified merozoites. Opsonizing IgG was significantly higher in individuals with asymptomatic P. falciparum infection than in those without infection at BL in both the Indian (P = 0.018) and the Ghanaian (P < 0.001) cohorts, suggesting a boosting effect of concurrent infections on antibody levels (Fig. 1A). The levels of antibodies were also higher in individuals who did not experience febrile malaria during follow-up (protected group) than in those who did (susceptible group) (P = 0.008 [India] and P < 0.001 [Ghana]) (Fig. 1B). Participants were categorized into low, medium, or high anti-merozoite IgG responders and assessed for the risk of febrile malaria in Cox regression models accounting for age. It was found that responders in the high IgG group had a significantly higher probability of remaining free of febrile malaria than those in the low IgG group in India (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.19 to 0.87; P = 0.020), as well as in Ghana (HR = 0.17; 95% CI = 0.08 to 0.34; P < 0.001; visualized as Kaplan-Meier plots in Fig. 1C and D). Collectively, these findings are consistent with the notion that anti-merozoite immunity develops globally and correlates positively with age and parasite exposure.

FIG 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1

Antibodies against merozoites are associated with protection against febrile malaria. Fluorescence intensities were determined by FC-IFA. Antibody levels are shown stratified by infection at baseline (A) or by febrile malaria status during follow-up (B). The data are presented as box-and whisker plots showing the 5th to 95th percentiles. P values were determined by Mann-Whitney test. Asterisks represent P values (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001). (C and D) Antibody levels were stratified into three groups based on tertiles. Kaplan-Meier plots show the probability of remaining febrile malaria-free during the study period for individuals with low (red), medium (green), and high (blue) antibody levels against merozoites in India (C) and Ghana (D).

Association between antigen-specific antibodies and protection from febrile malaria.In an attempt to identify the molecular targets of NAI against merozoites, the levels of IgG antibodies against a panel of 24 recombinant merozoite antigens were measured by a multiplex assay (14) in both cohorts. Regarding the levels of merozoite IgG antibodies, both cohorts showed higher median levels of specific IgG in individuals who were (i) protected versus susceptible and (ii) parasitemic versus nonparasitemic at baseline (Fig. S2). Regardless of febrile malaria status and baseline parasitemia, the IgG antibody levels were generally higher in samples from Ghana than in those from India. The probability of developing febrile malaria during follow-up for each antibody level (categorized as low, medium, or high) was assessed by Cox regression analyses adjusted for age and the FC-IFA readouts for anti-merozoite IgG. Using the low IgG category as a reference for the respective antigens, we found that high IgG levels to 12 and 8 antigens were inversely related to the probability of developing febrile malaria in India and Ghana, respectively (Table 2). Of these, IgG responses to GLURP-R2, PfRh2a, and cMSP33D7 were common to both cohorts. After applying the Bonferroni correction for multiple testing, only one association remained significant in each cohort: GLURP-R2 in India and RON4 in Ghana.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
TABLE 2

Antigens associated with protection from febrile malaria in Indian and Ghanaian cohortsa

Breadth of antibodies and protection from febrile malaria.There is evidence that protection from febrile malaria most likely results from multiple antibody specificities (15–17). To evaluate associations between breadth of antigen-specific IgG and malaria immunity, we generated a breadth score (a linear variable) for each participant based on the magnitude of all 24 antibody specificities. As expected, the breadth score increased with age in both India and Ghana (P < 0.001; Fig. 2A and B). When individuals were stratified by febrile malaria status during follow-up, the group of protected individuals displayed higher breadth scores than susceptible individuals (P < 0.001; Fig. 2C and D). The breadth score was also significantly higher in individuals who were parasitemic at BL than nonparasitemic individuals both in India (P = 0.004) and in Ghana (P < 0.001).

FIG 2
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2

Breadth of antibody responses in relation to age and febrile malaria. Mean breadth scores in India (A and C) and Ghana (B and D) stratified by age (A and B) or febrile malaria status during follow-up (C and D). Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. P values were determined by Kruskal-Wallis test or Mann-Whitney test. The Cox proportional-hazard model comparing high and low responders was used to calculate hazard ratios, 95% confidence intervals, and P values for each antibody response or combination in India (E) and Ghana (F). The model was adjusted for age and antibody levels against whole merozoites. The horizontal dashed line indicates no association with protection (HR = 1). The vertical dotted line divides the subsets of antigens and combinations identified in India and Ghana (left and right, respectively). Asterisks represent P values (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001).

Next, we used the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and 10-fold cross-validation analysis method (18) to select combinations of antibody specificities that could explain protective immunity better than any individual response. By using this approach, IgG responses against antigen subsets identified for the Indian and Ghanaian cohorts consist of those against four (MSP6, MSP3.7, MSPDBL2, and Pf12) and five (cMSP33D7, MSP3.3, MSPDBL1 [Leucine], GLURP-R2, and RALP-1) antigens, respectively. Cox proportional-hazard models used to determine estimates of protection confirmed that these combinations of four and five antibody specificities were strongly associated with protection in India (HR = 0.18, P < 0.001) and Ghana (HR = 0.31, P < 0.001), respectively (Fig. 2E and F). The protective associations of antibody reactivities against the combination of antigens identified in each cohort were stronger than the combination of all antigens (HR = 0.30 and 0.61 in India and Ghana, respectively) or any of the individual antibody reactivities detected in the respective cohort. Importantly, the antigen combination identified in the Ghanaian cohort was also a strong predictor of protection from febrile malaria in the Indian cohort (HR = 0.23) and vice versa (HR = 0.37).

Profiling IgG subclasses against each antigen subset in the respective populations.Antibodies of the cytophilic subclasses (19) and in particular IgG3 (14, 20–23) are associated with immunity against blood-stage P. falciparum. It was therefore of interest to determine the subclass profile of naturally acquired IgG against these two antigen subsets. It appears that there is a predominance of cytophilic antibodies against both antigen subsets in both cohorts (Fig. 3A and B). Specific IgG subclasses were categorized as low, medium, or high based on the respective mean fluorescence intensities (MFIs). For the antigen subset identified in India, high levels of IgG subclasses against MSP6 (HRIgG1 = 0.25 and HRIgG3 = 0.37), MSP3.7 (HRIgG1 = 0.36 and HRIgG3 = 0.23), and Pf12 (HRIgG3 = 0.43) in the Indian cohort (Fig. 3C) and MSP3.7 (HRIgG1 = 0.47) and MSPDBL2 (HRIgG1 = 0.32 and HRIgG3 = 0.42) in the Ghanaian cohort (Fig. 3D) were significantly associated with a higher probability of remaining malaria-free during the follow-up period. For the antigen subset identified in Ghana, high levels of IgG subclasses against GLURP-R2 (HRIgG1 = 0.36, HRIgG2 = 0.36, and HRIgG3 = 0.49) and cMSP33D7 (HRIgG1 = 0.43 and HRIgG2 = 0.51) in the Ghanaian cohort (Fig. 3D) and against cMSP33D7 (HRIgG1 = 0.36, HRIgG2 = 0.20, HRIgG3 = 0.28), MSP3.3 (HRIgG3 = 0.25), and RALP-1 (HRIgG1 = 0.25) in the Indian cohort (Fig. 3C) were significantly associated with protection against febrile malaria.

FIG 3
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 3

IgG subclass responses against selected antigens and their association with protection. Bars represent the median of log10-transformed fluorescence intensities (MFIs) values of immunoglobulin G (IgG) subclass (IgG1, IgG2, and IgG3) in samples from India (A) and Ghana (B), respectively. The vertical dotted line divides the subsets of antigens identified in India (left) and Ghana (right). (C and D) Associations of IgG subclass responses with protection from febrile malaria in Indian and Ghanaian cohorts, respectively. Hazard ratios, 95% confidence intervals, and P values were calculated using a Cox proportional-hazard model comparing high and low responders. The models were adjusted for age and antibody levels against whole merozoites. The horizontal dashed line indicates no association with protection (HR = 1). Asterisks represent P values (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

Identification of molecular targets of NAI has been hampered not only by an incomplete understanding of the underlying mechanisms but also by conflicting evidence from several immune epidemiological studies involving the use of different isoforms of same antigens, variations in the detection of antibody reactivities, and differences adopted in data analysis. Using harmonious experimental methodology and identical data analysis plan, we have demonstrated that antibodies against whole merozoite preparation, and certain combinations of recombinant antigens (from a panel of 24) in particular, are involved in NAI against malaria in geographically diverse populations from Africa and India.

First, using a common batch of purified merozoites, we found that high levels of merozoite IgG were associated with a reduced probability of febrile malaria in both cohorts from India and Ghana. Second, we assessed specific IgG reactivities toward a panel of 24 recombinant merozoite antigens using common reagents. These recombinant antigens were subdomains from different merozoite proteins selected from different subcellular compartments, most of which have been identified to play mechanistic roles in erythrocyte invasion and have been identified as targets of protective immune responses in various studies (14, 15, 24–26). In both study cohorts, antibody reactivity to whole merozoites, as well as to the majority of the recombinant antigens, individually and in combination, increased with age and was higher in participants who were parasitemic at baseline, thus reinforcing the notion that an active infection boosts preexisting malarial antibodies. In general, the levels of specific IgG antibodies were higher in the Ghanaian than in the Indian cohort, most likely due to higher malaria transmission in Ghana. Next, we prospectively assessed antibody associations with protective immunity and found that antibodies against 12 and 8 antigens were individually associated with protection against febrile malaria in India and Ghana, respectively. To identify those antibody specificities which are most strongly associated with protection from febrile malaria, we used the LASSO regression and 10-fold cross-validation analysis method, which aids in selecting subsets of relevant predictors and can be applied to Cox proportional-hazard models. LASSO has been successfully applied to create predictive models in multiple human diseases (27–31). By using this approach, we identified two antigen subsets—(i) MSP6, MSP3.7, MSPDBL2, and Pf12 and (ii) cMSP33D7, MSP3.3, MSPDBL1 (Leucine), GLURP-R2, and RALP-1—that explained protective immunity better than any individual antibody reactivity in the Indian and Ghanaian cohorts, respectively. Our data thus reinforce previous findings that the cumulative responses to combinations of antigens are a better predictor of protection than responses to their single-antigen components (25, 32), and these combinations may vary among populations. It is not fully understood why different subsets of antigens were more protective in the two cohorts; however, further planned studies on both parasite genetic variability and host major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II restrictions in the cohorts may help explain some of these observations.

From the Indian subset of antigens, IgG3 subclass antibody levels against Pf12, MSP3.7, and MSP6 were also associated with protection, whereas in a previous study in the same cohort, MSP6-specific IgG3 antibodies were found to be nonprotective (14). This is due to variation in the data analysis plan. Previously, protective association of each antigen was assessed by multivariate logistic regression analysis (fitting IgG3 data as a linear covariate) (14), while in the present study IgG3 data (categorized into tertiles) were assessed by Cox proportional-hazard models. In an earlier study, two of the antigens (GLURP-R2 and cMSP33D7) from this Ghanaian subset were also found to correlate with protective immunity and opsonic phagocytosis of merozoite activity when these Ghanaian IgG preparations were assessed in an antigen-coated bead-based phagocytosis assay (26).

Taken together, these observations suggest that multiple antibody specificities are involved in NAI and that the exact combination of such antibodies differs from one region to another, possibly due to differences in population-specific MHC class II restrictions and circulating parasite strains (antigenic polymorphism). Interestingly, seven of the antigens identified as targets of NAI in our study, both in the Indian and the Ghanaian cohorts, are peripherally associated MSPs. Of these, six belong to the MSP3 family of proteins (MSP6, MSP3.7, and MSPDBL2 from the Indian cohort and cMSP33D7, MSP3.3, and MSPDBL1 [Leucine] from the Ghanaian cohort), and one is GLURP-R2, which was recently characterized as another merozoite surface protein (5). A network of cross-reactivity has been reported among the conserved domains of MSP3 family of proteins, where antibodies elicited against any member of this family (depending on the host MHC class II restrictions) could exert an antiparasite effect through reactivity against other members of the family (33). In this study, we used unique domains from members of MSP3-family of proteins, which do not share appreciable sequence similarities. However, it is intriguing that study participants could have developed antibody responses toward other domains of the MSP3 family of proteins, including those against the conserved cross-reactive domains. Indeed, in the present study we detected IgG responses against cMSP33D7 in both the Indian and the Ghanaian cohorts, which were found to be associated with protection against febrile malaria. IgG responses to conserved cross-reactive domains of other MSP3 family of proteins remains to be tested. Curiously, one rhoptry-neck protein Pf12 and RALP-1 were identified in the Indian and Ghanaian cohorts, respectively. While Pf12 is a GPI-anchored protein (34), RALP-1 is associated through coiled-coil domains with an unknown protein and colocalizes with RON4, another rhoptry-neck protein (35). Whereas RON4 was the strongest predictor of protection in the Ghanaian cohort, this was not the case in the Indian cohort.

Most of the NAI targets identified in the present study have been previously described as targets of functional antibodies with antiparasite effects, either through neutralization of the merozoite invasion in erythrocytes or in cooperation with mononuclear cells through antibody-dependent cellular inhibition and opsonic phagocytosis (5, 26, 36–39). It should be noted that our experimental setup has the inherent limitation of not completely reflecting the in vivo situation since we quantified antibody levels with a multiplex assay, using recombinant proteins, rather than assessing antigen-specific antibodies in functional assays, which are likely to be better correlates of protective immunity. Though IgM antibodies have been relatively understudied, they have been found to inhibit merozoite invasion of erythrocytes in a complement-dependent manner. Along with IgG, their levels have also been significantly associated with protective immunity against malaria and therefore warrant further investigation to validate their role in malaria immunity (40).

In conclusion, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first report about the identification of targets of NAI using comparative immune epidemiological studies in geographically diverse cohorts from Africa and India. Findings from this study reinforce the observations from earlier studies that anti-merozoite IgG is important in NAI against febrile malaria; notwithstanding, the methodological synchrony in such immune epidemiological studies, involving either whole parasites or individual proteins, is critical for consistent results. Furthermore, using a well-suited statistical tool for the identification of antigenic targets, we found that cumulative antibody responses to two distinct combinations of peripheral merozoite surface antigens were strongly associated with protective immunity in both Indian and Ghanaian study populations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ethics statement.The studies were approved by the Institutional Review Board of Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research of the University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana, and by the Institutional Ethics Committee of the National Institute of Malaria Research, Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India. Written informed consent was given by the study participants or their guardians before enrollment in the study.

Study areas, populations, and design.The Indian study was conducted in Dumargarhi in the state of Jharkhand and has been described in detail previously (13). A total of 945 individuals (ages 1 to 82 years) were enrolled in the study, which lasted from May 2014 to September 2016. It included four cross-sectional surveys in which subsets of the population were sampled, and a 13-month longitudinal cohort survey (LCS) between April 2015 and April 2016. During this period, trained field workers visited the village every fortnight for active surveillance, which included recording the temperature for all febrile individuals.

The African study was conducted in Asutsuare, Damgbe, West District, in Ghana, as previously described in detail (12). In total, 798 children under 12 years were enrolled in May 2008. Venous blood was obtained at enrollment and children were followed up actively and passively for malaria detection in a 42-week LCS.

At both sites, febrile malaria was defined as any P. falciparum parasitemia confirmed by microscopy of stained thick and thin blood smears plus reported fever or axillary temperature ≥37.5°C at the time of the visit. Individuals who suffered at least one case of febrile malaria during follow-up were considered susceptible, while those who did not experience any episodes of febrile malaria despite having parasites at BL were considered protected.

Parasite culture and merozoite isolation.P. falciparum strain NF54 was cultured in O+ human erythrocytes at a parasitemia between 1 and 5% with a 3% hematocrit. Parasite growth medium consisted of RPMI 1640 with 25 mM HEPES, 2 mM l-glutamine, 25 μg/ml gentamicin, 0.5% AlbuMAX, and 2% heat-inactivated serum. Parasites were kept at 37°C in an atmosphere containing 5% O2, 5% CO2, and 90% N2. Parasitemia and developmental stage were monitored by preparing thin blood smears. Smears were fixed with methanol, stained with 10% Giemsa for 10 min, and observed by light microscopy. Parasites were synchronized by treatment with 5% sorbitol for 10 min. Early schizonts were harvested with a magnetic separation column and then cultured in parasite growth medium. Mature schizonts were filtered through a 1.2-μm-pore filter, and hemozoin was removed by passing through an LS MACS column three times.

Flow cytometry-based immunofluorescence assay.Flow cytometry-based immunofluorescence assay (FC-IFA) was performed as previously described (14). In brief, purified merozoites (4 × 105 per well) were added to a 96-well U-bottom plate. Test samples were added, followed by incubation for 1 h with shaking. Plates were washed twice with wash buffer (0.5% bovine serum albumin in phosphate-buffered saline [PBS]). Then, 100 μl of phycoerythrin-conjugated sheep anti-human IgG antibodies diluted 1:1,000 was added. After incubation for 1 h and two washes, the merozoites were resuspended in 200 μl of wash buffer. Plates were read in a Beckman Coulter cytometer (5,000 events). The results were analyzed using Kaluza analysis software.

Multiplex assay for antibody measurement.A panel of 24 P. falciparum recombinant antigens (41) was covalently coupled to internally labeled microspheres according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Luminex). Antibody quantification has been described in detail previously (41). In brief, a mix containing approximately 1,250 beads of each of the antigen-coupled bead regions was added to each well of a prewetted 96-well filter microtiter plate. The plates were then washed three times with assay buffer E (ABE; 0.1% bovine serum albumin, 0.05% Tween 20, and 0.05% sodium azide in PBS [pH 7.4]). Test samples were added at 100 μl per well and incubated for 2 h with shaking. After three washes with ABE, 100 μl of phycoerythrin-labeled goat anti-human IgG antibodies (Jackson Immuno Research) was added at a dilution of 1:3,500. The plates were then incubated for 1 h with shaking and washed three times with ABE. After three washes and resuspension of the samples in 100 μl of ABE, the plates were read in a Luminex 200 (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.).

Data analysis.The Mann-Whitney test was used to evaluate differences between two groups. For comparisons between more than two groups, the Kruskal-Wallis test and Dunn’s multiple-comparison test were used. P values of less than 0.05 were considered significant. The Cox proportional-hazard model was used to determine the association of antibody levels and breadth scores with protection. The levels and scores were classified into three groups (low, medium, and high) based on tertiles with models comparing the low and high groups. Age and anti-merozoite IgG levels were included in the models as confounders. Age was stratified into three levels in India (≤10, 11 to 15, and ≥16 years) and into two levels in Ghana (≤5 and ≥6 years), as previously reported (5, 14, 39, 42). In antigen-specific total IgG, subclasses or breadth score association analyses, we adjusted for age and anti-merozoite IgG levels as confounders because both of these variables are (i) a proxy for parasite exposure, (ii) correlated with malaria disease outcome, and (iii) correlated with each other. In the past, we (14, 26) and others (32) have used a similar approach in antibody association studies. As published previously, bed net usage and gender were not identified as confounders (5, 14).

To generate the breadth scores, antigen-specific antibody levels were first normalized for each cohort separately using the following formula: z=x−x¯σ, where x is the observation, x¯ is the mean, and σ is the standard deviation of the samples. Each individual’s z values for all 24 antigens were averaged to calculate the breadth score.

The LASSO regression model was applied to select antibody combinations strongly associated with protection. Normalized antigen-specific IgG levels were included in the model. Variables with little predictive value were reduced to zero, which reduced the number of variables, resulting in a simpler final model (Fig. S3A and B). The appropriate lambda value was selected using 10-fold cross-validation and optimizing for low deviance (Fig. S3C and D). New breadth scores were calculated as described previously for the antibody combinations selected with the LASSO procedure.

Statistical analysis was performed using Prism 8 (GraphPad Software, Inc.) and R version 3.5.1 (43). The packages survival (44, 45) and glmnet (46) were used for modeling and cross-validation.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank the study participants, their parents, and guardians who volunteered to participate in this study and without whose cooperation this work would have not have been possible.

This study was supported by the Indo-Danish research program (idMALVAC) jointly funded by the Danish Council for Strategic research (grant 13127), the Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs (DFC file no. 14-P01-GHA), and the Department of Biotechnology, Government of India (BT/IN/Denmark/13/SS/2013); the European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership (grant TA.2007.40200.012); and the African Malaria Network Trust (grant 008/2008AIA).

S.S. is a consultant at Virdis BioPharma Pvt., Ltd., Mumbai, India.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 1 October 2019.
    • Returned for modification 1 November 2019.
    • Accepted 14 January 2020.
    • Accepted manuscript posted online 21 January 2020.
  • Supplemental material is available online only.

  • Copyright © 2020 American Society for Microbiology.

All Rights Reserved.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    World Health Organization. 2018. World malaria report 2018. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
  2. 2.↵
    1. Cohen S,
    2. McGregor I,
    3. Carrington S
    . 1961. Gamma-globulin and acquired immunity to human malaria. Nature 192:733–737. doi:10.1038/192733a0.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    1. Dodoo D,
    2. Theisen M,
    3. Kurtzhals JA,
    4. Akanmori BD,
    5. Koram KA,
    6. Jepsen S,
    7. Nkrumah FK,
    8. Theander TG,
    9. Hviid L
    . 2000. Naturally acquired antibodies to the glutamate-rich protein are associated with protection against Plasmodium falciparum malaria. J Infect Dis 181:1202–1205. doi:10.1086/315341.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Green TJ,
    2. Kreier JP
    . 1978. Demonstration of the role of cytophilic antibody in resistance to malaria parasites (Plasmodium berghei) in rats. Infect Immun 19:138–145. doi:10.1128/IAI.19.1.138-145.1978.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Kana IH,
    2. Adu B,
    3. Tiendrebeogo RW,
    4. Singh SK,
    5. Dodoo D,
    6. Theisen M
    . 2017. Naturally acquired antibodies target the glutamate-rich protein on intact merozoites and predict protection against febrile malaria. J Infect Dis 215:623–630. doi:10.1093/infdis/jiw617.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Sabchareon A,
    2. Burnouf T,
    3. Ouattara D,
    4. Attanath P,
    5. Bouharoun-Tayoun H,
    6. Chantavanich P,
    7. Foucault C,
    8. Chongsuphajaisiddhi T,
    9. Druilhe P
    . 1991. Parasitologic and clinical human response to immunoglobulin administration in falciparum malaria. Am J Trop Med Hyg 45:297–308. doi:10.4269/ajtmh.1991.45.297.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Beeson JG,
    2. Drew DR,
    3. Boyle MJ,
    4. Feng G,
    5. Fowkes FJ,
    6. Richards JS
    . 2016. Merozoite surface proteins in red blood cell invasion, immunity and vaccines against malaria. FEMS Microbiol Rev 40:343–372. doi:10.1093/femsre/fuw001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. McCallum FJ,
    2. Persson KE,
    3. Fowkes FJ,
    4. Reiling L,
    5. Mugyenyi CK,
    6. Richards JS,
    7. Simpson JA,
    8. Williams TN,
    9. Gilson PR,
    10. Hodder AN,
    11. Sanders PR,
    12. Anders RF,
    13. Narum DL,
    14. Chitnis C,
    15. Crabb BS,
    16. Marsh K,
    17. Beeson JG
    . 2017. Differing rates of antibody acquisition to merozoite antigens in malaria: implications for immunity and surveillance. J Leukoc Biol 101:913–925. doi:10.1189/jlb.5MA0716-294R.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Turner L,
    2. Wang CW,
    3. Lavstsen T,
    4. Mwakalinga SB,
    5. Sauerwein RW,
    6. Hermsen CC,
    7. Theander TG
    . 2011. Antibodies against PfEMP1, RIFIN, MSP3, and GLURP are acquired during controlled Plasmodium falciparum malaria infections in naive volunteers. PLoS One 6:e29025. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0029025.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Fowkes FJ,
    2. Richards JS,
    3. Simpson JA,
    4. Beeson JG
    . 2010. The relationship between anti-merozoite antibodies and incidence of Plasmodium falciparum malaria: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med 7:e1000218. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000218.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Singh SK,
    2. Tiendrebeogo RW,
    3. Chourasia BK,
    4. Kana IH,
    5. Singh S,
    6. Theisen M
    . 2018. Lactococcus lactis provides an efficient platform for production of disulfide-rich recombinant proteins from Plasmodium falciparum. Microb Cell Fact 17:55. doi:10.1186/s12934-018-0902-2.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. 12.↵
    1. Adu B,
    2. Dodoo D,
    3. Adukpo S,
    4. Hedley PL,
    5. Arthur FK,
    6. Gerds TA,
    7. Larsen SO,
    8. Christiansen M,
    9. Theisen M
    . 2012. Fc gamma receptor IIIB (FcγRIIIB) polymorphisms are associated with clinical malaria in Ghanaian children. PLoS One 7:e46197. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0046197.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Das MK,
    2. Prajapati BK,
    3. Tiendrebeogo RW,
    4. Ranjan K,
    5. Adu B,
    6. Srivastava A,
    7. Khera HK,
    8. Chauhan N,
    9. Tevatiya S,
    10. Kana IH,
    11. Sharma SK,
    12. Singh S,
    13. Theisen M
    . 2017. Malaria epidemiology in an area of stable transmission in tribal population of Jharkhand, India. Malar J 16:181. doi:10.1186/s12936-017-1833-9.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  14. 14.↵
    1. Kana IH,
    2. Garcia-Senosiain A,
    3. Singh SK,
    4. Tiendrebeogo RW,
    5. Chourasia BK,
    6. Malhotra P,
    7. Sharma SK,
    8. Das MK,
    9. Singh S,
    10. Adu B,
    11. Theisen M
    . 2018. Cytophilic antibodies against key Plasmodium falciparum blood stage antigens contribute to protection against clinical malaria in a high transmission region of Eastern India. J Infect Dis 218:956–965. doi:10.1093/infdis/jiy258.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  15. 15.↵
    1. Osier FH,
    2. Fegan G,
    3. Polley SD,
    4. Murungi L,
    5. Verra F,
    6. Tetteh KK,
    7. Lowe B,
    8. Mwangi T,
    9. Bull PC,
    10. Thomas AW,
    11. Cavanagh DR,
    12. McBride JS,
    13. Lanar DE,
    14. Mackinnon MJ,
    15. Conway DJ,
    16. Marsh K
    . 2008. Breadth and magnitude of antibody responses to multiple Plasmodium falciparum merozoite antigens are associated with protection from clinical malaria. Infect Immun 76:2240–2248. doi:10.1128/IAI.01585-07.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Murungi LM,
    2. Kamuyu G,
    3. Lowe B,
    4. Bejon P,
    5. Theisen M,
    6. Kinyanjui SM,
    7. Marsh K,
    8. Osier FH
    . 2013. A threshold concentration of anti-merozoite antibodies is required for protection from clinical episodes of malaria. Vaccine 31:3936–3942. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.06.042.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. 17.↵
    1. Soe S,
    2. Theisen M,
    3. Roussilhon C,
    4. Aye KS,
    5. Druilhe P
    . 2004. Association between protection against clinical malaria and antibodies to merozoite surface antigens in an area of hyperendemicity in Myanmar: complementarity between responses to merozoite surface protein 3 and the 220-kilodalton glutamate-rich protein. Infect Immun 72:247–252. doi:10.1128/iai.72.1.247-252.2004.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Tibshirani R
    . 1997. The lasso method for variable selection in the Cox model. Stat Med 16:385–395. doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19970228)16:4<385::aid-sim380>3.0.co;2-3.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. 19.↵
    1. Ndungu FM,
    2. Bull PC,
    3. Ross A,
    4. Lowe BS,
    5. Kabiru E,
    6. Marsh K
    . 2002. Naturally acquired immunoglobulin (Ig)G subclass antibodies to crude asexual Plasmodium falciparum lysates: evidence for association with protection for IgG1 and disease for IgG2. Parasite Immunol 24:77–82. doi:10.1046/j.0141-9838.2001.00440.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. 20.↵
    1. Shi YP,
    2. Sayed U,
    3. Qari SH,
    4. Roberts JM,
    5. Udhayakumar V,
    6. Oloo AJ,
    7. Hawley WA,
    8. Kaslow DC,
    9. Nahlen BL,
    10. Lal AA
    . 1996. Natural immune response to the C-terminal 19-kilodalton domain of Plasmodium falciparum merozoite surface protein 1. Infect Immun 64:2716–2723. doi:10.1128/IAI.64.7.2716-2723.1996.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Taylor RR,
    2. Allen SJ,
    3. Greenwood BM,
    4. Riley EM
    . 1998. IgG3 antibodies to Plasmodium falciparum merozoite surface protein 2 (MSP2): increasing prevalence with age and association with clinical immunity to malaria. Am J Trop Med Hyg 58:406–413. doi:10.4269/ajtmh.1998.58.406.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  22. 22.↵
    1. Oeuvray C,
    2. Theisen M,
    3. Rogier C,
    4. Trape JF,
    5. Jepsen S,
    6. Druilhe P
    . 2000. Cytophilic immunoglobulin responses to Plasmodium falciparum glutamate-rich protein are correlated with protection against clinical malaria in Dielmo, Senegal. Infect Immun 68:2617–2620. doi:10.1128/iai.68.5.2617-2620.2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Roussilhon C,
    2. Oeuvray C,
    3. Müller-Graf C,
    4. Tall A,
    5. Rogier C,
    6. Trape J-F,
    7. Theisen M,
    8. Balde A,
    9. Pérignon J-L,
    10. Druilhe P
    . 2007. Long-term clinical protection from falciparum malaria is strongly associated with IgG3 antibodies to merozoite surface protein 3. PLoS Med 4:e320. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040320.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Reiling L,
    2. Boyle MJ,
    3. White MT,
    4. Wilson DW,
    5. Feng G,
    6. Weaver R,
    7. Opi DH,
    8. Persson KEM,
    9. Richards JS,
    10. Siba PM,
    11. Fowkes FJI,
    12. Takashima E,
    13. Tsuboi T,
    14. Mueller I,
    15. Beeson JG
    . 2019. Targets of complement-fixing antibodies in protective immunity against malaria in children. Nat Commun 10:610. doi:10.1038/s41467-019-08528-z.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  25. 25.↵
    1. Richards JS,
    2. Arumugam TU,
    3. Reiling L,
    4. Healer J,
    5. Hodder AN,
    6. Fowkes FJ,
    7. Cross N,
    8. Langer C,
    9. Takeo S,
    10. Uboldi AD,
    11. Thompson JK,
    12. Gilson PR,
    13. Coppel RL,
    14. Siba PM,
    15. King CL,
    16. Torii M,
    17. Chitnis CE,
    18. Narum DL,
    19. Mueller I,
    20. Crabb BS,
    21. Cowman AF,
    22. Tsuboi T,
    23. Beeson JG
    . 2013. Identification and prioritization of merozoite antigens as targets of protective human immunity to Plasmodium falciparum malaria for vaccine and biomarker development. J Immunol 191:795–809. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1300778.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Kana IH,
    2. Singh SK,
    3. Garcia-Senosiain A,
    4. Dodoo D,
    5. Singh S,
    6. Adu B,
    7. Theisen M
    . 2019. Breadth of functional antibodies is associated with Plasmodium falciparum merozoite phagocytosis and protection against febrile malaria. J Infect Dis 220:275–284. doi:10.1093/infdis/jiz088.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  27. 27.↵
    1. Bruun T,
    2. Oppegaard O,
    3. Hufthammer KO,
    4. Langeland N,
    5. Skrede S
    . 2016. Early response in cellulitis: a prospective study of dynamics and predictors. Clin Infect Dis 63:1034–1041. doi:10.1093/cid/ciw463.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Guimaraes AO,
    2. Cao Y,
    3. Hong K,
    4. Mayba O,
    5. Peck MC,
    6. Gutierrez J,
    7. Ruffin F,
    8. Carrasco-Triguero M,
    9. Dinoso JB,
    10. Clemenzi-Allen A,
    11. Koss CA,
    12. Maskarinec SA,
    13. Chambers HF,
    14. Fowler VG,
    15. Baruch A,
    16. Rosenberger CM
    . 2019. A prognostic model of persistent bacteremia and mortality in complicated Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection. Clin Infect Dis 68:1502–1511. doi:10.1093/cid/ciy739.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  29. 29.↵
    1. Ojal J,
    2. Goldblatt D,
    3. Tigoi C,
    4. Scott J
    . 2018. Effect of maternally derived anti-protein and anticapsular IgG antibodies on the rate of acquisition of nasopharyngeal carriage of pneumococcus in newborns. Clin Infect Dis 66:121–130. doi:10.1093/cid/cix742.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  30. 30.↵
    1. van der Zee RP,
    2. Richel O,
    3. van Noesel CJM,
    4. Novianti PW,
    5. Ciocanea-Teodorescu I,
    6. van Splunter AP,
    7. Duin S,
    8. van den Berk GEL,
    9. Meijer C,
    10. Quint WGV,
    11. de Vries HJC,
    12. Prins JM,
    13. Steenbergen R
    . 2019. Host cell deoxyribonucleic acid methylation markers for the detection of high-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia and anal cancer. Clin Infect Dis 68:1110–1117. doi:10.1093/cid/ciy601.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  31. 31.↵
    1. Wei JH,
    2. Feng ZH,
    3. Cao Y,
    4. Zhao HW,
    5. Chen ZH,
    6. Liao B,
    7. Wang Q,
    8. Han H,
    9. Zhang J,
    10. Xu YZ,
    11. Li B,
    12. Wu JT,
    13. Qu GM,
    14. Wang GP,
    15. Liu C,
    16. Xue W,
    17. Liu Q,
    18. Lu J,
    19. Li CX,
    20. Li PX,
    21. Zhang ZL,
    22. Yao HH,
    23. Pan YH,
    24. Chen WF,
    25. Xie D,
    26. Shi L,
    27. Gao ZL,
    28. Huang YR,
    29. Zhou FJ,
    30. Wang SG,
    31. Liu ZP,
    32. Chen W,
    33. Luo JH
    . 2019. Predictive value of single-nucleotide polymorphism signature for recurrence in localised renal cell carcinoma: a retrospective analysis and multicentre validation study. Lancet Oncol 20:591–600. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30932-X.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  32. 32.↵
    1. Osier FH,
    2. Mackinnon MJ,
    3. Crosnier C,
    4. Fegan G,
    5. Kamuyu G,
    6. Wanaguru M,
    7. Ogada E,
    8. McDade B,
    9. Rayner JC,
    10. Wright GJ,
    11. Marsh K
    . 2014. New antigens for a multicomponent blood-stage malaria vaccine. Sci Transl Med 6:247ra102. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3008705.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    1. Singh S,
    2. Soe S,
    3. Weisman S,
    4. Barnwell JW,
    5. Perignon JL,
    6. Druilhe P
    . 2009. A conserved multi-gene family induces cross-reactive antibodies effective in defense against Plasmodium falciparum. PLoS One 4:e5410. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005410.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Tonkin ML,
    2. Arredondo SA,
    3. Loveless BC,
    4. Serpa JJ,
    5. Makepeace KA,
    6. Sundar N,
    7. Petrotchenko EV,
    8. Miller LH,
    9. Grigg ME,
    10. Boulanger MJ
    . 2013. Structural and biochemical characterization of Plasmodium falciparum 12 (Pf12) reveals a unique interdomain organization and the potential for an antiparallel arrangement with Pf41. J Biol Chem 288:12805–12817. doi:10.1074/jbc.M113.455667.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    1. Ito D,
    2. Hasegawa T,
    3. Miura K,
    4. Yamasaki T,
    5. Arumugam TU,
    6. Thongkukiatkul A,
    7. Takeo S,
    8. Takashima E,
    9. Sattabongkot J,
    10. Han ET,
    11. Long CA,
    12. Torii M,
    13. Tsuboi T
    . 2013. RALP1 is a rhoptry neck erythrocyte-binding protein of Plasmodium falciparum merozoites and a potential blood-stage vaccine candidate antigen. Infect Immun 81:4290–4298. doi:10.1128/IAI.00690-13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    1. Osier FH,
    2. Feng G,
    3. Boyle MJ,
    4. Langer C,
    5. Zhou J,
    6. Richards JS,
    7. McCallum FJ,
    8. Reiling L,
    9. Jaworowski A,
    10. Anders RF,
    11. Marsh K,
    12. Beeson JG
    . 2014. Opsonic phagocytosis of Plasmodium falciparum merozoites: mechanism in human immunity and a correlate of protection against malaria. BMC Med 12:108. doi:10.1186/1741-7015-12-108.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Hill DL,
    2. Eriksson EM,
    3. Carmagnac AB,
    4. Wilson DW,
    5. Cowman AF,
    6. Hansen DS,
    7. Schofield L
    . 2012. Efficient measurement of opsonizing antibodies to Plasmodium falciparum merozoites. PLoS One 7:e51692. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0051692.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    1. Hill DL,
    2. Eriksson EM,
    3. Li Wai Suen CS,
    4. Chiu CY,
    5. Ryg-Cornejo V,
    6. Robinson LJ,
    7. Siba PM,
    8. Mueller I,
    9. Hansen DS,
    10. Schofield L
    . 2013. Opsonizing antibodies to P falciparum merozoites associated with immunity to clinical malaria. PLoS One 8:e74627. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0074627.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    1. Tiendrebeogo RW,
    2. Adu B,
    3. Singh SK,
    4. Dziegiel MH,
    5. Nebie I,
    6. Sirima SB,
    7. Christiansen M,
    8. Dodoo D,
    9. Theisen M
    . 2015. Antibody-dependent cellular inhibition is associated with reduced risk against febrile malaria in a longitudinal cohort study involving Ghanaian children. Open Forum Infect Dis 2:ofv044. doi:10.1093/ofid/ofv044.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. 40.↵
    1. Boyle MJ,
    2. Chan JA,
    3. Handayuni I,
    4. Reiling L,
    5. Feng G,
    6. Hilton A,
    7. Kurtovic L,
    8. Oyong D,
    9. Piera KA,
    10. Barber BE,
    11. William T,
    12. Eisen DP,
    13. Minigo G,
    14. Langer C,
    15. Drew DR,
    16. de Labastida Rivera F,
    17. Amante FH,
    18. Williams TN,
    19. Kinyanjui S,
    20. Marsh K,
    21. Doolan DL,
    22. Engwerda C,
    23. Fowkes FJI,
    24. Grigg MJ,
    25. Mueller I,
    26. McCarthy JS,
    27. Anstey NM,
    28. Beeson JG
    . 2019. IgM in human immunity to Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Sci Adv 5:eaax4489. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aax4489.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  41. 41.↵
    1. Jepsen MP,
    2. Roser D,
    3. Christiansen M,
    4. Olesen Larsen S,
    5. Cavanagh DR,
    6. Dhanasarnsombut K,
    7. Bygbjerg I,
    8. Dodoo D,
    9. Remarque EJ,
    10. Dziegiel M,
    11. Jepsen S,
    12. Mordmuller B,
    13. Theisen M
    . 2012. Development and evaluation of a multiplex screening assay for Plasmodium falciparum exposure. J Immunol Methods 384:62–70. doi:10.1016/j.jim.2012.07.009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  42. 42.↵
    1. Adu B,
    2. Jepsen MP,
    3. Gerds TA,
    4. Kyei-Baafour E,
    5. Christiansen M,
    6. Dodoo D,
    7. Theisen M
    . 2014. Fc gamma receptor 3B (FCGR3B-c.233C>A-rs5030738) polymorphism modifies the protective effect of malaria specific antibodies in Ghanaian children. J Infect Dis 209:285–289. doi:10.1093/infdis/jit422.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. 43.↵
    R Core Team. 2018. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/.
  44. 44.↵
    1. Therneau TM
    . 2015. A package for survival analysis in S, v2.38. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=survival.
  45. 45.↵
    1. Therneau TM,
    2. Grambsch PM
    . 2000. Modeling survival data: extending the Cox model. Springer, New York, NY.
  46. 46.↵
    1. Friedman J,
    2. Hastie T,
    3. Tibshirani R
    . 2010. Regularization paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent. J Stat Softw 33:1–22.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Peripheral Merozoite Surface Proteins Are Targets of Naturally Acquired Immunity against Malaria in both India and Ghana
Asier Garcia-Senosiain, Ikhlaq Hussain Kana, Susheel Kumar Singh, Bishwanath Kumar Chourasia, Manoj Kumar Das, Daniel Dodoo, Subhash Singh, Bright Adu, Michael Theisen
Infection and Immunity Mar 2020, 88 (4) e00778-19; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.00778-19

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Infection and Immunity article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Peripheral Merozoite Surface Proteins Are Targets of Naturally Acquired Immunity against Malaria in both India and Ghana
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Infection and Immunity
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Infection and Immunity.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Peripheral Merozoite Surface Proteins Are Targets of Naturally Acquired Immunity against Malaria in both India and Ghana
Asier Garcia-Senosiain, Ikhlaq Hussain Kana, Susheel Kumar Singh, Bishwanath Kumar Chourasia, Manoj Kumar Das, Daniel Dodoo, Subhash Singh, Bright Adu, Michael Theisen
Infection and Immunity Mar 2020, 88 (4) e00778-19; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.00778-19
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

malaria
immunity
merozoite

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About IAI
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #IAIjournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0019-9567; Online ISSN: 1098-5522